http://deadspin.com/espn-suspends-bill-simmons-three-weeks-over-goodell-cri-1638842937

 

For criticizing Roger Goodell.  

That hardly seems fair.

The only defensible reason is that at some point journalists have to have proof otherwise it is libel.

 

I 100% agree with Simmons.

He's right about Goodell, but a good rule of thumb is not to threaten your bosses.

ESPN is so in bed with the NFL that there's a limit to how much criticism it will allow.

Here was the top entry in the Deadspin comments section:

 

Ray Rice gets two weeks (initially).

 

Stephen A. Smith implies the future Mrs. Rice had it coming, he gets two weeks.

 

Bill Simmons gets three weeks for doing his job and calling for accountability for all involved.

 

 

ESPN is so in bed with the NFL that there's a limit to how much criticism it will allow.

 

In fairness (and god do I despise that you made me post this) - they did run an OTL exposing cover ups by the Ravens just a few days ago.

 

That said, this is an awesome move for Simmons to make ESPN look pathetic.  And anyone that makes ESPN look bad is doing good work in my book.  Now just take Grantland and be your own thing Simmons.

Also, ESPN similiarily suspended someone for going after Bud Selig a few years back. So, at least their consistent. Simmons should be proud of his suspension.

 

I got warned in this very forum for suggesting the Twins front office didn't know how baseball works. Sometimes you have to say what you have to say and consequences be damned.

Also, ESPN similiarily suspended someone for going after Bud Selig a few years back. So, at least their consistent. Simmons should be proud of his suspension.

 

I got warned in this very forum for suggesting the Twins front office didn't know how baseball works. Sometimes you have to say what you have to say and consequences be damned.

One of these is not like the other.

One of these is not like the other.

Is it the Bud Selig part? Has to be, right? Wink face.