Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Twins Daily

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

 

I think you are reading far too into this. All I'm saying the return Suzuki would have gotten in July, would be greater than he'll get now in August due to the nature of the waiver system. Not to mention that there is less time left in the season to provide value to the acquiring team. 

I agree his return in July would have been better, if only for the longer period the new team would have him on the roster.

 

But we didn't see much movement in the catching market this deadline, which leads me to believe teams just weren't very interested in shoring up catching.

  • Replies 63
  • Views 8.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Mike Sixel
    Mike Sixel

    I admit that they are making me think they should keep Suzuki next year.......but I don't love/like that idea at all....

  • Brock Beauchamp
    Brock Beauchamp

    Wait, what? No.   Park has 244 MLB plate appearances and 119 MiLB plate appearances.   That's a touch over 1/2 of a season. He also makes $3m a year.   Why give up on that guy?   (never mind that his

  • jorgenswest
    jorgenswest

    Players without significant contracts will get blocked. The return on others will not shift the franchise.   If a team claims Plouffe or Suzuki with the intention of blocking (they don't offer a playe

 

I agree his return in July would have been better, if only for the longer period the new team would have him on the roster.

 

But we didn't see much movement in the catching market this deadline, which leads me to believe teams just weren't very interested in shoring up catching.

 

Really, the decision to move Suzuki should have been done independent of market conditions for catchers. He's an impending free agent having a good year on a non-contending team. Those are no-brainer type moves. He wouldn't have brought much in July, but without a doubt more than he'd bring back now, and moving him now would still be better than letting him walk for nothing in the offseason. 

 

I'd never put it at 0%, but I can't see any team giving Suzuki a multi year deal.

Unfortunately, I can see one team giving him a multi year deal.

I cannot see Grossman clearing waivers, or Escobar for that matter...

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.