Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

2017-18 non-Twins MLB Off-Season Transactions Thread


Squirrel

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Carlos Santana to Cleveland, Cosart to the Angels (to play 3b).

 

Don't mind seeing the Indians get weaker, Angels really going for it.

 

Even more clear that right now that the Twins are 6th in the AL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Carlos Santana to Cleveland, Cosart to the Angels (to play 3b).

 

Don't mind seeing the Indians get weaker, Angels really going for it.

 

Even more clear that right now that the Twins are 6th in the AL.

Carlos Santana just signed a 3 year $60M deal to play with the Phillies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlos Santana just signed a 3 year $60M deal to play with the Phillies.

Correct, typo on my part.

 

I don't think signing Santana would also make Cleveland weaker. Losing him does. I suspect they'll move Brantley to 1b/dh and sign a cheap corner of. But their lineup takes a hit. They are also likely to trade Kipnis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Braves trade Kemp to the Dodgers for Adrian Gonzalez, Scott Kazmir, Brandon McCarthy, Charlie Culberson and cash. Gonzalez is already DFA’d.

Does anyone here know how cash figures into luxury tax computations? Reportedly, this trade was intended to help the Dodgers get under the luxury tax threshold. If they had not traded Adrian Gonzalez, and merely released him, I think his large salary would count toward next year's payroll. When they send cash along with him to the Braves, who have plenty of "cap" space toward the tax, does that cash not count in any payroll totals? In principle could the amount of cash be equal to his salary, and then they exploit a loophole?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone here know how cash figures into luxury tax computations? Reportedly, this trade was intended to help the Dodgers get under the luxury tax threshold. If they had not traded Adrian Gonzalez, and merely released him, I think his large salary would count toward next year's payroll. When they send cash along with him to the Braves, who have plenty of "cap" space toward the tax, does that cash not count in any payroll totals? In principle could the amount of cash be equal to his salary, and then they exploit a loophole?

I'm pretty sure cash still counts against the Dodgers here.

 

The reason this works for them is that Kemp is spread over two years, while most of the Braves guys are done after this year. The cash just (more or less) evens out thr actual burden, not the accounting burden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone here know how cash figures into luxury tax computations? Reportedly, this trade was intended to help the Dodgers get under the luxury tax threshold. If they had not traded Adrian Gonzalez, and merely released him, I think his large salary would count toward next year's payroll. When they send cash along with him to the Braves, who have plenty of "cap" space toward the tax, does that cash not count in any payroll totals? In principle could the amount of cash be equal to his salary, and then they exploit a loophole?

the cash was only 4.5 mil to even put the swap. Total salaries swapped was 50 mil in 2018 for 23 mil in 18 and 23 mil in 19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Kind of sucks that old friend Denard Span has to play out his (likely) final season at Tropicana Field. 

Yeah but he's had a pretty nice career - 10 years, 25 WAR, 103 OPS+, 1400 hits, good on-base skills. Got to play in 4 different post seasons. And 41m and counting in salaries. Not too bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DSPN was one of my favorite Twins during his time with the team, but I haven't kept much track of how he's been doing since then. Is it really so clear that he's going to hang it up after next year? I know he's been hurt and the Giants had been wanting to move him out of CF...

 

Ah, you are correct! Then it's not so bad... A homecoming for his final season. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Indians have replaced Carlos Santana with Yonder Alonso with a 2 year $16M deal. If Alonso can repeat his 2017 season (28 HRs .866 OPS), this'll be a bargain. The four previous seasons in San Diego he hit a total of 27 HRs and .724 OPS. I wonder if getting out of Petco Park helped, I know that place is notorious for not allowing HRs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The Indians have replaced Carlos Santana with Yonder Alonso with a 2 year $16M deal. If Alonso can repeat his 2017 season (28 HRs .866 OPS), this'll be a bargain. The four previous seasons in San Diego he hit a total of 27 HRs and .724 OPS. I wonder if getting out of Petco Park helped, I know that place is notorious for not allowing HRs.

 

I think this is a move that really helps the Indians. Alonso was a guy who very notably worked on his swing angle and hit for much more power, but he's always played quality 1B defense and had a good contact ability. Not a huge drop off from Santana, for a lot less money, giving them a lot of flexibility to not just pursue options at the deadline or get depth this offseason, but also to bring back Allen and Miller, both free agents after 2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starters don't want to go there. Imo, this is a better strategy than not trying. I don't know if it will work, but if these three take a lot of innings, it might.

 

They need more hitting and fielding now.

They also have a boatload of young arms, so they can expect to need more innings and they are also not pumping huge financial resources into the rotation.

 

There is some logic in the Rockies doing this based on their location and roster makeup, just unlikely to end well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

They also have a boatload of young arms, so they can expect to need more innings and they are also not pumping huge financial resources into the rotation.

There is some logic in the Rockies doing this based on their location and roster makeup, just unlikely to end well.

 

Most MLB plans, like hitters, fail. The only one that doesn't is buying a team and reaping the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, in the year that Charlie Blackmon and DJ LeMahieu are slated to hit free agency (2019), the Rockies are committed to $57 million between Ian Desmond and four relievers, only one of whom is elite. The situation is similar with respect to 2020, when Nolan Arenado is eligible for free agency, except that the least expensive reliever (Dunn) can be bought out.

 

That strikes me as incredibly bizarre, particularly given the fact that relievers are the most volatile position in terms of performance even before factoring in uncertainty related to Coors (e.g., what happens if Davis' curveball loses its bite?).

 

The worse part is that the Rockies still aren't among the top NL teams for 2018. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

They weren't going to afford signing all of them, likely, anyway. I didn't like the Desmond signing at all. These I can at least understand the strategy. At some point, you need to add talent, not just wait to resign talent.

 

Well if Blackmon and Arenado leave, they won't have leads for their bullpen to protect. 

 

If I were the Rockies and wanted to add talent, I'd have signed Santana and one of the mid-priced outfielders, like Bruce or Morrison. 

 

If they can't keep their guys nearing free agency, the best approach would probably be to trade them now and hope for a quick rebuild. Instead they're backed into something of a corner . . . basically a 1-year window, with a mediocre roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...