Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Acquire Jake Odorizzi From Rays For Jermaine Palacios


    Seth Stohs

    According to multiple reports, the Twins have acquired RHP Jake Odorizzi from the Tampa Bay Rays in exchange for shortstop prospect Jermaine Palacios.

    Michael Pineda moved to 60-Day Disabled List to make room on the 40-man roster to make room for Odorizzi.

    Image courtesy of Derek Hamilton, USA Today

    Twins Video

    One day after Twins fans were frustrated by the signing of Anibal Sanchez, the Twins have acquired a hard-throwing right-hander from the Tampa Bay Rays.

    Odorizzi went 10-8 in 2017 with a 4.14 ERA for the Rays. In his four full major league seasons, he has had ERAs between 3.35 and 4.14. After compiling a 9.3 K/9 rate in his first full season, he has averaged 8.0 K/9 exactly in his last three seasons.

    The Twins acquired a guy who will be fit well at the top of the Twins rotation with Ervin Santana and Jose Berrios.

    Tweet from Twins PR director Dustin Morse:

    https://twitter.com/morsecode/status/965059891277762560

    The Twins gave up shortstop Jermaine Palacios. The shortstop had a return to prospect status in 2017 after a disappointing and injury-plagued 2016 season. He was just outside of the Twins Daily Top 20 prospect rankings, but was in most Top 30s.

    But the Twins have strong shortstop depth throughout the organization. Jorge Polanco is in the big leagues. Nick Gordon should spend most of 2018 in Rochester. And Royce Lewis and Wander Javier are high-ceiling prospects in the lower levels.

    ccs-19-0-80028600-1518923740_thumb.jpg

    Jermaine Palacios was appreciative of the Twins and excited about this trade. Here is what he told Mariana Guzman after the deal.

    One day after the Sanchez signing frustrated Twins fans, the Derek Falvey/Thad Levine Twins pulled off what appears to be a very good trade on its surface.

    What are your thoughts?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Sort of OK. Odorizzi had a bad year last year and may have been slotted eighth in the Rays’ rotation this year. If last year is not a trend and he moderately bounces back to being a 2 WAR pitcher, then it’s good.

     

    If the Rays are dumping, will they take Tyler Wells for Dickerson?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Please, explain how he was terrible last year. 4.14 ERA last year would put him very solidly at our number three. How is this not a great get? We basically have the same team as last year but better relievers and a better starter than all but two of our last year's starters. I was hoping for Cobb but this appears to be a solid improvement. Twins don't get better by picking up all stars at every position. They get better by improving at multiple positions either by acquiring guys or having guys already here do better. Sanchez, I don't get. This one looks good. I've got to believe he is better than the Colon, Santiago, Turley, etc. guys we were running out there for the 4th and 5th spots last year.

    5.43 FIP, 5.10 xFIP.

    He had an extremely lucky, and unsustainable babip.

     

    Now, that doesn't mean he can't be better this year. He's done it before. But last year he was pretty bad, which is why he was available for a borderline top 20 organizational prospect.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Can't believe the number of people ho-humming this deal.  Odorizzi is the most polished, in-his-prime starting pitcher we've acquired since Ervin.  He's averaged 30-starts and 165-innings over four years, while consistently keeping his team in games.  He cost us our #4 prospect at SS, not our #4 overall.  Is he a lock-down #1 starter?  Obviously not, but realistically we're gonna have to develop that for ourselves, like almost everyone else.  At worst, this allows the Twins time to continue to polish the next wave like Gonsalves, Romero, Slegers, Jose, Littel & yes even Stewart.

     

    Patience paid off, Falvine.  Good job!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Can't believe the number of people ho-humming this deal. Odorizzi is the most polished, in-his-prime starting pitcher we've acquired since Ervin. He's averaged 30-starts and 165-innings over four years, while consistently keeping his team in games. He cost us our #4 prospect at SS, not our #4 overall. Is he a lock-down #1 starter? Obviously not, but realistically we're gonna have to develop that for ourselves, like almost everyone else. At worst, this allows the Twins time to continue to polish the next wave like Gonsalves, Romero, Slegers, Jose, Littel & yes even Stewart.

     

    Patience paid off, Falvine. Good job!

    I think maybe you should ask yourself, "why was he available straight up for such a low level prospect?"

     

    If last year was a trend in the wrong direction, he might barely be a major league starter. (He was 0.0 bWAR last year.)

    If it was an explainable blip, then yes, it could be a great price.

    The point of the trade that others are excited about (the relatively low return), is actually a point that worries me. If even 1 or 2 teams around the league weren't concerned about his 2017, then surely someone easily beats our offer, right?

     

    But, given the low cost, I'm cautiously optimistic that they've identified an injury or other mechanical issue that caused 2017.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Pretty sure Sanchez signed a minor league contract. No need to clear space unless he makes the team out of ST.

     

    Sanchez's deal is an MLB deal, pending a physical. No word yet from the Twins on the deal. But reports are that it's a non-guaranteed MLB deal. But, since it'll mean a 40-man roster spot, a few things need to be done before the Twins announce it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That seems like highway robbery to me. When I saw the headline, I immediately looked to see what prospects they gave up, assuming it would be a couple in the 15 range. Pretty amazed to see it be only Palacios.

     

    Makes me wonder how far off this board is in terms of guesses on an Archer offer.

    Odorizzi and Archer aren't comparable as trade assets, IMO.

     

    I'm not sure many would have expected it would cost much for Odorizzi.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think maybe you should ask yourself, "why was he available straight up for such a low level prospect?"

    If last year was a trend in the wrong direction, he might barely be a major league starter. (He was 0.0 bWAR last year.)
    If it was an explainable blip, then yes, it could be a great price.
    The point of the trade that others are excited about (the relatively low return), is actually a point that worries me. If even 1 or 2 teams around the league weren't concerned about his 2017, then surely someone easily beats our offer, right?

    But, given the low cost, I'm cautiously optimistic that they've identified an injury or other mechanical issue that caused 2017.

     

    I get your point, truly I do.  But even if he is trending downward, he still has a long way to fall to be on par with our current #3, Kyle Gibson.  Don't know why the Rays took the deal, but am sure excited that they did.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I still cant believe we got Odorizzi for Palacios and thats it.  Don't get me wrong, I think he's a fine prospect, but when I saw the headliner that a SS was involved, I thought immediately it was Gordon, or worse, Javier.   To give up only our 4th best SS prospect is great.  Maybe they like Palacios better than Gordon, but I still take Gordon over him quite easily.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I get your point, truly I do. But even if he is trending downward, he still has a long way to fall to be on par with our current #3, Kyle Gibson. Don't know why the Rays took the deal, but am sure excited that they did.

    Kyle Gibson has never had a FIP or an xFIP as bad as Odorizzi had last year.

    So, no he wouldn't have to fall any further to be on par with Gibson, he'd already be worse.

    Odorizzi's ERA last year was based on Danny Santana level unsustainable luck.

     

    Hopefully, though, last year was an aberration, either by injury or something correctable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Not sure that it matters, but I'll just throw this out there... Here is where Jermaine Palacios ranked in the 2018 Twins Prospect Handbook:

     

    Seth - 19

    Cody - 20

    Tom - 21

    Jeremy - 17

     

    I really like Palacios as a prospect, but to get a pitcher of Odorizzi's caliber for him, one-for-one, is terrific. 


    Pretty much where I sit.  Only 4th best SS prospect to boot.  He could have a good career and Id still feel good about the value with the risk there.  When the ticker said "Odorizzi to Twins for SS prospect" I thought for sure it was Nick Gordon and iffy.  If it was Javier, I would've lost my mind.  This was great.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Odorizzi was available for Palacios probably because Odorizzi allowed 1.88 HR/9 and and an xFIP of 5.10 last year. I hope the Twins see something I don't with Sanchez and Odorizzi. Both were cheap for a reason. Super underwhelming.

    Look at his September... Great month.   Back issues early in the year.  Got him super cheap.  Only 4th best SS prospect.  Great value.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    His splits are pretty favorable; he did much better in the second half (dynamite in Sept.), and on the road.   

     

    Is Ordozzi a flyball or groundball guy? Maybe Buxton can help if the former.  (Edit: his flyball rate rose precipitously last season, and the groundball rate dropped even more so. I don't know league averages, so I lack context to answer my own question)

     

    League averages 2017:

    FB - 35.3%

    LD - 20.7%

    GB - 44.0%

     

    Odorizzi 2017:

    FB - 47.3%

    LD - 22.1%

    GB - 30.6%

     

    Clearly he is an extreme flyball pitcher (and while that is up from previous seasons they were in the low to mid 40% range). That is going to be a big problem because Target field was actually an extreme HR park last year and has been above average the last three. Last year Target Field allowed 28% more HR's than Tropicana Field. 

    Edited by Oxtung
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Look at his September... Great month. Back issues early in the year. Got him super cheap. Only 4th best SS prospect. Great value.

    His September was a 26 inning sample size that featured a .143 babip. His walk rate was still high in September.

    He doesn't have to give it back, but I'm not sure it means a whole lot.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No disrespect to Palacios, who I hope has a long career and makes this trade seem one sided for the Rays (good luck kid) but getting a starter that makes people argue about whether he slots at 2-3 or 4 for a SS not named Gordon is something we weren't counting on after missing out on Yu know who.  

    So we can still add a FA starter? 

    This allows Gonsalves and Romero to start in AAA and build up some work before getting the call. It puts Sanchez in the garage. Realistically, this takes pressure off but at the same time sharpens the focus on the competition for the last two spots. Going to be interesting to see 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Please, explain how he was terrible last year.    4.14 ERA last year would put him very solidly at our number three.    How is this not a great get?    We basically have the same team as last year but better relievers and a better starter than all but two of our last year's starters.    I was hoping for Cobb but this appears to be a solid improvement.    Twins don't get better by picking up all stars at every position.  They get better by improving at multiple positions either by acquiring guys or having guys already here do better.    Sanchez, I don't get.   This one looks good.   I've got to believe he is better than the Colon, Santiago, Turley, etc. guys we were running out there for the 4th and 5th spots last year.

     

    Move past the ERA. It's just an illusion, man.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Look at his September... Great month.   Back issues early in the year.  Got him super cheap.  Only 4th best SS prospect.  Great value.

     

    Also had below average peripherals in '16. He's been trending downwards for a while now. Without more data his September looks nothing more than an aberration and not the start of the new trend. He is cheap. For a reason.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...