Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • entries
    891
  • comments
    3,675
  • views
    1,590,995

The Next Twins Bat Is Ready


Ted Schwerzler

2,642 views

 Share

Twins Video

As the summer has drug on, the Minnesota Twins have been noted to need some right handed hitting help. Whether the roster is constructed with eight relievers, or the more efficient seven, a boost could be given to the 25 man with a strong hitter on the right side of the plate. For quite some time, Mitch Garver has made a case to be that guy, and it's time to take notice.

 

Thus far this season, Kennys Vargas has been shuttled between Triple-A Rochester and the big leagues six times. He's often been the guy sent down when a spot is needed, and he's been the easy choice with his production lacking. While the home run power is obvious, Vargas has posted a .723 OPS in 176 at bats, but owns just a .291 OBP in 2017. He has hit eight long balls, but his 54/10 K/BB ratio continues to drag him down. Add in the fact that he's been well below average defensively, and Minnesota simply can't find a reason to carry him.

 

If there's an opportunity for a new name the next time the big club decides to make a move, it's absolutely worth considering Garver. A 9th round pick in the 2013 MLB Draft, Mitch Garver has predominantly been a catcher in the Twins system. This season at Triple-A, he's branched out to playing first base and left field more often, only expanding his flexibility. Behind the dish, he's at worst an average receiver, and he's consistently thrown out one-third of would-be base stealers in his time as a pro.

 

Garver started to gain some real intrigue after a strong second season as a professional with Cedar Rapids. Postin an .880 OPS with 16 homers, there was excitement surrounding the New Mexico native heading into 2015. After scuffling for Fort Myers, he used a strong Arizona Fall League showing to bolster the last two years of his career. With a .764 OPS at Double and Triple-A a year ago, Garver's .915 OPS in 2017 takes his career up a notch. Consistent all season, Garver has already hit 13 homers, and ripped 20 doubles for the Red Wings in 2017.

 

When looking at his numbers as a whole, it may be easy to overlook just how good Garver has been of late as well. Over the course of his last 31 games, Garver owns a .328/.389/.630 slash line with 12 doubles and eight long balls. On the season, his .884 OPS against righties is solid, and his 1.005 OPS against lefties is downright incredible.

 

With the Twins currently opting to go the extra pitcher route, they've found themselves using the likes of Jorge Polanco and Eduardo Escobar as the designated hitter. Bench bats have included Chris Gimenez and Ehire Adrianza. When on the roster, Kennys Vargas has played first poorly. Robbie Grossman has shown significant limitations in the outfield, and the 25 man as a whole continues to clamor for a more versatile righty.

 

It would be foolish to expect Garver to come up and be some sort of a savior for the Twins club. A catcher first, any other position will see some drop off as a secondary position. Also, while hitting the snot out of the ball at Triple-A, he's a 26 year-old rookie that would likely need some time to adjust to the next level. What's also foolish to expect, is that Garver isn't up to the task.

 

Thanks to the lackluster play of the Cleveland Indians, the Minnesota Twins find themselves in the thick of the AL Central division race. Squeezing out extra wins by raising the water level on the roster with players from within seems like a solid strategy. Mitch Garver represents a clear upgrade for the hometown nine, and it's time he gets his shot.

 

For more from Off The Baggy, click here. Follow @tlschwerz

 Share

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

If there is one thing I like about Molitor, he is not afraid to use his second catcher in a game. This having to keep the guy ALWAYS on the bench during the Gardy years wore thin with me.

 

The bigger question...do the Twins see Garver as a catcher for the future, catching upwards to 100 games a season, or will they be happy to get 80-90 game and rrtate him with someone else.

 

Having him catch more often than not is the ONLY reason to keep him at Rochester right now. If he comes to the majors, he won't neccesarily get rotations behind-the-plate.

 

That he can play 1st base (probably as well as Vargas) and the corner outfields (on par with Grossman) is a plus factor. He has the potential to hit as well as anyone else in the designated hitter spot not named Sano, who is playing well at third,

 

But if you goal is to have him share catching duties 100% with Castro next season, and probably take over the job in 2019...it ain't happening if you are forced to find him playing time with Gimenez as the backup backstop.

 

But yes, the next time you drop down the bullpen and amp up the bench, bring him up for the week or two to get a taste of the big leagues.

Link to comment

I'd love to see Garver this year, but I also think we continue to develop Vargas.  I know you're not suggesting we cut bait on Vargas, but consider this... his defense is, according to UZR, above average.  It's a small sample size, but he has an UZR of 1 this year.  He's probably something approximating average.  Agree the Ks are just too much.  He has a big problem there which he may never overcome, but his D isn't hurting him.

Link to comment

I am all for this but I am confused about why we keep Gimenez who's current line is .200/.325/.375.  You hear talk about getting Garver up and fitting him in w/o getting rid of Gimenez.  Folks might say veteran leadership and maybe there is something to that but it's not quantifiable.  What I am missing?  Bring up Garver and DFA Gimenez.  Garver's stats may suffer a bit because he will be facing MLB pitching but they would likely stay far above those of Gimenez.  And, you will have a guy who is 26 and the immediate future of the back-up catcher role vs a guy who will be gone next year.  Many have addressed this but I still feel like it deserves more attention.  

 

What would stop the FO from making this move?         

Link to comment
I am all for this but I am confused about why we keep Gimenez who's current line is .200/.325/.375.  You hear talk about getting Garver up and fitting him in w/o getting rid of Gimenez.  Folks might say veteran leadership and maybe there is something to that but it's not quantifiable.  What I am missing?  Bring up Garver and DFA Gimenez.  Garver's stats may suffer a bit because he will be facing MLB pitching but they would likely stay far above those of Gimenez.  And, you will have a guy who is 26 and the immediate future of the back-up catcher role vs a guy who will be gone next year.  Many have addressed this but I still feel like it deserves more attention.  

 

What would stop the FO from making this move?

 

I don't see much of a downside to DFA'ing Gimenez either. Obviously there's the wrinkle that both Falvey and Levine have had him on team previously and respect him quite a bit. He's been a clear downgrade from Castro defensively though, and while he seems like a great guy, that's a place you can make your roster better.

Link to comment

 

I don't see much of a downside to DFA'ing Gimenez either. Obviously there's the wrinkle that both Falvey and Levine have had him on team previously and respect him quite a bit. He's been a clear downgrade from Castro defensively though, and while he seems like a great guy, that's a place you can make your roster better.

 

I feel like the Twins would want to at least see Garver play a few games and to make sure he's not completely overwhelmed before they did something with Gimenez.

Link to comment

 

I feel like the Twins would want to at least see Garver play a few games and to make sure he's not completely overwhelmed before they did something with Gimenez.

That's fair.  Get him up for a series instead of Vargas and do a test run.  We are on the backside of the season.  Let's do this.  

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...