Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • What A Miguel Sano Long-Term Contract Might Look Like


    Seth Stohs

    On April 12, 2008, Evan Longoria made his major league debut with the Tampa Bay Rays. Six days later, he signed a six year, $17.5 million contract with the team that included three option years which really made it a nine year, $47.5 million deal.

    Miguel Sano burst onto the scene and has now played 40 games for the Twins. The topic of signing him to a long-term contract has already become a talker on Twitter and on local radio air waves. So, I thought I would take a few minutes to think about what a long-term contract could potentially mean for Miguel Sano and the Twins.

    Image courtesy of Bruce Kluckhohn, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Of course, it turned into a lot of work. Trying to find similar contracts wasn’t easy. A lot of players sign long-term deals to eat up some arbitration years and buy out a couple of years of free agency. In the last 15 years, the Twins have done that with the following players (and some that didn’t work out as well):

    • Joe Mauer – 4 years, $33 million - bought out three years of arbitration and a year of free agency.
    • Torii Hunter – 4 years, $32 million – bought out two years of arbitration and two years of free agency. It included an option year that made it a five year, $42 million deal.
    • Michael Cuddyer – 3 years, $24 million – bought out one year of arbitration and two years of free agency.
    • Justin Morneau – 6 years, $80 million – bought out two years of arbitration and four years of free agency.
    • Johan Santana – 4 years, $39.75 million – bought out two years of arbitration and two free agent years.
    • Joe Nathan – 4 years, $47 million – That came after two separate two year deals.

    If the Twins go that route, they can wait until after the 2019 or 2020 season to try to lock him up long term. It may make sense. The sample size and his track record will be much more telling than a 40-game sample. However, here are some recently signed deals for players who waited until they were arbitration eligible to sign long-term deals.

    • Mike Trout – 6 years, $144.5 million – Trout is obviously in a world all of his own, so this would be the ceiling for a potential deal. He would have gone through his first arbitration year but instead signed the deal.
    • Albert Pujols – 7 years, $100 million – This deal was almost a decade ago, but he, like Trout, should have had more MVP awards than he actually did. He avoided arbitration with this deal.
    • Giancarlo Stanton – 13 years, $325 million – Stanton made $5.5 million in his first year of arbitration. The Marlins surprised many with the deal, though Stanton has an opt-out in six years, if he feels he can make more. The first six years of the deal are worth $107 million. The seven years after the opt-out would be worth $218 million.
    • Ryan Howard – 3 year, $54 million – Howard set records before arbitration and made $10 million in year one of arbitration. He signed the three-year deal the next year and then got a huge deal later.

    Sano has less than a year of service time. As I said earlier, there are not many examples of players who signed long-term deals with less than one year of service time.

    • Evan Longoria – 6 years, $17.5 million with three option years. As I mentioned above, it turned into a nine year, $47.5 million deal. He remains with the Rays and has signed another long-term deal to stick there.
    • Ryan Braun – 8 years, $45 million – Braun came up about the same time Sano did and the next offseason reached this deal. He proved to be well worth it and has signed another long-term deal.

    Those two deals were made about eight years ago, and inflation and new national TV deals mean that Sano should make a bit more than they have.

    Let’s play a couple of scenarios out. Let’s say that Sano becomes a perennial All- Star, maybe even an MVP candidate. Let’s estimate what he would make from year-to-year if the Twins and Sano went year-to-year.

    • 2016: $550,000, 2017: $650,000, 2018: $800,000 (pre-arbitration, $2.0 million)
    • 2019: $7 million, 2020: $14 million, 2021: $20 million (arbitration years, $41 million)
    • That would be $43 million for six years.

    At that point, he would become a free agent. He would have teams lining up for his services and $30 million annual salaries might be the starting point for negotiations.

    So, after looking at the contracts of mentioned above, plus the long-term contracts of All-Stars like Andrew McCutchen, Anthony Rizzo and Paul Goldschmidt, let me try to lay out what a long-term deal could look like for Miguel Sano and the Twins.

    • Pre-Arbitration – 2016: $600,000, 2017: $700,000, 2018: $1 million ($2.3 million)
    • Arbitration Buy-Out – 2019: $5 million, 2020: $8 million, 2021: $12 million ($25 million)
    • Free Agency Buy-Out – 2022: $18 million, 2023: $20 million, 2024: $30 million option with $8 million buyout ($46 million)
    • That equates to an 8 year, $73.3 million deal, with a team option.

    Why the Twins Should do this deal?

    The term ‘cost certainty’ comes up when these types of deals are made. Rather than going year to year and not knowing what it’ll cost, they will have one certain contract for eight years. Also, if Sano becomes the player that many believe that he will become (a slugging, middle of the lineup hitter), this deal would give them at least two to three extra years with the slugger. They would also potentially save a bunch of money to spend elsewhere, including a similar deal with Byron Buxton or others. He’s 22, and eight years would take him through his 20s, his best years.

    Why the Twins Should Not do this deal?

    That’d be a $73 million risk. What if he gets hurt? What if he strikes out 240 times every season and never makes an adjustment? Knowing the make-up for Sano, there is little concern that he will take the money and stop working, but how a player will handle that kind of financial security has to factor into the discussion. Most believe that he will be a star, but there is risk. As Nick wrote yesterday, the Twins have tied themselves to some
    big contracts
    in recent years that have not yet paid off.

    Why Miguel Sano Should do this deal?

    Can you imagine being offered $73 million when you’re 22 years old? That kind of money takes care of Sano and his family for generations to come. He can still become a free agent at age 30 and get another long-term deal.

    Why Miguel Sano Should Not do this deal?

    If he truly wants to optimize his earning potential, it makes the most sense for him to go year-to-year. He would then become a free agent at age 28 and be set up for a ten-year deal if things play out right.

    It is an interesting discussion, and likely one that we will have regarding Byron Buxton in the next year or two as well. Who knows? Maybe they’ll pull a Parise-Suter and sign equal contracts to stick around together for the next eight to ten years.

    What would you do? Reach out to Sano’s agent (Rob Plummer) now, or wait a couple of years?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    I think that is a good point.  But Boras almost always goes year to year and takes his guy to market. If the Twins do that with Sano he is a 6-7 year player for us and nothing more.  So naturally a Sano deal is before a Bryant deal anyway.  Or he will be fitted for pinstripes, Dodger blue, or eating clam chowder.

    The effect might be: Bryant, an elite comparable going year-to-year, could inflate the arb market.  Meaning Sano could see a further bump in his pay, beyond what he'd normally receive those years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The effect might be: Bryant, an elite comparable going year-to-year, could inflate the arb market.  Meaning Sano could see a further bump in his pay, beyond what he'd normally receive those years.

     

    It could turn out that Sano could inflate the market for Bryant in arb. 

     

    Sano has 11 HR and a .978 OPS in 184 AB.  Bryant has 19 HR and a .843 OPS in almost 500 AB.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It could turn out that Sano could inflate the market for Bryant in arb.

     

    Sano has 11 HR and a .978 OPS in 184 AB. Bryant has 19 HR and a .843 OPS in almost 500 AB.

    Well, except that Bryant is scheduled to hit arb a year before Sano (as a Super 2)... but they could kind of one-up each other through the years, as each might have a claim to more than the other guy.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Discussion of a long term contract for someone who has not even faced every team in the American League a second time may be fun and interesting, but it's also very premature. Before we put Sano in the Hall of Fame, let's see how he reacts to all of the forthcoming adjustments, shifts, etc. Way too soon for this discussion.

    What type of shift protects against home runs, and doubles off the wall? ;-)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After reading Souhan's article on the Twins this a.m. I wanted to see if opinions have changed from this Aug 2015 article. I am very concerned about Sano's strikeouts and defense. He was out of shape last year, came to camp in better shape this year, however I get the feeling he isn't driven to be great. Souhan points out he (and presumably Twins front office/coaches) were expecting more leadership from Sano but he seems to spend all his free time in the locker room on his phone. Would really like to get a feeling that he was 100% all in as a MN Twin.

     

    All that being said I am in the camp that we should try to lock him up through at least a couple of free agency years. If he fulfills even 80% of original expectations he is well above replacement level. In today's market is that $100M+? With last years less than stellar year it may be the right time to strike.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...