Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Would a Twins Trade for Tyler Glasnow Make Sense?


    Nash Walker

    It’s not often a playoff team trades away their ace the following offseason, but the Tampa Bay Rays could do so with Tyler Glasnow. 

    Image courtesy of Jonathan Dyer-USA TODAY Sports

    Baseball is a relatively simple game. Offseasons are usually just as simple, with contending teams adding to their rosters while clubs further away build for the future. The Rays are an exception to that rule. Fresh off an American League pennant in 2020, the Rays turned around and traded their frontline starter, Blake Snell, to the Padres. 

    Snell then had the worst season of his career, furthering the Rays’ impeccable timing on pitchers (but maybe not Joe Ryan). Constantly churning their roster and trading away pricey players for elite prospects, the Rays embody the notion that no player is “untouchable.”

    Enter Tyler Glasnow. The six-foot-8 monster from California is a must-watch when he takes the mound. Glasnow, 28, pairs a triple-digits fastball with a wipeout hook. Glasnow has struck out 36% of hitters since 2019, the third-highest rate behind Jacob deGrom and Gerrit Cole. 

    Glasnow’s name floated at the trade deadline, with Ken Rosenthal and Dennis Lin reporting potential possibilities. 

    Among 114 starters who’ve pitched at least 200 innings over the last three seasons, Glasnow ranks third in ERA (2.80), xFIP (2.78), and opponent’s average (.185), fourth in FIP (2.87), and sixth in SIERA (3.03). 

    For as dominant as he is on the mound, he’s not on it very often. Glasnow hasn’t thrown 100 innings in a season since 2018 when he threw 111 2/3. Injuries have riddled his career, and 2021 was no exception. 

    Glasnow was rocking a 2.66 ERA and 36% strikeout rate before he got hurt last June. His season ended with Tommy John surgery in August, and he’s likely to miss all of the 2022 season. A free agent after 2023, Glasnow is projected to make $5.8 million in his third year of arbitration (2022), with a raise to $8 or $9 million in year four (2023). 

    Trading for Glasnow would be an investment for 2023, when the Twins hope to be back in contention. Think of the first Michael Pineda contract, when he rehabbed in year one and contributed in year two. That deal went well, and there’s a “back pocket” aspect to a trade like this. 

    A trade makes sense if the Rays are looking to shed payroll and cash in on Glasnow before he inevitably reaches free agency. There’s no telling how many starts the Twins could expect from Glasnow in 2023, who will have thrown only 206 innings the past four seasons. 

    Like Byron Buxton, assessing Glasnow’s trade value is a tricky proposition. He’s an elite player with health a major question mark. MLB Trade Simulator says a Ryan Jeffers and Jhoan Duran package would satisfy both sides. If the Rays wanted quantity, Matt Canterino, Keoni Cavaco, Brent Rooker, Caleb Thielbar, and Matt Wallner match up well.

    As Rosenthal eloquently wrote, Glasnow coming off Tommy John surgery is probably a better bet than any prospect the Twins would trade for him. Additionally, the inside track to an extension is compelling and offers an attractive opportunity for more value. Whether a long-term investment in Glasnow is wise is another question. Again, when healthy, he's unquestionably an ace. The Twins haven't had one of those over a decade

    Glasnow’s price in a trade would likely be less than that of Frankie Montas, Luis Castillo, or even Chris Bassitt. It’s a high-upside move that could give the Twins a weapon in 2023 and potentially beyond. 

    What do you think? Should the Twins make a run at Tyler Glasnow? Comment below!

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Order the Offseason Handbook
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email 

     

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 minute ago, mikelink45 said:

    I am in the minority, but I think 2020 was a short season fluke -  However, you might be right, he will certainly be penciled in the rotation and perhaps Ober's ride will be at an end.  We all know it takes at least 8 pitchers to make a season so he is welcomed back, but he is not a 1 or 2 in the future. 

    I agree that 2020 was a good year for him, but he still is an above average #3 or #4 starter.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mikelink45 said:

    I am in the minority, but I think 2020 was a short season fluke -  However, you might be right, he will certainly be penciled in the rotation and perhaps Ober's ride will be at an end.  We all know it takes at least 8 pitchers to make a season so he is welcomed back, but he is not a 1 or 2 in the future. 

    He was quite solid in the summer months of this past year before he got injured.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    The Rays have done a great job for sure.  However, the twins most recent deal with them looks pretty good at the moment.  We got Joe Ryan and Drew Strotman for 2 months of Nelson Cruz.  His wRC+ of 96 was 12th on the Ray's team forthose 2 months. The Rays lost their division series 3-1.  IDK what Ryan and Strotman will contribute but I would bet 5 years from now we will see this trade as a great deal for the Twins.  

    I seem to remember a trade with them for a pitcher a few years back, too. Something like Jake Odorizzi for Jermaine Palacios. If I'm remembering correctly Mr. Palacios is back in the Twins system now. I think we could call that a win for the Twins ?‍♂️

    If it's not clear I'm being sarcastic about not remembering the details of the trade. The Rays are great at what they do, but they are certainly not "winning" 100% of their trades. They win enough and develop better than just about anyone, but, I agree, the current Twins FO has "won" their trades with the Rays.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Mark G said:

    Throughout the comment section I see two themes:  One, the thought that we should not trade prospects for a pitcher who is currently injured.  Two, we don't know if this pitcher will pitch much if he comes back from surgery, as he has not pitched many innings since 2018.  

    Both of these thoughts confuse me somewhat.  We are more than willing to trade major league players for prospects, year after year after year after year after........sorry, but we don't ever seem to be willing to part with said prospects for major league players.  Why?  Major league players have already proven themselves to some degree, prospects have not, or they would be major league players.  And why do we care about how many innings a pitcher might pitch for a team who loves 4 inning starts and 4 relievers afterward?  Seems he would fit right in with our philosophy, wouldn't he?  Save him for the stretch, and all that.  I guess it strikes me if we aren't willing to make a trade like this, assuming the cost is within reason for a pitcher out for '22, then we are taking the position that we will only use free agency to build on our farm, and assume that the farm will always produce and the free agents will always be worth their signing.  How has that worked out so far?  

    In my extremely humble opinion, go for it if the cost is right and take a chance on a true ace, which does not appear to be on the horizon as of right now (hope I am wrong on that).  What have we got to lose, except a couple of prospects which may or may not ever be major league players.  It is a gamble, but one worth taking at this point in time.  

    We traded a prospect for Odo and an MLB ready prospect for Maeda. And that's just the 2 most obvious answers. Wade for Anderson was a prospect for a major leaguer. They've also made minor in season trades of prospects for major leaguers. Luis Gil and Huascar Ynoa are brought up on this site weekly if not daily. So the idea that they're not willing to trade prospects for major league players is false. 

    And, yes, major league players have proven themselves. The major league player being discussed here has proven he can't pitch a full major league season. He's literally never done it. Now he's going to be coming off TJ surgery and you seem to be suggesting that the assumption should be that for the first time in his entire career 2023 will be the year he finally pitches an entire season. A "true ace" pitches more than 100 innings in a season. So your thoughts confuse me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The value of Glasnow is incorrect on the trade simulator. It is not recognizing that he is out for 2022. Cut that AFV in half, add a couple million more for salary, and you get a player with a median surplus value of roughly 7. Duran alone should be enough, more than enough for the cost-conscious Rays. 

    If the Twins can work out some sort of reasonable 4yr extension thru 2025, with a team option, that is guaranteed based on IP for 2024 and 2025, I'd pull the trigger. 

    Without the extension though, not a chance.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Rays would likely want players that do not need to be on the 40 person roster. A phone call asking about any of their players but especially Glasnow, Walls, and Kiermeier sure can't hurt. Conversations should be taking place, absolutely. Glasnow, as previously mentioned, is worth much less than shown on BTV due to salary and injury. Finally, the Rays do not like to sit on players making good money while they only have a year left before free agency. Call and listen.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    We traded a prospect for Odo and an MLB ready prospect for Maeda. And that's just the 2 most obvious answers. Wade for Anderson was a prospect for a major leaguer. They've also made minor in season trades of prospects for major leaguers. Luis Gil and Huascar Ynoa are brought up on this site weekly if not daily. So the idea that they're not willing to trade prospects for major league players is false. 

    And, yes, major league players have proven themselves. The major league player being discussed here has proven he can't pitch a full major league season. He's literally never done it. Now he's going to be coming off TJ surgery and you seem to be suggesting that the assumption should be that for the first time in his entire career 2023 will be the year he finally pitches an entire season. A "true ace" pitches more than 100 innings in a season. So your thoughts confuse me.

    Not sure why.  I never suggested that he would pitch more than 100 innings in his first season back; I specifically suggested he would fit in on a team that doesn't ask pitchers to pitch too many innings, preferring that the BP take a big part of the load, though a 28 year old might be able to if he makes a full recovery and doesn't try to come back too soon.  And while they have made an occasional trade over the years, I was lamenting that it is the exception for this FO, not the rule.  The trades for Odo and Maeda were nice, but far more often it is the other way, major leaguers for prospects (and I considered the trade for Maeda a major leaguer for major leagure, as Graterol was already on the major league roster).  And if the injury history is the main reason we would hesitate to make a deal like this then we never would have even considered the deal we just gave Buck, so that is a non starter for me.

    I just feel this would be a nice gamble to take, kind of like the MP deal a few years back, if it wouldn't cost too much in prospects we know we can part with.  Maybe it is just the way my mind works, but it isn't confusing to me at all.  Sorry if I am not explaining the thought process well. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Mark G said:

     And while they have made an occasional trade over the years, I was lamenting that it is the exception for this FO, not the rule.  The trades for Odo and Maeda were nice, but far more often it is the other way, major leaguers for prospects (and I considered the trade for Maeda a major leaguer for major leagure, as Graterol was already on the major league roster).  And if the injury history is the main reason we would hesitate to make a deal like this then we never would have even considered the deal we just gave Buck, so that is a non starter for me.

    I just feel this would be a nice gamble to take, kind of like the MP deal a few years back, if it wouldn't cost too much in prospects we know we can part with.  Maybe it is just the way my mind works, but it isn't confusing to me at all.  Sorry if I am not explaining the thought process well. 

    Apparently you are assuming that trading prospects for major leaguers is a better strategy for building a playoff team / contender than trading established players for prospects.  If you look back at how playoff teams acquired the players on their roster you will find players that were traded for as prospects by FAR exceed trades for established players.  It's not even remotely close, especially among below average revenue teams. 

    Don't believe me?  Pick a few playoff teams outside the top 10 in revenue.  Go to Fangraphs and select that team and select the given year.  Now look at how their top players by WAR were acquired.  Cleveland and Tampa will stand out.  They have acquired a lot of good players as prospects.

    You will have a very different point of view if you are willing to go through this exercise and let the facts speak for themselves.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Mark G said:

    Not sure why.  I never suggested that he would pitch more than 100 innings in his first season back; I specifically suggested he would fit in on a team that doesn't ask pitchers to pitch too many innings, preferring that the BP take a big part of the load, though a 28 year old might be able to if he makes a full recovery and doesn't try to come back too soon.  And while they have made an occasional trade over the years, I was lamenting that it is the exception for this FO, not the rule.  The trades for Odo and Maeda were nice, but far more often it is the other way, major leaguers for prospects (and I considered the trade for Maeda a major leaguer for major leagure, as Graterol was already on the major league roster).  And if the injury history is the main reason we would hesitate to make a deal like this then we never would have even considered the deal we just gave Buck, so that is a non starter for me.

    I just feel this would be a nice gamble to take, kind of like the MP deal a few years back, if it wouldn't cost too much in prospects we know we can part with.  Maybe it is just the way my mind works, but it isn't confusing to me at all.  Sorry if I am not explaining the thought process well. 

    Brusdar had pitched 9.2 innings for the Twins before he was traded. Our definitions of major leaguers vs prospects are very different. He threw 23.1 innings for the Dodgers his first year there. Your original argument was for wanting major leaguers because they'd established they were major leaguers. 9.2 innings is certainly not establishing that you're a major leaguer. You're moving the goal posts on me a little there.

    I don't know if you're being serious about their usage of the starting staff or not. If you're trading for Glasnow as a "true ace," as you described him, the Twins would absolutely be looking for significantly more than 100 innings for him. Berrios threw 121.2 innings for the Twins as their de facto "ace" last year and he was traded in July. Maeda threw 106.1 and he missed half the year with multiple injuries. Happ threw 98.1 and he missed starts before being traded in July. Ober threw 92.1 and he was on a strict pitch/innings limit in his 20 starts. Shoot, Griffin Jax threw 82 innings and only made 14 starts. Not expecting Glasnow to get to more than 100 innings is even more confusing to me. You're now suggesting the Twins trade for a "true ace" that will pitch barely more than a bad closer (Colome threw 65 innings last year). Him being 28 doesn't have anything to do with him being able to throw 170+ innings that you'd want from him. He didn't do it before he was 28 and not coming off TJ so I'm not sure why him being 28 would suddenly make him able to do it when he couldn't when he was younger and not coming off surgery.

    Buxton was a homegrown superstar. It took Buxton wanting to spend his entire career with 1 team to get that deal done. And took years of back and forth to get it figured out. They're very different situations. Not to mention this FO very clearly being far more weary of pitching injury struggles than position players. They also paid JD a ton with his injury concerns. They're more willing to take on position player injury risk than pitchers.

    I don't have any problem with people wanting to take a gamble on him. And if the price is right every player should be a target. I just don't get people suggesting he's going to come here and be the savior when he's never pitched an entire season and will then be coming of TJ with 1 season of playable control. If they're trading a bag of BP balls for him so it's just a financial thing, cool. But talk of Duran and other top 10 prospects being the cost blows my mind. Glasnow isn't the pitcher to be sending top 10 prospects out for. There's nothing at all to suggest he's the missing piece to get them over the postseason hump in 2023 because there's nothing at all to suggest he can pitch an entire season and lead a postseason staff.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I thought I read a blurb somewhere that the Rays were considering releasing Glasnow when faced with paying his arbitration salary in 2022 (for nothing) and then a bigger arbitration salary in 2023 on spec.  Total of nearly $9M for a limited number of innings in 2023 coming off TJS, with unknown results.  And that number could go up higher with the new CBA.  Heck, Glasnow might be a FA in 2023 under the new CBA, not arbitration eligible.

    I certainly would take a flyer for a nominal prospect, but nothing like the package listed by the OP.  No.  Way.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...