Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins, Rockies Talk Tulowitzki


    Jeremy Nygaard

    First and foremost, there are literally hundreds of thousands of trade conversations that happen between teams throughout the season and especially as the end of July rolls around. If the Twins weren’t talking to every team about ways to improve their team, that would be extremely disappointing.

    Image courtesy of USA Today Sports

    Twins Video

    Jim Bowden posted a piece called Anatomy of a Trade (Insider required) yesterday at ESPN and - to everyone’s surprise - it was fantastic. It discusses how trades come together and he goes through a hypothetical trade that takes place… and how it progresses over the course of nearly 40 days.

    This hypothetical trade ends with both teams coming to an agreement at the deadline. But you must keep in mind that for every one that goes through, there are probably hundreds that never grow legs and die.

    One conversation that I can confirm has happened - and continues to happen - is between the Twins and the Colorado Rockies. It’s still in the infant stages. In fact, the idea sprouted after an All-Star break where the Twins All-Star second baseman, Brian Dozier, and the Rockies All-Star shortstop, Troy Tulowitzki, “bonded.”

    As Bowden suggests in his piece, the first call is made and the initial offer is “usually lopsided and downright embarrassing.” I don’t know who made the first offer, but the Rockies’ top target is Kyle Gibson. They’ve also asked for Miguel Sano. The Twins target? Troy Tulowitzki.

    Where do negotiations go from here? If the Rockies insist on a top arm, there are really only a couple of options. Besides Gibson, you’d have to imagine that Jose Berrios will be brought up. And possibly Trevor May and/or Alex Meyer to a lesser extent. But as far the “headliner” goes, only Gibson and Berrios could really fit in that category.

    With ten days to go, this discussion could really morph in a lot of different directions. In the right deal, the Rockies would be willing to send some cash. (Seth covered Tulowitzki’s contract really well in this piece posted early today, so I don’t feel the need to re-hash it.) In any deal where money is sent, the Rockies would ask for a better return.

    Would the Twins have interest in acquiring other pieces from the Rockies? Both LaTroy Hawkins and John Axford could be valuable additions to the Twins bullpen. The Twins have also asked about Rockies catcher Nick Hundley, who is under contract through next season and having his best offensive season since 2011.

    If you’re wondering how the Rockies could deal the face of their franchise, it seems like they might be ready to move on from the duo of Tulowitzki and Carlos Gonzalez, with star 3B Nolan Arenado and All-Star 2B D.J. LaMahieu taking over. Moving Tulo, CarGo and potentially Charlie Blackmon could add a lot of valuable pieces to a franchise who has struggled almost as badly as the Twins have over the past five seasons.

    None of that means that a deal is going to happen. Not with the Twins or with anyone else. All things have to line up perfectly for a deal to get done.

    As one source familiar with the talks told me, if the Twins make it through their gauntlet-of-a-week this week, “talks will get serious and move fast.”

    Whether you like Tulowitzki or not, the Twins are having conversations with the intent of getting better this year.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Like I mentioned in my post above, I don't think the Rockies consider that much, and they certainly don't eat any salary in that deal (Gibson or Berrios, no Sano).

     

    But I'm glad to see folks are at least coming around to the idea that the Twins wouldn't walk away from such a deal!

    I don't know. It's not far from the Johan deal and Santana was the best pitcher in baseball with no injury risk. He was also two years younger.

     

    All three players are on the cusp of MLB (unlike the Johan deal). Berrios is a 30-ish prospect. Polanco is a fringe 100. Kepler is pretty much a lock to creep into the 75 range this offseason (that kid is seriously raking at an advanced level).

     

    On top of that, who in baseball needs a SS and can even match that offer?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree they are not getting a top 10 prospect, and maybe no other team matches that offer.

     

    Still doesn't mean the Rockies trade him, though. There is no pressure on them to accept a non-overwhelming offer right now. They could probably do similarly well anytime over the next year or two, if they want.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

    But I'm glad to see folks are at least coming around to the idea that the Twins wouldn't walk away from such a deal!

    FOR the record, I was never in the camp that said we should walk away from such a deal :-)

     

    And obviously I disagree about the money. I've seen Tulo trade scenarios at Fangraphs and other sites during chats that had Rockies getting similar deals and eating some money.  MLB Network has said similar things. Berrios is Sporting News #17 prospect in all of baseball as of last month and they need pitchers like him.

     

    I wish I could say we'll see, but we aren't getting Tulo anyway.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If I'm a GM, I would rather be on the Rockies side of the table on the Tulo or Berrios, Polanco, and Kepler deal.  I will draft and develop a guy, get him up through 30 (peak production), flip him and start over.   That is a much better formula for long term success than the Twins side here.

     

    Personally, I think the Twins have too much money already tied up in aging players.  We have $50M locked up in immovable players (Mauer, Nolasco, and Ervin).  As good as Tulo has been when healthy, he has a shot at becoming immovable with another injury or two.  The irony here is as you get payroll and roster spots locked up in 30+ year olds you need young cheap players to step up.  So I see these three for one deals as hurting you on both ends.  Berrios, Polanco, and Kepler are close to a lock in my eyes of helping the Twins.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Santana had no injury risk? The Mets would like a word with you...

    He had no greater injury risk than any other healthy player.

     

    Tulo can't say the same. He missed half his team's games from 2012-2014.

     

    Santana was as much of a sure thing as one can find in a pitcher at the time of the trade. He never started fewer than 33 games after entering the rotation to start a season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree they are not getting a top 10 prospect, and maybe no other team matches that offer.

    Still doesn't mean the Rockies trade him, though. There is no pressure on them to accept a non-overwhelming offer right now. They could probably do similarly well anytime over the next year or two, if they want.

    I know nothing of the Rockies' financials but yeah, there's a good chance they're in no hurry to trade Tulowitzki at all.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Welcome aboard the Pro-Tulo team Brock! I know you haven't completely written off the deal throughout this whole thread, but up until today you were much more skeptical about it. What's changed?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I know nothing of the Rockies' financials but yeah, there's a good chance they're in no hurry to trade Tulowitzki at all.

     

    Ironically, given his injury risk, I'd deal him if I could, for 3 guys I thought were MLB players.....Berrios, Polanco and someone? I'd do that if I was them. They are terrible right now....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Welcome aboard the Pro-Tulo team Brock! I know you haven't completely written off the deal throughout this whole thread, but up until today you were much more skeptical about it. What's changed?

    It didn't work from the Twins' side of things. It wasn't until I started rearranging multiple pieces that I saw a way to make it work.

     

    I'm still not 100% sold on the idea. It's a big gamble... But it sure is interesting.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ironically, given his injury risk, I'd deal him if I could, for 3 guys I thought were MLB players.....Berrios, Polanco and someone? I'd do that if I was them. They are terrible right now....

    Not to mention that you also free up $20m to sign some pretty good players. A team could look pretty good in 2016-2017 with Gibson/Berrios, Polanco, Kepler/Walker, and $20m.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Welcome aboard the Pro-Tulo team Brock! I know you haven't completely written off the deal throughout this whole thread, but up until today you were much more skeptical about it. What's changed?

    Brock is open minded and actually thinks about opposing ideas as opposed to worrying more about winning an argument.  That's what good debaters do.  It's about the truth. He may not think it's a good idea still, but seems he is at least thinking it may not be so bad.  That's a good thing.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Ironically, given his injury risk, I'd deal him if I could, for 3 guys I thought were MLB players.....Berrios, Polanco and someone? I'd do that if I was them. They are terrible right now....

    exactly, and then I'd turn around and trade Cargo, Blackmon and Hawkins too. Have their 2B and 3B be the face of the team

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It didn't work from the Twins' side of things. It wasn't until I started rearranging multiple pieces that I saw a way to make it work.

     

    I'm still not 100% sold on the idea. It's a big gamble... But it sure is interesting.

    I like it. The trade proposal, the reasoning behind the proposal, all of it. It's a gamble but could pay off in huge dividends for our favorite club.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The best things about

     

    I like it. The trade proposal, the reasoning behind the proposal, all of it. It's a gamble but could pay off in huge dividends for our favorite club.

    The best things about it:We get a stud player till he's almost 36 (not almost 40) and it's a trade that would actually work for both sides.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    And obviously I disagree about the money. I've seen Tulo trade scenarios at Fangraphs and other sites during chats that had Rockies getting similar deals and eating some money.  MLB Network has said similar things.

    Perhaps money is one reason why those hypothetical deals never came to fruition...

     

    How many good-performing stars have been traded with long-term contracts, much less required cash to be sent with them?  Texas sent money with A-Rod, but he was the highest paid player in the game at the time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Perhaps money is one reason why those hypothetical deals never came to fruition...

     

    How many good-performing stars have been traded with long-term contracts, much less required cash to be sent with them?  Texas sent money with A-Rod, but he was the highest paid player in the game at the time.

    My point was, many of the supposed experts believe money will have to move if they get cost controlled quality prospects (and Berrios qualifies at a position of need).  I honestly don't care about the money, don't think the Twins should either, nor think it should be an obstacle in either trade scenario.

     

    So, whatever.  You may be right, truthfully you almost always are IMO, and that's fine with me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The best things about

     

    The best things about it:We get a stud player till he's almost 36 (not almost 40) and it's a trade that would actually work for both sides.

    Exactly. No need to tell me, I've been pro-Tulo trade this whole thread. I nearly lost my mind reading all of the "declining phase" posts earlier...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    exactly, and then I'd turn around and trade Cargo, Blackmon and Hawkins too. Have their 2B and 3B be the face of the team

    The Rockies 2B may have been an all-star, but he is not a very good player.  I suspect some of their reticence to move Tulo might be due to the fact that any infielders they develop of acquire might be needed at 2B soon more than as Tulo's replacement.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I live in Colorado and am a Rockies fan. Tulo has let us down with his inability to stay on the field. That fact alone is enough to say no go. The fact that he would play half his games in TF also scares me. If people have been frustrated by joes inability to stay healthy a few years back , then they will go insane with Tulo. The cost is much to high for a guy with a ton of question marks and a massive prce tag.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Not to mention that you also free up $20m to sign some pretty good players. A team could look pretty good in 2016-2017 with Gibson/Berrios, Polanco, Kepler/Walker, and $20m.

    Not to mention what they could get for Cargo along with Gray, Butler, Story.

     

    And they would still have Arenado and DJ.

     

    They need to trade Cargo and Tulo this year if they go for the rebuilding and they are a mess, so they should be rebuilding.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    On top of that, who in baseball needs a SS and can even match that offer?

    The Yankees desperately need a SS and could match that offer by leading with Severino or Judge.

     

    If the Mets included just one of the 4 young starters (Harvey, deGrom, Syndergaard, Matz), they can probably beat either the Twins or Yankees.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I live in Colorado and am a Rockies fan. Tulo has let us down with his inability to stay on the field. That fact alone is enough to say no go. The fact that he would play half his games in TF also scares me. If people have been frustrated by joes inability to stay healthy a few years back , then they will go insane with Tulo. The cost is much to high for a guy with a ton of question marks and a massive prce tag.

    I'm a Rockies fan, live close to Coloarado and I disagree.  I also don't blame the player for injuries. He's a very good player in all aspects including intangibles.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Pittsburgh could beat our offer too if they were willing to give up Glasnow.

     

    I don't think they would right now, but the Rockies can afford to wait and see.  Heck, even that Twins offer is probably still on the table this winter, if not into 2016 too.  Other teams may see a SS need arise in the next year or two too, especially if they lose patience with struggling incumbents (i.e. Cubs).

    Edited by spycake
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The Yankees desperately need a SS and could match that offer by leading with Severino or Judge.

     

    If the Mets included just one of the 4 young starters (Harvey, deGrom, Syndergaard, Matz), they can probably beat either the Twins or Yankees.

    I think the Yankees would have to offer both Severino and Judge to match Berrios and Kepler. Severino is a stud and I'd probably take him over Berrios but Judge... Eh, I'd go with the huge upside of Kepler over Judge. I've always been slightly skeptical of Kepler but his contact ability, discipline, and potential as a centerfielder won me over. Judge has to rake to be a good player but Kepler has an outside shot at being a fringy centerfielder in the majors, which makes it a lot easier to get production out of him.

     

    Also, Kepler is nearly a full year younger.

     

    Agreed on the Mets. If they want to get into the mix, they could win Tulo (really, so could the Twins, but Ryan isn't trading Buxton or Sano).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I live in Colorado and am a Rockies fan. Tulo has let us down with his inability to stay on the field. That fact alone is enough to say no go. The fact that he would play half his games in TF also scares me. If people have been frustrated by joes inability to stay healthy a few years back , then they will go insane with Tulo. The cost is much to high for a guy with a ton of question marks and a massive prce tag.

     

    I am not sure how familiar you are with Minnesota.  Allow me to explain. We complain six months of the year because it is too cold.  Then summer rolls around and we complain that it is too hot and muggy.  We run the AC and stay indoors.  Kind of how we operate.

     

    In baseball terms we spend years complaining about seeing our players leave even though they often leave with really bad contracts.  Then we give Joe Mauer $184M and then instantly complain when he is hurt, moves off catcher, or doesn’t hit enough HR’s.  So please let us complain about not getting Tulo. Don’t rain on this parade.  The enthusiasm of the trade (that won’t happen) will last until he hits into a double play or misses one game.  Then we will spend five years complaining about all these aging veterans.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...