Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • What If The Twins Stand Pat?


    Seth Stohs

    Right before midnight last night, the news came that the Blue Jays had acquired shortstop Troy Tulowitzki and LaTroy Hawkins from the Colorado Rockies in exchange for Jose Reyes and three good prospects. The expected response from many Twins fans came. We are now four days from the trade deadline, plenty of time to bolster the ball club. But what if the Twins decide not to make a deal by the deadline?

    Image courtesy of Denny Medley, USA Today

    Twins Video

    I remember one July night in 2004. I had finished playing a couple of slow-pitch softball games and was at a local establishment with some of the guys when I saw that the White Sox had acquired All Star outfielder Carl Everett. I went home and wrote a scathing blog post about how the White Sox had made a move and would likely run away with the division.

    I was about a year into blogging. The Twins won the division by nine games that year.

    Since then, I’ve matured and realized that no matter what deals are made, the game is still played between the lines and on the field. The best example may have been the 2014 Oakland A’s. They had one of the best records in baseball last year at this time. Billy Beane made the decision to “go for it” and gave up a lot to acquire starting pitchers Jon Lester and Jeff Samardzija. The team tanked and then lost the wild card game to the Kansas City Royals.

    There is just one absolute in baseball, in my opinion, and that is that there are no absolutes. It’s a great game because you just never know what’s going to happen.

    That said, making sound moves in July can certainly help. Improving the level of talent on your team is never a bad thing and can improve the odds of winning. It’s just not a guarantee that there will be actual winning.

    With all that said, what would happen if the Twins and GM Terry Ryan decide to stand pat at the July 31 trade deadline? The honest answer from all of us should be “Who knows?”

    The Twins currently have a three game lead over the Toronto Blue Jays in the race for the second wild card. Adding Tulowitzki to baseball’s best offense certainly is big. That said, the Blue Jays still need pitching and are linked to some quality starters.

    The Twins have three perceived needs; shortstop, catcher and relief pitching. Let’s look at each of those areas and see what would need to happen with each for the Twins to win.

    CATCHER

    As I wrote a couple of weeks ago, Kurt Suzuki has been pretty bad to this point in 2015. He had a terrific first four months last year and earned his first All-Star experience, but since that game, he has returned to the player that he has been the last three or four years, which isn’t very good. The Twins don’t need him to post a .700 OPS the rest of the way to succeed, but an OPS in the mid-.600s would be good. They also need him to lead the way behind the plate. He has the confidence of his pitchers and that is important. He’s been better of late, hitting .297 over his past 11 games.

    SHORTSTOP

    Paul Molitor’s ability to continue putting Danny Santana into the lineup at shortstop is equal parts impressive and frustrating. We all see the talent and athleticism that Santana possesses, and we saw how that could look on the field in 2014. It’s just been a bad year for Santana. He’s been arguably the worst full-time player in baseball this year.

    If Molitor continues to write Santana’s name into the lineup, Santana doesn’t need to hit .319 like he did last year. He needs to take good at-bats, maybe mix in an occasional walk and drive the ball the way he did in 2014. As important, or maybe more important, he needs to be consistent in the field.

    Eduardo Nunez has been getting quite a bit of playing time at shortstop. Though he doesn’t have much range, he has been solid, making most of the plays he gets to. Eduardo Escobar was terrific at shortstop a year ago, offensively and defensively. By going from Santana to Escobar, they would be going from really bad (to this point) to a league average shortstop, which would be a huge improvement.

    In my mind, trading for a shortstop is not a high priority because I think they have an internal option that can be just fine.

    RELIEF PITCHING

    The Twins bullpen, outside of their closer, has been a mess the last couple of months. Blaine Boyer and Aaron Thompson were terrific the first two months but reality has set in for them. Brian Duensing was pretty bad for three months, but he has returned to form in the last month. Thompson was replaced by Ryan O’Rourke, who has been good in his three weeks in the big leagues. Casey Fien has not been the pitcher that he was the last two seasons with the Twins. He has missed time already this season with injury.

    Adding a veteran reliever sounds great. I was a big proponent of the Twins getting LaTroy Hawkins because 1.) he’s been really good since coming off the DL, and 2.) it would not have cost a lot in terms of prospects to get him.

    There are quite a few similar relievers available, so I don’t think that the Twins need to go after an Aroldis Chapman or Craig Kimbrel to improve the bullpen. They don’t need to give up top prospects to improve the bullpen. In fact, there will be several quality relievers available in August as well.

    The other thing to remember is that the relievers that the Twins would be receiving at the end of July would likely get between 25 to 30 innings pitched the rest of the season. The nature of relief pitching says that is a pretty small sample size to be able to know how a guy will perform.

    The Twins have guys in Rochester that are capable of coming up and doing well for 25 innings the rest of the way. First, Trevor May was brought in to a one-run game in the eighth inning and came through. He could start seeing more situations like that. Michael Tonkin and AJ Achter continue to pitch well in Rochester. Also, Red Wings starters Tyler Duffey and Taylor Rogers could come up and perform down the stretch.

    If the Twins choose not to go get a reliever, it isn’t the end of the world. However, it will mean that guys in the organization will have to piece it together and come up big down the stretch.

    SUMMARY

    I expect that the Twins will be active in the next four days. Based on little, I expect the Twins will make two moves over the next four days. I don’t expect them to be big names, and I expect (and hope) that the Twins don’t part with any of their top prospects.

    The Twins and Terry Ryan have spent the last three years building up one of baseball’s best farm systems. There is a clear long-term plan in place, and my hope is that this trade deadline would not be a big step back to that plan. In reality, the Twins have used some of their youth to put themselves in this position. They have received contributions from Trevor May, Eddie Rosario and Miguel Sano. They will also need veterans like Trevor Plouffe, Brian Dozier and Joe Mauer to lead the offense while Glen Perkins, Phil Hughes and Ervin Santana lead the pitching staff.

    That said, the Twins players have put themselves in a position to compete in August and September. It would not be right to not supplement the current roster with some additions. Right now, they have the lead in the wild card race. Though experts don’t expect the Twins success to continue, they are there now, so they might as well go for it. Just not at the expense of the future.

    Can the Twins make the playoffs if they stand pat? Of course, they can. A lot would have to go right though. If the Twins add minor pieces, or even major pieces, would it guarantee a playoff berth? Of course not. Appeasing fans is never a good reason for making a move, but a strategic move can certainly create some excitement.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I'm fine with standing pat. I think trading for a good reliever is a good idea, but if they are just going to go get another Tim Stauffer, then no thanks. Unless we are going to legitimately upgrade, let's just give some internal guys a shot.  As for catcher, I'm ok with (1) a low-cost rental to share the role with Suzuki and give him more days off, or (2) making a bigger trade for a longer-term upside catcher that has a few years left, if the price is right but I think that is unlikely to be available.  Otherwise I'd wait until the offseason to pay or trade for a long-term solution at catcher. No interest in trading for a SS unless someone offers a great deal. 

     

    The only thing I would trade Kepler, Berrios, Rosario, Arcia, Polanco, Gordon, or Gonsalves for at this point (I'm assuming Buxton, Sano, May, Gibson and Hicks are off limits) would be as part of a deal for a high-upside catcher with multiple years left. Otherwise I'd just keep them. I might trade Stewart, Walker, Meyer, Hu, etc. as part of a package for a legitimately good reliever.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I would have loved to trade those pieces now to get an elite SS that solves a huge question mark in 2016-17-18-19. I don't believe buyer's markets come around too often, and we could be missing out on acquiring high end talent at Costco-like prices.

    We have much more pressing needs than SS, and our options by 2017-2019 for SS are likely to be even better than they are now (Polanco's D might improve and Gordon might be ready by 18 or 19). Until then, Escobar can hold down the fort. If Turner or Garver turn into league average catchers and a number of our relief prospects turn the corner, then maybe SS would become the top priority. But unfortunately I think that is unlikely to happen, so C and RP are by far the bigger priorities right now, for both the short and medium term.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Instead of trades, why not try to see if guys like Jose Berrios, Brandon Peterson, Tyler Duffey, AJ Achter, et al could do a Brandon Finnegan type role in the 8th for the Twins? 

     

    Too bad the Twins didn't select Aaron Nola last year. 

     

    And ironically, this is about the time I would have guessed (expected?) Nick Burdi to be ready. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just a note, which seems to be taking hold.  32-33 is the new 36.  After the steroid era things are returning to normal and your average major league(no superstar) is done between 32-34.  Taking on players over 30 is dicey.  Pitchers are a different sort, but this is close to true.  Some pitchers with better stuff and pinpoint control will be very good longer.  I hope we will see 1-2 new relievers in here this week, but don't want to give top level prospects for them.  Younger players with control are more important as Twins window is coming in the next 6 years.  A bad trade could haunt us for a long time. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    They needed RP help (and C help) yesterday, these trades should have been made weeks ago, waiting around in August may be to late.

    On the nose.  Yesterday was already a couple of months ago.  It's just inexplicable, maddening even, that they haven't made move one in to fill these two black holes in all this time.  (Plus continuing the Santana experiment waaaaay too long).  

    Now we're facing getting into a bidding war for marginal players, and letting the wild card cushion and playoff prospects slip away.  I think it's already too late- witness the last 3 series since the break.  What a mess.  I don't want to see a flurry of activity for its own sake.  The one and only thing I'd beg TR to do is get some bloody BP help- way past the time to get it done.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We have much more pressing needs than SS, and our options by 2017-2019 for SS are likely to be even better than they are now (Polanco's D might improve and Gordon might be ready by 18 or 19). Until then, Escobar can hold down the fort. If Turner or Garver turn into league average catchers and a number of our relief prospects turn the corner, then maybe SS would become the top priority. But unfortunately I think that is unlikely to happen, so C and RP are by far the bigger priorities right now, for both the short and medium term.

    All fine and dandy, can't argue with your reasoning that C and RP are pressing needs. Unfortunately C was not available, and an elite SS was at a discounted price.

     

    The Twins need a lot of things to go right (Polanco's D MIGHT improve, Gordon MIGHT be ready by 18/19) They are all still question marks....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think among viable options for the season, these two strike me as the most likely.

     

    1. The Twins stand pat, take advantage of the unbalanced schedule with more games against dreck-like teams than the rest of the AL, win a Wild Card birth and either lose there or in a series against KC.

     

    2. The Twins make a move, fill a hole or two, win the Wild Card and lose either there or in a series against KC. 

     

    It's hard to come up with a trade scenario that gives them enough offense or pitching to win it all this year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would have loved to trade those pieces now to get an elite SS that solves a huge question mark in 2016-17-18-19. I don't believe buyer's markets come around too often, and we could be missing out on acquiring high end talent at Costco-like prices.

    I really doubt Tulowitzki will be a SS in 18-19, maybe not even 17.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    I think among viable options for the season, these two strike me as the most likely.

     

    1. The Twins stand pat, take advantage of the unbalanced schedule with more games against dreck-like teams than the rest of the AL, win a Wild Card birth and either lose there or in a series against KC.

     

    2. The Twins make a move, fill a hole or two, win the Wild Card and lose either there or in a series against KC. 

     

    It's hard to come up with a trade scenario that gives them enough offense or pitching to win it all this year.

    The most likely is invisible option #3 that says they don't make the playoffs at all because they've overplayed their talent and are coming back down Earth.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I agree the Twins shouldn't sell the farm but you don't punt when you hold a playoff position on July 31st, which the Twins probably will.

     

    I agree with this sentence. I want them to add a couple of pieces. I dont' think they need a 'star' to continue winning, but they do need to shore up the bullpen. As I wrote, acquiring the big names at the deadline don't always work out. Sticking with your guys doesn't mean it won't.

     

    The GM needs to think this year and the future...

     

    That said, I don't think we should minimize the wild card game. Ask the Royals... they went from the Wild Card to the World Series... get into the tournament and see what happens.

     

    But don't sell the future.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I might prefer they stood pat at this point. Bring up some pitchers for bullpen help. Send Danny Santana down. I don't really want to trade prospects for a relief pitcher or backup catcher for this season unless they are extremely expendable.

     

    When I say stand pat, I don't mean keep the roster/lineup as it is. Someone else needs to be starting at SS. They can bring up Arcia or someone like Beresford if they think they need another infielder. Get pitching help from AAA.

     

    It is a bit deflating to me to see what it took to get Troy Tulowitzki and he's going to someone other than the Twins.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I really doubt Tulowitzki will be a SS in 18-19, maybe not even 17.

    I'd bet he will.  He'll be 35 at the end of his contract unless Toronto makes the playoffs in his last year of the contract. He won't be 40. He will, for sure, be a shortstop in 2017 and still an average- good defensive one too.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Uh...

     

    they haven't tried Pelfrey in the pen yet.

    they haven't tried Berrios or Dufffey or Rogers in the pen yet.

     

    Pitching is pitching, and its a team game. Save resources, move guys into different roles.

     

    Same might even go for the SS hole. Its amazing to me that the Twins can be so wildly flexible about putting infielders in the outfield but don't seem to have considered putting Dozier back at SS. His defense was disproportionately penalized by a couple of high-profile gaffes in 2012 but overall, it really wasn't that bad. He's every bit as athletic as Escobar. Get him back at SS, and bring up Polanco to play 2B. At least its worth a shot.

     

    Even at C - has anyone else noticed Eric Fryer sitting among the top framers at baseball prospectus? He still may not have enough bat but maybe he should be catching a greater share of games.

     

    Unless/until the Twins exhaust some of these options it seems premature to ship away talent.

    Edited by Willihammer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    All fine and dandy, can't argue with your reasoning that C and RP are pressing needs. Unfortunately C was not available, and an elite SS was at a discounted price.

    The Twins need a lot of things to go right (Polanco's D MIGHT improve, Gordon MIGHT be ready by 18/19) They are all still question marks....

    What elite SS is at a discounted price? Tulo? He would have taken one of either Gibson or Berrios, plus a bunch more. If he were two or three years younger, I might have considered it, but I wouldn't call that discounted.

     

    As for SS, it is a combo of Escobar being league average already, Polanco possibly being able to play SS soon, and Gordon possibly in 18-19. Yes, the latter two are big IFs, but the combination of all three means there is not much downside there.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I really doubt Tulowitzki will be a SS in 18-19, maybe not even 17.

    I can't guess he will be a SS 3 years from now just like you can't guess he won't.

     

    All I know is if his SS playing days are numbered, he still has an elite bat that can stick in a non-premium position on the field, or DH.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    What elite SS is at a discounted price? Tulo? He would have taken one of either Gibson or Berrios, plus a bunch more. If he were two or three years younger, I might have considered it, but I wouldn't call that discounted.

     

     

    He would have?  The Rockies just traded him and Hawkins, took on Toronto's salary dump and still didn't get a prospect like Berrios OR a MLB pitcher like Gibson. If we didn't throw a salary dump or ask for Hawkins, you think he STILL costs Berrios plus a bunch more?  And depending on what more it would have taken, it's still a good trade for us.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't think standing pat is a huge deal. This team isn't good enough across the board to make noise in the playoffs this year. If Ryan can get a guy that's part of the future in the pen, SS, or catcher then go for it but a rental makes no sense. The team has overachieved their talent so far and that's great. They are fun to watch and some of the young guys like Rosario and Sano have helped. 

     

    I would bring up Arcia, Tonkin, and any other viable bullpen arm they have internally and see how they handle this slump. If they collapse then you know what you have and can fix it in the offseason. But maybe they learn to overcome adversity and it helps them down the line.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just don't have any faith in TR at this point. When was the last time he made a good trade? Shannon Stewart, 10 years ago? Maybe May or Tommy Milone but those are iffy at this point and certainly aren't big impact trades.

     

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    He would have?  The Rockies just traded him and Hawkins, took on Toronto's salary dump and still didn't get a prospect like Berrios OR a MLB pitcher like Gibson. If we didn't throw a salary dump or ask for Hawkins, you think he STILL costs Berrios plus a bunch more?  And depending on what more it would have taken, it's still a good trade for us.

    Hoffman is just below Berrios, and I would argue has a higher ceiling. And Castro is at least a Gonsalves-level prospect. And Reyes' salary is not great, but at least it is limited to two years. If Tulo starts to decline in 2017 or 2018, which is at least a decent probability, the Jays will have 3 or 4+ years of significant salary to eat as well. So yeah, I stand by my characterization.

    Edited by nytwinsfan
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would like to see Benoit.  Great track record, making $8M next year.  Gives us a really good 8-9 innings.  Play matchups in the 7th.

     

    However, if the demands for a guy like that are really high, say Kepler, Kohl, etc....it is hard for me to fault the Twins because they can sign a guy like that in the off-season on about a 2 year commitment.

    What do I expect?  A reliever that is no better than Duensing or Boyer.  Then we hear about how he is a veteran and been around and will really help us.

    Edited by tobi0040
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think among viable options for the season, these two strike me as the most likely.

     

    1. The Twins stand pat, take advantage of the unbalanced schedule with more games against dreck-like teams than the rest of the AL, win a Wild Card birth and either lose there or in a series against KC.

     

    2. The Twins make a move, fill a hole or two, win the Wild Card and lose either there or in a series against KC. 

     

    It's hard to come up with a trade scenario that gives them enough offense or pitching to win it all this year.

    I agree but I think small moves should be made to shore up the biggest deficiencies.

     

    At the very least, you give Gibson, May, Sano, Rosario, Buxton, et al a chance to play meaningful games through the end of the season. That's worth giving up a few 20-ish level prospects by itself.

     

    And then there's the increased fan interest side of the equation, which is worth a hell of a lot of money to the Twins. Two months ago, they were trailing 2014 attendance by 4-5,000 per game. They're set to pass average 2014 attendance during this homestand. That's worth millions by itself.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd bet he will.  He'll be 35 at the end of his contract unless Toronto makes the playoffs in his last year of the contract. He won't be 40. He will, for sure, be a shortstop in 2017 and still an average- good defensive one too.

    He's not a good one now. His range factor is negative and that generally doesn't increase with age. If he's a SS in 2017 it's only because Toronto has nowhere else to put him, he's definately on the Hanley Rameriz train to Cornertown.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't believe for a second it would have taken Sano (and what he just got traded for seems to back that up) and losing Gibson doesn't give me even a seconds pause.

    Not to mention that Gibson is quite a bit more valuable than what the Rockies got from the Jays.

     

    No matter how you view Gibson's past six weeks, he's more valuable than a 80-ish prospect who isn't missing bats in AA.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Hoffman is just below Berrios, and I would argue has a higher ceiling. And Castro is at least a Gonsalves-level prospect. And Reyes' salary is not great, but at least it is limited to two years. If Tulo starts to decline in 2017 or 2018, which is at least a decent probability, the Jays will have 3 or 4+ years of significant salary to eat as well. So yeah, I stand by my characterization.

    going into this season, Kiley McDaniel had Berrios #24 and Hoffman # 67. That's not so close.  Berrios also got a future value ranking of 60.  Hoffman, 55.

     

    Tulo will still be a quality player in 2017 and 2018.  And they relieved themselves of a big contract as well that they would have had to pay for a worse player, which helps.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...