The article says the Twins are on a "Road to nowhere". The road represents the plan to sure up the roster through short-term contracts. I don't know how one could read the article and believe the author is saying the Twins have "no plan", as it takes the time to articulate the nature of the plan. The author is doing exactly as you requested, describing the plan as they see it, and explaining why it won't yield a productive result, instead leading us "nowhere".
You also ask the author to stop assuming that no attempt has been made to sign players to long-term deals. Again, if you are able to read and comprehend the article, no such claim is made. In fact, the author states his belief that the plan has likely been to save to make the big splash sign. The author simply points out that has rarely worked out, which is a reasonable observation. They also acknowledge and give credit for some long-term signs that have come to fruition. They clearly did not assert what you insinuate they did.
Also, "cherry picking bad contracts"? He mentions Nelson Cruz, acknowledged the successful short-term deals during the Bomba squad years.
I appreciate the content on the site. I enjoyed this work, as I always enjoy the free content on TD, whether I disagree with an author or not. I probably wouldn't attack an author as you did. If I were going to, I would definitely make sure to read it and comprehend it well first.