Chris Hanel

If you're expected to win, and then fail to do so in spectacular fashion, people are going to have thoughts.
It's also safe to assume that those thoughts don't stay surface level for very long. For the 2021 Twins, the last few weeks have been a long trudge past the acceptance of things as they are, and have begun to approach the next station down the line: Why?
"Why" is an important question that has consumed the game of baseball since its creation. It is a question that drives everyone involved in the game and almost everyone that follows it. Careers are made and broken attempting to answer it. Out of all the major spectator sports in the world, baseball is one of the most random, volatile, and unpredictable. The best team in the league facing off against the worst still isn't as heavy a favorite as you might expect. This makes answering the question even more important. But this game has been played for over a century, and despite front offices being invaded by every Ivy League sabermatrician with programming experience, there's a lot about the game that just cannot be accounted for.
It is within this vacuum that narrative begins to form, and like a gas, expand to fill every available inch of social media. Our emotional investment in the Twins demands an attempt to make sense of a senseless sequence. Words like "implosion" don't feel adequate, because it doesn't do justice to how much it feels like it's a force being inflicted upon the team, rather than the results of internal motivations. Regardless, we try and take an inventory of what hurts, and search for accountability.
Is the roster underperforming? Unquestionably. I can't recall ever seeing so much of a single roster falling to the bottom 20% of their preseason projections with such synchrony. Are the Twins seeing their share of injuries? Yes, and then some. Are the Twins unlucky? According to the stats, they're the unluckiest in the league, and have a lot of production stats in common with the Oakland A's, who have more wins than the Twins have losses. Everything is happening, it's all bad, and it's happening all at once.
And then, to rub salt in the wound, the White Sox got hot. They started their rebuild later, they were on a trajectory to give the Twins a bit more time to contend, and then they leapfrogged them in the standings while destroying them mercilessly along the way. They're doing this while also suffering from their best players sidelined and being managed by a guy who started his pro ball career when John F. Kennedy was in office, and hasn't updated his worldview since. Where the Twins are punished for their faults, the White Sox seem to glide through life. As a Twins fan, this was supposed to be our time, and the spotlight got stolen by the worst possible division rival.
Watching all this transpire, attempting to process it, you're left holding the bag and being asked to put a nice neat bow on a morass of misfortune. Unable to wrap your arms around it, the narrative becomes more and more tempting.
"The coaches are too calm, they need to fire up this team and yell more!"
"Rocco's lost the clubhouse, it's time to fire him."
"The players don't want it enough!"
Any time you hear missives like these, and they aren't accompanied by direct evidence from the clubhouse or a credible source, Colin Cowherd-sized alarm bells should start going off in your head. You are being asked to accept generalities to rationalize a giant sea of inexplicable fate. Explaining data points by assuming the motives of strangers is a task that should be reserved for criminal profilers, not Twins Twitter. Kenta Maeda isn't struggling because of some nebulous lack of leadership, it's because he's lost the ability to locate his slider.
There's a notable clip from ESPN's First Take in 2012, when Mark Cuban came onto the show, and used every available moment to go after Skip Bayless and his notions of 'narrative'. 
Throughout the exchange, Cuban lays out his argument for why statements like how the one team "played harder" aren't worth the airtime they're eventually given- because they're not backed up by any meaningful data and are fueled by apathy at best, and intentional ignorance at worst.
If you want to convince me how the Twins got to 13-26 and have someone to blame, you're going to have to do a lot more than sell me on a lack of motivation, clubhouse chemistry, or some kind of failing strategic approach, because in the words of Kronk, it doesn't make any sense.
Baseball is a cruel game. You can assemble the same roster and play the same way, and end up with radically different results by the end of the season. I have a hard time finding obvious fatal flaws in the approach by the front office, management, or the players themselves. Sure, I'll always agree that ownership could stand to spend some more money, but a few million dollars doesn't magically repair Byron Buxton's hamstring, and it doesn't solve why any game that doesn't go exactly 9 innings becomes an automatic loss.
I'm not angry at the team, the coaches, or the FO. I'm just sad. This roster- and by extension, this fanbase- deserves better than the hand they've been dealt, right as the window of contention seemed to be opening wide (and, by some accounts, ahead of schedule). And now, after six weeks of unprecedented horror- which is saying something for a team with this kind of history- the voices are growing louder that it's time to pack it in and start over from scratch.
All that said, I'm going to continue rooting for this team. They clearly want it enough. The clubhouse knows what they're capable of, and would love the opportunity to showcase it, if fate and luck would just get out of the goddamn way. In the meantime, I'll be watching, and screaming into the nearest pillow every time a barreled ball goes straight at an opposing fielder.
The Twins are dead. Long live the Twins.

If you're expected to win, and then fail to do so in spectacular fashion, people are going to have thoughts.
It's also safe to assume that those thoughts don't stay surface level for very long. For the 2021 Twins, the last few weeks have been a long trudge past the acceptance of things as they are, and have begun to approach the next station down the line: Why?
"Why" is an important question that has consumed the game of baseball since its creation. It is a question that drives everyone involved in the game and almost everyone that follows it. Careers are made and broken attempting to answer it. Out of all the major spectator sports in the world, baseball is one of the most random, volatile, and unpredictable. The best team in the league facing off against the worst still isn't as heavy a favorite as you might expect. This makes answering the question even more important. But this game has been played for over a century, and despite front offices being invaded by every Ivy League sabermatrician with programming experience, there's a lot about the game that just cannot be accounted for.
It is within this vacuum that narrative begins to form, and like a gas, expand to fill every available inch of social media. Our emotional investment in the Twins demands an attempt to make sense of a senseless sequence. Words like "implosion" don't feel adequate, because it doesn't do justice to how much it feels like it's a force being inflicted upon the team, rather than the results of internal motivations. Regardless, we try and take an inventory of what hurts, and search for accountability.
Is the roster underperforming? Unquestionably. I can't recall ever seeing so much of a single roster falling to the bottom 20% of their preseason projections with such synchrony. Are the Twins seeing their share of injuries? Yes, and then some. Are the Twins unlucky? According to the stats, they're the unluckiest in the league, and have a lot of production stats in common with the Oakland A's, who have more wins than the Twins have losses. Everything is happening, it's all bad, and it's happening all at once.
And then, to rub salt in the wound, the White Sox got hot. They started their rebuild later, they were on a trajectory to give the Twins a bit more time to contend, and then they leapfrogged them in the standings while destroying them mercilessly along the way. They're doing this while also suffering from their best players sidelined and being managed by a guy who started his pro ball career when John F. Kennedy was in office, and hasn't updated his worldview since. Where the Twins are punished for their faults, the White Sox seem to glide through life. As a Twins fan, this was supposed to be our time, and the spotlight got stolen by the worst possible division rival.
Watching all this transpire, attempting to process it, you're left holding the bag and being asked to put a nice neat bow on a morass of misfortune. Unable to wrap your arms around it, the narrative becomes more and more tempting.
"The coaches are too calm, they need to fire up this team and yell more!"
"Rocco's lost the clubhouse, it's time to fire him."
"The players don't want it enough!"
Any time you hear missives like these, and they aren't accompanied by direct evidence from the clubhouse or a credible source, Colin Cowherd-sized alarm bells should start going off in your head. You are being asked to accept generalities to rationalize a giant sea of inexplicable fate. Explaining data points by assuming the motives of strangers is a task that should be reserved for criminal profilers, not Twins Twitter. Kenta Maeda isn't struggling because of some nebulous lack of leadership, it's because he's lost the ability to locate his slider.
There's a notable clip from ESPN's First Take in 2012, when Mark Cuban came onto the show, and used every available moment to go after Skip Bayless and his notions of 'narrative'. 
Throughout the exchange, Cuban lays out his argument for why statements like how the one team "played harder" aren't worth the airtime they're eventually given- because they're not backed up by any meaningful data and are fueled by apathy at best, and intentional ignorance at worst.
If you want to convince me how the Twins got to 13-26 and have someone to blame, you're going to have to do a lot more than sell me on a lack of motivation, clubhouse chemistry, or some kind of failing strategic approach, because in the words of Kronk, it doesn't make any sense.
Baseball is a cruel game. You can assemble the same roster and play the same way, and end up with radically different results by the end of the season. I have a hard time finding obvious fatal flaws in the approach by the front office, management, or the players themselves. Sure, I'll always agree that ownership could stand to spend some more money, but a few million dollars doesn't magically repair Byron Buxton's hamstring, and it doesn't solve why any game that doesn't go exactly 9 innings becomes an automatic loss.
I'm not angry at the team, the coaches, or the FO. I'm just sad. This roster- and by extension, this fanbase- deserves better than the hand they've been dealt, right as the window of contention seemed to be opening wide (and, by some accounts, ahead of schedule). And now, after six weeks of unprecedented horror- which is saying something for a team with this kind of history- the voices are growing louder that it's time to pack it in and start over from scratch.
All that said, I'm going to continue rooting for this team. They clearly want it enough. The clubhouse knows what they're capable of, and would love the opportunity to showcase it, if fate and luck would just get out of the goddamn way. In the meantime, I'll be watching, and screaming into the nearest pillow every time a barreled ball goes straight at an opposing fielder.
The Twins are dead. Long live the Twins.

I might love the Twins, and defend them even during some of the darkest times, but that also means being honest even when it hurts. That kind of tough love was exactly what came to mind when Tyler Duffey used his relief appearance in a close contest to 'send a message' by throwing behind Yermin Mercedes on only the fourth pitch of his appearance.
Everyone seemed to know it was coming. Tony La Russa, fresh from using his media time all but telling the Twins they *should* bean Mercedes, had a conversation with the umpiring crew before the incident, likely warning them what was to come. Rookie Twins pitcher Bailey Ober was making his debut that evening, and wasn't going to spoil his first start in the majors by getting involved. But now, with Ober done for the night, Duffey in, and Mercedes up to the plate with 1 out, the ingredients were there. And then, it happened.
This, in a not-so-polite word, was chicken****. For a long time, when other teams or crusty veterans have crowed about 'playing the white right way' or unwritten rules, I've been able to take solace in the fact that the Twins haven't engaged in similar grandstanding since the Falvine era started, and that the roster was young, diverse, and helping usher in a new era of enjoying baseball and reveling in the emotion.
There have been a few speed bumps along the way. Sure, the broadcasters aren't in the clubhouse, but you were sure to hear a lot about what wasn't okay when Bert Blyleven or Jack Morris were in the analyst seat, and Dan Gladden has used his presence on the radio to show his age from time to time. In terms of the actual team, Paul Molitor was never likely to put on a "Let the Kids Play" hoodie, and Brian Dozier got in on the action once with a take so cold that it's a strong candidate to host the next Winter Olympics. But overall, in this most recent era, Rocco's clubhouse has been loose and positive, with none of the toxic tantrums that still plague the sport decades after it should have gone out of style. Intentional HBP's felt alien. You could feel good about cheering on this team if you cared about that sort of thing.
Well, Tyler Duffey put a 93 MPH fastball-shaped dent in that argument with his retaliation, and nobody comes out of this looking good except for the White Sox players more or less in open revolt over their own manager's caveman philosophies. Willians Astudillo's fuming on the mound after the initial home run (Willians! One of the most enjoyable players to spectate in baseball! Chirping about unwritten rules! What is the world coming to?!), Duffey's willingness to jeopardize a close game (and definitely get ejected) when the bullpen desperately needs to turn things around... and I understand that Rocco Baldelli's job is to have his players' backs, but to use the rain and say "our plan was to pitch him inside" as an excuse and feign innocence over any malicious intent feels awful to hear coming out of his mouth. I mean, just say that Duffey got distracted because he thought he saw a raccoon behind home plate. Or maybe it was a rat, he couldn't be sure.
None of this had to happen. Nobody would have thought of the Twins as pushovers or weak had they not decided to exact vengeance. Tony La Russa saw the opportunity to seize all the negative attention from Mercedes's dinger and did so with both hands. Why Rocco, Duffey, Astudillo, or anyone else involved didn't allow him to enjoy that time to himself is baffling to me- Especially when every Twin Cities sportswriter with a hot take to conjure up and column inches to fill needs a reason to complain about the team that doesn't feel like a retread. Well, you gave it to them in spades. And that's on you.
It's not enough to play better, Twins. Please *be* better.
 

Yes, the number in the title is not an exaggeration. The true odds of the moment we find ourselves in at the close of the Twins 2020 postseason campaign, brief as it was, comes to one in 69 billion. Somewhere in the galaxy, Zaphod Beeblebrox fired up the Improbability drive and Minnesota got caught in the wake.
 
Let's do some math, shall we?
 
Setting a baseline
 
Now, there's a very good chance you've seen the number 262,144 floating around Twins Twitter in the last day or two, and that's because if you were to flip a coin 18 times, the odds of each flip resulting in the same outcome are 262,144:1 against, or 218. Already, this feels bad. This feels unfair. We want to fight against this statistic. BASEBALL GAMES AREN'T COIN FLIPS, I hear you cry out. So many of those games were as underdogs against the almighty Yankees, surely the odds weren't THAT bad?
 
And yeah, from that perspective, you'd be correct. @Awoodruff3 on Twitter looked at the problem from a gambling odds perspective:
 
https://twitter.com/awoodruff3/status/1311415416456085510
 
28,524:1 against! Already, this is 10 times as likely as the coin flip scenario, so the sting should only be a fraction of what we currently feel, right?
 
Sadly, no. Here's how it really breaks down.
 
The Methodology
 
I have gone into the Fangraphs archives for each of the 18 games in the losing streak and made note of the moment in time where the Twins had the highest expected win probability. In 17 of the 18 games, the Twins were favored to win - and in a few cases, extremely favored - before eventually taking the L. With that information, we can look at the odds of losing from these moments where the Twins had the greatest amount of leverage to create a future other than the ones we find ourselves in now.
 

 
October 6th, 2004: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 12th, 1 out, Twins ahead by 1 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


87.3%
 
How'd things look?


With Joe Nathan on the mound for his third inning of work, John Olerud strikes out and the Twins are 2 outs away from taking a 2-0 lead in the series.
 
What happened?


Nathan gives consecutive walks before A-Rod hits a ground rule double, followed by an intentional walk and a Matsui sac fly to win.
 
Odds of a loss


7.87:1 against[/table] 

 
October 8th, 2004: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 2nd, 2 outs, Twins ahead by 1 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


64.5%
 
How'd things look?


Carlos Silva gets a ground ball out from Bernie Williams. It's still early, but teams in the lead tend to stay in the lead.
 
What happened?


Silva immediately gave up 5 consecutive singles and 3 runs before the 2nd inning was over, and the Twins never saw daylight again.
 
Odds of a 2-game losing streak


22:1 against[/table] 

 
October 9th, 2004: ALDS Game 4
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 7, 0 outs, Twins ahead by 4 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


97.0%(!)
 
How'd things look?


A-Rod concludes a 1-2-3 inning in the top of the 7th by fouling out to first base. The Twins have retired 9 straight batters.
 
What happened?


Yankees tie the game in the top of the 8th on an RBI single and a 3-run homer, game goes to extra innings, Yankees take the lead in the 11th, Twins fans begin to wonder if this is the start of something dire. (Narrator: It is.)
 
Odds of a 3-game losing streak


739:1 against[/table] 

 
October 3rd, 2006: ALDS Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 1, 0 outs, tie game vs. Oakland
 
Twins Win Probability


58.3%
 
How'd things look?


Luis Castillo leads off for the Twins with a walk. This would be as good as it got.
 
What happened?


Frank Thomas homers to take the lead in the 2nd, and despite the Twins making things interesting in the bottom of the 8th, they would never be favored again.
 
Odds of a 4-game losing streak


1,773:1 against[/table] 

 
October 4th, 2006: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 6, 0 outs, tie game vs. Oakland
 
Twins Win Probability


57.6%
 
How'd things look?


Down 2, the Twins start the bottom of the 6th with consecutive homers by Cuddy and Morneau to tie the game, and Oakland goes to the bullpen.
 
What happened?


Oakland responds in the 7th with 2 runs off an inside the park home run.
 
Odds of a 5-game losing streak


4,181:1 against[/table] 

 
October 6th, 2006: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 2, 0 outs, tie game at Oakland
 
Twins Win Probability


56.3%
 
How'd things look?


Morneau opens the 2nd with a double, with Torii Hunter on deck.
 
What happened?


Morneau doesn't score, Oakland opens up a 4-0 lead, and eventually win 8-3.
 
Odds of a 6-game losing streak


9,569:1 against[/table] 

 
October 7th, 2009: ALDS Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 3, 2 outs, Twins ahead by 2 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


68.7%
 
How'd things look?


Twins take a 2-0 lead when Joe Mauer scores on a Jorge Posada passed ball
 
What happened?


Yankees immediately tie the game on a Derek Jeter home run, and the Twins never score again. Yankees win 7-2.
 
Odds of a 7-game losing streak


30,571:1 against[/table] 

 
October 9th, 2009: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 9, 0 outs, Twins ahead by 2 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


91.7%
 
How'd things look?


After the Twins take a 2 run lead in the top of the 8th, the Yankees go down 1-2-3, and Joe Mauer comes to the plate to open the 9th.
 
What happened?


Yankees tie it up in the bottom of the 9th, Joe Mauer hits a double in the 11th that Phil Cuzzi incorrectly rules foul, and settles for a single- only to be followed by 2 consecutive singles that would have scored him had the double stood. Instead, Mauer doesn't score, Yankees walk it off on a Mark Teixeira homer, and just typing out this sentence makes me want to die inside.
 
Odds of an 8-game losing streak


368,333:1 against[/table] 

 
October 11th, 2009: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 7, 1 out, Twins ahead by 1 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


72.6%
 
How'd things look?


The Twins have struck first on an RBI single by Mauer, and the Yankees have responded with a Mark Teixeira groundout.
 
What happened?


Yankees immediately take the lead with home runs by A-Rod and Posada. Twins threaten to tie in the 8th with a leadoff Punto double, but fail to capitalize. Yankees win 4-1.
 
Odds of a 9-game losing streak


1,344,281:1 against[/table] 

 
October 6th, 2010: ALDS Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 6, 1 out, Twins ahead by 3 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


87.7%
 
How'd things look?


Francisco Liriano has only given up 2 hits to the Yankees, who are down three and open the 6th with a Nick Swisher strikeout.
 
What happened?


The wheels come off moments later as Lirano gives up a double, a wild pitch, 2 singles, and a triple to give the Yankees a 4-3 lead. The Twins would later tie it, only to lose 6-4.
 
Odds of a 10-game losing streak


10,929,120:1 against[/table] 

 
October 7th, 2010: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 3, 0 outs, Twins ahead by 1 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


66.5%
 
How'd things look?


Twins opened the scoring in the 2nd on a Danny Valencia sac fly, and the Yankees go down 1-2-3 in response.
 
What happened?


Yankees would later take a 2-1 lead before Orlando Hudson ties the game with a solo shot, but that tie doesn't last long. Yankees win 5-2.
 
Odds of an 11-game losing streak


32,624,240:1 against[/table] 

 
October 9th, 2010: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 2, 0 outs, Twins tied at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


50%
 
How'd things look?


This is the only game in the 18-game streak where the Twins were never favored. It remained 50/50 after both teams failed to accomplish anything in the first inning.
 
What happened?


Twins fall behind in the 2nd, and never get close, losing 6-1.
 
Odds of a 12-game losing streak


65,248,481:1 against[/table] 

 
October 3th, 2017: AL Wild Card
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 1, 1 out, Twins ahead by 3 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


81.8%
 
How'd things look?


You remember this inning, right? Twins go into Yankee Stadium and immediately knock Luis Severino out of the game with homers by Brian Dozier and Eddie Rosario, followed by an Escobar single and a Kepler double. 3 run lead, 2 men on, only 1 out. We've got this. Yankees don't have a CHANCE.
 
What happened?


Buxton and Castro strike out to end the inning, Ervin Santana gives up the lead on a 3-run homer, Yankees win 8-4, and everyone in my generation starts to develop serious anxiety complexes revolving around who the hell we hurt to cause this.
 
Odds of a 13-game losing streak


358,508,138:1 against[/table] 

 
October 4th, 2019: ALDS Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 3, 2 out, Twins ahead by 2 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


67.1%
 
How'd things look?


Twins were already leading 1-0 when Nelson Cruz comes up big with a solo home run against James Paxton.
 
What happened?


As per usual, Twins lose the lead immediately. They tie things up in the 5th, but that also doesn't last. Twins lose 10-4.
 
Odds of a 14-game losing streak


1,089,690,390:1 against[/table] 

 
October 5th, 2019: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 1, 1 out, Twins tied at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


53.6%
 
How'd things look?


Inexplicably known as the Randy Dobnak game, the Twins were statistically favored for the briefest of moments when a HBP and a single put 2 men on in the first inning with only one out.
 
What happened?


Those baserunners are stranded on a double play, Yankees score first and never look back. Twins lose 8-2.
 
Odds of a 15-game losing streak


2,348,470,670:1 against[/table] 

 
October 7th, 2019: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 2, 0 outs, Twins losing by 1 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


62.6%
 
How'd things look?


The only entry on this series where the Twins were favored while losing. Why? The Twins opened the 2nd inning by loading the bases with no outs. This is a scenario where you are highly likely to score multiple runs.
 
What happened?


They didn't.
 
Odds of a 16-game losing streak


6,279,333,342:1 against[/table] 

 
September 29th, 2020: AL Wild Card Round Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 5th, 0 outs, Twins ahead by 1 vs. Houston
 
Twins Win Probability


78.4%
 
How'd things look?


Twins open the 5th with consecutive walks while already leading.
 
What happened?


Strikeout, pop fly, groundout. Twins twitter immediately fears the worst due to the failure to capitalize, and their fears are proven valid.
 
Odds of a 17-game losing streak


29,070,987,697:1 against[/table] 

 
September 30th, 2020: AL Wild Card Round Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 6th, 0 outs, Twins tied vs. Houston
 
Twins Win Probability


57.9%
 
How'd things look?


After loading the bases in the first inning and still failing to score, the Twins have done very litte. Still, it's a tie game, and the Twins are coming up to bat as slight favorites.
 
What happened?


The bats continued to stay silent, and couldn't overcome a 2-run deficit in the 9th. I cried, and then began writing this article as a coping mechanism.
 
Odds of a 18-game losing streak


69,052,227,309:1 against[/table] 

 
Conclusions
 
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1311406223019790336

Yes, the number in the title is not an exaggeration. The true odds of the moment we find ourselves in at the close of the Twins 2020 postseason campaign, brief as it was, comes to one in 69 billion. Somewhere in the galaxy, Zaphod Beeblebrox fired up the Improbability drive and Minnesota got caught in the wake.
 
Let's do some math, shall we?
 
Setting a baseline
 
Now, there's a very good chance you've seen the number 262,144 floating around Twins Twitter in the last day or two, and that's because if you were to flip a coin 18 times, the odds of each flip resulting in the same outcome are 262,144:1 against, or 218. Already, this feels bad. This feels unfair. We want to fight against this statistic. BASEBALL GAMES AREN'T COIN FLIPS, I hear you cry out. So many of those games were as underdogs against the almighty Yankees, surely the odds weren't THAT bad?
 
And yeah, from that perspective, you'd be correct. @Awoodruff3 on Twitter looked at the problem from a gambling odds perspective:
 
https://twitter.com/awoodruff3/status/1311415416456085510
 
28,524:1 against! Already, this is 10 times as likely as the coin flip scenario, so the sting should only be a fraction of what we currently feel, right?
 
Sadly, no. Here's how it really breaks down.
 
The Methodology
 
I have gone into the Fangraphs archives for each of the 18 games in the losing streak and made note of the moment in time where the Twins had the highest expected win probability. In 17 of the 18 games, the Twins were favored to win - and in a few cases, extremely favored - before eventually taking the L. With that information, we can look at the odds of losing from these moments where the Twins had the greatest amount of leverage to create a future other than the ones we find ourselves in now.
 

 
October 6th, 2004: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 12th, 1 out, Twins ahead by 1 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


87.3%
 
How'd things look?


With Joe Nathan on the mound for his third inning of work, John Olerud strikes out and the Twins are 2 outs away from taking a 2-0 lead in the series.
 
What happened?


Nathan gives consecutive walks before A-Rod hits a ground rule double, followed by an intentional walk and a Matsui sac fly to win.
 
Odds of a loss


7.87:1 against[/table] 

 
October 8th, 2004: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 2nd, 2 outs, Twins ahead by 1 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


64.5%
 
How'd things look?


Carlos Silva gets a ground ball out from Bernie Williams. It's still early, but teams in the lead tend to stay in the lead.
 
What happened?


Silva immediately gave up 5 consecutive singles and 3 runs before the 2nd inning was over, and the Twins never saw daylight again.
 
Odds of a 2-game losing streak


22:1 against[/table] 

 
October 9th, 2004: ALDS Game 4
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 7, 0 outs, Twins ahead by 4 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


97.0%(!)
 
How'd things look?


A-Rod concludes a 1-2-3 inning in the top of the 7th by fouling out to first base. The Twins have retired 9 straight batters.
 
What happened?


Yankees tie the game in the top of the 8th on an RBI single and a 3-run homer, game goes to extra innings, Yankees take the lead in the 11th, Twins fans begin to wonder if this is the start of something dire. (Narrator: It is.)
 
Odds of a 3-game losing streak


739:1 against[/table] 

 
October 3rd, 2006: ALDS Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 1, 0 outs, tie game vs. Oakland
 
Twins Win Probability


58.3%
 
How'd things look?


Luis Castillo leads off for the Twins with a walk. This would be as good as it got.
 
What happened?


Frank Thomas homers to take the lead in the 2nd, and despite the Twins making things interesting in the bottom of the 8th, they would never be favored again.
 
Odds of a 4-game losing streak


1,773:1 against[/table] 

 
October 4th, 2006: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 6, 0 outs, tie game vs. Oakland
 
Twins Win Probability


57.6%
 
How'd things look?


Down 2, the Twins start the bottom of the 6th with consecutive homers by Cuddy and Morneau to tie the game, and Oakland goes to the bullpen.
 
What happened?


Oakland responds in the 7th with 2 runs off an inside the park home run.
 
Odds of a 5-game losing streak


4,181:1 against[/table] 

 
October 6th, 2006: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 2, 0 outs, tie game at Oakland
 
Twins Win Probability


56.3%
 
How'd things look?


Morneau opens the 2nd with a double, with Torii Hunter on deck.
 
What happened?


Morneau doesn't score, Oakland opens up a 4-0 lead, and eventually win 8-3.
 
Odds of a 6-game losing streak


9,569:1 against[/table] 

 
October 7th, 2009: ALDS Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 3, 2 outs, Twins ahead by 2 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


68.7%
 
How'd things look?


Twins take a 2-0 lead when Joe Mauer scores on a Jorge Posada passed ball
 
What happened?


Yankees immediately tie the game on a Derek Jeter home run, and the Twins never score again. Yankees win 7-2.
 
Odds of a 7-game losing streak


30,571:1 against[/table] 

 
October 9th, 2009: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 9, 0 outs, Twins ahead by 2 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


91.7%
 
How'd things look?


After the Twins take a 2 run lead in the top of the 8th, the Yankees go down 1-2-3, and Joe Mauer comes to the plate to open the 9th.
 
What happened?


Yankees tie it up in the bottom of the 9th, Joe Mauer hits a double in the 11th that Phil Cuzzi incorrectly rules foul, and settles for a single- only to be followed by 2 consecutive singles that would have scored him had the double stood. Instead, Mauer doesn't score, Yankees walk it off on a Mark Teixeira homer, and just typing out this sentence makes me want to die inside.
 
Odds of an 8-game losing streak


368,333:1 against[/table] 

 
October 11th, 2009: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 7, 1 out, Twins ahead by 1 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


72.6%
 
How'd things look?


The Twins have struck first on an RBI single by Mauer, and the Yankees have responded with a Mark Teixeira groundout.
 
What happened?


Yankees immediately take the lead with home runs by A-Rod and Posada. Twins threaten to tie in the 8th with a leadoff Punto double, but fail to capitalize. Yankees win 4-1.
 
Odds of a 9-game losing streak


1,344,281:1 against[/table] 

 
October 6th, 2010: ALDS Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 6, 1 out, Twins ahead by 3 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


87.7%
 
How'd things look?


Francisco Liriano has only given up 2 hits to the Yankees, who are down three and open the 6th with a Nick Swisher strikeout.
 
What happened?


The wheels come off moments later as Lirano gives up a double, a wild pitch, 2 singles, and a triple to give the Yankees a 4-3 lead. The Twins would later tie it, only to lose 6-4.
 
Odds of a 10-game losing streak


10,929,120:1 against[/table] 

 
October 7th, 2010: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 3, 0 outs, Twins ahead by 1 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


66.5%
 
How'd things look?


Twins opened the scoring in the 2nd on a Danny Valencia sac fly, and the Yankees go down 1-2-3 in response.
 
What happened?


Yankees would later take a 2-1 lead before Orlando Hudson ties the game with a solo shot, but that tie doesn't last long. Yankees win 5-2.
 
Odds of an 11-game losing streak


32,624,240:1 against[/table] 

 
October 9th, 2010: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 2, 0 outs, Twins tied at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


50%
 
How'd things look?


This is the only game in the 18-game streak where the Twins were never favored. It remained 50/50 after both teams failed to accomplish anything in the first inning.
 
What happened?


Twins fall behind in the 2nd, and never get close, losing 6-1.
 
Odds of a 12-game losing streak


65,248,481:1 against[/table] 

 
October 3th, 2017: AL Wild Card
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 1, 1 out, Twins ahead by 3 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


81.8%
 
How'd things look?


You remember this inning, right? Twins go into Yankee Stadium and immediately knock Luis Severino out of the game with homers by Brian Dozier and Eddie Rosario, followed by an Escobar single and a Kepler double. 3 run lead, 2 men on, only 1 out. We've got this. Yankees don't have a CHANCE.
 
What happened?


Buxton and Castro strike out to end the inning, Ervin Santana gives up the lead on a 3-run homer, Yankees win 8-4, and everyone in my generation starts to develop serious anxiety complexes revolving around who the hell we hurt to cause this.
 
Odds of a 13-game losing streak


358,508,138:1 against[/table] 

 
October 4th, 2019: ALDS Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 3, 2 out, Twins ahead by 2 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


67.1%
 
How'd things look?


Twins were already leading 1-0 when Nelson Cruz comes up big with a solo home run against James Paxton.
 
What happened?


As per usual, Twins lose the lead immediately. They tie things up in the 5th, but that also doesn't last. Twins lose 10-4.
 
Odds of a 14-game losing streak


1,089,690,390:1 against[/table] 

 
October 5th, 2019: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 1, 1 out, Twins tied at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


53.6%
 
How'd things look?


Inexplicably known as the Randy Dobnak game, the Twins were statistically favored for the briefest of moments when a HBP and a single put 2 men on in the first inning with only one out.
 
What happened?


Those baserunners are stranded on a double play, Yankees score first and never look back. Twins lose 8-2.
 
Odds of a 15-game losing streak


2,348,470,670:1 against[/table] 

 
October 7th, 2019: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 2, 0 outs, Twins losing by 1 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


62.6%
 
How'd things look?


The only entry on this series where the Twins were favored while losing. Why? The Twins opened the 2nd inning by loading the bases with no outs. This is a scenario where you are highly likely to score multiple runs.
 
What happened?


They didn't.
 
Odds of a 16-game losing streak


6,279,333,342:1 against[/table] 

 
September 29th, 2020: AL Wild Card Round Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 5th, 0 outs, Twins ahead by 1 vs. Houston
 
Twins Win Probability


78.4%
 
How'd things look?


Twins open the 5th with consecutive walks while already leading.
 
What happened?


Strikeout, pop fly, groundout. Twins twitter immediately fears the worst due to the failure to capitalize, and their fears are proven valid.
 
Odds of a 17-game losing streak


29,070,987,697:1 against[/table] 

 
September 30th, 2020: AL Wild Card Round Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 6th, 0 outs, Twins tied vs. Houston
 
Twins Win Probability


57.9%
 
How'd things look?


After loading the bases in the first inning and still failing to score, the Twins have done very litte. Still, it's a tie game, and the Twins are coming up to bat as slight favorites.
 
What happened?


The bats continued to stay silent, and couldn't overcome a 2-run deficit in the 9th. I cried, and then began writing this article as a coping mechanism.
 
Odds of a 18-game losing streak


69,052,227,309:1 against[/table] 

 
Conclusions
 
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1311406223019790336

Yes, the number in the title is not an exaggeration. The true odds of the moment we find ourselves in at the close of the Twins 2020 postseason campaign, brief as it was, comes to one in 69 billion. Somewhere in the galaxy, Zaphod Beeblebrox fired up the Improbability drive and Minnesota got caught in the wake.
 
Let's do some math, shall we?
 
Setting a baseline
 
Now, there's a very good chance you've seen the number 262,144 floating around Twins Twitter in the last day or two, and that's because if you were to flip a coin 18 times, the odds of each flip resulting in the same outcome are 262,144:1 against, or 218. Already, this feels bad. This feels unfair. We want to fight against this statistic. BASEBALL GAMES AREN'T COIN FLIPS, I hear you cry out. So many of those games were as underdogs against the almighty Yankees, surely the odds weren't THAT bad?
 
And yeah, from that perspective, you'd be correct. @Awoodruff3 on Twitter looked at the problem from a gambling odds perspective:
 
https://twitter.com/awoodruff3/status/1311415416456085510
 
28,524:1 against! Already, this is 10 times as likely as the coin flip scenario, so the sting should only be a fraction of what we currently feel, right?
 
Sadly, no. Here's how it really breaks down.
 
The Methodology
 
I have gone into the Fangraphs archives for each of the 18 games in the losing streak and made note of the moment in time where the Twins had the highest expected win probability. In 17 of the 18 games, the Twins were favored to win - and in a few cases, extremely favored - before eventually taking the L. With that information, we can look at the odds of losing from these moments where the Twins had the greatest amount of leverage to create a future other than the ones we find ourselves in now.
 

 
October 6th, 2004: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 12th, 1 out, Twins ahead by 1 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


87.3%
 
How'd things look?


With Joe Nathan on the mound for his third inning of work, John Olerud strikes out and the Twins are 2 outs away from taking a 2-0 lead in the series.
 
What happened?


Nathan gives consecutive walks before A-Rod hits a ground rule double, followed by an intentional walk and a Matsui sac fly to win.
 
Odds of a loss


7.87:1 against[/table] 

 
October 8th, 2004: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 2nd, 2 outs, Twins ahead by 1 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


64.5%
 
How'd things look?


Carlos Silva gets a ground ball out from Bernie Williams. It's still early, but teams in the lead tend to stay in the lead.
 
What happened?


Silva immediately gave up 5 consecutive singles and 3 runs before the 2nd inning was over, and the Twins never saw daylight again.
 
Odds of a 2-game losing streak


22:1 against[/table] 

 
October 9th, 2004: ALDS Game 4
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 7, 0 outs, Twins ahead by 4 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


97.0%(!)
 
How'd things look?


A-Rod concludes a 1-2-3 inning in the top of the 7th by fouling out to first base. The Twins have retired 9 straight batters.
 
What happened?


Yankees tie the game in the top of the 8th on an RBI single and a 3-run homer, game goes to extra innings, Yankees take the lead in the 11th, Twins fans begin to wonder if this is the start of something dire. (Narrator: It is.)
 
Odds of a 3-game losing streak


739:1 against[/table] 

 
October 3rd, 2006: ALDS Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 1, 0 outs, tie game vs. Oakland
 
Twins Win Probability


58.3%
 
How'd things look?


Luis Castillo leads off for the Twins with a walk. This would be as good as it got.
 
What happened?


Frank Thomas homers to take the lead in the 2nd, and despite the Twins making things interesting in the bottom of the 8th, they would never be favored again.
 
Odds of a 4-game losing streak


1,773:1 against[/table] 

 
October 4th, 2006: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 6, 0 outs, tie game vs. Oakland
 
Twins Win Probability


57.6%
 
How'd things look?


Down 2, the Twins start the bottom of the 6th with consecutive homers by Cuddy and Morneau to tie the game, and Oakland goes to the bullpen.
 
What happened?


Oakland responds in the 7th with 2 runs off an inside the park home run.
 
Odds of a 5-game losing streak


4,181:1 against[/table] 

 
October 6th, 2006: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 2, 0 outs, tie game at Oakland
 
Twins Win Probability


56.3%
 
How'd things look?


Morneau opens the 2nd with a double, with Torii Hunter on deck.
 
What happened?


Morneau doesn't score, Oakland opens up a 4-0 lead, and eventually win 8-3.
 
Odds of a 6-game losing streak


9,569:1 against[/table] 

 
October 7th, 2009: ALDS Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 3, 2 outs, Twins ahead by 2 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


68.7%
 
How'd things look?


Twins take a 2-0 lead when Joe Mauer scores on a Jorge Posada passed ball
 
What happened?


Yankees immediately tie the game on a Derek Jeter home run, and the Twins never score again. Yankees win 7-2.
 
Odds of a 7-game losing streak


30,571:1 against[/table] 

 
October 9th, 2009: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 9, 0 outs, Twins ahead by 2 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


91.7%
 
How'd things look?


After the Twins take a 2 run lead in the top of the 8th, the Yankees go down 1-2-3, and Joe Mauer comes to the plate to open the 9th.
 
What happened?


Yankees tie it up in the bottom of the 9th, Joe Mauer hits a double in the 11th that Phil Cuzzi incorrectly rules foul, and settles for a single- only to be followed by 2 consecutive singles that would have scored him had the double stood. Instead, Mauer doesn't score, Yankees walk it off on a Mark Teixeira homer, and just typing out this sentence makes me want to die inside.
 
Odds of an 8-game losing streak


368,333:1 against[/table] 

 
October 11th, 2009: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 7, 1 out, Twins ahead by 1 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


72.6%
 
How'd things look?


The Twins have struck first on an RBI single by Mauer, and the Yankees have responded with a Mark Teixeira groundout.
 
What happened?


Yankees immediately take the lead with home runs by A-Rod and Posada. Twins threaten to tie in the 8th with a leadoff Punto double, but fail to capitalize. Yankees win 4-1.
 
Odds of a 9-game losing streak


1,344,281:1 against[/table] 

 
October 6th, 2010: ALDS Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 6, 1 out, Twins ahead by 3 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


87.7%
 
How'd things look?


Francisco Liriano has only given up 2 hits to the Yankees, who are down three and open the 6th with a Nick Swisher strikeout.
 
What happened?


The wheels come off moments later as Lirano gives up a double, a wild pitch, 2 singles, and a triple to give the Yankees a 4-3 lead. The Twins would later tie it, only to lose 6-4.
 
Odds of a 10-game losing streak


10,929,120:1 against[/table] 

 
October 7th, 2010: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 3, 0 outs, Twins ahead by 1 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


66.5%
 
How'd things look?


Twins opened the scoring in the 2nd on a Danny Valencia sac fly, and the Yankees go down 1-2-3 in response.
 
What happened?


Yankees would later take a 2-1 lead before Orlando Hudson ties the game with a solo shot, but that tie doesn't last long. Yankees win 5-2.
 
Odds of an 11-game losing streak


32,624,240:1 against[/table] 

 
October 9th, 2010: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 2, 0 outs, Twins tied at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


50%
 
How'd things look?


This is the only game in the 18-game streak where the Twins were never favored. It remained 50/50 after both teams failed to accomplish anything in the first inning.
 
What happened?


Twins fall behind in the 2nd, and never get close, losing 6-1.
 
Odds of a 12-game losing streak


65,248,481:1 against[/table] 

 
October 3th, 2017: AL Wild Card
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 1, 1 out, Twins ahead by 3 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


81.8%
 
How'd things look?


You remember this inning, right? Twins go into Yankee Stadium and immediately knock Luis Severino out of the game with homers by Brian Dozier and Eddie Rosario, followed by an Escobar single and a Kepler double. 3 run lead, 2 men on, only 1 out. We've got this. Yankees don't have a CHANCE.
 
What happened?


Buxton and Castro strike out to end the inning, Ervin Santana gives up the lead on a 3-run homer, Yankees win 8-4, and everyone in my generation starts to develop serious anxiety complexes revolving around who the hell we hurt to cause this.
 
Odds of a 13-game losing streak


358,508,138:1 against[/table] 

 
October 4th, 2019: ALDS Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 3, 2 out, Twins ahead by 2 at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


67.1%
 
How'd things look?


Twins were already leading 1-0 when Nelson Cruz comes up big with a solo home run against James Paxton.
 
What happened?


As per usual, Twins lose the lead immediately. They tie things up in the 5th, but that also doesn't last. Twins lose 10-4.
 
Odds of a 14-game losing streak


1,089,690,390:1 against[/table] 

 
October 5th, 2019: ALDS Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Top 1, 1 out, Twins tied at New York
 
Twins Win Probability


53.6%
 
How'd things look?


Inexplicably known as the Randy Dobnak game, the Twins were statistically favored for the briefest of moments when a HBP and a single put 2 men on in the first inning with only one out.
 
What happened?


Those baserunners are stranded on a double play, Yankees score first and never look back. Twins lose 8-2.
 
Odds of a 15-game losing streak


2,348,470,670:1 against[/table] 

 
October 7th, 2019: ALDS Game 3
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 2, 0 outs, Twins losing by 1 vs. New York
 
Twins Win Probability


62.6%
 
How'd things look?


The only entry on this series where the Twins were favored while losing. Why? The Twins opened the 2nd inning by loading the bases with no outs. This is a scenario where you are highly likely to score multiple runs.
 
What happened?


They didn't.
 
Odds of a 16-game losing streak


6,279,333,342:1 against[/table] 

 
September 29th, 2020: AL Wild Card Round Game 1
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 5th, 0 outs, Twins ahead by 1 vs. Houston
 
Twins Win Probability


78.4%
 
How'd things look?


Twins open the 5th with consecutive walks while already leading.
 
What happened?


Strikeout, pop fly, groundout. Twins twitter immediately fears the worst due to the failure to capitalize, and their fears are proven valid.
 
Odds of a 17-game losing streak


29,070,987,697:1 against[/table] 

 
September 30th, 2020: AL Wild Card Round Game 2
 
[table]
 
Game State


Bottom 6th, 0 outs, Twins tied vs. Houston
 
Twins Win Probability


57.9%
 
How'd things look?


After loading the bases in the first inning and still failing to score, the Twins have done very litte. Still, it's a tie game, and the Twins are coming up to bat as slight favorites.
 
What happened?


The bats continued to stay silent, and couldn't overcome a 2-run deficit in the 9th. I cried, and then began writing this article as a coping mechanism.
 
Odds of a 18-game losing streak


69,052,227,309:1 against[/table] 

 
Conclusions
 
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1311406223019790336

Over the past decade, pitch framing has become a hot topic, not only in how we've begun to identify its value, but also in finding methods to quantify it, and coming to grips with its influence on the game. However, I contend that our focus has been far too narrow, and we must look beyond the catcher- in fact, past the backstop, into the stands, up to the media boxes, and directly at the role of play-by-play broadcaster. How the game's on-camera talent describe the action shapes our measurement of every pitch, even when most telecasts have live strike zone graphics present.
In this post, we'll be looking at the tendencies of long time Twins play-by-play broadcaster Dick Bremer, who has a very specific methodology: Since it sounds more impressive when a pitcher hits the corner of the strike zone, any and all parts of the strike zone and its immediate surroundings qualify as "The Corner", and will be described as such when the opportunity arises.
 
Our analysis will include video breakdowns of the 11 instances of the word 'corner' being used by Bremer during the Twins' April 17th game versus the Toronto Blue Jays. To quantify each pitch, we will use an Actual Corner Value (how close a pitch actually comes to a corner of the strike zone) as well as a Broadcaster Corner Value (how close the pitch comes to the corner, as perceived and presented by Dick Bremer).
 
Pitch #1: Bottom 2nd, 2 outs, 1-2
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118572113256833025
Pitcher: Aaron Sanchez
Throw: 96 mph fastball
Result: Strike 3
 
Dick's call: "On the outside corner, didn't waste it at all. Buried it on the outside corner."
 
Analysis: On a 1-2 pitch, Toronto pitcher Aaron Sanchez throws a 96 mph fastball at the outside edge of the plate, though it lands in the center third of the height of the zone with room to spare. Already, at this first sighting, we understand the challenge presented to Dick due to working on a television broadcast rather than radio, where pitch framing is sometimes less of an art and more the act of a used car salesman, free to invent whatever fiction will sell their desired narrative. Here, on TV, viewers can plainly see that this pitch is not on a corner. Dick, however, is unfazed, and reaches into his bag of tricks, declaring it on the corner not once, but TWICE - and not only stating its location, but insisting that it was BURIED there. This is the act of a seasoned professional, understanding that repetition and commitment are key to manipulating our perception, if not our very understanding of reality.
 
Actual Corner Value (ACV): 4/10
Broadcaster Corner Value (BCV): 10/10
Adjusted score: +6
 
Pitch #2: Bottom 3rd, 2 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118754724696641536
Pitcher: Aaron Sanchez
Throw: 96 mph fastball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "Strike on the outside corner."
 
Analysis: Someday, electronic strike zones will lord over our game as unfeeling adjudicators, but until that day, they serve merely as proxy armchair quarterbacks - a tool we rely on as viewers to feel validated in our desire to maim and/or injure the home plate umpire for their imperfections. On this pitch, Fox Trax smugly refuses to fill in the outline of the ball's arrival point, declaring that this pitch was a ball and all those who disagree are filthy heretics.
 
How comforting it is, then, for Dick to step in and remind all of us that in the end, the strike zone is defined solely by what the umpire says it is, no matter how many cameras and scanners say otherwise. This pitch is not outside. It is on the corner. The umpire's corner.
 
ACV: 7/10
BCV: 8/10
Adjusted score: +1
 
Pitch #3: Top 4th, 1 out, 1-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118755023842729984
Pitcher: Kyle Gibson
Throw: 94 mph fastball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "And now an outside corner fastball to even the count."
 
Analysis: Kyle Gibson started the 2017 season as someone fans understood to be roster filler, but ended it on an underappreciated upward trend. In 2018, he broke out with his best season to date and cemented his position at the front of the Twins rotation. Now, in 2019, he has started off somewhat shaky, with a suspect ERA and the need to make it deeper into ball games.
 
On this pitch, Dick has his pitcher's back, finding the corner where one does not exist. Catcher Mitch Garver positioned his glove exactly on the corner, and while Kyle missed his target high, he still found the edge and a called strike. For Dick, this is enough. He has earned approbation in the eyes of the telecast.
 
ACV: 5/10
BCV: 8/10
Adjusted score: +3
 
Pitch #4: Top 6th, 0 outs, 0-1
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118755338788851712
Pitcher: Kyle Gibson
Throw: 93 mph fastball
Result: Strike 2
 
Dick's Call: "On the outside corner with a fastball."
 
Analysis: Freddy Galvis must be listening to Dick through AirPods under that helmet, because his face says what we all know in our hearts: That was a meatball of a pitch, and Dick Bremer is a hero for carrying on the cause, however lost it may be.
 
ACV: 2/10
BCV: 7/10
Adjusted score: +5
 
Pitch #5: Top 6th, 2 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118755513288626176
Pitcher: Ryne Harper
Throw: 74 mph breaking ball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "Breaking ball on the outside corner, strike one."
 
Analysis: Is this pitch actually in the corner of the strike zone? Yes! The arc of the baseball tucks itself into the furthest nook available to it. In times like these, where no deception is necessary, you might expect that Dick Bremer would bluster and harangue us with unfettered righteousness, knowing that there can be no doubt as to where the ball landed. However, Dick finds a gentle touch in his commentary, content to let the pitch speak for itself, a simple declaration of its corner-ness being satisfactory. It needs no help, and will be allowed to lift its own weight.
 
ACV: 9/10
BCV: 9/10
Adjusted score: 0
 
Pitch #6: Bottom 6th, 0 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118755746894639104
Pitcher: Aaron Sanchez
Throw: 94 mph fastball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "Strike on the outside corner."
 
Analysis: A location extremely similar to pitch #2, though now delivered with an additional hint of defeat, as it arrives against the hot bat of Jorge Polanco. Immediately after listing his current bona fides, Polanco falls victim to the quantum state of the umpire's zone. While he was fooled, Dick was not, and he wearily sheds the burden he has carried throughout this pitch, allowing us all to taste from the tree of knowledge.
 
ACV: 9/10
BCV: 9/10
Adjusted score: 0
 
Pitch #7: Bottom 7th, 2 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118756058548170752
Pitcher: Thomas Pannone
Throw: 74 mph breaking ball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "Breaking ball over the inside corner."
 
Analysis: The work of a true master is present here, and we must parse the commentary carefully. The Twins are behind, but the tying run is at the plate. Now is the time for hope, and Kepler has watched a first pitch strike sail past him. Does the pitch find the corner? By exact definition, no. However, it is an excellent pitch - if one ignores that catcher Danny Jansen is set up on the exact opposite spot of the strike zone. Dick refuses to give Pannone the total satisfaction of finding the corner - stating that it is simply OVER the corner - while still testifying that it is a fine pitch. By Dick's standards, this is a backhanded compliment.
 
ACV: 8/10
BCV: 9/10
Adjusted score: +1
 
Pitch #8: Top 8th, 0 outs, 2-2
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118756254917120000
Pitcher: Tyler Duffey
Throw: 95 mph fastball
Result: Strike 3
 
Dick's Call: "On the outside corner. 95 on the outside edge or thereabouts, one away."
 
Analysis: NO! This is Duffey's first game back in the majors this season, and wanting to bolster his confidence, our protagonist has overextended himself, daring to go where others fear to tread, well outside the zone and at the exact vertical center. Corners have not existed in these parts since the days of Marty Foster's gift-wrapped delivery of Joe Nathan's 300th save. And yet, with zero hesitation, Dick plants his flag - immediately realizing that he has made a grave error. It will not be enough to double down on his argument, as was the case on Pitch #1. He knows when he has been beaten, and he retreats at the first opportunity.
 
It must also be noted that at the end of the clip, one can hear a chuckle from today's analyst, Jack "Back in My Day" Morris. This will be one of the few times during today's broadcast that I agree with him.
 
ACV: 1/10
BCV: 0/10
Adjusted score: -1
 
Pitch #9: Bottom 8th, 0 outs, 3-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1119309223332986880
Pitcher: Joe Biagini
Throw: 94 mph fastball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "On the outside corner."
 
Analysis: Matter of fact. All business. The pitch arrived enough within the margin of error that Bremer presents his truth with the cadence of a trusted newsman.
 
ACV: 7/10
BCV: 8/10
Adjusted Score: +1
 
Pitch #10: Bottom 9th, 0 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1119309442338541568
Pitcher: Ken Giles
Throw: 87 mph "fastball"
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "On the outside corner, strike 1."
 
Analysis: The drama is beginning to rise, as the Twins are down to their final 3 outs, behind by a single run, and sending Nelson Cruz to the plate as a pinch hitter. Once again, the ball is only in the corner's general aura, but Dick knows we are too excited to notice, and continues past it without pause.
 
ACV: 6/10
BCV: 8/10
Adjusted score: +2
 
Pitch 11: Bot 9th, 1 out, 3-1
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1119309817019944960
Pitcher: Ken Giles
Throw: 97 mph fastball
Result: Strike 2
 
Dick's Call: "Strike two on the outside corner... 97 in a REAL GOOD SPOT."
 
Analysis: Perfection. Mastery. Finally, near the climax of this game, we find what has eluded us: A true corner, spotted in the wild for all of us to enjoy, and Dick refuses to let it go to waste. His initial hushed tones give way to wonder and amazement, before his final accentuation that not only hammers home the exact precision of this corner, but makes us feel that we too knew it all along, even if we didn't happen to be looking at the TV at the time. Even if we didn't know what a strike zone was. All of us, collectively, knew what we had seen. We are enlightened and made whole. We are one with baseball, and one with each other.
 
ACV: 10/10
BCV: 12/10
Adjusted score: +2
Final Score: +20 Adjusted Corner Value
 
This concludes part one of this series. Stay tuned for part two, when we extend our gaze to the rest of the strike zone, and learn about the subtext necessary when one is not allowed to call a professional baseball player a 'belly itcher' and get away with it for long. In the meantime, for my research purposes, please share any high-BCV highlights for your team of choice in the comments.

Over the past decade, pitch framing has become a hot topic, not only in how we've begun to identify its value, but also in finding methods to quantify it, and coming to grips with its influence on the game. However, I contend that our focus has been far too narrow, and we must look beyond the catcher- in fact, past the backstop, into the stands, up to the media boxes, and directly at the role of play-by-play broadcaster. How the game's on-camera talent describe the action shapes our measurement of every pitch, even when most telecasts have live strike zone graphics present.
In this post, we'll be looking at the tendencies of long time Twins play-by-play broadcaster Dick Bremer, who has a very specific methodology: Since it sounds more impressive when a pitcher hits the corner of the strike zone, any and all parts of the strike zone and its immediate surroundings qualify as "The Corner", and will be described as such when the opportunity arises.
 
Our analysis will include video breakdowns of the 11 instances of the word 'corner' being used by Bremer during the Twins' April 17th game versus the Toronto Blue Jays. To quantify each pitch, we will use an Actual Corner Value (how close a pitch actually comes to a corner of the strike zone) as well as a Broadcaster Corner Value (how close the pitch comes to the corner, as perceived and presented by Dick Bremer).
 
Pitch #1: Bottom 2nd, 2 outs, 1-2
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118572113256833025
Pitcher: Aaron Sanchez
Throw: 96 mph fastball
Result: Strike 3
 
Dick's call: "On the outside corner, didn't waste it at all. Buried it on the outside corner."
 
Analysis: On a 1-2 pitch, Toronto pitcher Aaron Sanchez throws a 96 mph fastball at the outside edge of the plate, though it lands in the center third of the height of the zone with room to spare. Already, at this first sighting, we understand the challenge presented to Dick due to working on a television broadcast rather than radio, where pitch framing is sometimes less of an art and more the act of a used car salesman, free to invent whatever fiction will sell their desired narrative. Here, on TV, viewers can plainly see that this pitch is not on a corner. Dick, however, is unfazed, and reaches into his bag of tricks, declaring it on the corner not once, but TWICE - and not only stating its location, but insisting that it was BURIED there. This is the act of a seasoned professional, understanding that repetition and commitment are key to manipulating our perception, if not our very understanding of reality.
 
Actual Corner Value (ACV): 4/10
Broadcaster Corner Value (BCV): 10/10
Adjusted score: +6
 
Pitch #2: Bottom 3rd, 2 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118754724696641536
Pitcher: Aaron Sanchez
Throw: 96 mph fastball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "Strike on the outside corner."
 
Analysis: Someday, electronic strike zones will lord over our game as unfeeling adjudicators, but until that day, they serve merely as proxy armchair quarterbacks - a tool we rely on as viewers to feel validated in our desire to maim and/or injure the home plate umpire for their imperfections. On this pitch, Fox Trax smugly refuses to fill in the outline of the ball's arrival point, declaring that this pitch was a ball and all those who disagree are filthy heretics.
 
How comforting it is, then, for Dick to step in and remind all of us that in the end, the strike zone is defined solely by what the umpire says it is, no matter how many cameras and scanners say otherwise. This pitch is not outside. It is on the corner. The umpire's corner.
 
ACV: 7/10
BCV: 8/10
Adjusted score: +1
 
Pitch #3: Top 4th, 1 out, 1-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118755023842729984
Pitcher: Kyle Gibson
Throw: 94 mph fastball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "And now an outside corner fastball to even the count."
 
Analysis: Kyle Gibson started the 2017 season as someone fans understood to be roster filler, but ended it on an underappreciated upward trend. In 2018, he broke out with his best season to date and cemented his position at the front of the Twins rotation. Now, in 2019, he has started off somewhat shaky, with a suspect ERA and the need to make it deeper into ball games.
 
On this pitch, Dick has his pitcher's back, finding the corner where one does not exist. Catcher Mitch Garver positioned his glove exactly on the corner, and while Kyle missed his target high, he still found the edge and a called strike. For Dick, this is enough. He has earned approbation in the eyes of the telecast.
 
ACV: 5/10
BCV: 8/10
Adjusted score: +3
 
Pitch #4: Top 6th, 0 outs, 0-1
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118755338788851712
Pitcher: Kyle Gibson
Throw: 93 mph fastball
Result: Strike 2
 
Dick's Call: "On the outside corner with a fastball."
 
Analysis: Freddy Galvis must be listening to Dick through AirPods under that helmet, because his face says what we all know in our hearts: That was a meatball of a pitch, and Dick Bremer is a hero for carrying on the cause, however lost it may be.
 
ACV: 2/10
BCV: 7/10
Adjusted score: +5
 
Pitch #5: Top 6th, 2 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118755513288626176
Pitcher: Ryne Harper
Throw: 74 mph breaking ball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "Breaking ball on the outside corner, strike one."
 
Analysis: Is this pitch actually in the corner of the strike zone? Yes! The arc of the baseball tucks itself into the furthest nook available to it. In times like these, where no deception is necessary, you might expect that Dick Bremer would bluster and harangue us with unfettered righteousness, knowing that there can be no doubt as to where the ball landed. However, Dick finds a gentle touch in his commentary, content to let the pitch speak for itself, a simple declaration of its corner-ness being satisfactory. It needs no help, and will be allowed to lift its own weight.
 
ACV: 9/10
BCV: 9/10
Adjusted score: 0
 
Pitch #6: Bottom 6th, 0 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118755746894639104
Pitcher: Aaron Sanchez
Throw: 94 mph fastball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "Strike on the outside corner."
 
Analysis: A location extremely similar to pitch #2, though now delivered with an additional hint of defeat, as it arrives against the hot bat of Jorge Polanco. Immediately after listing his current bona fides, Polanco falls victim to the quantum state of the umpire's zone. While he was fooled, Dick was not, and he wearily sheds the burden he has carried throughout this pitch, allowing us all to taste from the tree of knowledge.
 
ACV: 9/10
BCV: 9/10
Adjusted score: 0
 
Pitch #7: Bottom 7th, 2 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118756058548170752
Pitcher: Thomas Pannone
Throw: 74 mph breaking ball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "Breaking ball over the inside corner."
 
Analysis: The work of a true master is present here, and we must parse the commentary carefully. The Twins are behind, but the tying run is at the plate. Now is the time for hope, and Kepler has watched a first pitch strike sail past him. Does the pitch find the corner? By exact definition, no. However, it is an excellent pitch - if one ignores that catcher Danny Jansen is set up on the exact opposite spot of the strike zone. Dick refuses to give Pannone the total satisfaction of finding the corner - stating that it is simply OVER the corner - while still testifying that it is a fine pitch. By Dick's standards, this is a backhanded compliment.
 
ACV: 8/10
BCV: 9/10
Adjusted score: +1
 
Pitch #8: Top 8th, 0 outs, 2-2
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118756254917120000
Pitcher: Tyler Duffey
Throw: 95 mph fastball
Result: Strike 3
 
Dick's Call: "On the outside corner. 95 on the outside edge or thereabouts, one away."
 
Analysis: NO! This is Duffey's first game back in the majors this season, and wanting to bolster his confidence, our protagonist has overextended himself, daring to go where others fear to tread, well outside the zone and at the exact vertical center. Corners have not existed in these parts since the days of Marty Foster's gift-wrapped delivery of Joe Nathan's 300th save. And yet, with zero hesitation, Dick plants his flag - immediately realizing that he has made a grave error. It will not be enough to double down on his argument, as was the case on Pitch #1. He knows when he has been beaten, and he retreats at the first opportunity.
 
It must also be noted that at the end of the clip, one can hear a chuckle from today's analyst, Jack "Back in My Day" Morris. This will be one of the few times during today's broadcast that I agree with him.
 
ACV: 1/10
BCV: 0/10
Adjusted score: -1
 
Pitch #9: Bottom 8th, 0 outs, 3-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1119309223332986880
Pitcher: Joe Biagini
Throw: 94 mph fastball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "On the outside corner."
 
Analysis: Matter of fact. All business. The pitch arrived enough within the margin of error that Bremer presents his truth with the cadence of a trusted newsman.
 
ACV: 7/10
BCV: 8/10
Adjusted Score: +1
 
Pitch #10: Bottom 9th, 0 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1119309442338541568
Pitcher: Ken Giles
Throw: 87 mph "fastball"
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "On the outside corner, strike 1."
 
Analysis: The drama is beginning to rise, as the Twins are down to their final 3 outs, behind by a single run, and sending Nelson Cruz to the plate as a pinch hitter. Once again, the ball is only in the corner's general aura, but Dick knows we are too excited to notice, and continues past it without pause.
 
ACV: 6/10
BCV: 8/10
Adjusted score: +2
 
Pitch 11: Bot 9th, 1 out, 3-1
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1119309817019944960
Pitcher: Ken Giles
Throw: 97 mph fastball
Result: Strike 2
 
Dick's Call: "Strike two on the outside corner... 97 in a REAL GOOD SPOT."
 
Analysis: Perfection. Mastery. Finally, near the climax of this game, we find what has eluded us: A true corner, spotted in the wild for all of us to enjoy, and Dick refuses to let it go to waste. His initial hushed tones give way to wonder and amazement, before his final accentuation that not only hammers home the exact precision of this corner, but makes us feel that we too knew it all along, even if we didn't happen to be looking at the TV at the time. Even if we didn't know what a strike zone was. All of us, collectively, knew what we had seen. We are enlightened and made whole. We are one with baseball, and one with each other.
 
ACV: 10/10
BCV: 12/10
Adjusted score: +2
Final Score: +20 Adjusted Corner Value
 
This concludes part one of this series. Stay tuned for part two, when we extend our gaze to the rest of the strike zone, and learn about the subtext necessary when one is not allowed to call a professional baseball player a 'belly itcher' and get away with it for long. In the meantime, for my research purposes, please share any high-BCV highlights for your team of choice in the comments.

Over the past decade, pitch framing has become a hot topic, not only in how we've begun to identify its value, but also in finding methods to quantify it, and coming to grips with its influence on the game. However, I contend that our focus has been far too narrow, and we must look beyond the catcher- in fact, past the backstop, into the stands, up to the media boxes, and directly at the role of play-by-play broadcaster. How the game's on-camera talent describe the action shapes our measurement of every pitch, even when most telecasts have live strike zone graphics present.
In this post, we'll be looking at the tendencies of long time Twins play-by-play broadcaster Dick Bremer, who has a very specific methodology: Since it sounds more impressive when a pitcher hits the corner of the strike zone, any and all parts of the strike zone and its immediate surroundings qualify as "The Corner", and will be described as such when the opportunity arises.
 
Our analysis will include video breakdowns of the 11 instances of the word 'corner' being used by Bremer during the Twins' April 17th game versus the Toronto Blue Jays. To quantify each pitch, we will use an Actual Corner Value (how close a pitch actually comes to a corner of the strike zone) as well as a Broadcaster Corner Value (how close the pitch comes to the corner, as perceived and presented by Dick Bremer).
 
Pitch #1: Bottom 2nd, 2 outs, 1-2
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118572113256833025
Pitcher: Aaron Sanchez
Throw: 96 mph fastball
Result: Strike 3
 
Dick's call: "On the outside corner, didn't waste it at all. Buried it on the outside corner."
 
Analysis: On a 1-2 pitch, Toronto pitcher Aaron Sanchez throws a 96 mph fastball at the outside edge of the plate, though it lands in the center third of the height of the zone with room to spare. Already, at this first sighting, we understand the challenge presented to Dick due to working on a television broadcast rather than radio, where pitch framing is sometimes less of an art and more the act of a used car salesman, free to invent whatever fiction will sell their desired narrative. Here, on TV, viewers can plainly see that this pitch is not on a corner. Dick, however, is unfazed, and reaches into his bag of tricks, declaring it on the corner not once, but TWICE - and not only stating its location, but insisting that it was BURIED there. This is the act of a seasoned professional, understanding that repetition and commitment are key to manipulating our perception, if not our very understanding of reality.
 
Actual Corner Value (ACV): 4/10
Broadcaster Corner Value (BCV): 10/10
Adjusted score: +6
 
Pitch #2: Bottom 3rd, 2 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118754724696641536
Pitcher: Aaron Sanchez
Throw: 96 mph fastball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "Strike on the outside corner."
 
Analysis: Someday, electronic strike zones will lord over our game as unfeeling adjudicators, but until that day, they serve merely as proxy armchair quarterbacks - a tool we rely on as viewers to feel validated in our desire to maim and/or injure the home plate umpire for their imperfections. On this pitch, Fox Trax smugly refuses to fill in the outline of the ball's arrival point, declaring that this pitch was a ball and all those who disagree are filthy heretics.
 
How comforting it is, then, for Dick to step in and remind all of us that in the end, the strike zone is defined solely by what the umpire says it is, no matter how many cameras and scanners say otherwise. This pitch is not outside. It is on the corner. The umpire's corner.
 
ACV: 7/10
BCV: 8/10
Adjusted score: +1
 
Pitch #3: Top 4th, 1 out, 1-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118755023842729984
Pitcher: Kyle Gibson
Throw: 94 mph fastball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "And now an outside corner fastball to even the count."
 
Analysis: Kyle Gibson started the 2017 season as someone fans understood to be roster filler, but ended it on an underappreciated upward trend. In 2018, he broke out with his best season to date and cemented his position at the front of the Twins rotation. Now, in 2019, he has started off somewhat shaky, with a suspect ERA and the need to make it deeper into ball games.
 
On this pitch, Dick has his pitcher's back, finding the corner where one does not exist. Catcher Mitch Garver positioned his glove exactly on the corner, and while Kyle missed his target high, he still found the edge and a called strike. For Dick, this is enough. He has earned approbation in the eyes of the telecast.
 
ACV: 5/10
BCV: 8/10
Adjusted score: +3
 
Pitch #4: Top 6th, 0 outs, 0-1
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118755338788851712
Pitcher: Kyle Gibson
Throw: 93 mph fastball
Result: Strike 2
 
Dick's Call: "On the outside corner with a fastball."
 
Analysis: Freddy Galvis must be listening to Dick through AirPods under that helmet, because his face says what we all know in our hearts: That was a meatball of a pitch, and Dick Bremer is a hero for carrying on the cause, however lost it may be.
 
ACV: 2/10
BCV: 7/10
Adjusted score: +5
 
Pitch #5: Top 6th, 2 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118755513288626176
Pitcher: Ryne Harper
Throw: 74 mph breaking ball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "Breaking ball on the outside corner, strike one."
 
Analysis: Is this pitch actually in the corner of the strike zone? Yes! The arc of the baseball tucks itself into the furthest nook available to it. In times like these, where no deception is necessary, you might expect that Dick Bremer would bluster and harangue us with unfettered righteousness, knowing that there can be no doubt as to where the ball landed. However, Dick finds a gentle touch in his commentary, content to let the pitch speak for itself, a simple declaration of its corner-ness being satisfactory. It needs no help, and will be allowed to lift its own weight.
 
ACV: 9/10
BCV: 9/10
Adjusted score: 0
 
Pitch #6: Bottom 6th, 0 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118755746894639104
Pitcher: Aaron Sanchez
Throw: 94 mph fastball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "Strike on the outside corner."
 
Analysis: A location extremely similar to pitch #2, though now delivered with an additional hint of defeat, as it arrives against the hot bat of Jorge Polanco. Immediately after listing his current bona fides, Polanco falls victim to the quantum state of the umpire's zone. While he was fooled, Dick was not, and he wearily sheds the burden he has carried throughout this pitch, allowing us all to taste from the tree of knowledge.
 
ACV: 9/10
BCV: 9/10
Adjusted score: 0
 
Pitch #7: Bottom 7th, 2 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118756058548170752
Pitcher: Thomas Pannone
Throw: 74 mph breaking ball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "Breaking ball over the inside corner."
 
Analysis: The work of a true master is present here, and we must parse the commentary carefully. The Twins are behind, but the tying run is at the plate. Now is the time for hope, and Kepler has watched a first pitch strike sail past him. Does the pitch find the corner? By exact definition, no. However, it is an excellent pitch - if one ignores that catcher Danny Jansen is set up on the exact opposite spot of the strike zone. Dick refuses to give Pannone the total satisfaction of finding the corner - stating that it is simply OVER the corner - while still testifying that it is a fine pitch. By Dick's standards, this is a backhanded compliment.
 
ACV: 8/10
BCV: 9/10
Adjusted score: +1
 
Pitch #8: Top 8th, 0 outs, 2-2
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1118756254917120000
Pitcher: Tyler Duffey
Throw: 95 mph fastball
Result: Strike 3
 
Dick's Call: "On the outside corner. 95 on the outside edge or thereabouts, one away."
 
Analysis: NO! This is Duffey's first game back in the majors this season, and wanting to bolster his confidence, our protagonist has overextended himself, daring to go where others fear to tread, well outside the zone and at the exact vertical center. Corners have not existed in these parts since the days of Marty Foster's gift-wrapped delivery of Joe Nathan's 300th save. And yet, with zero hesitation, Dick plants his flag - immediately realizing that he has made a grave error. It will not be enough to double down on his argument, as was the case on Pitch #1. He knows when he has been beaten, and he retreats at the first opportunity.
 
It must also be noted that at the end of the clip, one can hear a chuckle from today's analyst, Jack "Back in My Day" Morris. This will be one of the few times during today's broadcast that I agree with him.
 
ACV: 1/10
BCV: 0/10
Adjusted score: -1
 
Pitch #9: Bottom 8th, 0 outs, 3-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1119309223332986880
Pitcher: Joe Biagini
Throw: 94 mph fastball
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "On the outside corner."
 
Analysis: Matter of fact. All business. The pitch arrived enough within the margin of error that Bremer presents his truth with the cadence of a trusted newsman.
 
ACV: 7/10
BCV: 8/10
Adjusted Score: +1
 
Pitch #10: Bottom 9th, 0 outs, 0-0
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1119309442338541568
Pitcher: Ken Giles
Throw: 87 mph "fastball"
Result: Strike 1
 
Dick's Call: "On the outside corner, strike 1."
 
Analysis: The drama is beginning to rise, as the Twins are down to their final 3 outs, behind by a single run, and sending Nelson Cruz to the plate as a pinch hitter. Once again, the ball is only in the corner's general aura, but Dick knows we are too excited to notice, and continues past it without pause.
 
ACV: 6/10
BCV: 8/10
Adjusted score: +2
 
Pitch 11: Bot 9th, 1 out, 3-1
https://twitter.com/GoTwinkiesGo/status/1119309817019944960
Pitcher: Ken Giles
Throw: 97 mph fastball
Result: Strike 2
 
Dick's Call: "Strike two on the outside corner... 97 in a REAL GOOD SPOT."
 
Analysis: Perfection. Mastery. Finally, near the climax of this game, we find what has eluded us: A true corner, spotted in the wild for all of us to enjoy, and Dick refuses to let it go to waste. His initial hushed tones give way to wonder and amazement, before his final accentuation that not only hammers home the exact precision of this corner, but makes us feel that we too knew it all along, even if we didn't happen to be looking at the TV at the time. Even if we didn't know what a strike zone was. All of us, collectively, knew what we had seen. We are enlightened and made whole. We are one with baseball, and one with each other.
 
ACV: 10/10
BCV: 12/10
Adjusted score: +2
Final Score: +20 Adjusted Corner Value
 
This concludes part one of this series. Stay tuned for part two, when we extend our gaze to the rest of the strike zone, and learn about the subtext necessary when one is not allowed to call a professional baseball player a 'belly itcher' and get away with it for long. In the meantime, for my research purposes, please share any high-BCV highlights for your team of choice in the comments.