November 24, 201411 yr I've conceded that I miscounted and overstated. Your reply here actually underscores my point: They performed at replacement level. Average relievers would have allowed fewer runs, good relievers fewer still. So let's replace them.I have no idea what "replacement level" is for inherited runner scored percentage, but yes, they were below average in that measure for a month and a half. For the season, Burton was actually the best on the team by that measure, with a percentage better than the best team bullpen in the league. And Duensing was within one run of league average by this measure too. There's a case to be made that these relievers are worth replacing, but it's not in their below-average inherited runners scored percentage over one-fourth of the season.
Create an account or sign in to comment