Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Astros Being Investigated for Using Tech to Steal Pitching Signs


Vanimal46

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 295
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I really do like the blending of new school tech with old school garbage can banging communication. It's a truly great compromise to appease the purists who only like sign stealing via dodgy "fan" in the outfield with binoculars and a walkie-talkie.

 

But I hope the MLB takes away all their draft picks and caps their international free agent budget at $50.

 

I don't even care if the Astros are guilty, I hope they do it just because.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manfred has previously threatened to take away draft picks if organizations partake in shenanigans. I then think it's only fair that Houston is prohibited from making any offers to any free agents tied to draft pick compensation until this investigation clears up.

 

Which I then hope is approximately April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blasphemous to steal signs, or try to, but a great talent to steal the pitch and fool/cheat the umpire with pitch framing. One maybe gives the batter an advantage. The other cheats the actual outcome of the pitch.

 

OK to steal signs with no tech, but criminal to steal signs with tech. OK to figure out a tell, or how a pitcher tips his pitches, and then share that, but criminal to figure out a series of 10 hand signals with video.

 

Sometimes I just don't understand the outrage, or the distinctive difference, on what is a great talent to quantify, and what is "cheating". I hate pitch framing cheating the most, and it is still a thing, when it can easily be eliminated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stealing signs is all well and good, but, still have to hit the ball.

Well, sure. But if major-league batters are allowed to sell out to the fastball, and can ignore being fooled with something offspeed, an awful lot of them turn into Babe Ruth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a video breakdown of how they conveyed the pitch to hitters. WARNING: There's swearing in the video.

https://twitter.com/Jomboy_/status/1194348775965437952?s=19

I believe it. I’m glad that Twitter guy did that work. Eventually I’d like to see more evidence and also something from the 2017 postseason.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is really entertaining; however until the MLB establishes rules(*) against stealing signs, no written rule was broken and no punishment should be doled out, other than unwritten rules one.

 

(*) There is a "directive" against stealing signs by electronic means.  The Red Sox were found guilty of that and got a slap on the hand (fine of undisclosed amount) as a penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought this was a possibility, I mean, the commentators are calling the pitches before they are thrown because they see the signs on the monitor.

 

Not sure how to constrain the ability to cheat on this. 

 

A guy could carry a silent buzzer in one pocket, just for the change-up. It could all be done remotely.

 

Houston, we got problems here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

crazy as hell.

 

years ago, in a competitive 28-and-over league, my team had a first-base coach with a knack for seeing the signs that opposing catchers put down. on days that it worked (some catchers held their legs closer together than others), he'd say our hitter's first name for fastball ("come on, johnny") and last name for offspeed ("you're due, johnson"). it often worked like a charm, gave us a tremendous advantage and really let you relax in the batter's box. no opponent ever caught on and, in my opinion, it was well within baseball's unwritten rules. 

 

but i believe that using a camera (or even binoculars) crosses a line. and in houston's case, it sounds like the yankees caught on -- and houston denied and changed the signal. which seems like VERY dirty pool.

 

One way to stop it might be to always give three sets of signs (like when a runner is on second base) and only the pitcher and defense know which signal is the real one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Blasphemous to steal signs, or try to, but a great talent to steal the pitch and fool/cheat the umpire with pitch framing. One maybe gives the batter an advantage. The other cheats the actual outcome of the pitch.

 

OK to steal signs with no tech, but criminal to steal signs with tech. OK to figure out a tell, or how a pitcher tips his pitches, and then share that, but criminal to figure out a series of 10 hand signals with video.

 

Sometimes I just don't understand the outrage, or the distinctive difference, on what is a great talent to quantify, and what is "cheating". I hate pitch framing cheating the most, and it is still a thing, when it can easily be eliminated.

 

Of course, pitch framing is just a fancy word for sets a good target and other things....and is about getting a strike called correctly more than getting a ball called a strike.....they aren't the same thing as stealing signs at all. It's part of the actual play, for example, among other differences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well, sure. But if major-league batters are allowed to sell out to the fastball, and can ignore being fooled with something offspeed, an awful lot of them turn into Babe Ruth.

It's all fun and games until the breaking stuff is called a strike. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Blasphemous to steal signs, or try to, but a great talent to steal the pitch and fool/cheat the umpire with pitch framing. One maybe gives the batter an advantage. The other cheats the actual outcome of the pitch.

 

OK to steal signs with no tech, but criminal to steal signs with tech. OK to figure out a tell, or how a pitcher tips his pitches, and then share that, but criminal to figure out a series of 10 hand signals with video.

 

 

Robo umps takes care of one of those problems.. and I'm in favor of that..

 

The other is players playing vs. someone helping them... pretty big difference in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reviewing the video footage, it's so obvious that something was going on. Even Farquhar caught it. The Astros couldn't have been that concerned about getting caught.

 

Instead of banging on a trashcan in the dugout, why not have a small receiver inside the batter's helmet? Put it underneath the foam pads so you couldn't see it when Polanco loses his helmet. How about a vibrating receiver that looks like a heart rate monitor underneath the batter's clothes? There are so many possibilities that would be difficult to detect that make me think all teams are stealing signs with technology. There is so much money at stake.

 

I'd love to think sign stealing with tech is not going on, but it's so easy to do with wifi and high speed pan and zoom cameras today. Heck, my wyze security cameras are 20 bucks each, they are pretty small, and they can relay what's going on at my house to any phone anywhere 24/7. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I hate sign stealing. It's not part of the play, but outside it. But there is virtually no way to eliminate it, alas.

You could use encrypted electronic communication between the bench, catcher, and pitcher.

 

if we’re going to replace umpires with technology we might as well go all in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You could use encrypted electronic communication between the bench, catcher, and pitcher.

 

if we’re going to replace umpires with technology we might as well go all in.

 

I like the idea, but it would be a significant change in the game in that the catcher would no longer be calling pitches as obviously the batter could hear him talking.

 

But really, if teams were OK with breaking the mold, I'd think a pitching coach would more often than not be the ideal person to make the calls anyway.

 

I might expect a small possibility of a drastic swing away from offense in the game as unlike the catcher, the pitching coach or whomever is calling pitches, would have real time analytics at his fingertips. I'd be interested in seeing how it plays out though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I like the idea, but it would be a significant change in the game in that the catcher would no longer be calling pitches as obviously the batter could hear him talking.

 

But really, if teams were OK with breaking the mold, I'd think a pitching coach would more often than not be the ideal person to make the calls anyway.

 

I might expect a small possibility of a drastic swing away from offense in the game as unlike the catcher, the pitching coach or whomever is calling pitches, would have real time analytics at his fingertips. I'd be interested in seeing how it plays out though.

Yes, the bench would actually be calling the pitches.

 

It's another fine step into turning baseball into a video game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Not sure what provoked this memory, but, here's a bad yet hilarious video.

If you watch carefully, it's clear that the bongo player is signaling something to the singer -- perhaps about the arrival of the floating motorcycle lady? In any case, this should prevent Marc Bolan from ever getting into the Rock 'n' Roll Hall of Fame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...