Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

  • Twins Daily Awards 2016: Most Improved Player

    Seth Stohs

    By Seth Stohs

    The Twins season is over, mercifully. However, that also means that it is time to hand out some Major League Awards. Last month, we gave out five Minor League awards. Over the next four days, we’ll hand out four Major League Awards.

    Our first 2016 Twins Daily award of the offseason is the Most Improved Player. The Twins Daily writers, including minor league writers, voted for their top 3 most improved. There were a handful of decent candidates, but at the end of the day/season, Brian Dozier was the overwhelming choice for the Twins Most Improved Player.

    Image courtesy of Brad Rempel, USA Today

    Twins Video

    “Improvement” is something that can be found and defined in several ways. It’s hard to believe that a Most Improved player can be coming off an All-Star season. Brian Dozier posted a .751 OPS in 2015 with 39 doubles and 28 home runs. In 2014, Brian Dozier hit 33 doubles, 23 homers and had an OPS of .762.

    In other words, Brian Dozier was a really good player before 2016.

    However, Dozier saw an 18% improvement in his OPS. He hit .268/.340/.546 (.886) with 35 doubles, five triples and 42 home runs (including 40 as second baseman, an American League record).

    In 2015, he set a Twins record with 148 strikeouts. He cut that number down to 138. We often wondered what Dozier could do if he could cut down the strikeouts and find a way to hit for better batting average. We found out in 2016. Dozier raised his batting average from .236 to .268. In doing so, his on-base percentage moved from .307 to .340. A .034 improvement in batting average, with about the same walk rate meant that he was on base 7.5% more often than in 2015.

    However, the biggest area of improvement came in the Slugging Percentage and Isolated Power. In 2015, Dozier’s Isolated Power was a very respectable .208. That number jumped to .278 in 2016. I guess that’s what happens when you jump from 28 home runs to 42 home runs.

    But improvement can mean different things, including improvement within a season. For Dozier, his improvement from the first two months of the season to the final four months of the season was as dramatic as you can imagine.

    In late May, Dozier was out of the Twins lineup two straight games, given a couple of days by his manager to regroup. At that time, he was hitting .199/.284/.318 (.602) with just six doubles and four home runs. There were even some fans calling for the Twins to send him to Rochester.

    He was back in the Twins lineup on May 25, and from that point forward, he hit .291/.356/.621 (.977) with 29 doubles, five triples and 38 home runs in 115 games. And that is even after ending his season by going 7-58 (.127) over his final 13 games.

    There were certainly other candidates for Most Improved Twins player in 2016. If Eduardo Nunez had stuck around all season, it is possible he would have been the lead candidate for this award. He went from utility infielder to All-Star shortstop with a strong first half. Kennys Vargas had an immensely disappointing 2015 season. While he spent most of the 2016 season putting up fairly pedestrian numbers in Rochester. Those numbers were boosted by a ton of walks, which is what we needed to see from him. He was terrific in his limited duty with the big league club, hitting .238/.343/.517 (.860) in 46 games with the Twins, including 10 home runs. 21 of his 35 hits for the Twins went for extra bases. And Byron Buxton’s September was a major improvement over anything we’ve seen from him in the big leagues over the previous 14 months. Kurt Suzuki was good with the bat again in 2016 after a rough 2015.

    While the Twins took a huge step backwards (maybe 10-12 steps backwards?), it should not cloud our vision on the fact that there were some positives during the 2016 season. Brian Dozier led the way in many categories and it was his improvement in 2016 that helped make the team something to watch.

    Feel free to share your thoughts, and your ballot, in the comments below. In an attempt at transparency, below are the votes from our writers and the results:

    The Ballots

    Seth: 1.) Eduardo Nunez, 2.) Brian Dozier, 3.) Kennys Vargas

    Nick: 1.) Brian Dozier, 2.) Kurt Suzuki, 3.) Byron Buxton

    Parker: 1.) Brian Dozier, 2.) Eduardo Nunez, 3.) Kennys Vargas

    Cody: 1.) Eduardo Nunez, 2.) Brian Dozier, 3.) Kennys Vargas

    Jeremy: 1.) Byron Buxton, 2.) Kennys Vargas, 3.) Ryan Pressly

    Steve L: 1.) Brian Dozier, 2.) Kennys Vargas, 3.) Byron Buxton

    Eric: 1.) Max Kepler, 2.) Buddy Boshers, 3.) Byron Buxton

    Points

    Brian Dozier - 13

    Eduardo Nunez - 8

    Kennys Vargas - 7

    Byron Buxton - 6

    Max Kepler - 3

    Buddy Boshers - 2

    Kurt Suzuki - 2

    Ryan Pressly - 1

    Seth Stohs has been blogging about the Minnesota Twins since May 2003. A founder and owner of Twins Daily, Seth has been a Twins fan for 40 years and has a passion for covering the minor leagues and prospects.
    Follow Seth Stohs on Twitter: sethtweets

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share
     Share
    Go to articles

    Community Blogs

    • Gopher Preview (Week 3)
    • The Downfall of Byung-Ho Park

    Forum Topics

    • PVTEST
    • Hey, look here
    • This is an exceptionally long title to test how various points look on a phone and smaller devices
    The Ultimate Minnesota Twins Gift Ideas Shopping Guide

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Kwak

    Kwak 1,440

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    Most Improved--Has to be Buxton. Last year he was basically overwhelmed--started this year likewise. Dozier had 3.5 great months, and of course he was withthe Twins given his contract and all, while Buxton went to Rochester. Buxton's September/October equaled Dozier's August. The outlier is that Dozier was a proven veteran who had demonstrated both SLG and consistency, but Buxton was making rumbles like a bust--until his final recall.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    diehardtwinsfan

    diehardtwinsfan 14,830

  • Community Moderator

    • Posted

     

    Most Improved--Has to be Buxton. Last year he was basically overwhelmed--started this year likewise. Dozier had 3.5 great months, and of course he was withthe Twins given his contract and all, while Buxton went to Rochester. Buxton's September/October equaled Dozier's August. The outlier is that Dozier was a proven veteran who had demonstrated both SLG and consistency, but Buxton was making rumbles like a bust--until his final recall.

     

    Buxton had one good month... Not seeing this.  I'd vote Vargas over Buxton for no other reason than he forced his way back into the 2017 picture.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Parker Hageman

    Parker Hageman 3,850

  • Owner

    • Posted

    For me it boiled down to this with Brian Dozier:

     

    2nd Half, 2015: 311 PA .210/.280/.359 9 HR

    1st Half, 2016: 359 PA .246/.335/.450 14 HR

    2nd Half, 2016: 332 PA .291/.344/.646 28 HR

     

    Nunez's power numbers -- the 12 home runs -- was the reason I thought he was second but in reality, he hit very similar to his 2015 season this year with the Twins as well (758 OPS vs 764 OPS). 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    alarp33

    alarp33 2,765

  • Provisional Member

    • Posted (edited)

     

    Buxton had one good month... Not seeing this.  I'd vote Vargas over Buxton for no other reason than he forced his way back into the 2017 picture.

     

    Vargas had one good month.  

     

    From Aug 1 to end of season Vargas hit .163/.252/.380

     

    He is a designated hitter, not a gold glove caliber center fielder.  If that's forcing his way into the 2017 picture, that says more about the state of the organization than anything he did

    Edited by alarp33
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    h2oface

    h2oface 7,066

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    Dozier got the extra homer and RBI that he is not getting credit for. The rain. He needs an asterisk, and the rule needs to be changed to keep all individual stats from rainouts. To pretend that they didn't happen is cheating history.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Doomtints

    Doomtints 2,816

  • Verified Member

    • Posted (edited)

    I can see the love for Dozier but his run at the end of the season is unsustainable.  He deserves a team MVP award (probably), however.

     

    I think it has to be Nunez, who made the best of getting regular playing time due to the rest of the team being terrible.  Apparently he played too well to keep around.  Shucks.

     

    The rest of the players that got votes can be completely ignored for the purpose of this discussion, but it looks like everyone had to produce 3 candidates so I understand why they ended up here.   :P

    Edited by Doomtints
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Doomtints

    Doomtints 2,816

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

     

    Vargas had one good month.  

     

    From Aug 1 to end of season Vargas hit .163/.252/.380

     

    He is a designated hitter, not a gold glove caliber center fielder.  If that's forcing his way into the 2017 picture, that says more about the state of the organization than anything he did

     

    Unfortunately, most of the guys on this list had one good month.  So yeah, you're right.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    alarp33

    alarp33 2,765

  • Provisional Member

    • Posted

     

    Unfortunately, most of the guys on this list had one good month.  So yeah, you're right.  

     

    One was the last month, not the 1st.  Since this is about "Most Improved" I just found the reasoning to pick Vargas to be odd

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Doomtints

    Doomtints 2,816

  • Verified Member

    • Posted (edited)

     

    One was the last month, not the 1st.  Since this is about "Most Improved" I just found the reasoning to pick Vargas to be odd

     

    I can see why he would be a #3, because there are really only two guys to pick from this year.  

     

    I imagine the only reason Nunez was not on some lists is because he is no longer on the team.  However, it seems like a couple of guys threw darts at a lineup card to determine their picks.  That's OK, that's about all this year has been worth.  

    Edited by Doomtints
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Doomtints

    Doomtints 2,816

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

     

    If you miss 1/3 of the season as a member of the Twins because you were traded and not a Twin...... Well, you can no longer be the most improved Twin because you are not a Twin. At least in my world.

     

    It's "Most Improved Player."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    h2oface

    h2oface 7,066

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    It's "Most Improved Player."

    Exactly. His averages: OPS, OPS+, BA, SLUG, and OBP for the year was virtually identical to 2015. Improved? Not so much. And even if you disregard the last two months...... not so much. In my world, the whole season's performance counts, though. You can vote the way you like. I will do the same.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Champuckett

    Champuckett 153

  • Provisional Member

    • Posted

    Dozier was an all-star last year.  It was no surprise he hit a lot of HRs again, but hitting 40+ was clearly a surprise.  He has had 3 decent seasons with good offensive stats coming into 2016.  Our best player by far for the year was obviously Dozier, but most improved?

     

    I would give that to Nunez.  Even though he left midway through the season, he was a terror against other teams for the first few months of the season.  He had a high ba and would often steal 1-2 bases once he got on with an incredible 27 stolen bases in just 91 games (he lead the team this  year in that stat 9 more than the runner up).  He was never more than a gap filler in the lineup and an offensive+ utility infielder until this season where he locked down a starting job for the first time with the Twins.  He clearly made the most of it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Seth Stohs

    Seth Stohs 23,732

  • Owner

    • Posted

     

    If you miss 1/3 of the season as a member of the Twins because you were traded and not a Twin...... Well, you can no longer be the most improved Twin because you are not a Twin. At least in my world.

     

    Fair point, but when I sent out the "ballot," I didn't give any criteria for any of the awards, so the voters could determine their thoughts on this as well and pick as they choose. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    h2oface

    h2oface 7,066

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    If Most Disappointing equals a 25-home runs season... the Twins are in for some exciting years ahead!!

    That is the hope, eh? From what most predicted Sano would do this year (didn't you have a Sano prediction?) , it was a let down. Hey, plenty of room to improve, for the whole .230 club, which includes Sano, Kepler, Vargas, and Escobar, with Buxton knocking on the door in the .220 club. Remember, Arcia made the 20 homer club, and that was as exciting as it got. Yeah, I stick with Sano's season as most disappointing, with hopes he really decides to work on his craft and drop 20 pounds over the off season and really improve in 2017.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Teddy

    Teddy 102

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    So, 42 possible points to be given out across 21 voting slots by 7 voters. Two pitchers out of the 21 slots on the list.

     

    Sounds about right for what we saw this year.  I really hope we see mostly pitchers on this list next year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Seth Stohs

    Seth Stohs 23,732

  • Owner

    • Posted

     

    That is the hope, eh? From what most predicted Sano would do this year (didn't you have a Sano prediction?) , it was a let down. Hey, plenty of room to improve, for the whole .230 club, which includes Sano, Kepler, Vargas, and Escobar, with Buxton knocking on the door in the .220 club. Remember, Arcia made the 20 homer club, and that was as exciting as it got. Yeah, I stick with Sano's season as most disappointing, with hopes he really decides to work on his craft and drop 20 pounds over the off season and really improve in 2017.

     

    Oh yeah, I had him for like 40 homers and a .930+ OPS... I'm not saying it wasn't disappointing, but at the same time, he set the bar really high in 2015.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    jimmer

    jimmer 9,961

  • Verified Member

    • Posted (edited)

     

    If Most Disappointing equals a 25-home runs season... the Twins are in for some exciting years ahead!!

    If excitement in offense is judged by HRs only, yeah.  

     

    When a young top notch power prospect is a horrible defender at any corner spot on the field, and his bat is the only redeeming quality in his game, a wRC+ of 107 (or OPS+ of 110 if one prefers) is quite a disappointment, regardless of the HRs.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Seth Stohs

    Seth Stohs 23,732

  • Owner

    • Posted

     

    If excitement in offense is judged by HRs only, yeah.  

     

    When a young top notch power prospect is a horrible defender at any corner spot on the field, and his bat is the only redeeming quality in his game, a wRC+ of 107 (or OPS+ of 110 if one prefers) is quite a disappointment, regardless of the HRs.

     

    Not disagreeing with any of that... It was a disappointing season, but I also feel like it also tells us just how good he can be.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...
    ×

×
×
  • Create New...