Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Wheeler’s Gone, But Bumgarner Would Give the Twins Plenty to Work With


    Patrick Wozniak

    With Zack Wheeler signing with the Philadelphia Phillies for $118 million over five years, Minnesota’s interest turns to Madison Bumgarner. Like Wheeler, Bumgarner is now rumored to sign before winter meetings and the Twins are supposedly making a strong push to sign the left-hander.

    Image courtesy of © Cody Glenn - USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    After just watching Wheeler’s market heat up and go beyond what anyone predicted, it seems likely that Bumgarner could end up with a bigger contract than expected, though likely still less than Wheeler. Cole Hamels also signing a one-year deal with the Atlanta Braves could help the Twins, as Atlanta seemed to be the favorites to sign Bumgarner, but are now less likely to do so.

    Personally, I was in the sign-Wheeler camp, but a recent article by The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal has warmed me a bit more on Bumgarner. His number’s pitching outside of San Francisco definitely give me pause, but Rosenthal pointed to some encouraging stats in the 2019 version of Bumgarner.

    Bumgarner’s strikeout rate (24.1%) was his highest since 2016 while his walk rate (5.1%) was the lowest since 2015. That’s great, but also encouraging is the fact that his fastball velocity was also the highest it’s been since 2015. Of course, Wes Johnson is known for getting a little extra oomph out of the fastball, so Bumgarner may even be able to add a bit more to the 91.72 mph he averaged in 2019.

    However, the most interesting tidbit of the article has to do with the increase in spin rate that Bumgarner’s fastball saw last season. He had the greatest overall increase of all MLB pitchers, going from 2081 to 2405 for a difference of 324 from 2018 to 2019. The next four pitchers on the list, Lucas Giolito, Gerrit Cole, Mike Minor, and Matthew Boyd make for pretty good company. Minnesota’s embrace of analytics and technology may help to further enhance Bumgarner’s pitches.

    Of course, Bumgarner is a legend for what he has done in the postseason and his track record in that regard would certainly be attractive to a team like Minnesota, who hope to be contending for the length of Bumgarner’s contract. In addition to his postseason success, Bumgarner also pitched better against “good” teams in 2019 with a 3.68 ERA against the top-18 offenses according to Rosenthal, which would also be welcome.

    Now that Wheeler signed, Bumgarner and Hyun-Jin Ryu are all that is left of the second-tier of top free agent starters. With Gerrit Cole and Stephen Strasburg seemingly out of the picture (not that they were ever in it), Bumgarner may be the Twins last chance, as Ryu seems unlikely to land in Minnesota. There are more than four teams in need of a front-end starter, so some teams are bound to be left out. If the Twins strikeout on Bumgarner, a trade may be the last hope in significantly improving the rotation.

    Please share your thoughts in the comments below. Not registered? Click here to create an account. To stay up to date, follow Twins Daily on Twitter and Facebook.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY

    Twins Announce Plans to Extend Netting at Target Field

    Just How Good is Blake Treinen, and Should the Twins Sign Him?

    Twins High Impact Pitching Options Dwindling as Wheeler and Hamels Reach Agreements

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    If it takes 5/$100 to get MadBaum, offer him $24 million to start and decline $2 million/year. We have the flexibility now and it will be less painful to pay him $16 million for the 2024 season when he's 35.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I've asked this in other posts but have not got a great answer.    Wheeler was the 3rd or 4th best pitcher on a third place team.     Twins had 3 guys that performed just as well last year.

    If you haven't gotten a great answer, it's probably because you're not really asking a question but stating an opinion.

     

    By some measures, Wheeler was the second best pitcher on the Mets last year, behind only the Cy Young winner deGrom. At worst, he's roughly in line with Syndergaard and Stroman, who are two pretty useful pitchers too.

     

    The Mets were a third place team, but had 86 wins in arguably the most competitive division in baseball last year (wild card team, four .500+ teams). If you account for the fact that 5 of the 6 worst teams in baseball were in the AL last year, an 86 win NL team might have been the equivalent of a 90 win AL team.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I haven't read a single "but what about the draft pick" post this year.

    What about the draft pick. My God with that draft pick and the genius of the front office they could be drafting the next Walter Johnson.  link provided for proper reference of his greatness

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If you haven't gotten a great answer, it's probably because you're not really asking a question but stating an opinion.

     

    By some measures, Wheeler was the second best pitcher on the Mets last year, behind only the Cy Young winner deGrom. At worst, he's roughly in line with Syndergaard and Stroman, who are two pretty useful pitchers too.

     

    The Mets were a third place team, but had 86 wins in arguably the most competitive division in baseball last year (wild card team, four .500+ teams). If you account for the fact that 5 of the 6 worst teams in baseball were in the AL last year, an 86 win NL team might have been the equivalent of a 90 win AL team.

    Well ok.   You are right in all you say, or rather the opinion you state has validity.    I never said he wasn't useful.   He would be an asset but still not sure I would put him above Berrios, Odorizzi or Pineda and the narrative on these  seem to suggest he is above at least two of them.    If its at worst an opinion that still has a question attached that hasn't been answered.  The only plus he has over those guys is innings.   Its not nothing but not worth all the love either.  That is my opinion welcoming a rebuttal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    With Gerrit Cole and Stephen Strasburg seemingly out of the picture (not that they were ever in it), Bumgarner may be the Twins last chance, as Ryu seems unlikely to land in Minnesota.

     

    Why is Ryu unlikely to land in Minnesota?

     

    Not asking because I have a strong conviction otherwise, but curious what your thinking is.

     

    There has long been a perception that most Asian-born players prefer to play on the coasts, particularly the west coast, if they have a choice about where to play. Presumably this perception started from real examples of players feeling this way, but it seems like it gets repeated in many different cases and I wonder how true it really is across the board.

     

    On the other hand, the Dodgers seem to prioritize retaining their own free agents and to make it happen when they want to, so if they like the match with Ryu then yes, I'd guess that any other team is at a disadvantage.

    I just haven't heard anything linking him to Minnesota and feel like he will probably end up back in LA. But I'd be happy to be wrong!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Well ok.   You are right in all you say, or rather the opinion you state has validity.    I never said he wasn't useful.   He would be an asset but still not sure I would put him above Berrios, Odorizzi or Pineda and the narrative on these  seem to suggest he is above at least two of them.    If its at worst an opinion that still has a question attached that hasn't been answered.  The only plus he has over those guys is innings.   Its not nothing but not worth all the love either.  That is my opinion welcoming a rebuttal.

    I don't know if it's as much being better than those guys, as simply being another one of those guys. (Although I'll remind that Pineda is not yet under contract, will miss at least a month in 2020, and Wheeler has 3 seasons with more IP than Pineda's career high too...)

     

    We need another couple guys like that, and every FA that signs somewhere else makes it a little less likely that we'll get the guys we need. (And Wheeler looked like one of the better FA options with upside, although obviously it came at a cost too.)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Do you work for the Twins?

     

    Otherwise I don't see how you could possibly know both what they offered to Wheeler or have on the table right now. Not to mention their motivation.

     

    Anything reported about contract negotiations is based on hearsay or rumors. Unless the reporter literally saw the offer, it should be taken with a grain of salt.

    Uhh...if you go to mlbtraderumors.com there's a pretty lengthy piece about what the Twins offered to Wheeler.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’ll argue it’s mostly a failure to develop pitching prospects into MLB starters. Blowing draft picks on Jay and Stewart and failing to develop guys like Gonsalves and Romero are the key reasons why our rotation is barren. You obviously can’t expect them to all pan out, but the success rate is pretty low for the past few years.

    Romero is the one i'm most dissapointed about. He has/had the raw stuff.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Uhh...if you go to mlbtraderumors.com there's a pretty lengthy piece about what the Twins offered to Wheeler.

    Which was published 2 hours after I said this.

     

    (Maybe the STrib article was before that though.) 

     

    Edit: Okay, I can't read the difference between AM/PM.

     

    Anyway, that still doesn't really change my original point, even if 1/3 of my original comment was reported somewhere.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I’ll argue it’s mostly a failure to develop pitching prospects into MLB starters. Blowing draft picks on Jay and Stewart and failing to develop guys like Gonsalves and Romero are the key reasons why our rotation is barren. You obviously can’t expect them to all pan out, but the success rate is pretty low for the past few years.

    This is EXACTLY why you simply must leave the #5 spot (and 4 some years) open for one of the youngsters to get their opportunity to enter the rotation.  This approach of continuing to load up on re-treads and reclamation projects for the #5 (keeping the young pitchers in the minors until they break down, are moved to relief, or are finally washed out) just makes NO sense.  If not this year, then when?  If we had done so two years ago with Romero as a FY starter, with one of Thorpe/Dobnak/Smeltzer most of last year versus Perez, and Graterol/Dobnak next year vs. TBN reclamation project, and Balazovic/Duran in 2021, we may/will have a solid answer on our internal prospects (which is what we did with Berrios).  Otherwise, you have to continue to shop for free-agents or trades each year to re-build the staff when deals are up for the starters.  I get that we are now a viable playoff team, but I don't think you are ever very successful in addressing the #5 with the re-tread/reclamation merry-go-round.  History proves this. 

     

    Thus, I say add one more veteran by FA or Trade.  Then, leave the #5 open and make the young pitchers work to win it.  You clearly have the numbers to find one viable option.  Do the same the following year when Odo is at risk of coming off the books, and Pineda the following year.  You need to build MOST of your staff in-house if you are not the Yankees or Boston - he77, even the Dodgers are a big money team and they build most of their pitching assets from within.  Atlanta and St. Louis have also historically built most of their staffs from within and should be our model with a similar market and payroll most years (particularly now with our seemingly better pitching assessment and coaching acumen - and with the death of the pitch-to-contact failed philosophy of the Garden Gnome and his sidekick, Rick 'beachball's welcome' Anderson).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    BTW:  Were we to add MadBum, my gut says that we will be fortunate to get 'Good Kyle Gibson' numbers in the regular season.  I say this due to the AL effect, his away numbers from SF (pitchers park), his lessened velocity and penchant for giving up the long-ball with some short RF porches in the AL, etc.  That said, I expect more 'Good MadBum' numbers in the playoffs, than 'Bad Kyle Gibson' numbers in the playoffs or 'Bad MadBum' numbers.  I say this because MadBum is a big-game pitcher, and he has proven it enough to validate this for me (much more than any other current Twins pitcher, Wheeler, or any other pitcher we could reasonably consider at this point).  That alone, makes the risk good enough for me at present in bringing him aboard.  The only flyer I would take in 2020 would be Gaussman - for the 5 weeks that Pineda is out as our #4, not for the #5.  Within that time period (and Spring Training), we should have a good idea if he can be fixed, and I expect that there might be some bumps in the road with Pineda's conditioning/stamina or other injuries that might be worth checking out Gaussman during that time (move him to RP if it isn't working out - he may be a find there where his above average stuff might play up further).  In contrast to my post above, I add this option ONLY because we are in the unique situation with Pineda's early season suspension, which affords us this luxury, while cycling through the youngsters for the #5.  Gaussman also shouldn't cost too much...though maybe 2-3 years will be necessary.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the Twins are going to be legitimate contenders it will be because Berrios and Odorizzi step forward. That is where the ace and number 2 come from. I have as much confidence in them taking the next step as I do in Wheeler becoming dominant for a full season.

     

    I would be happy with Bumgarner or Keuchel, or maybe even Ryu, as a veteran lefty in the rotation. That role is not one that requires a 4 or 5 year commitment that will cause problems with keeping the core together in a few years. If Madbum is open to a 2 or 3 yr deal, heavily front loaded, then I say go for it. If not, wish him well and move on.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If the Twins are going to be legitimate contenders it will be because Berrios and Odorizzi step forward. That is where the ace and number 2 come from. I have as much confidence in them taking the next step as I do in Wheeler becoming dominant for a full season.

    I would be happy with Bumgarner or Keuchel, or maybe even Ryu, as a veteran lefty in the rotation. That role is not one that requires a 4 or 5 year commitment that will cause problems with keeping the core together in a few years. If Madbum is open to a 2 or 3 yr deal, heavily front loaded, then I say go for it. If not, wish him well and move on.

    I agree with the premise of the first part of your post. I think the rotation improving has alot to do with Berrios improving and turning into one of the best 7-8 pitchers in baseball. Odorizzi though? I think him performing the way he did last year would be about as good as we can expect. 

     

    Signing a guy like Madbum or Ryu IMO, is more about quality throughout the rotation, than it is about signing one of them to be your ACE. A #2 guy is about all we can expect out of either of them. Berrios, unless we sign Cole or Strasburg, will still be this team's #1 guy. 

     

    As far as getting any pitcher to sign for 2-3 years that doesn't profile as a 4th-5th starter. It's not gonna happen. You want one of these guys I think 4 years will be the absolute minimum it will take to get them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If the Twins are going to be legitimate contenders it will be because Berrios and Odorizzi step forward. That is where the ace and number 2 come from. I have as much confidence in them taking the next step as I do in Wheeler becoming dominant for a full season.

    I would be happy with Bumgarner or Keuchel, or maybe even Ryu, as a veteran lefty in the rotation. That role is not one that requires a 4 or 5 year commitment that will cause problems with keeping the core together in a few years. If Madbum is open to a 2 or 3 yr deal, heavily front loaded, then I say go for it. If not, wish him well and move on.

     

    How will signing a guy past 2 years hinder keeping the core?

     

    Odo will  be gone, Cruz will be gone. Rosario will likely be gone, if not in 21, then in 22. 

     

    Of the core, only Buxton, Sano, and Berrios will need signing in the next two-three years (you aren't extending a catcher that can't be a free agent until he's 31 any time soon). 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There's just too many red flags with MadBum. Looks like he hit his peak in 2016 and has been declining ever since. If he was worth 20 million per year the Giants would sign him (Any one hear remember Sam Dyson from a couple months ago?).

    No reason for the Twin's to pay for past performance. Hard pass.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not Graussman - never been consistently good for more one or two months, and in fact has been consistently bad; unless a miracle happens, guys like that will drag the team down.  No one wants to sit and stew every fifth day until June when he gets an outright release.  Not a sound investment, even at a bargain price.

     

    And pass on Keuchel - overpriced, basically league-average innings eater.  We should have some young talent that can at least match that.

     

    I find it hard to fathom MadBum' commanding 4 or 5 years.  If it was like 17/yr for 3 years for the Twins, it might work out, but he appears to getting better offers than that, both in terms of money and length.  Twins don't have resources IMO to be bogged down that long if a signing like this goes bust.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In September Madbum gave up 19 earned runs in 31 IP. Just think how many months he will have an ERA over 5 in the AL.

     

    There goes your payroll. Oh you will gush if he gets off to a good start, but, he is not 24 anymore.

     

    $120 million for 5 years? I've seen reports that our GM is interested in him in St. Louis. Still paying for his signing mid-level relievers for several years and Mike Leake.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...