Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Official 2014 Draft Day Thread, Day 1


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 351
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Not a fan. Two years will be wasted trying to make him a starter, then another year while he learns to be int the pen, then they will commit to him as a reliever. Just not the approach I would take. It does not work to make relievers into starters. This is not some market inefficiency to be exploited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They aren't going to make him a starter. He's a power set-up guy and will eventually take over when Perkins is gone.

 

The team that won't promote relievers now, and has tried for two years to make obvious relievers into starters is going to abandon their strategy? That would be nice....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Burdi, he doesn't have the upside as one of the HS guys but we might have not had the money to sign one of them and who know's what Gordon's demands were. Burdi pitches 100+ and he could help us out this year or beginning of next year, could be much worse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To pass on guys like Imhof, Reid-Foley, etc., for a relief pitcher, makes zero sense. The Twins do not have enough starting pitching depth to take a reliever #46 overall. Unforced errors like this are why the Twins have gotten so little out of their drafts for much of the past decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

Burdi...hmmmm... His stuff is so good reports are he could pitch in the bigs right after signing. With Perkins locked up for cheap, is a dominant setup man worth an early 2nd rounder? Will we try and convert him to a SP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest USAFChief
Guests

I'm not much of a draftnic but I like this pick. Big arms are always nice to have.

 

Just let him stay in the pen and he'll be in the majors quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of mocks had Burdi going #21 to Detroit. Nothing wrong with getting him here.

 

What difference does that make? For what it's worth, Law had him ranked #56, but again- this pick makes no sense for the Twins. They are not a contender who logically could prefer short-term help over longer-term upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burdi...hmmmm... His stuff is so good reports are he could pitch in the bigs right after signing. With Perkins locked up for cheap, is a dominant setup man worth an early 2nd rounder? Will we try and convert him to a SP?

 

I think he's just a good value guy there but I don't think the Twins see him as a starter. We drafted him 3 years ago. The Twins like his stuff. I think he'll end up being a set up guy by next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Twins do not have enough starting pitching depth to take a reliever #46 overall.
In the lower minors, they actually do. So much so they can't find a rotation spot for Stephan Gonsalves and just now have made room for Thorpe and Romero.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What difference does that make? For what it's worth, Law had him ranked #56, but again- this pick makes no sense for the Twins. They are not a contender who logically could prefer short-term help over longer-term upside.

 

Why wouldn't he be part of the future teams? We have control of him for 6 years at a minimum. The team should be a contender in a few years with the Sano/Buxton foundation. Burdi profiles as an easy replacement for Perkins at the back end of the pen. A lot of the draft guru's had Burdi as the best relief arm in the draft. That's not a bad pick at #46.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...