Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins/Tigers Players Vote to Postpone Tonight's Game


    Seth Stohs

    On Thursday afternoon, news came that the Twins players had voted to not play tonight's game in Detroit against the Tigers. Soon after, it was also noted that the Tigers players did the same thing. It is a postponement. The game will be made up at a later date.

    Image courtesy of Raj Mehta, USA Today

    Twins Video

    "As long as our players are empowered and able to speak their minds, then we're doing something right." Rocco Baldelli, Minnesota Twins Manager

    Rocco Baldelli said that his team has had several meaningful discussions over the past 24 hours about what is going on in the country. There have been individual conversations, discussions in small groups and later in the day, the group assembled.

    One player stood up first, and said, "I don't think we should play today."

    Baldelli said that player was Taylor Rogers. He was followed by Nelson Cruz and Trevor May in voicing their similar thoughts to the team.

    The manager said, "It was a very powerful gathering. The players were in solidarity in the decision. We ultimately formally raised our hands and unanimously voted not to play out of respect for all. I'm very proud of the way it was handled by our group, respectfully and thoroughly."

    Baldelli said that he had several discussions with Tigers manager (and former Twins manager) Ron Gardenhire before this and that the Tigers also held emotion-filled meetings and voted the same way.

    2020 has been a difficult year on so many fronts. Baldelli continues to lead by encouraging and facilitates open communications,

    "This goes back to when we were all home and the only thing we could do was meet on Zoom calls and we would talk. We talked about a lot of things that we've never gotten into, a lot of topics that we've literally never broached in baseball. In my 20 years of baseball, I've never seen any of these types of discussions live and in person. We've had more discussions about inequality and how people are feeling and how it's affecting them at the field, away from the field, how it affects loved ones, and so many aspects of this that have long been something that people have kept to themselves, and that's not healthy."

    Baldelli noted that the focus so much has been about what is happening today, but he also understands that the important discussion also has to be What is Next?

    "How this affects tomorrow exactly, I don't know if anyone can answer that question. I think it's something that a lot off people are thinking about. I know that I don't have the answer for that. I just know that what we decided to do today was most definitely the right thing to do for our group, and we feel very good leaving the ballpark today about the way it was handled and the message it sends to everyone inside our clubhouse and outside our clubhouse."

    He continued, "I think that the impact of what has been going on it sports is going to be felt throughout... If it wasn't meaningful. If it wasn't something that we thought was sending not only the right message but something that can push us toward getting more of the result of what people are looking for, which is the acknowledgement of all the different inequalities that continue to exist in our country and not ignoring these things."

    The Twins have a lot of players from all around the world, some of whom don't know the country's history or follow current events. Baldelli said that's OK, but they do have a very key role on the team.

    "What they are responsible for is to always been there for their teammates, and to always be willing to listen to their teammates. That is something we have been very very able to do from the beginning of this that has allowed us to get to this point to allow us to have the discussions we had today."

    He continued by saying something that should resonate with all of us, "And if you have an open ear and an open heart for the people around you, you're going to be in good shape, and that's what our guys have done."

    Baldelli added, "I'm actually really happy that I'm in baseball right now, to be experiencing everything that's going on. Baseball is a wonderful game. We all love showing up at the ballpark every day. We all love being able to focus on our jobs. We all love being able to step out there on the field and be out there on the grass watching guys do great things on the field. But I'm also really happy to be spending this moment with our group, going through everything that we're going through, experiencing it all, and feeling like we are doing something very positive, not just for baseball but for the country and for all people.

    On Friday, the Twins will be back on the field for two games.

    https://twitter.com/morsecode/status/1299100858257477632

    Press release from the Twins::

    “The Minnesota Twins remain committed to using our platforms to push for racial justice and equality. Therefore, we fully respect our players for their decision to not play tonight’s game versus the Detroit Tigers. The recent shooting of Jacob Blake, a mere three months after the killing of George Floyd, shows again that real change is necessary and far overdue in our country, and it is our responsibility to continue playing a role in efforts to affect meaningful reform. We stand in solidarity with the Black community and, as full partners with others in the Twin Cities and beyond, we are committed to creating the change we want to see in the world – where everyone is protected, safe and welcome. There is no place for racism, inequality or injustice in our society.”

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    They’re making a public statement. No sacrifice is needed to make a statement.

     

    An artificially imposed sacrifice makes no sense and serves literally no one.

    Sacrifice is needed to make changes. No change comes easy and without sacrifices. Taking today off only serves them teams that have chosen that path. Do tell me you care... show me you care. Show me what your willing to lose. This choice not to play isn't showing me anything. It's empty.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, that’s what happened so I’m not sure what your argument is here. The players decided to not play, the front office and ownership supported them in that decision, so we’re all good here.

    yes management supported them , their choice, but you , not management, asked why there should be consequences, not your choice.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sacrifice is needed to make changes. No change comes easy and without sacrifices. Taking today off only serves them teams that have chosen that path. Do tell me you care... show me you care. Show me what your willing to lose. This choice not to play isn't showing me anything. It's empty.

    No, it’s not. Several players across various sports have said sitting out is about creating awareness and quieting the sports world so Americans can dedicate their attention to the events surrounding us right now, which is more important than watching men and women hit and throw sports balls.

     

    No sacrifice is needed to make that statement. A league imposed artificial sacrifice does the opposite, as it gives the optics of a bunch of rich white owners telling young black and Latino athletes to shut up and entertain us while Rome burns.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is an apples to oranges comparison. I'm guessing you don't have a job that involves millions of people tuning in to watch you on TV every day. Professional athletes have a unique platform to raise awareness and affect change, and I think it's commendable that they're willing to use it for a cause that they believe is bigger than sports. I don't know what MLB would get by punishing players for this, besides lots of bad PR.

    maybe, it’s possible they lose fans too
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    yes management supported them , their choice, but you , not management, asked why there should be consequences, not your choice.

    This... doesn’t make sense. People have asserted there should be consequences, yet no one has actually said why that’s the case when both players and ownership seem to be on the same page here.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Sacrifice is needed to make changes. No change comes easy and without sacrifices. Taking today off only serves them teams that have chosen that path. Do tell me you care... show me you care. Show me what your willing to lose. This choice not to play isn't showing me anything. It's empty.

    I suspect that this is just a first step for many players, and there will be sacrifices of time and/or money from those who really do care deeply about these issues. There are probably many players who have already sacrificed their time and/or money for similar causes. That kind of sacrifice makes sense and helps to bring about change; I can't see what would be accomplished through silly punishments like forcing a team to forfeit and take an L.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This... doesn’t make sense. People have asserted there should be consequences, yet no one has actually said why that’s the case when both players and ownership seem to be on the same page here.

    There will be consequences, there are a lot of fans who won’t agree, enough to have an impact should they choose to go that route. These players sometimes overestimate their appeal. As far as wins and losses or possible loss of pay, you’re correct if management supports the players then everything is good. Well there is the League too, but I think it’s safe to assume MLB supports the players too.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This... doesn’t make sense. People have asserted there should be consequences, yet no one has actually said why that’s the case when both players and ownership seem to be on the same page here.

    They’re on the same page because literally none of them have anything to lose. Fans aren’t allowed in the stadium this whole year, so any fan boycotts aren’t going to be felt until maybe next year, if people even still care by then. The clubs would take a beating if they disciplined their players. Sponsors would pull out. The players get a night off, a days pay and no fines. It’s an empty gesture when there’s no skin in the game

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    EXACTLY. There won’t be consequences. They’ll play the DH tomorrow and no big deal. The players will feel like they did something, the ownership will look good for not disciplining, and everyone wins. Now had you or I told our boss we weren’t coming in to work, and not using time off, what would the response be?

     

    Not quite the same thing, but my company did tell people to take Juneteenth off even though it was not a regular day off for us.  They wanted people to take the day off and volunteer or reflect at what was happening and the on-going issues that had created the situation or simply use as a mental health day to deal with all the stress that was happening at the time.

     

    I am sure some of it was a calculated PR move, but there have been what I take are sincere efforts to spot light things that go under the radar for a lot of us and highlight things that people of color have to thing about that would not even occur to me.  They had a number of employees candidly speak on what it is like to be the only person of color on a team or on a project or even in some offices, as well as warnings they have to give their kids if they ever get pulled over or how they can spot a clerk watching them when they are in a nice store etc.

     

    Obviously, this is not going to solve all of the problems, but it is generating some additional discussion, and maybe some of the athlete's statements will make this seem more like a real issue to people who do not experience it.

     

    I do realize I am lucky in that I could just take a day off, not everyone is in a situation where they can do that or has a job where that is feasible.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They’re on the same page because literally none of them have anything to lose. Fans aren’t allowed in the stadium this whole year, so any fan boycotts aren’t going to be felt until maybe next year, if people even still care by then. The clubs would take a beating if they disciplined their players. Sponsors would pull out. The players get a night off, a days pay and no fines. It’s an empty gesture when there’s no skin in the game

    Again, it’s not an empty gesture when many players have said the point of sitting out games is to redirect attention to real events happening all around us.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with those who point out that the decision not to play is intended to call attention to the issue.  Those who call for consequences simply do not understand civil protest. Take for example a mother who marches to the state capital with a sign encouraging the enactment of a bill to lower the cost of medication, say insulin, for her daughter, a type 1 diabetic.  The mother is bringing attention to the cost and seeking others to assist in a resolution she believes in.  There is no necessity for consequences.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Lots of games being played , the Brewers game is on, in Milwaukee

     

    Um they didn't play last night.

     

    And I'd be happy if the company I work for and the federal government cared enough to actually supply enough PPE for me to do my job safely. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Um they didn't play last night.

     

    And I'd be happy if the company I work for and the federal government cared enough to actually supply enough PPE for me to do my job safely.

    what does that have to do with anything on this thread
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with those who point out that the decision not to play is intended to call attention to the issue. Those who call for consequences simply do not understand civil protest. Take for example a mother who marches to the state capital with a sign encouraging the enactment of a bill to lower the cost of medication, say insulin, for her daughter, a type 1 diabetic. The mother is bringing attention to the cost and seeking others to assist in a resolution she believes in. There is no necessity for consequences.

    There is absolutely consequences for the person in this story. Time and energy are consequences. If she needed to find care for her ill child, that's consequences. Time away from he child is a consequence. She has decided the juice is worth the squeeze and she's willing to accept the sacrifices to improve a system. She's taking actions.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There is absolutely consequences for the person in this story. Time and energy are consequences. If she needed to find care for her ill child, that's consequences. Time away from he child is a consequence. She has decided the juice is worth the squeeze and she's willing to accept the sacrifices to improve a system. She's taking actions.

    Now you’re just inventing scenarios that may not exist.

     

    There is no reason to demand sacrifice to make a statement, much less create an artificial sacrifice for no real reason.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree that consequences are not necessary to make a statement. I just wish the statements coming from each team weren't so generic. I also think the message has little clout when someone can just change the channel and watch a different game. That's what makes me thinks the teams are just falling in line as to not be singled out. It feels disingenuous. Every player probably feels like the guy in the commercial mulling over checking the organ donorship box on his driver's license. The entire room is staring at him, so he decides that he can lose the glaring eyes and maybe feel better about himself. Anyone who thinks that 100% of the players have strong feelings about this is just blinded by idealism.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't want to make this too long. I'm an old white guy. I live 7 blocks from where George Floyd was murdered and 3 blocks from the carnage on Lake St in May. I have suffered a loss because of the riots.  I also enjoy baseball. A lot. Herb Carneal was the background noise of my summers growing up.

     

    I also roll my eyes at some celebrities who have spoken out about some cause. (Movie stars testifying before Congress? Really?) 

     

    To me this is different. If the players haven't experienced racism personally, they know who has. Players, who if they are not black or brown, are living and playing ball with black and brown players from February to September (I only wish it was through October). They are comrades and going through the grind together. That the players, unanimously, decided not to play is a testament to their solidarity and love for one another. 

     

    Sure, they are all going to get paid for the game, eventually. They won't be punished monetarily. I guess I don't care if they aren't paying a monetary price. They have a platform and they are making a statement. I care about that, and I care about the fact that as a team they thought this was important that these issues of race are brought up. I wholeheartedly agree with them. This is very, very important

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree that consequences are not necessary to make a statement. I just wish the statements coming from each team weren't so generic. I also think the message has little clout when someone can just change the channel and watch a different game. That's what makes me thinks the teams are just falling in line as to not be singled out. It feels disingenuous. Every player probably feels like the guy in the commercial mulling over checking the organ donorship box on his driver's license. The entire room is staring at him, so he decides that he can lose the glaring eyes and maybe feel better about himself. Anyone who thinks that 100% of the players have strong feelings about this is just blinded by idealism.

    The ownership can feel good

    The players can feel good

    No one had to do much heavy lifting

    Life resumes tomorrow

     

    Activism in 2020

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't want to make this too long. I'm an old white guy. I live 7 blocks from where George Floyd was murdered and 3 blocks from the carnage on Lake St in May. I have suffered a loss because of the riots.  I also enjoy baseball. A lot. Herb Carneal was the background noise of my summers growing up.

     

    I also roll my eyes at some celebrities who have spoken out about some cause. (Movie stars testifying before Congress? Really?) 

     

    To me this is different. If the players haven't experienced racism personally, they know who has. Players, who if they are not black or brown, are living and playing ball with black and brown players from February to September (I only wish it was through October). They are comrades and going through the grind together. That the players, unanimously, decided not to play is a testament to their solidarity and love for one another. 

     

    Sure, they are all going to get paid for the game, eventually. They won't be punished monetarily. I guess I don't care if they aren't paying a monetary price. They have a platform and they are making a statement. I care about that, and I care about the fact that as a team they thought this was important that these issues of race are brought up. I wholeheartedly agree with them. This is very, very important

    Great post. That’s a lot of tear gas you have inhaled—a sacrifice of breathable, fresh air if there ever was one. Thanks for hanging with us on Twins Daily!
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    As far as I can tell, the sacrifice seems to be on the part of people who don’t have a game to commentate on tonight. I am not sympathetic to their pain.

    Me neither.

     

    I'd implore people to watch the video of Jacob Blake's mother, Julie Jackson,  addressing ALL of us. Personally, I will never know the depth and despair felt by so many after witnessing two more horrific acts of callous hatred play out in Kenosha. We don't know how this is impacting individual players and their loved ones. But I think it might be tone deaf to think of the "consequences" for any of them to be minimal, or to think they are "getting a day off."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Now you’re just inventing scenarios that may not exist.

     

    There is no reason to demand sacrifice to make a statement, much less create an artificial sacrifice for no real reason.

    I didn't invent that story. I was pointing out the consequences of the story. I'm not demanding anything. I'm pointing out that The Twins " Statement" is completely empty. It's selfish. It's virtue singling and nothing more as it stands right now because there are no consequences. Some want to praise The Twins - pat them on the backs - when they didn't do anything. Their action was actually inaction.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am torn.  I hate that professional sports and celebrities are the people we listen to now.   I also think that justice will be done but it takes time.  Investigations need to be completed and in this case it may not be easy sorting out the facts before making an arrest.  In the George Floyd case the arrests were swift.   In my opinion justice is being served and will be in this case too.    Besides arresting the officer’s involved what other justice is expected.   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Great post. That’s a lot of tear gas you have inhaled—a sacrifice of breathable, fresh air if there ever was one. Thanks for hanging with us on Twins Daily!

    Thanks. Fortunately, I didn't get the tear gas. But I did stand with my neighbor looking toward Lake St and wondering which building was burning. Having the National Guard in your neighborhood, not because they are there to help clean up from a natural disaster, but there to protect the fire department from violence is something I will never, ever forget. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I didn't invent that story. I was pointing out the consequences of the story. I'm not demanding anything. I'm pointing out that The Twins " Statement" is completely empty. It's selfish. It's virtue singling and nothing more as it stands right now because there are no consequences. Some want to praise The Twins - pat them on the backs - when they didn't do anything. Their action was actually inaction.

    Thank you TJ for the term "virtue signaling."  It's the first time I heard it.  I looked it up and then I added it to my arsenal.  Thank you very much!

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...