Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins, Rockies Talk Tulowitzki


    Jeremy Nygaard

    First and foremost, there are literally hundreds of thousands of trade conversations that happen between teams throughout the season and especially as the end of July rolls around. If the Twins weren’t talking to every team about ways to improve their team, that would be extremely disappointing.

    Image courtesy of USA Today Sports

    Twins Video

    Jim Bowden posted a piece called Anatomy of a Trade (Insider required) yesterday at ESPN and - to everyone’s surprise - it was fantastic. It discusses how trades come together and he goes through a hypothetical trade that takes place… and how it progresses over the course of nearly 40 days.

    This hypothetical trade ends with both teams coming to an agreement at the deadline. But you must keep in mind that for every one that goes through, there are probably hundreds that never grow legs and die.

    One conversation that I can confirm has happened - and continues to happen - is between the Twins and the Colorado Rockies. It’s still in the infant stages. In fact, the idea sprouted after an All-Star break where the Twins All-Star second baseman, Brian Dozier, and the Rockies All-Star shortstop, Troy Tulowitzki, “bonded.”

    As Bowden suggests in his piece, the first call is made and the initial offer is “usually lopsided and downright embarrassing.” I don’t know who made the first offer, but the Rockies’ top target is Kyle Gibson. They’ve also asked for Miguel Sano. The Twins target? Troy Tulowitzki.

    Where do negotiations go from here? If the Rockies insist on a top arm, there are really only a couple of options. Besides Gibson, you’d have to imagine that Jose Berrios will be brought up. And possibly Trevor May and/or Alex Meyer to a lesser extent. But as far the “headliner” goes, only Gibson and Berrios could really fit in that category.

    With ten days to go, this discussion could really morph in a lot of different directions. In the right deal, the Rockies would be willing to send some cash. (Seth covered Tulowitzki’s contract really well in this piece posted early today, so I don’t feel the need to re-hash it.) In any deal where money is sent, the Rockies would ask for a better return.

    Would the Twins have interest in acquiring other pieces from the Rockies? Both LaTroy Hawkins and John Axford could be valuable additions to the Twins bullpen. The Twins have also asked about Rockies catcher Nick Hundley, who is under contract through next season and having his best offensive season since 2011.

    If you’re wondering how the Rockies could deal the face of their franchise, it seems like they might be ready to move on from the duo of Tulowitzki and Carlos Gonzalez, with star 3B Nolan Arenado and All-Star 2B D.J. LaMahieu taking over. Moving Tulo, CarGo and potentially Charlie Blackmon could add a lot of valuable pieces to a franchise who has struggled almost as badly as the Twins have over the past five seasons.

    None of that means that a deal is going to happen. Not with the Twins or with anyone else. All things have to line up perfectly for a deal to get done.

    As one source familiar with the talks told me, if the Twins make it through their gauntlet-of-a-week this week, “talks will get serious and move fast.”

    Whether you like Tulowitzki or not, the Twins are having conversations with the intent of getting better this year.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

     

    That is only part of the story. Before the batter even hits the ball he is at an enormous advantage for two reasons. Opposing pitchers tire more quickly at elevation and opposing pitchers all

     

    So part of my theory (and what my initial stat analysis showed) is that part of the reason Rockies hitters struggle on the road (the big splits) is that all of a sudden the ball is breaking a lot more than usual and they aren't able to adjust in the course of 1-2 road series. When given a longer period to adjust (like being traded/FA) their non Coors stats improved.

     

    Brock posted some stats a few pages ago that are misleading about Holliday. His Busch numbers are extraordinary when compared to his Coors numbers. Of course his BA is down at Busch. A) park effect B) BA league wide is down 15 pts from his Rockies days C) Holliday is in his 30's for most of his career at Busch

     

    The only questions regarding a Tulo trade is how much has to be given up and if he can be healthy. The health part of the equation is the only reason that the Twins can even consider a deal w/o buxton/Sano in it or even consider it all. The money really doesn't matter. Mauer/Santana/Nolasco are all FA's by the time Buxton/Sano (and most young players) are in arb. In the next few years the Twins don't have any big contracts or extensions to commit to since arguably almost every position except catcher, SS and front line starter are filled mostly with young and cheap players. FA is a horrible place to spend money and the Twins aren't going to be going after a 150-200M starter regardless if Tulo is here. Saving money on seasonal payroll is only useful if you have somewhere good to spend it later.

    Oh snap! Brock given a Stone TOLD Stunner re: his Holliday example
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I love the idea of going after Tulo. A healthy Tulo is probably the best shortstop in baseball, and perhaps one of the top 3 or 4 players in all of baseball. However, I am not interested at all in parting with Gibson and/or Sano. Gibson is far too important to part with right now and Sano is too great a part of the future to get rid of. 

     

    It should be worth noting that third base is currently occupied in Colorado, as Nolan Arenado has that spot locked down for years to come, and Colorado has no DH, as they are an NL team. They have a number of first base prospects and I guarantee you they don't put Sano in that cavernous outfield they have at Coors Field. Sano isn't a fit in Colorado. 

     

    If Gibson is mentioned in the offseason, that may be a different story. But you can't deal away your ace in a playoff race. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Do you think the Twins will sign an ace in free agency if they DON'T have Tulowitzki on the roster?

    I think the problem is that they thought they did, three times in the last two years actually.

     

    I don't want them signing an ace, that rarely works out for the team. I want them to develop their own, just like winning clubs do, then sign and extend him with money not already wasted on declining vets.

     

    I'd be on board with trying for Tulowitzki or Cole Hammels if this club hadn't already foolishly gave big fat deals to Mauer, Nolasco, Santana and Hughes. There's only 25 spots on the active roster, the Twins are supposed to lock up 20% of them on untradable and uncuttable aging players? It's not going to be pretty in a couple years when the team realistically should be a contender.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sigh. Yeah, I got "told".

     

    *rolls eyes*

     

    Care to revisit your completely baseless, statistically inaccurate, and anecdotal Escobar argument from a few pages ago, Dave?

    Escobar is not a good baseball player.He should not be a starting player for a major league team at any position. Especially a contending one, Punto or Derosa are a much better option.

     

    Rebuttal?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He has a 110 wRC+ as a shortstop and defensive metrics rate him as consistently average.

     

    But yeah, other than that he's pretty terrible.

    .670 career OPS, 85 career OPS+. .684 ops this year. Yawn.

     

    No range.

     

    Yeah keep trotting out more and more made up things regarding Escobar.

     

    Haven't seen a man crush like this on a crappy player since Nick N on Brendan Harris and Alaskan on Joe Dillon :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tulo's career OPS on the road is .819. That was accumulated during his prime. It is safe his OPS the next 5 years will be lower and he is likely to be injured more than he has, which is a lot.

     

    We would be effectively giving up on a borderline Top 100 prospect (polanco) AND likely have to part with a package centered around one the best two young pitchers in our system (JO or Gibson). Both are cost controlled through their prime which is invaluable.

     

    Further. If we had a spare 100 million last off season we could have signed Hanley Ramirez who has a career OPS of .869. 50 basis points higher than Tulo's road OPS and we would not have to part with good assets.

     

    Lastly. Roughly 90 million would be committed to a bunch of players in their 30's save dozier and Hughes. IMHO that prevents keeping a talented young core a few years from now because we have 32-35 year olds. It should not be the case but it is.

     

    Lastly part Two. If we are going to part with crazy young players and take a huge salary back, I cast a vote for hamels. Not tulo. He has been healthier and does not have home park question marks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tulo's career OPS on the road is .819. That was accumulated during his prime. It is safe his OPS the next 5 years will be lower and he is likely to be injured more than he has, which is a lot.

     

    We would be effectively giving up on a borderline Top 100 prospect (polanco) AND likely have to part with a package centered around one the best two young pitchers in our system (JO or Gibson). Both are cost controlled through their prime which is invaluable.

     

    Further. If we had a spare 100 million last off season we could have signed Hanley Ramirez who has a career OPS of .869. 50 basis points higher than Tulo's road OPS and we would not have to part with good assets.

     

    Lastly. Roughly 90 million would be committed to a bunch of players in their 30's save dozier and Hughes. IMHO that prevents keeping a talented young core a few years from now because we have 32-35 year olds. It should not be the case but it is.

     

    Lastly part Two. If we are going to part with crazy young players and take a huge salary back, I cast a vote for hamels. Not tulo. He has been healthier and does not have home park question marks.

    Tulo has a .820 ops on the road this year, the decline certainly hasn't shown up yet!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Tulo's career OPS on the road is .819. That was accumulated during his prime. It is safe his OPS the next 5 years will be lower and he is likely to be injured more than he has, which is a lot.

    We would be effectively giving up on a borderline Top 100 prospect (polanco) AND likely have to part with a package centered around one the best two young pitchers in our system (JO or Gibson). Both are cost controlled through their prime which is invaluable.

    Further. If we had a spare 100 million last off season we could have signed Hanley Ramirez who has a career OPS of .869. 50 basis points higher than Tulo's road OPS and we would not have to part with good assets.

    Lastly. Roughly 90 million would be committed to a bunch of players in their 30's save dozier and Hughes. IMHO that prevents keeping a talented young core a few years from now because we have 32-35 year olds. It should not be the case but it is.

    Lastly part Two. If we are going to part with crazy young players and take a huge salary back, I cast a vote for hamels. Not tulo. He has been healthier and does not have home park question marks.

    How has Hanley looked this year?

     

    Tulo has an AWAY OPS over .819 this year, and Tulo's away OPS has been heavily affected by NL West parks, as I've shown. Additionally, he can still play shortstop, which Ramirez can't.  Ramirez can't play anywhere and to say he was a below average shortstop when he did play there would be generous. It would give him too much credit. So we'd still need a shortstop.

     

    Career wRC+ of 125 for Tulo and 131 for Hanley.  One has been a quality defender most of his career, they other, yeah, not so much.  Tulo has been and is still a much better player.

     

     

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As good as Tulowitzki is I would rather have the Twins hold off for another year before making a big splash deal.  Also, if we were to make a move to acquire a superstar I'd much rather go after an Ace pitcher.  I'd much rather the Twins put their eggs in the Cole Hamels basket and try to make part of the deal offloading Nolasco's deal to open up both a rotation spot and save a few bucks.

     

    I think the Twins have a better chance of finding a solid SS between Polanco/Escobar/Gordon/Santana than they do of getting a legitimate Ace pitcher like Hamels.  I guess with some nice organizational depth SS isn't as big of an issue to me and I see a better chance at them filling that void internally.

     

    Now Ace Pitcher and/or C are the spots I could understand making a splash.  To me, Lucroy or Hamels should be the targets if the Twins are ready to make a splash.  I think they are a year away from making any moves of the sort though.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    So now it is 2017, but only if they develop an ace internally. ...then they are allowed to try to win it all?

    Unreal. Who in this system looks like an ace?

    Not going to be an ace, but I'm surprised that Taylor Rogers has been mentioned a handful of times in this thread while Tyler Duffey hasn't been mentioned at all. He is having a great year so far. He would come up to the majors before Berrios.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the later of those two were enough I'd do it in a heartbeat. Including Berrios gives me pause. He's the only thing we have resembling a true ace in the near-term. It's hard to win a World Series with Kyle Gibson or Phil Hughes as your best pitcher.

    I don't think they can trade Gibson in the middle of a playoff race, I would give up Berrios +Polanco+Vargas+Nolasco for Tulo.

    Or May+Polanco+Kepler+Nolasco for Tulo

    The idea is you toss in Nolasco and don't have to ask the Rockies for money back.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sick burn, bro.

    Rebuttal on his zero range? Instead of a double play he allows a game Clinching single and interferes with the runner to boot.

     

    I'm sure you can make up some stats to justify it though bud.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am as big a fan of Tulowitzki as anybody and would love to be able to watch him as a member of the Twins. That being said, I would be less inclined to give up Gibson, Mainly because it would be a big blow to the current rotation but also because he is developing into a really good and unique pitcher with an ability to induce GBs at a high rate and produce K's.

     

    Though you have to give something to get something, so I would live with Berrios being included along with Santana/Polanco (gives them a SS) as well as one of the position players that has fallen out of favor Vargas/Arcia/Pinto and another lesser piece likely a pitcher such as Duffey, Jorge or Rogers. If cash has to be included, take Nolasco. My cause for concern, and the reason I wouldn't want to include too much more is not only money owed but the injury history. No question he is one of the games very best when healthy but he has missed time throughout his career.

     

    All this talk might be moot as he has said he wants to stay and the owner is a big fan.

     

    http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/07/troy-tulowitzki-not-interested-trade-rockies.html#comments

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I see absolutely nothing special about Gibson at all.  He turns 28 this year, not 22 or 23. He is what he is at this point and it's nothing special at all.  If HE is going to be the centerpiece of this rotation for year to come, we are boned.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I love Tulo, I really do. I just can't see making a trade for in though. He is just hurt too much. There is no way I would move Gibson or Berrios. 

     

    Another thing, Why do I keep reading that Berrios is too short to be an ace? He is six feet tall. We are talking about a major league pitcher right? Not a small forward. Plenty, I mean literally thousands of pitchers have been just fine playing at that height. Some of them have even been called aces. Some of them have even been called Hall Of Famers. Find something real to knock about him if you don't like him, but his height, really trying to stretch the criticism on that one.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So because some people aren't enamored with Gibson, we should move him to get Tulowitski?  An older player who has had trouble staying on the field?

     

    This is somehow supposed to get us closer to....what exactly?  Another year of Mike Pelfrey?  I fail to see how that makes even an ounce of sense for accomplishing something this year or in the likely window with Tulowitski.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When we start talking about Tulo being an older player, does it matter that Tulo is only three years older than Gibson? And that he's actually a proven top notch player for a decade as opposed to a pitcher who hasn't shown himself to be anything more than average at best?

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    When we start talking about Tulo being an older player, does it matter that Tulo is only three years older than Gibson?

     

    With his injury history?  Um, yes.  Yes it does.

     

    I also fail to see how giving up one of our better, younger starting pitchers moves us forward.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    With his injury history? Um, yes. Yes it does.

     

    I also fail to see how giving up one of our better, younger starting pitchers moves us forward.

    What about Gibsons injury history?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tulo is an actual proven top notch player, and has been for a decade, The 'young' Gibson (who will be 28 going into the offseason) hasn't shown himself to be anything more than average at best.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So because some people aren't enamored with Gibson, we should move him to get Tulowitski? An older player who has had trouble staying on the field?

     

    This is somehow supposed to get us closer to....what exactly? Another year of Mike Pelfrey? I fail to see how that makes even an ounce of sense for accomplishing something this year or in the likely window with Tulowitski.

    The problem Gibson will always have is he can't strike guys out and his stuff just isn't that good. Very good teams like the Angels will be able to take advantage more often then not.

     

    I like Gibson, but he projects more to be a average two or nice 3 then anything else.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The problem Gibson will always have is he can't strike guys out and his stuff just isn't that good. Very good teams like the Angels will be able to take advantage more often then not.

    I like Gibson, but he projects more to be a average two or nice 3 then anything else.

    I'll be shocked if he ever shows the skills to be a true #2.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No one is immortalizing Kyle Gibson.  He's just, you know, sort of important right now also.  

     

    SS aging curves and Tulo's injury history are a very stacked deck against this move long term, but you hurt your short term goals to give up one of your better starters to get him.  Could there be a net gain?  Sure, but why would you do this for anything other than prospects?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...