Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • entries
    167
  • comments
    297
  • views
    205,723

Thank You, Betsy


Steven Buhr

3,063 views

 Share

Twins Video

If you're a Minnesota Twins fan, you're probably already well aware of the allegations that independent photographer Betsy Bissen went public via Twitter a couple days ago with her #MeToo experience involving Twins star Miguel Sano. I won't go into all the details but you can easily find them with a quick browser search.

 

(This article was originally posted at Knuckleballsblog.com)

 

http://knuckleballsblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/metoo-300x169.jpg

 

In a nutshell, Betsy's account is that, following an autograph session at a memorabilia store in 2015, Sano forcibly attempted to pull her into a restroom. The struggle, from which she ultimately extricated herself, lasted several terrifying minutes.

 

Over the past few weeks and months, we've seen victim after victim of male abuse of power/position come to light, most predominantly in the Hollywood, political and corporate environments. However, to my limited knowledge, this is perhaps the first allegation against a major league professional athlete, at least since the #MeToo movement came to prominence.

 

Given the historically misogynistic world of professional sports, the only surprising thing is that it took this long for experiences such as Betsy's to become public. Her allegation may or may not have been the first involving a MLB, NFL, NBA, NHL player, but I think we can be pretty certain it won't be the last.

 

MLB is beginning an investigation into the allegations regarding Sano, as is their responsibility and duty, apparently, under the current Collective Bargaining Agreement with the MLB Players Association. It is proper, I know, for those who know neither Sano nor Bissen personally, to decide they want to hold off on judgement until MLB does it's investigation thing.

 

Most of us who know Betsy at all (I consider myself her friend, though we are not what either of us, I'm sure, would consider to be close friends) are not generally feeling compelled to wait out an investigation before expressing our unequivocal support for her.

 

In fact, since she went public, she has received what would at least be considered public corroborative support from various parties who have, in the past, been at least somewhat familiar with Mr. Sano's treatment of women in manners not inconsistent with what Betsy described.

 

One person, Mike Holmdahl, recounted via Twitter that he had observed Sano making a female usher in Chattanooga uncomfortable during Sano's playing days with the Lookouts earlier in the same season that the event involving Bissen took place. That person was told by a senior usher there that they were so aware of Sano's activities with regard to female ushers that they had made an effort to avoid posting females near the home dugout. (You can find Holmdahl's full recounting as part of Brandon Warne's excellent piece at Zone Coverage.)

 

Jeff Passan of Yahoo Sports wrote that he had been told by, "five people, including teammates, ex-teammates and confidants, with whom he has spent time," that they characterized Sano as someone who, "saw the pursuit of women as sport," One of them called Sano "a ticking time bomb."

 

Jeff Goldklang, a member of the ownership group that currently owns the St. Paul Saints (for whom Bissen does some photography work) and previously owned the Twins' class high-A Ft. Myers Miracle related via Twitter that, "I've seen enough of both people to have absolutely no doubts in this story's veracity. I've personally seen Sano act inappropriately towards a woman- while in uniform, no less."

 

In fact, given these statements of at least partial corroboration, it does lead one to wonder what the Twins' front office knew about Sano's issues with women and when they knew it. But that's a question for another day and, if the MLB and the media do their jobs, we'll possibly get some answers some day.

 

All of this is just by way of saying that it would appear that Betsy Bissen is worthy of the support that her friends and many others are giving her.

 

But I'm not writing this to say I support her. She deserves more than that.

 

I'm writing to say, "Thank you," to Betsy for having the courage to speak out, knowing that the result would not be 100% supportive - that there would be a significant - and very vocal - segment of the population of Twins Territory who would demonize her for speaking out (conveniently hiding behind anonymous social media pseudonyms in most cases, of course}.

 

I will admit that Betsy's public allegations made me uncomfortable, just as the whole #MeToo movement has made me uncomfortable. But you know what? It's SUPPOSED to make me uncomfortable.

 

It's supposed to make me take stock of my own views and treatment of women - past, present and, in particular, future. And it has done just that.

 

I'm a 61 year old man. And while I certainly have never behaved toward any woman the way that Betsy related that Sano behaved toward her, I'm absolutely certain my words and actions toward women at various points in my life would not stand up to the spotlight that #MeToo is shining on us today.

 

I'm not naive enough to think #MeToo and people like Betsy Bissen are going to quickly and dramatically change the way we view and treat women in our society, especially, perhaps, in an era where our country has elected an openly misogynist President, sending a signal to a considerable segment of our population that it's OK to behave similarly toward our wives, girlfriends, sisters, daughters and granddaughters.

 

In fact, I doubt we'll see the kind of change that is needed take hold fully during my lifetime.

 

But, thanks to people like Betsy and others possessing similar courage, I have hope that my two grandsons (ages 2 and 4) will grow up in a world where they don't even question whether it's appropriate to treat girls and women with respect and, frankly, just common decency.

 

More importantly yet, I have hope that my not-quite-yet born granddaughter will grow up in such a world.

 

I have hope that she will grow up knowing that, if she aspires to be a sports photographer (or an actress or a political aide or a corporate executive), she shouldn't have to accept that being subject to what Betsy Bissen went through (or much worse) is considered just the price of admission into her chosen profession or avocation.

 

So, on behalf of my granddaughter and myself, let me just say it.

 

Thank you, Betsy.

 Share

10 Comments


Recommended Comments

People seem to like to use words like misogynistic, and other words with misogyny as its root, very loosely these days, and for dramatic effect, it seems. I think it borders on sensationalism.

 

Misogyny refers specifically to a hatred of women. The word is formed from the Greek roots misein (“to hate”) and gynē (“woman”). Each of these roots can be found in other English words, both common and obscure. Gynē helped to form gynecologist and androgynous, and misein can be found in such words as misoneism (“a hatred, fear, or intolerance of innovation or change”) and misandry (“a hatred of men”).

 

But it has evolved in these modern times to be used for other lesser behaviors than hatred, and I believe that is wrong. It deconstrues the meaning.

 

Misogynistic now is used to include dislike, mistrust, and mistreatment of women, in addition to hatred, which is its true meaning.

 

I believe that is what is meant here. Mistreatment. People mistreat women, or others, without hating them, all the time. It happens everyday, in almost all social situations. Most people in professional sports do not hate women. I would go as far to say almost all people in professional sports do not hate women. They adore women, and desperately want women in their life. The fact that they are messed up and mistreat them, (and I don't believe any that read this has never ever mistreated a woman in some way in their lifetime) does not mean they are misogynistic. That is a very strong, and misguided word to use for disliking someone, or mistrusting someone, or mistreating someone. 

 

I guess that isn't going to change now, and I will just have to get used to it.

Link to comment

 

People seem to like to use words like misogynistic, and other words with misogyny as its root, very loosely these days, and for dramatic effect, it seems. I think it borders on sensationalism.

 

Misogyny refers specifically to a hatred of women. The word is formed from the Greek roots misein (“to hate”) and gynē (“woman”). Each of these roots can be found in other English words, both common and obscure. Gynē helped to form gynecologist and androgynous, and misein can be found in such words as misoneism (“a hatred, fear, or intolerance of innovation or change”) and misandry (“a hatred of men”).

 

But it has evolved in these modern times to be used for other lesser behaviors than hatred, and I believe that is wrong. It deconstrues the meaning.

 

Misogynistic now is used to include dislike, mistrust, and mistreatment of women, in addition to hatred, which is its true meaning.

 

I believe that is what is meant here. Mistreatment. People mistreat women, or others, without hating them, all the time. It happens everyday, in almost all social situations. Most people in professional sports do not hate women. I would go as far to say almost all people in professional sports do not hate women. They adore women, and desperately want women in their life. The fact that they are messed up and mistreat them, (and I don't believe any that read this has never ever mistreated a woman in some way in their lifetime) does not mean they are misogynistic. That is a very strong, and misguided word to use for disliking someone, or mistrusting someone, or mistreating someone. 

 

I guess that isn't going to change now, and I will just have to get used to it.

 

I don't think I'll adjust my usage, given that the Oxford Dictionary defines misogyny as:

 

Dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women.
‘she felt she was struggling against thinly disguised misogyny’

 

I'm pretty sure it was not your intent to insinuate that behavior such as what is alleged in this case could occur because someone "adored women" too much, but the impression left when I first read the comment comes dangerously close to that, imo.

 

I would maintain that the extreme mistreatment is reflective of a person who has an "ingrained prejudice against women," whether that prejudice is due to "dislike of" or "contempt for" women or simply a strong feeling that they are entitled to control women. The level of extreme disrespect such behavior reflects comes close enough to me that I'm comfortable using the term in question to describe it.

 

I understand if your opinion differs and I'm perfectly willing for us to agree to disagree.

 

I appreciate those who have taken the time to read this piece and, especially, anyone who takes the additional time to offer a well-thought out comment.

Link to comment

 

I don't think I'll adjust my usage, given that the Oxford Dictionary defines misogyny as:

 

Dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women.
‘she felt she was struggling against thinly disguised misogyny’

 

I'm pretty sure it was not your intent to insinuate that behavior such as what is alleged in this case could occur because someone "adored women" too much, but the impression left when I first read the comment comes dangerously close to that, imo.

 

I would maintain that the extreme mistreatment is reflective of a person who has an "ingrained prejudice against women," whether that prejudice is due to "dislike of" or "contempt for" women or simply a strong feeling that they are entitled to control women. The level of extreme disrespect such behavior reflects comes close enough to me that I'm comfortable using the term in question to describe it.

 

I understand if your opinion differs and I'm perfectly willing for us to agree to disagree.

 

I appreciate those who have taken the time to read this piece and, especially, anyone who takes the additional time to offer a well-thought out comment.

 

That same abridged online oxford dictionary says this... and it was omitted here as part of its published definition above.

 

Origin
Mid 17th century: from Greek misos ‘hatred’ + gunē ‘woman’.

 

"I'm pretty sure it was not your intent to insinuate that behavior such as what is alleged in this case could occur because someone "adored women" too much, but the impression left when I first read the comment comes dangerously close to that, imo."

 

I did not speak at all about the behavior alleged in this case, did I? No, upon rereading several times, I did not. You are correct in being pretty sure that I was not saying something, or insinuating something, that I didn't say. 

 

In 2013, several dictionaries, because of rampant and massive misuse, added figuratively as an added definition of literally, the literal opposite.

 

https://www.salon.com/2013/08/22/according_to_the_dictionary_literally_now_also_means_figuratively_newscred/

 

So many people pronounced the t in often, that the mispronunciation of the silent t became an accepted alternate pronunciation. 

 

I am sure this is not the place for this discussion of words, but then all of this is not a discussion of baseball anymore. The degree of variation of the presently accepted meanings of misogyny is great. I certainly understand your choice to use it. The extra/alternate meanings have been added over time, agreed. I apologize for the tangent.

Link to comment

I appreciate your story. I was writing a confused reply with a lot of thoughts and interrelated questions but might be better to focus on just one.

 

I don't think "what the Twins knew" is a question for another day. If the Me Too movement really is about smashing the male-dominated power structures and exposing abuses like these, then the Twins as a team need to be penalized sharply to be made an example of that MLB will not tolerate any such abuse going forward. If a person is not on board with sanctioning the Twins in some way, then that person is not really on board with this movement. That's how I see this. Thoughts?

Link to comment

I agree. My point was just that I didn't want to take up space in this post addressing that issue. The "another day" absolutely should come soon. If the Twins were aware of any problems regarding Sano & his treatment of women (and it's hard for me to imagine they didnt if the Lookouts & his teammates did), they had a responsibility to address those issues & I would hope we find out that they did make a serious attempt to. If not, that is a significant problem.

Link to comment

The issue here is with the culture and until you change that you will have these stories. I agree change will come slowly, but to many of the males who excel at sports, they have come to expect the almost all women are available to them, and do not take no for an answer very well. You only have to look at college football or basketball to realize this is a fact.

Twins have a problem here, and I hope they can get Sano to fix it, before it becomes an issue where both sides feel they want to move on from it.  That would be a big loss for the Twins as it that occurs the Twins would be selling very low on a high level talent. Still if that is what it takes to clean up the issue, we have to be prepared to do so.  

Doubt Sano will get a big time suspension for the one issue, but am very concerned about the pattern and if MLB takes that into consideration when handling the discipline.  

This story is just one more of things that are now coming to light and for women operating in the sports or news world, hopefully the start of something better.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...