Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins, Rockies Talk Tulowitzki


    Jeremy Nygaard

    First and foremost, there are literally hundreds of thousands of trade conversations that happen between teams throughout the season and especially as the end of July rolls around. If the Twins weren’t talking to every team about ways to improve their team, that would be extremely disappointing.

    Image courtesy of USA Today Sports

    Twins Video

    Jim Bowden posted a piece called Anatomy of a Trade (Insider required) yesterday at ESPN and - to everyone’s surprise - it was fantastic. It discusses how trades come together and he goes through a hypothetical trade that takes place… and how it progresses over the course of nearly 40 days.

    This hypothetical trade ends with both teams coming to an agreement at the deadline. But you must keep in mind that for every one that goes through, there are probably hundreds that never grow legs and die.

    One conversation that I can confirm has happened - and continues to happen - is between the Twins and the Colorado Rockies. It’s still in the infant stages. In fact, the idea sprouted after an All-Star break where the Twins All-Star second baseman, Brian Dozier, and the Rockies All-Star shortstop, Troy Tulowitzki, “bonded.”

    As Bowden suggests in his piece, the first call is made and the initial offer is “usually lopsided and downright embarrassing.” I don’t know who made the first offer, but the Rockies’ top target is Kyle Gibson. They’ve also asked for Miguel Sano. The Twins target? Troy Tulowitzki.

    Where do negotiations go from here? If the Rockies insist on a top arm, there are really only a couple of options. Besides Gibson, you’d have to imagine that Jose Berrios will be brought up. And possibly Trevor May and/or Alex Meyer to a lesser extent. But as far the “headliner” goes, only Gibson and Berrios could really fit in that category.

    With ten days to go, this discussion could really morph in a lot of different directions. In the right deal, the Rockies would be willing to send some cash. (Seth covered Tulowitzki’s contract really well in this piece posted early today, so I don’t feel the need to re-hash it.) In any deal where money is sent, the Rockies would ask for a better return.

    Would the Twins have interest in acquiring other pieces from the Rockies? Both LaTroy Hawkins and John Axford could be valuable additions to the Twins bullpen. The Twins have also asked about Rockies catcher Nick Hundley, who is under contract through next season and having his best offensive season since 2011.

    If you’re wondering how the Rockies could deal the face of their franchise, it seems like they might be ready to move on from the duo of Tulowitzki and Carlos Gonzalez, with star 3B Nolan Arenado and All-Star 2B D.J. LaMahieu taking over. Moving Tulo, CarGo and potentially Charlie Blackmon could add a lot of valuable pieces to a franchise who has struggled almost as badly as the Twins have over the past five seasons.

    None of that means that a deal is going to happen. Not with the Twins or with anyone else. All things have to line up perfectly for a deal to get done.

    As one source familiar with the talks told me, if the Twins make it through their gauntlet-of-a-week this week, “talks will get serious and move fast.”

    Whether you like Tulowitzki or not, the Twins are having conversations with the intent of getting better this year.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Not getting him pretty much means Santana stays out there, right? I mean, we are in July, and he's still there........why would anything change unless something really changed?

     

    To the person that said Tulo's past means nothing, do you really think Polanco is likely to put up more WAR in the next three years than Tulo?

     

    I said it means nothing when comparing him to Polanco.  If Tulo was traded for Polanco I couldn't care less what his WAR was before the trade, but it's what they obtain after that counts.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The numbers here are not perfect but should be within a ball-park.  We have all these threads out there suggesting we should extend guys right now.  Sano, Gibson, and Plouffe the most common.  We had some really high numbers thrown out already for Buxton and I am sure we are a year or two away from the chatter about extending Berrios and May.

     

    With that top of mind, I come up with about $95M in commitments to 7 players if we add Tulo. Most that go out 3-4 years (5 for Tulo).   Save Dozier and Hughes, these guys are all on the wrong side of 30 already.  So I would hate to be in a position that we can't afford to lock up someone like Sano, Berrios, or Buxton if they prove to be a stud through their prime becaue we are paying a bunch of 34-35 year olds

     

     

    2016   Mauer (23), Tulo (20), Nolasco (14), Ervin (14), Hughes (12) Dozier (7.5), Perkins (5).  $95M for 7 players.

     

    I have a bias against one trade for one player that blows through farm assets and payroll assets at the same time.  We should think about what a 5 year $100M contract on the free agent market next winter would look like.  Because you can spend the money there without giving up a Gibson, Berrios, etc.

     

    Additionally, Tulo is not a SS for that entire contract and his road .819 OPS will decline. I

    I am only on page 4 reading as i write this so someone maybe already corrected it, but Dozier is only $3 Mill next yr not 7.5.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I said it means nothing when comparing him to Polanco.  If Tulo was traded for Polanco I couldn't care less what his WAR was before the trade, but it's what they obtain after that counts.

     

    And, who is likely to be better the next three years? Me, I'll predict that Tulo will be better than a guy that can't throw the ball to the 1B in AAA. I could be wrong for sure, but if I had to bet, I'd bet on the Tulo.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    And, who is likely to be better the next three years? Me, I'll predict that Tulo will be better than a guy that can't throw the ball to the 1B in AAA. I could be wrong for sure, but if I had to bet, I'd bet on the Tulo.

     

    And if it were a 1 for 1 trade it would be an easy decision wouldn't it?  You take Tulo and I will take May-Polanco-Rosario.  Or Berrios-Polanco-Kepler or whatever the purposed trade is and let's make it 5 years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    btw, no way this happens. None. Nada. Nil.

     

    It's nice to dream though (I admit, for some of you, this sounds like a nightmare).

    Tulo for Polanco,May and Rosario?  Sign me up. Rockies would never take such a small haul.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For The Often Injured Tulo ?

     

    I wouldn't think about offering Gibson or Berrios.

     

    My offer Jorge Polanco and Alex Meyer and maybe one other lower level prospect.

     

    thats it.

     

    No way they get Sano, no way they get Berrios or Gibson and they should know that.

     

    ALSO COORS FIELD INFLATES TULO's statistics. over his whole career.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If he's so good, why isn't he here? Why does he have 7 (or more) errors in AAA already?

    The answer to that is Paul Molitor. He was Danny Santana's hitting tutor in the minors, and he's loathe to give up on the kid, even if Santana just isn't going to be another Paul Molitor.

     

    Even if Santana is destined to "figure things out," at some point, it ain't happening on the mlb club. Santana needs to go down to AAA and build himself a plan at the plate that's not just "I hope I get a hit."

     

    Meanwhile Jorge Polanco already has a pretty good plan at the plate, and it's hard to say his defense is any shakier than Santana's. Twins don't have much to lose by giving Polanco a shot for at least a month.

     

    I'm not saying Polanco is better than Tulo, either. I'm saying the price the Rockies will want for him is too steep. The Twins will need some of these guys to keep the team stocked with good talent over the next decade. If you trade away the talent in AAA and AA, you strip the team of its future.

    Edited by jimbo92107
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Tulo for Polanco,May and Rosario?  Sign me up. Rockies would never take such a small haul.

    I dunno, again there you are getting 3 low cost players, May is a mid rotation guy, and Rosario looks like he could at least be a league average CF and has some pretty decent upside.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

    ALSO COORS FIELD INFLATES TULO's statistics. over his whole career.

    His career away OPS is .813.  An .813 OPS from a quality defender at the shortstop position is special (and this is the FIRST season he hasn't shown good skills there.  One season is not a trend).There are only two qualifying shortstops who have an OPS of .813 or better this season and he is one of them (with the best one by far).

    People said the same thing about Holliday when he left Coors.  Ooops.  People think it's only about leaving Coors, but it's also about playing a ton of games in parks like Petco, Dodger Stadium and AT&T.  Not exactly hitters parks over the course of his career and not to mention against quality pitching staffs from those teams to boot on a regular basis.Tulo is a great hitter, period. And he's a leader, he has the intangibles too while still being a great player.

    Even if he played 120 games a season, 120 games of him and 42 from others still makes the best shortstop situation.

    At least for another couple years until Correa takes his belt.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The answer to that is Paul Molitor. He was Danny Santana's hitting tutor in the minors, and he's loathe to give up on the kid, even if Santana just isn't going to be another Paul Molitor.

     

     

    Considering how often the Rockies have had to use their other middle infielders when Tulowitzki is on the shelf, there's still plenty room for Santana or Polanco.

     

    Trading for Tulowitzki would excite me for 2015 and then I'd spend the next five years filled with dread waiting for the other shoe to drop.  I don't know what scares me more, having to give up one of the young top arms which this team so desperately needs, or being tied to another giant contract that may prohibit the extension of any or all of Sano, Buxton, Berrios or anyone that is deserving.

     

    I'm a big picture guy, and I can't see Tulowitzki winning this team a WS in 2015 unless he turned into an ace starter who also moonlights as a set up guy between starts. 

     

    If this team is only allowed to have one glaring offensive hole, can't it be SS? The cheaper option in terms of prospects and dollars is to fix the catcher spot in the off season.

    Edited by nicksaviking
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I dunno, again there you are getting 3 low cost players, May is a mid rotation guy, and Rosario looks like he could at least be a league average CF and has some pretty decent upside.

    We know what Tulo is, we are guessing what those three will be.  This team, and it's fans, have a history of over-rating our prospects by a sizable amount. I often wonder how many quality players we have missed out on over the years as our team hoarded prospects that turned out to be extremely disappointing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Considering how often the Rockies have had to use their other middle infielders when Tulowitzki is on the shelf, there's still plenty room for Santana or Polanco.

     

    Trading for Tulowitzki would excite me for 2015 and then I'd spend the next five years filled with dread waiting for the other shoe to drop.  I don't know what scares me more, having to give up one of the young top arms which this team so desperately needs, or being tied to another giant contract that may prohibit the extension of any or all of Sano, Buxton, Berrios or anyone that is deserving.

     

    I'm a big picture guy, and I can't see Tulowitzki winning this team a WS in 2015 unless he turned into both an ace starter who also moonlights as a set up guy between starts. 

     

    If this team is only allowed to have one glaring offensive hole, can't it be SS? The cheaper option in terms of prospects and dollars is to fix the catcher spot in the off season.

     

    so, where do they get that Ace next year or the year after? Because he's not on the roster or in the system?

     

    They don't have one glaring hole, they have SS, C, 1B, and CF.....and 1 guy in the bullpen, and yet have still banked 9 wins. You expect this collection to bank 9 wins next year?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    We know what Tulo is, we are guessing what those three will be.  This team, and it's fans, have a history of over-rating our prospects by a sizable amount. I often wonder how many quality players we have missed out on over the years as our team hoarded prospects that turned out to be extremely disappointing.

     

    IMO you are also guessing what you are going to be getting from Tulo, especially as he enters his early-mid 30's.  He's a guy who has played in 65% of his teams games over the past 5 seasons.  His defense has slowly been declining since the 2011 season.  Short turn he might look great, long term with his contract and the pieces given up required to acquire him might look like a long term disaster.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Considering how often the Rockies have had to use their other middle infielders when Tulowitzki is on the shelf, there's still plenty room for Santana or Polanco.

     

    Trading for Tulowitzki would excite me for 2015 and then I'd spend the next five years filled with dread waiting for the other shoe to drop.  I don't know what scares me more, having to give up one of the young top arms which this team so desperately needs, or being tied to another giant contract that may prohibit the extension of any or all of Sano, Buxton, Berrios or anyone that is deserving.

     

    I'm a big picture guy, and I can't see Tulowitzki winning this team a WS in 2015 unless he turned into an ace starter who also moonlights as a set up guy between starts. 

     

    If this team is only allowed to have one glaring offensive hole, can't it be SS? The cheaper option in terms of prospects and dollars is to fix the catcher spot in the off season.

    There's the rub. Even if you pick up Tulo and a good catcher, this Twins team still doesn't have the one thing they really need to win a Series - a top flight ace starter. The teams they'd be facing in the playoffs and Series would definitely have at least one ace, or they won't get there, either.

     

    I don't make Tulo-sized moves until AFTER I have one or two ace starters. Before that, you might as well hang onto all your blue- and red-chip prospects. This Twins team will NOT get past KC or Houston with the bunch of #2's and #3's they have now, and they certainly won't beat a team that can march out Greinke and Kershaw twice in five games.

    Edited by jimbo92107
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Not getting him pretty much means Santana stays out there, right? I mean, we are in July, and he's still there........why would anything change unless something really changed?

     

    To the person that said Tulo's past means nothing, do you really think Polanco is likely to put up more WAR in the next three years than Tulo?

    Wasn't me who said it, but I doubt Polanco will be better than Tulo over the next three years. Polanco is a good hitter, but not near as good as Tulowitzki while I also doubt he will ever put up a season even close to anything Tulowitzki has. Plus he still has to go through the stage of proving himself in the majors.

     

    I only have the minor league reports to go off of, but it doesn't sound like he is as good of a defender either. Tulowitzki is a major upgrade over anyone we have.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    People said the same thing about Holliday when he left Coors.  Ooops.  People think it's only about leaving Coors, but it's also about playing a ton of games in parks like Petco, Dodger Stadium and AT&T.  Not exactly hitters parks over the course of his career and not to mention against quality pitching staffs from those teams to boot on a regular basis.Tulo is a great hitter, period. And he's a leader, he has the intangibles too while still being a great player.

    I thought I pretty clearly dispelled this a few pages ago. Holliday is no less exempt from it than other players.

     

    Coors Field's biggest trait is that it inflates batting average but may or may not have a significant impact on power numbers. Removing a player from Coors has a visible impact on most players because they don't get to spray hits all over the outfield. The stadium is the king of cheap hits.

     

    Holliday career numbers: .307 .386 .520 .906

    Holliday Coors numbers: .361 .427 .656 1.082

    Holliday Busch numbers: .310 .405 .534 .938

     

    Playing in the NL West has a minimal impact because while AT&T, Dodger Stadium, and PETCO may sap power numbers, they certainly don't hurt batting average to the tune of .055 points. No stadium outside of Coors can manipulate a player's batting average to that extent.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I thought I pretty clearly dispelled this a few pages ago. Holliday is no less exempt from it than other players.

     

    Coors Field's biggest trait is that it inflates batting average but may or may not have a significant impact on power numbers. Removing a player from Coors has a visible impact on most players because they don't get to spray hits all over the outfield. The stadium is the king of cheap hits.

     

    Holliday career numbers: .307 .386 .520 .906

    Holliday Coors numbers: .361 .427 .656 1.082

    Holliday Busch numbers: .310 .405 .534 .938

     

    Playing in the NL West has a minimal impact because while AT&T, Dodger Stadium, and PETCO may sap power numbers, they certainly don't hurt batting average to the tune of .055 points. No stadium outside of Coors can manipulate a player's batting average to that extent.

    I'm not worried about the BA stat, so yeah, Coors inflates that.  That's good.  I'm saying if we think Tulo would have been some average overall hitting shortstop if he didn't play half his games at Coors, which the post I was responding to seemed to suggest, then I think that's very untrue.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'm not worried about the BA stat, so yeah, Coors inflates that.  That's good.  I'm saying if we think Tulo would have been some average overall hitting shortstop if he didn't play half his games at Coors, which the post I was responding to seemed to suggest, then I think that's very untrue.

    Well, anything you take from BA you have to also remove from SLG so the player ends up profiling quite differently once you remove the Coors effect. Average is the one aspect of a slash line that hits OPS twice (once for OBP, once for SLG).

     

    Out of curiosity, I looked up the Rockies' team stats since 2000. It's kinda insane.

     

    Since 2000, these are the years the Rockies led the NL in home batting average: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015.

     

    Since 2000, these are the years the Rockies finished in the top half of the NL in road batting average: ...

     

    It hasn't happened. They've never finished higher than tenth.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A couple weeks back I started a forum in the wrong place ("other baseball") about trading for Tulo. It was generally a pipe dream thread starter, and the comments generally acknowledged that.

     

    Then I again posted in the "trading prospects thread" of the perfect logic and timing of trading for Tulo, but speculated that TR was too inherently cautious and fond of prospects to make such a bold move.

     

    This article, and Jeremy's "little birds" changes a lot, though. This could happen. It's a perfect storm of a position of need, an unexpectedly quick path to competitiveness, an available elite player, a deep farm system, and cap space.

     

    If the Twins put together an "untouchable" list (Dozier, Sano, Buxton...plus maybe Berrios...not sure Gibson merits that list), but offer Rockies their choice of a three-player package of MLB players / prospects, I would think it could be done. And the Twins should do it.

     

    Tulo has put up 5+WAR 6 times in his career--that's one more 5WAR season than Mauer. He's younger than Mauer. Even if he is only a 4WAR player now in decline, he should put up 4/3.5/3/2.5/2 WAR from now until 2020. And that's conservative.

     

    Strike while the iron is hot!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Even discussing Gibson in Tulo trade talks is pure insanity.

     

    Give up Gibson, the only pitcher on this squad who is truly above average, for a SS who could begin his decline phase as early as tomorrow.

     

    I thought the point was to win in 2015. That seems a lot like robbing Peter to pay Paul and that's not going to bring a championship to Minnesota.

     

    Without Gibson, who actually wins a game for the Twins this October? May? Eh... Maybe if you're happy with a 5 IP, 1 ER game. Santana? Nope, can't play. Milone? Maybe - maybe - you put him out there in game four. Pelfrey? LOL.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Even discussing Gibson in Tulo trade talks is pure insanity.

     

    Give up Gibson, the only pitcher on this squad who is truly above average, for a SS who could begin his decline phase as early as tomorrow.

     

    I thought the point was to win in 2015. That seems a lot like robbing Peter to pay Paul and that's not going to bring a championship to Minnesota.

     

    Without Gibson, who actually wins a game for the Twins this October? May? Eh... Too shaky but at least he has a chance. Santana? Nope, can't play. Milone? Maybe - maybe - you put him out there in game four. Pelfrey? LOL.

    The only way trading Gibson makes sense is if the Twins think Berrios is ready as of today to come in and take his spot in the rotation and be effective. I don't think that is the case, so I would be very very surprised if Gibson was moved period.

     

    I think a playoff rotation of:

    1. Gibson

    2. Hughes (has pitched very well as of late)

    3. May

    4. Milone

    Could hold their own.

    Edited by DaveW
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Well, anything you take from BA you have to also remove from SLG so the player ends up profiling quite differently once you remove the Coors effect. Average is the one aspect of a slash line that hits OPS twice (once for OBP, once for SLG).

     

    Out of curiosity, I looked up the Rockies' team stats since 2000. It's kinda insane.

     

    Since 2000, these are the years the Rockies led the NL in home batting average: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015.

     

    Since 2000, these are the years the Rockies finished in the top half of the NL in road batting average: ...

     

    It hasn't happened. They've never finished higher than tenth.

    Yeah, you're mixing the very few star type players the Rockies have had with the plethora of scrubs they've had mixed in with the few stars.  

     

    Tulo's away numbers as a shortstop are top of the line.  And he's had to play a bunch of his away games in decidedly pitcher's parks.  He would have seen a drop of his career slashline if he played somewhere else, for sure, but he still would have been the best hitting shortstop in baseball over that time.  

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...