Everything posted by Squirrel
-
GAME THREAD: Twins @ White Sox, 7/5/22, 7:10 PM CT
Omg, stupid … it’s not like the game is a complete blowout. That’s giving up
-
GAME THREAD: Twins @ White Sox, 7/5/22, 7:10 PM CT
I live 2.5 miles from the park, and it’s not raining here at all. Can see the occasional lightning, but no rain here
-
GAME THREAD: Twins @ White Sox, 7/5/22, 7:10 PM CT
Okay, get in the bottom half of this inning and then hope for it to pour
-
GAME THREAD: Twins @ White Sox, 7/5/22, 7:10 PM CT
Seth pronounces it wine-der .... I figure he's a pretty good source, but who knows?
-
GAME THREAD: Twins @ White Sox, 7/5/22, 7:10 PM CT
The latter
-
GAME THREAD: Twins @ White Sox, 7/5/22, 7:10 PM CT
I don't know his story ... what's his deal?
-
Twins 6, White Sox 3: Buxton's 22nd Homer, Arraez 3-hit Night Fuels Extra-Inning Win
The way I see it ... it's a team sport. I don't think the manager alone is responsible for that much outcome difference. But, what a manager does can impact how players execute their jobs, i.e. ... keeping the clubhouse in good stead, and from every interview I've heard, the players give him lots of props for that. How that impacts wins and losses ... I don't think you can compute that exactly, unless the manager is awful in that regard. And even then, sometimes player personalities just cannot be overcome, either. As for game execution, it's primarily up to the players. How the manager communicates the plans is a factor, but, again, I think from everything I've heard from players, he does a very good job of that. I think together they win, together they lose, so no, I don't point a finger and blame him for specific losses or wins, except to poke a few who give him blame while giving no credit. I just don't think you can have it both ways. I do question some of the decisions, but there are many people on here who consistently say, 'This one's on Rocco' or 'They won in spite of him.' A LOT say this. I just don't think that's true. It's not that manager could be a robot and that wouldn't matter, but I don't think he's as responsible for wins and losses directly, at least not on his own. I mean, one poster here constructed their own measurement, called it manager WAR and basically gave Rocco a minus point for every game they thought Rocco lost for the team, and claimed it was legitimate because of how many games they've watched in their lifetime. I just think that's completely ridiculous. I don't think the manager is responsible in that manner. <shrug> We can agree to disagree on this, but how you and others put such specific responsibility on the manager for losses just isn't correct, imo. Yeah, he's the easy figure head to point a finger at, but ultimately, I don't really think that's fair.
-
GAME THREAD: Twins @ White Sox, 7/5/22, 7:10 PM CT
It's hard to judge ... it's looked really 'grayish' for a while ... and I've gotten alerts that say 'start raining by 9' ... but, sometimes these things miss this area
-
GAME THREAD: Twins @ White Sox, 7/5/22, 7:10 PM CT
Some of the players' social media accounts were showing them out and about in Chicago and I kind of wanted to play stalker and show up in places they were. But I didn't.
- Twins 6, White Sox 3: Buxton's 22nd Homer, Arraez 3-hit Night Fuels Extra-Inning Win
- Twins 6, White Sox 3: Buxton's 22nd Homer, Arraez 3-hit Night Fuels Extra-Inning Win
-
Twins 6, White Sox 3: Buxton's 22nd Homer, Arraez 3-hit Night Fuels Extra-Inning Win
Oh, come ... seriously ... you don't think there can be any middle ground here, that it's only completely one or the other? These arguments to the extreme isn't what anyone is saying. I get that this is very emotional for you, but just because it wouldn't be what you'd do doesn't mean it was entirely done by numbers and the manager can be replaced by a robot. Yes, the numbers are a big influence to the game plan in baseball, like it or not, but not everything goes according to plan and none of us knows what gets changed along the way because of the situation. I'd guess that they already planned for a series of different scenarios. Maybe there is 'less gut' to it than what you want, but I'd guess it's not none, in the same way that it's never anything but the numbers and a robot replacement would be just as good.
-
First Half Surprises, Second Half Predictions
Watching the Sox post-game show last night ... wow, LaRussa seemed really out of it. I mean, REALLY out of it. I thought he was drunk or maybe Alzheimer's or dementia setting in. Seriously. He was really bad and his face looked completely blank, eyes unfocussed. I was really shocked at just how terrible he seemed. And not in a laughing way, in a very sad way. It was difficult to listen to and to follow.
- Twins 6, White Sox 3: Buxton's 22nd Homer, Arraez 3-hit Night Fuels Extra-Inning Win
-
Twins 6, White Sox 3: Buxton's 22nd Homer, Arraez 3-hit Night Fuels Extra-Inning Win
Listening to the Sox post-game show, Ozzie Guillen said that that play was not why the Sox lost. Yeah, it was a blunder, but odd stuff happens in baseball all the time. He said the reason they lost is because the heart of the order didn’t come through in the bottom of the 9th. I get you don’t like how Rocco manages, I’m not always a fan either, but mostly I don’t care because managers, eh. But if we are going to play the if game here, then let’s say they don’t blunder and the Sox have runners on 2nd and 3rd with 1 out, you don’t know how that would have turned out. Could have scored, but maybe not. You are making a big assumption they do in order to justify your dislike of Rocco. I mean, this is the White Sox we are talking about, not the Yankees. There is absolutely no guarantee the Sox score there. Its more likely another team does, but not the White Sox. Or if they do, maybe the Twins come through in the 8th and/or 9th. The Twins won, so it meant they were supposed to win, so they would have even without the Sox blunder.
- Twins 6, White Sox 3: Buxton's 22nd Homer, Arraez 3-hit Night Fuels Extra-Inning Win
- Twins 6, White Sox 3: Buxton's 22nd Homer, Arraez 3-hit Night Fuels Extra-Inning Win
-
Game Thread Twins @ White Sox 7:10pm cdt 7/4/2022 ad
How do you figure? Because the Sox didn’t score there?
-
Game Thread Twins @ White Sox 7:10pm cdt 7/4/2022 ad
Man ... he looks and sounds really, really awful
-
Game Thread Twins @ White Sox 7:10pm cdt 7/4/2022 ad
wow ... Larussa looks HORRIBLE ... is he drunk?
-
Game Thread Twins @ White Sox 7:10pm cdt 7/4/2022 ad
Ozzie is classic on that ... can't wait to hear his breakdown on the triple play
-
Game Thread Twins @ White Sox 7:10pm cdt 7/4/2022 ad
It's music. Because it's what I need right now. A baseball game doesn't do it.
-
Game Thread Twins @ White Sox 7:10pm cdt 7/4/2022 ad
I'm listening to this instead: https://cso.org/experience/audio/10325/variations-on-america?fbclid=IwAR32LIwrgMeniE-708QhYiZpq2ZnUKFunNztyzH6IUSuIzsv9mMc4czP2xA Enjoy the game everyone!
-
Should the Twins trade for Montas?
Overplayed his hand and no one bought at the start if the season when he likely could have gotten a deal done
-
Game Thread: Orioles @ Twins 1:10 7/3/2022
Let's have a vote ... Choice 1: Choice 2: Choice 3: