We DID have to sign him to this contract. I thought it was too rich at the time, but that is besides the point. I think we all completely understand that the money has been spent and we understand that there are numerous young players making little money. Not every player on your team can be signed on a big contract or you would be called the Yankees. The issue with Mauer and this contract is what I call the "boat anchor" effect. Joe is basically anchored in at the 3 spot in the lineup and at first base. This is the issue. The studies have been done and Joe ranked very low, if not one of the lowest starting first basemen in the league in productivity. Being anchored in at these spots doesn't allow us to either move someone up or to sign someone from outside in order to improve either the 3 spot or first base. So if the last 2 seasons are what we are going to come to expect from Joe, he is dragging the team down, or best case, keeping it where its at and not allowing for improvement. It would be a tough pill for the organization to swallow to take him out of the everyday lineup or out of the 3 spot, but at this point, based on recent performance, a guy who NO LONGER reaches base 40% of the time, should not be in the middle of the order. The Mauer issue is possibly the biggest issue going into this offseason. Can we build the lineup to push Joe to the 6 or 7 spot? Can or should we rely on him to spend larger amounts of time at DH allowing for a harder hitting first baseman? Its complicated. He no doubt has sold the jerseys and gotten the organization their dollars worth, but now its down to production and there just hasn't been much. How do we change things knowing that hes going to be here for 3 more seasons? If Terry Ryan can figure that out, he probably deserves a raise!!