January 29, 201610 yr Looking for one or two more owners to join a highly active, highly competitive league. The average manager made 53 roster moves last season. AL-only, 6x6 with some saber-leaning categories (OBP instead of BA, QS instead of W), 8 or 10 teams. Send me a message for more details.
January 29, 201610 yr Looking for one or two more owners to join a highly active, highly competitive league. The average manager made 53 roster moves last season. AL-only, 6x6 with some saber-leaning categories (OBP instead of BA, QS instead of W), 8 or 10 teams. Send me a message for more details.buy in?
January 29, 201610 yr Author buy in? Haven't decided yet. We've done it some years and others not. Considering a charity buy in with the winner deciding where it all goes.
January 30, 201610 yr Haven't decided yet. We've done it some years and others not. Considering a charity buy in with the winner deciding where it all goes.Sounds good, my charity is the DaveW beer fund
January 30, 201610 yr Author Sounds good, my charity is the DaveW beer fundHaha -- sounds good as long as it is a 501c3
February 1, 201610 yr I was just looking at some fantasy baseball rankings at CBS Sports. I wanted to see how far down you had to go before you ran across a Twins starter. Sadly. Al Malchoir had the first Twin at #71. And it was Jose Berrios. #77 was Trevor May. The first actual starter was Ervin Santana at #91. Fantasy baseball is not the same as actual baseball, but I believe there is a much stronger correlation than many folks in the Twins front office would like to believe.
February 1, 201610 yr I was just looking at some fantasy baseball rankings at CBS Sports. I wanted to see how far down you had to go before you ran across a Twins starter. Sadly. Al Malchoir had the first Twin at #71. And it was Jose Berrios. #77 was Trevor May. The first actual starter was Ervin Santana at #91. Fantasy baseball is not the same as actual baseball, but I believe there is a much stronger correlation than many folks in the Twins front office would like to believe. you had to have missed Sano on the list someplace. edit: or, not. Uh, I'd have Sano in the top 125..... ESPN has Sano #57 on one list., USA today has him 54. so, ya, is missing a player.... Edited February 1, 201610 yr by Mike Sixel
February 1, 201610 yr Fantasy baseball always sounds like a great idea this time of year. Football's essentially over, NHL and NBA are in the meat grinder of their long seasons, and the anticipation builds up for opening day. Couldn't tell you how many times I drafted a fantasy baseball team, and completely forgot about it by June. Good luck finding additional members for your league!
February 1, 201610 yr you had to have missed Sano on the list someplace. edit: or, not. Uh, I'd have Sano in the top 125..... ESPN has Sano #57 on one list., USA today has him 54. so, ya, is missing a player.... I think he was going for starting pitcher....
February 2, 201610 yr Haha -- sounds good as long as it is a 501c3It's not. Why not just put a few bucks in and let the winner choose what they do with the money? It's perfectly legal. (Other than in Illinois) And frankly I would rather the $200 (or whatever the person wins) goes to them and their spouse for a nice dinner, or to their kids for a nice toy, rather than what is essentially nothing to a charity (and it keeps people more involved when they can actually WIN something for them, whether it's their child's college fund, a new TV, or a bottle of wine)
February 2, 201610 yr Fantasy baseball always sounds like a great idea this time of year. Football's essentially over, NHL and NBA are in the meat grinder of their long seasons, and the anticipation builds up for opening day. Couldn't tell you how many times I drafted a fantasy baseball team, and completely forgot about it by June. Good luck finding additional members for your league!This is why I like Daily a bit more then season long personally. Makes you get really pumped when you have a player who hits a couple bombs and 6-7 RBI. In season long its like "oh, that was cool, but doesn't effect much"
February 2, 201610 yr Author It's not. Why not just put a few bucks in and let the winner choose what they do with the money? It's perfectly legal. (Other than in Illinois) And frankly I would rather the $200 (or whatever the person wins) goes to them and their spouse for a nice dinner, or to their kids for a nice toy, rather than what is essentially nothing to a charity (and it keeps people more involved when they can actually WIN something for them, whether it's their child's college fund, a new TV, or a bottle of wine) Believe it or not, some people get just as much enjoyment out of making a nice donation to the charity of their choice than they do a bottle of wine or some cheap TV. An active league, pride and enjoyment in the game is plenty enough to keep everyone engaged. I care more about finding managers who will stay active than I do about finding someone to fork over $50.
February 2, 201610 yr Believe it or not, some people get just as much enjoyment out of making a nice donation to the charity of their choice than they do a bottle of wine or some cheap TV. An active league, pride and enjoyment in the game is plenty enough to keep everyone engaged. I care more about finding managers who will stay active than I do about finding someone to fork over $50.Fair enough, it should be the winners choice though. Forcing people to donate to a cause they may not even support is too much IMO. Oh well, not the league for me.
February 3, 201610 yr Author Fair enough, it should be the winners choice though. Forcing people to donate to a cause they may not even support is too much IMO.So it's okay to put money in a pot for the winner to spend (or, donate) however they want, but it's not okay to put money in a pot for the winner to donate however they want? That makes zero sense... Edited February 3, 201610 yr by jay
February 3, 201610 yr So it's okay to put money in a pot for the winner to spend (or, donate) however they want, but it's not okay to put money in a pot for the winner to donate however they want?That makes zero sense...I'm just not a fan of telling people what to do with their money.
February 3, 201610 yr you had to have missed Sano on the list someplace. edit: or, not. Uh, I'd have Sano in the top 125..... ESPN has Sano #57 on one list., USA today has him 54. so, ya, is missing a player.... I think he was going for starting pitcher.... I did mean starting pitcher. But to be fair, I might be in favor of Sano to the rotation, at least ahead of Nolasco.
Create an account or sign in to comment