Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • entries
    194
  • comments
    801
  • views
    409,163

mikelink45

2,764 views

 Share

Twins Video

blog-0463898001594955940.jpgI am always curious about trades – do they work in the short run, long run or not at all? How do we judge the Twins trades? I am not interested in the end of the career moves of Killebrew and Thome, but rather the movement of players who will have a career that goes on for a few years after the trade. Most likely the balance between good and bad will even out after a number of years, although David Ortiz will always be a thorn in the Minnesota Twins field. But then Ortiz was not traded - we cut him (and you still think Kelly was a good manager?) and so we got nothing for him. Lucky Boston. So I will ignore that stupid move and look at real trades.

 

And the Twins can always counter with - Liriano, Nathan and Bonser for Pierzynski. Joe Nathan is our greatest closer and he was with us for seven years accumulating 260 saves and 18.4 WAR. Liriano was also with us for seven years and was 50 – 52 with 4.33 ERA. For one year he was the best, but then injuries took him from HOF to great potential. He had 9 War for the seven years. Boof gave us our best name and played for us for three years. 18 – 25 with 5.12 era and -0.1 WAR. The three of them gave us 27.3 WAR. Pierzynski was with us 6 years and played 13 more after leaving us. He had 9.5 WAR with us and 14.3 after he left. I know we consider this a big Twins victory and it is, but maybe not as large as we like to claim.

 

In 1989 we acquired Tapani and Aguilera for Viola. Tapani played seven terrific years for the Twins and was terrific. 75 – 63 with 4.06 ERA and 19.1 WAR. Aguilera was with us 11 years 40 – 47 and 254 saves with 3.50 ERA and 15.5 WAR – that is 34.6 total WAR. Frank Viola was a stud for us for 8 years, but his career was not long after leaving. A total of 15 years with 64 – 57 record in his years with the Mets, Red Sox, Reds, and Blue Jays. His WAR was 11.4 with us, 11.8 with the Red Sox and Mets and -1.1 his last two years. We won that trade for sure.

 

Milton and Guzman and Buchanan for Knoblauch in 1998. Knoblauch was with us seven great years and is second to Carew in our 2B rankings. He accumulated 38 WAR in those year and then in 4 years with the Yankees he had 7.5 WAR until the yips ended his career. With the Yankees he also posted great post season numbers. Brian Buchanan was with us three years and had 0.3 WAR. Christian Guzman was with us 6 years and was one of the fastest and most exciting players we have had. He had 7.6 WAR before being traded. Eric Milton was with us six years and posted a record of 57 – 51 with 4.76 ERA. His WAR for us was -0.6. Put it all together and it is a wash, but NY was happy to have Knoblauch on their championship teams.

 

1976 Smalley, Singer, Gideon, and Cubbage for Blyleven Of course Bert would come back to the Twins and Smalley would go away and come back too. In all Smalley would play 10 years for us – seven after this trade and three more to end his career. He had 18.7 WAR in his seven years after this trade and 2.1 for his last stint with the team. Bill Singer was 9 – 9 in his one year with the team and had 0.4 WAR. Gideon did nothing for us or anyone else – he had one year in Texas. Mike Cubbage had five years with the Twins and 6.6 WAR. Blyleven had 11 years with the Twins out of 22 and seven came before the trade and 4 more in his last stint with us. He had 49.1 WAR with the Twins – 10.5 in his return so 38.6 before the trade. He had 47.1 WAR with other teams which would mean that we lost that trade!

 

In 1979 thanks to Calvin Griffiths big mouth we had to trade Rod Carew for OF Ken Landreaux, C/OF Dave Engle, RHP Paul Hartzell, LHP Brad Havens. Rod had 63.8 WAR with the Twins when we traded him and 17.4 with the Angels afterward. Ken Landreaux was with the Twins for two years and had 1.8 WAR. Dave Engle played five years for us and had 3.9 WAR. Paul Hartzell was with us one year for 0.4 WAR. Brad Havens was with us three years for 0.3 WAR. We lost that one.

 

In 1963 we pulled off one of our best trades – Jack Kralick for Jim Perry. Kralick pitched five years for Cleveland and had a 6.6. WAR. Jim Perry pitched for us for 10 years and won 128 games. He had a 26.3 WAR. That was a steal!

 

In 2008 we got OF Carlos Gómez, RHP Deolis Guerra, RHP Philip Humber, RHP Kevin Mulvey for Johann Santana. Yes we lost this one. In the four years before his injuries ended a HOF career he had 15.3 WAR with the Mets. Gomez in his two years was exciting and posted 2.6 WAR. Guerra did not pitch for us. Philip Humber had no wins or losses in two years and a WAR of -0.1. Kevin Mulvey had -0.2 in his one year. Yes we lost that one. And if you are thinking – we traded Gomez for J J Hardy so we won, think again, we kept him one year and traded for Jim Hoey and Brett Jacobson.

 

If you are keeping track, we are 3 – 3 – 1 in the trades so far.

 

1969 we got RHP Luis Tiant, RHP Stan Williams for 3B Graig Nettles, RHP Dean Chance, RHP Bob Miller, CF Ted Uhlaender! Tiant had a 2.84 ERA in six seasons with Cleveland before the trade, and Williams was thought of as an ace reliever. Tiant, only threw 92 2/3 innings with the Twins because of a shoulder issue and was released after the season. Williams had a 1.99 ERA in 68 relief appearances in 1970 but was traded to the Cardinals the next year. Tiant then caught on with the Red Sox as one of their star starters and Nettles went on to play 19 years. Tiant had 1.2 WAR with the Twins out of 66.1 for his career and was 7 -3 before his injury and went on to win 229 games. We lost because we could not wait for his injury to heal. Stan Williams was 14 – 6 with 19 saves. He was a terrific relief pitcher but we only kept him 2 years and he had 2.3 WAR for us.Craig Nettles would play 22 years. He had 1.1 WAR in three years with the Twins, but as an excellent glove man and power hitter he would amass 68 WAR in his career. Chance was terrific for us with 13 WAR in three years but had a total of zero war his last three years. Ted Uhlander played only three more years for 1.1 WAR. Bob Miller pitched 17 years – nine after we traded him. He gained 5.7 WAR in that time, but served as a valuable relief pitcher. With Nettles alone we lost this one. And with our impatience for Tiant we doubly lost.

 

2007 OF Delmon Young, INF Brendan Harris, OF Jason Pridie for Matt Garza, Jason Barlett, and Eddie Morlan. Young was such a disappointment it would have been a good trade if we had given up only Eddie Morlan (who?). Delmon was here 4 years and teased us with his potential each year. His WAR for those years totaled – 1. He played 10 years total. Jason Barlett totaled 10.4 WAR for Tampa. Do I need to go on? Well we did get Brendan Harris and for three years he played for us and accumulated -0.6 WAR. For his career he ended with -0.3. Jason Pridie was with us 2 years and had -0.2 WAR. And then there was Matt Garza who won 93 games in 12 years and had 13.5 WAR after leaving us. WE DEFINITLY LOST THIS ONE.

 

In 2010 there was the trade of Wilson Ramos to the Washington Nationals for Matt Capps and we also through in Joe Testa. I believe this was an unpopular trade! So far Ramos has 15.4 WAR. Matt was with us three years – I forgot that – and somehow got 1.9 WAR. So we lost that one too.

 

THAT BRINGS THE RECORD TO 3 – 6 – 1

 

Now we come to the Centerfielder trades.

Aaron Hicks for John Ryan Murphy – do I have to go into the details? We lost.

Denard Span for Alex Meyer – okay, let’s move on – we lost that one too.

Ben Revere for Vance Worley (not good) and Trevor May – great! We won. It just took a while.

 

Recently Eduardo Escobar was traded for Jhoan Duran and outfielders Gabriel Maciel and Ernie De La Trinidad. Escobar has been a stud for AZ and the minor leaguers are not here yet. Duran looks like he could be special and is listed as our number 5 prospect by MLB.com. Maciel is listed at number 27 and Tinidad is not on the list. Too early to judge, but AZ is happy!

 

What about relief pitchers.

Ryan Pressly traded for Acala (25) and Celestino (15). Both great prospects, but I think we would have liked to have Pressly in the pen. He was a star for Houston. Still too early for a final judgment.

Nick Anderson for Brian Schales – Tampa Bay would do this trade any day. Anderson had 1.4 WAR last year and 3.32 era for Tampa as a rookie.

Liam Hendriks was not really a trade but we DFA’d him so we could sign Phil Hughes. I suspect we would like him back too since he is now one of the best of all RPs. So I treat that as a default loss.

 

 

The tally as I have it is 4 – 10 – 3. Maybe the desire to make trades is something we might want to think about.

 Share

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

Thank you Mick for putting salt on the wound! LOL! But being serious I hope that our new FO will have a better track record than the past. I think you forgot Odorizzi/ Palacios trade I believe we won.  Also it  seems to me that Andy Macphail was pretty good

Link to comment

 

Thank you Mick for putting salt on the wound! LOL! But being serious I hope that our new FO will have a better track record than the past. I think you forgot Odorizzi/ Palacios trade I believe we won.  Also it  seems to me that Andy Macphail was pretty good

This includes the McPhail era.  It is true I did not get the Odorizzi trade in.  I think I prefer free agents like Cruz.

 

I also did not include the Maeda - Graterol trade - too early to judge.  But I do like Graterol. 

Link to comment

A few comments I have.  First, to simply look at WAR and say we won or lost a trade is a pretty simple way of looking at things.  It is one way, but it takes out the dynamics of the team at the time of the trade and what they were thinking, or needed.  Also, your list does not include the small trades that get done over the years.  You bring up Ortiz, and confused on why Kelly is responsible for his departure, but Ortiz came to Twins in a trade for Dave Hollins.  Johan came to Twins in a trade, technically.  Did we win those trades?  What about Brian Buchanan, of the Knoblcoch trade, that got Jason Bartlett, did we win that trade?  How about the Eric Milton for Carlos Silva and Nick Punto trade?  How about the Lirinano for Escobar trade? These were all younger players that could have had longer careers or did, but you fail to mention them.  I would put most if not all into wins for the Twins.  Bert was traded back in 86, not sure for who and he went on to pitch a few more years after.  

 

Every team will have Trades they win and trades they lose.  In hopes both teams get what they wanted out of it.  To point to some failed trades, by past GM's to suggest not trading in future is something to do is crazy.  Bill Smith made terrible trades in his history, not sure he "won" a single one, part of why he is no longer around.

 

What your trades also do not point out is what may have led to them.  Knobloch was forcing the trade.  Sure, Twins could have kept him, but they knew they were going to be terrible for a few years so bring in young talent for aging 2nd baseman is not a bad deal.  Some of that talent got moved for more talent.  The Matt Capps trade was terrible all the way around, but at the time, the belief was Mauer would catch for several more years, blocking Ramos.  It did not work out that way, and we most likely could have got more for Ramos, but that was Bill Smith for ya. 

 

Johan, was going to walk so get something, we got Gomez, which at the time were criticized for because another OF was ranked higher, who never did much.  Yeah, Bill sent him for JJ hardy, which was a fine trade until he compounded for the terrible follow up trade.  Again Bill Smith here.  

 

Carew said he was not playing again anyways, so again why not get something for him, but when your hands are tied value may not be there in trades.

 

You bring up the recent relief pitcher trades of Presley and Anderson.  Anderson was 29 and yet to make the majors, never a top prospect and may fizzle out as quick as he rose up.  Presley did well for Houston and maybe he could have helped a tiny bit last year, but we may get more out of the players we brought over, you never know.  Hendricks left in 2013, he did not rise to his level until 2019 where was top level closer, so it is not like the second he left he blew up, that is a lot of years replacement level relief pitching.  

 

You bring up the CF trades.  The Hicks trade was terrible, but he was not doing much with Twins at time of trade.  Possible the sand box that is Yankee stadium helped him and new coaching who knows, but yeah it was a loss.  Span and Revere may not have worked out as planned but they were traded to make room for Hicks.  Only so man positions on the field and sometimes players get traded because no room for them.  Some times players get traded because you will not resign them and something better than nothing.  Sometimes your team is terrible and you give up a good player now in hopes the prospects work out later.  Sometimes you give up a prospect for a short term fix vet.  

 

To really evaluate the trades in history you need the full context of them.  Sometimes it was just a blunder, sometimes it was a huge find, or sometimes you get what you wanted at the time but regret it later on. It does not mean trades should fully stop, or they should happen more often.  They are what they are.

Link to comment

 

A few comments I have.  First, to simply look at WAR and say we won or lost a trade is a pretty simple way of looking at things.  It is one way, but it takes out the dynamics of the team at the time of the trade and what they were thinking, or needed.  Also, your list does not include the small trades that get done over the years.  You bring up Ortiz, and confused on why Kelly is responsible for his departure, but Ortiz came to Twins in a trade for Dave Hollins.  Johan came to Twins in a trade, technically.  Did we win those trades?  What about Brian Buchanan, of the Knoblcoch trade, that got Jason Bartlett, did we win that trade?  How about the Eric Milton for Carlos Silva and Nick Punto trade?  How about the Lirinano for Escobar trade? These were all younger players that could have had longer careers or did, but you fail to mention them.  I would put most if not all into wins for the Twins.  Bert was traded back in 86, not sure for who and he went on to pitch a few more years after.  

 

Every team will have Trades they win and trades they lose.  In hopes both teams get what they wanted out of it.  To point to some failed trades, by past GM's to suggest not trading in future is something to do is crazy.  Bill Smith made terrible trades in his history, not sure he "won" a single one, part of why he is no longer around.

 

What your trades also do not point out is what may have led to them.  Knobloch was forcing the trade.  Sure, Twins could have kept him, but they knew they were going to be terrible for a few years so bring in young talent for aging 2nd baseman is not a bad deal.  Some of that talent got moved for more talent.  The Matt Capps trade was terrible all the way around, but at the time, the belief was Mauer would catch for several more years, blocking Ramos.  It did not work out that way, and we most likely could have got more for Ramos, but that was Bill Smith for ya. 

 

Johan, was going to walk so get something, we got Gomez, which at the time were criticized for because another OF was ranked higher, who never did much.  Yeah, Bill sent him for JJ hardy, which was a fine trade until he compounded for the terrible follow up trade.  Again Bill Smith here.  

 

Carew said he was not playing again anyways, so again why not get something for him, but when your hands are tied value may not be there in trades.

 

You bring up the recent relief pitcher trades of Presley and Anderson.  Anderson was 29 and yet to make the majors, never a top prospect and may fizzle out as quick as he rose up.  Presley did well for Houston and maybe he could have helped a tiny bit last year, but we may get more out of the players we brought over, you never know.  Hendricks left in 2013, he did not rise to his level until 2019 where was top level closer, so it is not like the second he left he blew up, that is a lot of years replacement level relief pitching.  

 

You bring up the CF trades.  The Hicks trade was terrible, but he was not doing much with Twins at time of trade.  Possible the sand box that is Yankee stadium helped him and new coaching who knows, but yeah it was a loss.  Span and Revere may not have worked out as planned but they were traded to make room for Hicks.  Only so man positions on the field and sometimes players get traded because no room for them.  Some times players get traded because you will not resign them and something better than nothing.  Sometimes your team is terrible and you give up a good player now in hopes the prospects work out later.  Sometimes you give up a prospect for a short term fix vet.  

 

To really evaluate the trades in history you need the full context of them.  Sometimes it was just a blunder, sometimes it was a huge find, or sometimes you get what you wanted at the time but regret it later on. It does not mean trades should fully stop, or they should happen more often.  They are what they are.

Okay, but what my post did was make you and others think about this and comment and I am pleased with that.

Link to comment

Thanks for the post. It does have me thinking about it.

I think there are two key factors here that somehow need to be measured.

 

1) The number of years of control. The value of that player shouldn’t be calculated beyond those years.

 

2) The salary cost of that control. A 2 WAR player on a pre-ARB contract is a valuable asset for a team. That same 2 WAR player in year two or three of arbitration and earning 10 times the pre ARB salary is a marginal asset.

 

One great deal was sending Liriano and his two months of control to the White Sox and getting all of Escobar’s control at a very low cost in his pre arb and arb seasons.

Link to comment

 

Thanks for the post. It does have me thinking about it.

I think there are two key factors here that somehow need to be measured.

 

1) The number of years of control. The value of that player shouldn’t be calculated beyond those years.

 

2) The salary cost of that control. A 2 WAR player on a pre-ARB contract is a valuable asset for a team. That same 2 WAR player in year two or three of arbitration and earning 10 times the pre ARB salary is a marginal asset.

 

One great deal was sending Liriano and his two months of control to the White Sox and getting all of Escobar’s control at a very low cost in his pre arb and arb seasons.

Good points - judging trades is really a challenge - I did the WAR route because that seems to be the industry standard right now.  Not perfect, but one tool. 

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...