Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Why I'm Not Buying The Twins-For Now


    Brandon Warne

    It’s early June, and the Minnesota Twins are not only keeping their proverbial heads above water, but in fact have the second-most wins and the best winning percentage in the entire American League. Yes this Twins team, who was picked by national types to be among the five or so worst teams in baseball, is leading the charge in one of the better divisions in baseball.

    Image courtesy of Credit: Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Baseball is truly a weird game.

    The Twins are 32-17 since a 1-6 start. They’re 31-16 against teams that aren’t from Detroit. They’re getting contributions from unlikely sources, winning games they have no business winning and having post-win dance parties which seem to have made baseball in Minnesota fun again. Fans seem to be noticing, as just over 100,000 people streamed through the gates for the Milwaukee Brewers series over the weekend.

    But I don’t think it’s sustainable.

    Even since I wrote the piece detailing how I’m not a Twins fan due to my work obligations, I’ve still seen scores of people imploring me to simply enjoy this current run. But I don’t really think a writer’s job changes too terribly much based on how good a team is. Sure, you might be more apt to see guys hang around for postgame comments, but with a team that has Torii Hunter, you immediately have that accountability anyhow. It isn’t my job to ride the wave; it’s my job to analyze streaks and tendencies to find out if I truly feel it can keep on going.

    And for a few reasons, I’m not sure it can.

    That isn’t to say this team hasn’t had great success. To be clear, being 10 games over .500 at any point in the season was never part of the plan. Think about all the projections that came up in the preseason. Most pegged the Twins at a 72-win team, again possibly prolonging the 90-loss streak into the first year of the Paul Molitor regime. Pretty much all of those projections have done an about face; Fangraphs’ latest projection has the Twins dead even at 81-81. That’s not only an 11-game improvement from last year, but just three games off the projected pace to win the division outright.

    As I mentioned before the season, I figured the AL Central on the whole would be a dogfight, separated by fewer than 10 games from top to bottom. The revised projections seem to flesh that out, with not only the winning team taking home 84 wins (a virtual tie between Kansas City and Cleveland at this second) and the last place team (Chicago) winning 76, but with the Tigers sneaking into third place with 83 wins and leaving the Twins in fourth. Still, that would make for an insane rest of the season if the first four spots have just three games separating them.

    But let’s talk about the rest of the division for a minute. To say Detroit is staggering is putting it nicely, as the Tigers are 13-17 over their last 30 games, 7-13 over the last 20 and 2-8 over the last 10. It’s gotten worse, not better for the aging Tigers as the season has worn on. But even so, if this Tigers team seems vulnerable, keep in mind they’re getting Victor Martinez and Justin Verlander back over a short span. That could provide a huge boost. For how well the Twins have been cruising, Kansas City is still nipping at their heels, just a game down coming into today’s action. As most expected their rotation has been suspect (4.55 ERA; 25th in MLB) and their bullpen has been unbelievable (1.75 ERA; No. 1 in MLB), and their offense is impossible to strike out. Cleveland has probably the best rotation in the AL, but it has been let down by poor luck and bad defense. Most projections still have them winning the division. And as for the White Sox coming off their free agent spending spree, well, they aren’t too far down to make a hard-charging run before all is finished.

    And maybe that’s the biggest detriment to the Twins, who have to continue playing at this pace to fend off all comers, which includes the heel-nipping Royals starting Monday night. In the Twins’ favor is their 20-9 record at home, and to be quite honest the 13-14 mark on the road is not terribly far off from what most playoff teams do — dominate at home and stay afloat on the road.

    But is it fair to say the Twins have gotten fat off playing subpar teams? Yeah, maybe a little. The Twins are 24-12 against teams presently under .500, and just 9-11 against teams currently over. That means as of today, the Twins have played 36 games against teams with more losses than wins. No other team in the division has played more than 28, as you’ll see here:

    Record against teams under .500 (AL Central):

    Twins – 24-12

    Royals – 16-7

    Tigers – 13-15

    Indians – 14-9

    White Sox – 13-11

    Interestingly, the team (Detroit) who has played the second-most games against lower-level teams is under .500 against them. And while it’s true that you have to take advantage of those opportunities when they’re presented, it does call into question the sustainability of this run over the long term.

    Another thing that could potentially become a problem is lineup depth. Consider this top four on any given day:

    .267/.341/.530

    .281/.335/.452

    .269/.329/.370

    .250/.321/.434

    That’s not exactly a star-studded top four in a lineup, but it’s more than enough to get the job done in today’s game. That’s Brian Dozier up top, Hunter, Joe Mauer and finally a still pretty decent line from a currently slumping Trevor Plouffe.

    Now, have a look at a handful of candidates that could fill out the bottom five of the lineup on any given day:

    .245/.318/.325

    .218/.235/.291

    .230/.252/.355

    .247/.291/.296

    .288/.301/.400

    Those are the slash lines for Kurt Suzuki, Danny Santana, Eduardo Escobar, Aaron Hicks and Eddie Rosario. You could also lump in Eduardo Nunez (.300/.340/.460 in just 53 PA), but either way this is not a group that inspires confidence. Sending out Santana for a resurgent Kennys Vargas (.308/.403/.519 in 16 Triple-A games) after Sunday’s game represents progress, but this is a bottom half that simply isn’t going to be competitive over the long haul. The other thing that stands out is that aside from a few more extra-base hits — three home runs, specifically — Escobar is having roughly the same season Santana is. In that sense, keep an eye on Jorge Polanco, who is hitting .315/.346/.440 down at Double-A Chattanooga.

    And while it would be foolish to suggest the pitching staff hasn’t made big strides this year, it’s still a rotation that doesn’t strike anyone out, and is backed by a largely piecemeal bullpen.

    The simplest way to explain it is that while the results have been better, the process has not. So while the team’s 3.84 ERA coming into Monday — still just eighth in the AL — is markedly better than last year’s 4.57 mark, the peripherals don’t really show a huge leap. Last year’s team struck out 6.5 batters per nine innings. This year’s iteration is at just 5.9. The league average last year was 7.7 K/9, and is 7.6 this year. So even as the league has taken a slight step back, the Twins took it a step further. Last year’s team had a 3.97 FIP (fielding independent pitching, a barometer of what the team’s ERA ought to normalize to over time); this year’s bunch has a 4.10.

    As we’ve seen with Mike Pelfrey and Kyle Gibson, strikeouts aren’t necessarily a must to be a successful starter. That isn’t to say that they can both sustain sub-3.00 ERA marks without strikeout jumps, but pitching isn’t a one-size-fits-all proposition either. With that said, the Twins’ staff isn’t really groundball heavy like Gibson and Pelfrey each are, ranking eighth in the AL with a roughly league-average 44.2 percent groundball rate. Considering Pelfrey (55.2 percent) and Gibson (53.2 percent) are both well above that mark, that means there are a fair share of other guys who come up way under that mark, and will need a little added help to keep their ERAs down.

    The theory behind that is if a guy isn’t striking too many hitters out, grounders are the next best step for run prevention because there are so few extra-base hits that come via the groundball. Basically speaking, a hitter has to roll one over the first- or third-base bag for an extra-base hit. Statistically in 2015, just 1.9 percent of grounders resulted in extra-base hits across both leagues. For fly balls, that spikes to 11.5 percent and for line drives a staggering 24.4 percent.

    The nice thing for the Twins moving forward is that they can address their fly ball tendencies one way, and it’s one the fans will be largely happy about: promoting Byron Buxton. There’s some buzz around town that the move could come sooner rather than later, and an outfield of Rosario-Buxton-Hicks would spell death to fly balls in a way that Twins fans haven’t seen since the days of the Soul Patrol. This bunch could be even better, and that would allow Molitor to keep Hunter fresh with more days DH’ing, with Rosario rotating in and out depending on how Vargas does with this go-round. Again, it would be nice for Molitor to have too many guys going well with the stick rather than needing to simply fill out the bottom of the order with guys who aren’t carrying their weight.

    That the Twins have managed to continue winning despite that might suggest a certain moxie, but most likely it’s been getting key hits at key times, something that doesn’t necessarily play itself out on a regular basis over the course of a 162-game season. The important thing to remember is that even if the Twins can’t keep it up over the long haul, nobody can take away the early-season wins, and any step forward represents a good look into the future. Even if this team finishes 81-81 as the projections suggest, that’s A. still in the thick of it in September and B. a huge improvement over last year.

    This post originated at Cold Omaha here; please consider clicking through to support the content.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I think a quite a few people before your article posted similar. It should be obvious that I do not make my living from sports. I can enjoy it for what it is, no appears was, a heck of a nice run. A team without a steady big bopper and a couple of little ones are doomed to have streaks. I would think all the stat heads know that. If a downturn continues, the kids in Chatanooga could be up sooner (glass half full) I really hope that the Twins do well,. This week, like the start of the season, is making it mighty tempting to finish off that glass.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For some strange reason I pulled up the Twins roster on Fangraphs. If in your top 10 for ofensive WAR  includes a minor league utility player and 2 pitchers, that is not good no matter how flawed the statistic is for being at the 1/3 point of a season

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The pitching COULD remain solid. We have Ervin Santana coming in. And even Gibson, when shelled, can pitch deep into games.

     

    It's a horriblel ine-up to construct. Somedays it is working well. The Royals series showed every mistake possible. You can't predict who might hit a homer, go forextra bases, move runners. You just hope the other team makes more mistakes and you can outpitch them in the end. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here is the thing:

     

    - if you win more than lose against teams under .500 and

    - if you win more than lose at home

     

    (which are 2 things that the Twins are doing)

     

    you will compete.   It is pretty simple.   I think that the Twins could continue doing this, but they have to beat good teams at home, and getting swept by the Royals after losing to Milwaukee...   Will be interesting to see how they will react the rest of the month.  If they are at .500 for June from now on, they will compete.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They're definitely not gonna win 20 games every month. Still don't see them as contenders but they have some pcs falling into place as well as some potentially valuable trade chips. At least they're more fun to watch. Props to the new manager and his staff

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It doesn't take Casey Stengel to realize their lineup has holes.  They are going to go into scoring droughts as well as hot streaks because of this fact.

     

    A reason to be optimistic is that starting pitching is a huge part of the equation and the Twins are doing pretty well in this area and should get better when Santana comes back.  The first two games against the Royals were good examples - their hitting was cold but were still in both games due to good pitching.

     

    I also think the pen can get fixed up, at least a little bit with parts they already have.  I would start with whatever starter not named Milone loses out in the rotation goes right to the pen.

     

    Bottom line: I predicted .500 at the beginning of the year and that's what I still expect.  Big jump over the last few years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I wasn't counting on them winning this year, none of us were.  It is/was a pleasant surprise, but I don't want to see the development of the young guys stunted because the team desperately wants to chase a winning record. 

     

    Winning in the comming years may be expected IF the young guys develop, but they won't develop if they are getting yanked up and down, or even simply kept down past the point where they should be at the MLB level.  I'm not saying all or any of these guys are past that point, just that the club really has to be carefull.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good article, thanks for posting!

     

    Think about all the projections that came up in the preseason. Most pegged the Twins at a 72-win team, again possibly prolonging the 90-loss streak into the first year of the Paul Molitor regime. Pretty much all of those projections have done an about face; Fangraphs’ latest projection has the Twins dead even at 81-81. That’s not only an 11-game improvement from last year, but just three games off the projected pace to win the division outright.

    As I mentioned before the season, I figured the AL Central on the whole would be a dogfight, separated by fewer than 10 games from top to bottom. The revised projections seem to flesh that out, with not only the winning team taking home 84 wins (a virtual tie between Kansas City and Cleveland at this second) and the last place team (Chicago) winning 76, but with the Tigers sneaking into third place with 83 wins and leaving the Twins in fourth. Still, that would make for an insane rest of the season if the first four spots have just three games separating them.

     

    The projections haven't done an about-face on the Twins.  Fangraphs projected them preseason at a .457 winning percentage, and they project them at .453 from here out.  The only difference now is the good luck of the first two months has to be added in.  (What would prompt a real about-face would be a change in personnel, or some players reaching a new projectable performance level, neither of which really applies (yet) to the Twins since opening day, sadly.)

     

    As for the projections indicating a dogfight, the entire AL is looking like that.  All three divisions have only a projected end of season 7-8 win spread, and the whole league only has a projected 11 win spread (down to 9 if you lop off the Yankees).

     

    The two worst projected teams (Twins and Rangers) have gotten off to good starts, a few more under-.500 projected teams (Astros and Rays) have also done well, and all five of the original projected playoff teams are currently under .500 (Red Sox, Indians, Mariners, Angels, and Tigers).  Regress all those to the mean, and assume neutral luck going forward, and indeed everyone is bunched up!

     

    It will be interesting to see how it plays out -- will some of these good "bad" teams keep it up?  Will some of the bad "good" teams indeed turn it around?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...