Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Twins Daily

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Squirrel

Community Leader
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Squirrel

  1. Omg, stupid … it’s not like the game is a complete blowout. That’s giving up
  2. I live 2.5 miles from the park, and it’s not raining here at all. Can see the occasional lightning, but no rain here
  3. Okay, get in the bottom half of this inning and then hope for it to pour
  4. Seth pronounces it wine-der .... I figure he's a pretty good source, but who knows?
  5. I don't know his story ... what's his deal?
  6. The way I see it ... it's a team sport. I don't think the manager alone is responsible for that much outcome difference. But, what a manager does can impact how players execute their jobs, i.e. ... keeping the clubhouse in good stead, and from every interview I've heard, the players give him lots of props for that. How that impacts wins and losses ... I don't think you can compute that exactly, unless the manager is awful in that regard. And even then, sometimes player personalities just cannot be overcome, either. As for game execution, it's primarily up to the players. How the manager communicates the plans is a factor, but, again, I think from everything I've heard from players, he does a very good job of that. I think together they win, together they lose, so no, I don't point a finger and blame him for specific losses or wins, except to poke a few who give him blame while giving no credit. I just don't think you can have it both ways. I do question some of the decisions, but there are many people on here who consistently say, 'This one's on Rocco' or 'They won in spite of him.' A LOT say this. I just don't think that's true. It's not that manager could be a robot and that wouldn't matter, but I don't think he's as responsible for wins and losses directly, at least not on his own. I mean, one poster here constructed their own measurement, called it manager WAR and basically gave Rocco a minus point for every game they thought Rocco lost for the team, and claimed it was legitimate because of how many games they've watched in their lifetime. I just think that's completely ridiculous. I don't think the manager is responsible in that manner. <shrug> We can agree to disagree on this, but how you and others put such specific responsibility on the manager for losses just isn't correct, imo. Yeah, he's the easy figure head to point a finger at, but ultimately, I don't really think that's fair.
  7. It's hard to judge ... it's looked really 'grayish' for a while ... and I've gotten alerts that say 'start raining by 9' ... but, sometimes these things miss this area
  8. Some of the players' social media accounts were showing them out and about in Chicago and I kind of wanted to play stalker and show up in places they were. But I didn't.
  9. I think his extreme idea was very much akin to your overly dramatic plan of replacing the managers with robots. Why does everyone need to take an extreme pov?
  10. I actually wanted this to be the plan whenever Sabathia was on the mound opposing us. Someone pointed out that batters would likely get hit pretty quick into that plan.
  11. Oh, come ... seriously ... you don't think there can be any middle ground here, that it's only completely one or the other? These arguments to the extreme isn't what anyone is saying. I get that this is very emotional for you, but just because it wouldn't be what you'd do doesn't mean it was entirely done by numbers and the manager can be replaced by a robot. Yes, the numbers are a big influence to the game plan in baseball, like it or not, but not everything goes according to plan and none of us knows what gets changed along the way because of the situation. I'd guess that they already planned for a series of different scenarios. Maybe there is 'less gut' to it than what you want, but I'd guess it's not none, in the same way that it's never anything but the numbers and a robot replacement would be just as good.
  12. Watching the Sox post-game show last night ... wow, LaRussa seemed really out of it. I mean, REALLY out of it. I thought he was drunk or maybe Alzheimer's or dementia setting in. Seriously. He was really bad and his face looked completely blank, eyes unfocussed. I was really shocked at just how terrible he seemed. And not in a laughing way, in a very sad way. It was difficult to listen to and to follow.
  13. Yeah, and they also thought Buxton's catch was routine and their elite CF let two drop for doubles that should have been caught. And, they blamed the base running gaffe all on Moncado because he had a better visual of what was happening and Engel didn't. Um, okay. Fandom at its best.
  14. Listening to the Sox post-game show, Ozzie Guillen said that that play was not why the Sox lost. Yeah, it was a blunder, but odd stuff happens in baseball all the time. He said the reason they lost is because the heart of the order didn’t come through in the bottom of the 9th. I get you don’t like how Rocco manages, I’m not always a fan either, but mostly I don’t care because managers, eh. But if we are going to play the if game here, then let’s say they don’t blunder and the Sox have runners on 2nd and 3rd with 1 out, you don’t know how that would have turned out. Could have scored, but maybe not. You are making a big assumption they do in order to justify your dislike of Rocco. I mean, this is the White Sox we are talking about, not the Yankees. There is absolutely no guarantee the Sox score there. Its more likely another team does, but not the White Sox. Or if they do, maybe the Twins come through in the 8th and/or 9th. The Twins won, so it meant they were supposed to win, so they would have even without the Sox blunder.
  15. Actually, no, it wasn’t defensible, in my (and Ozzie Guillen’s) opinion. You wait to tag. If he doesn’t get to it, it’s likely you score anyway. And if he does get to it, you end up on 3rd with only 1 out.
  16. That was when the Dodgers faced the Astros in 2020 for the first time after the cheating scandal came to light in the previous off season. Google ‘Joe Kelly Carlos Correa’ and you’ll come up with plenty of video. He was pitching about as well then as he did tonight
  17. How do you figure? Because the Sox didn’t score there?
  18. Man ... he looks and sounds really, really awful
  19. wow ... Larussa looks HORRIBLE ... is he drunk?
  20. Ozzie is classic on that ... can't wait to hear his breakdown on the triple play
  21. It's music. Because it's what I need right now. A baseball game doesn't do it.
  22. I'm listening to this instead: https://cso.org/experience/audio/10325/variations-on-america?fbclid=IwAR32LIwrgMeniE-708QhYiZpq2ZnUKFunNztyzH6IUSuIzsv9mMc4czP2xA Enjoy the game everyone!
  23. Overplayed his hand and no one bought at the start if the season when he likely could have gotten a deal done
  24. Let's have a vote ... Choice 1: Choice 2: Choice 3:

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.