Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • With Snell and Darvish Gone, What’s Left on the Starting Pitching Market?


    Tom Froemming

    It was a fun day to be a San Diego Padres fan, but what about the rest of us!? The Padres’ front office took a big bite out of the starting pitching trade market the past 24 hours.

    Image courtesy of © Quinn Harris-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Sunday evening, the Padres agreed to a trade to acquire Blake Snell from Tampa Bay. Tonight, they are finalizing another deal to add Yu Darvish from the Cubs. Quite the 24 hours for A.J. Preller & Co.

    So what rotation pieces are left on the free agent and trade markets? I took a look in the video below.

    This free agent class was pretty soft in terms of starting pitching, but it was further weakened when Marcus Stroman and Kevin Gausman accepted their qualifying offers. Now that Lance Lynn, Snell and Darvish have all been dealt, the trade market has also been thinned out.

    Here's another look at the list included in the video:

    Screenshot 2020-12-28 at 9.13.13 PM.png

    Kenta Maeda ended up being a starter primed for a breakout, can the Twins’ front office identify and acquire a similar pitcher this offseason?

    SEE ALSO

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    The reserve clause anti-trust exception hurts baseball. There is nothing wrong with profit though. 

    The post asks what is left? Lots. Now is as good a time as any to sign a player or become active in the trade market.

    I really think the Twins want to see Kluber throw for fifteen minutes before they move forward on to other free agents. The trade market is fluid depending on what NL Central teams are thinking.  

    The one player that should be offered a contract by the Twins is Liam Hendriks. The other additions will all be frosting.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    does the capitalist in you believe in teh draft and salary controls and team control of players even if they aren't under contract?

    No, the capitalist in me says there should be no cap and players should be able to make as much as they can. The draft is merely a mechanism for MLB (and all pro sports) to apportion players evenly. Team control can be freely collectively bargained.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    A salary cap isn't the only solution. One can use various draft incentives, a salary floor, and more rigorous luxury taxes to increase overall competitiveness. Except none of those things will likely happen, as MLB long ago showed us how much it's willing to sacrifice the quality of the sport for short-term profits.

     

    Every year, it's becoming more apparent to me that baseball needs a complete overhaul to avoid being left behind by more exciting, flexible sports. Those changes include both on-field and top-level changes that drastically change how the sport operates.

    I absolutely agree. I was just noting the most obvious mechanism for parity. There is no chance the MLBPA agrees to it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    does the capitalist in you believe in teh draft and salary controls and team control of players even if they aren't under contract?

     

    So what is your solution? How do you apportion players? How do you prevent the current competitive advantage provided by the revenue gap between top revenue and bottom revenue teams from be exacerbated by reducing control via draft? 

     

    MLB does not have the parity of the NFL or NHL. The revenue disparity is a primary cause and creates a lot of the bitterness we see here. While some of you think this problem would be resolved by a disregard for profit, the disparity would not be diminished by a willingness to operate at break-even. It would actually be increased. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    So what is your solution? How do you apportion players? How do you prevent the current competitive advantage provided by the revenue gap between top revenue and bottom revenue teams from be exacerbated by reducing control via draft? 

     

    MLB does not have the parity of the NFL or NHL. The revenue disparity is a primary cause and creates a lot of the bitterness we see here. While some of you think this problem would be resolved by a disregard for profit, the disparity would not be diminished by a willingness to operate at break-even. It would actually be increased. 

     

    Good question....but that wasn't the point....the person said he wanted a free market, but most people don't want a free market for the draft, once again, screwing the players. So, do you want a free market or not? And if not always, why always pick the owner's side of free markets?

     

    I actually have a solution I will post this spring, it is a hybrid system, where the worst teams get more money to spend on players entering the system, ,but no one gets to draft a player and make them go to a system for 6-10 years of no freedom of choice.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have said this all along, this off season will be like no other before.  So many teams will be waiting to see if players will take pennies on the dollar, and they will also see if teams will take pennies on the dollar to cut payroll.  Players in trades seem to be getting much less than expected, in my opinion.  

     

    Snell surprised me the most, as Rays already get no fans so their payroll should be similar.  kind of a joke but kind of serious.  Teams willing to take huge losses may go all in and take on ton of payroll, but teams worried about the bottom line will still look to dump payroll or save where ever they can.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I have said this all along, this off season will be like no other before.  So many teams will be waiting to see if players will take pennies on the dollar, and they will also see if teams will take pennies on the dollar to cut payroll.  Players in trades seem to be getting much less than expected, in my opinion.  

     

    Snell surprised me the most, as Rays already get no fans so their payroll should be similar.  kind of a joke but kind of serious.  Teams willing to take huge losses may go all in and take on ton of payroll, but teams worried about the bottom line will still look to dump payroll or save where ever they can.  

     

    Without looking it up ... I would assume the Rays benefit more from revenue sharing than any other team. 48% of all local revenue is shared equally. Therefore, the revenue shortfall is going to hit them almost as much as the other teams.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Without looking it up ... I would assume the Rays benefit more from revenue sharing than any other team. 48% of all local revenue is shared equally. Therefore, the revenue shortfall is going to hit them almost as much as the other teams.

    Yes, that is very true.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...