Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Trade Deadline Thread: What To Do About the Rotation?


    Tom Froemming

    As we continue to close in on the July 31 trade deadline, we'll be starting a thread each morning here at Twins Daily that focuses on a different topic. Yesterday we discussed the bullpen, today we'll shift the focus to the rotation. Should the Twins be seeking a starting pitcher?

    Image courtesy of © Wendell Cruz-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    The first question I’d like to ask is should the Twins add a starting pitcher to the rotation?

    As of Thursday, there were 58 American League pitchers with 70 innings. In terms of FIP, Twins starters ranked 13th (Berrios), 17th (Odorizzi), 21st (Gibson), 24th (Perez) and 27th (Pineda). In other words, the entire rotation was in the top half of that sample.

    To put that into perspective, the Astros have three guys inside the top 27 (Gerrit Cole, Justin Verlander and Brad Peacock), Cleveland has two (Shane Bieber and Trevor Bauer) and the Yankees only have one (James Paxton).

    Sounds really good right? I agree, however, this only tells us what has happened so far. FIP is a good predictor of future success (well, at least better than ERA), but the unknown element is whether or not the other contending teams in the AL will make significant additions to their rotations over the coming week.

    While the Twins rotation flexes in terms of depth, the other top teams in the AL have much more formidable pieces at the top. Can that still work?

    Yes, I think it can. We only need to look back to last year’s Milwaukee Brewers for proof. That team had a similar solid but unspectacular rotation that relied more on its depth. Jhoulys Chacin was the ace of that staff, though Wade Miley was very good when healthy. Neither of those guys can hold a candle to Berrios.

    That Milwaukee team managed to beat the Cubs in a Game 163 to take the NL Central with 96 wins. The pitching matchup was Chacin vs. Jose Quintana. The Brewers then swept the Rockies, giving up just two total runs in those three games. They even pushed the Dodgers all the way to a Game 7 in the NLCS behind a rotation of Miley, Chacin and Gio Gonzalez.

    The big difference is Milwaukee had an excellent bullpen, though it wasn't comprised of costly big-name arms. The Twins will need to upgrade their pitching staff, nobody is going to argue with that, but I’m not so convinced they really need to add a starter. Let me know what you think.

    The second thing I’d love to year your opinion on is if the Twins do acquire a starting pitcher, who gets booted to the bullpen? I think this is a tricky question. Might it actually come down to matchups?

    Berrios is clearly the No. 1 guy on the staff, but things get very fuzzy after that. Odorizzi went to the All-Star Game, but he has a 7.99 ERA over his past seven starts. On the other end of the spectrum, Pineda has a 2.93 ERA in his last seven outings. Gibson has been steady, but never spectacular. Perez has by far the worst WHIP on the staff, but he's also the only lefty starter.

    Deadline Discussion

    Should the Twins be aggressive on the starting pitching market? Would you trade Lewis and Kirilloff for Syndergaard? Who transitions to the bullpen if there is an addition? And if you hear any more rumors today, please feel free to pass them along.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Luis Arreze I believe has made Lewis available. For all we know Lewis may not pan out, he's not exactly living up to a number 1 overall pick, Arreze is.

    How is Lewis not living up to anything? He struggled early this year as he made mechanical adjustments but has an OPS well over .900 in July.

     

    Also, Lewis and Arraez have little overlap. Lewis is a SS that will fall back to CF if he can’t hack the position. Arraez is a second baseman who has acquitted himself well at third over the past month.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     



    I would do this trade.

     

     

    Yeah the one player likely blocked the most is Larnach.  Kiriloff is likely a slightly better hitter and younger and our outfield is set for at least 3 to 4 years I believe.  Also they Drafted a Larnach clone in Wallner this year so the well is not dry.  I would hate to have to trade pitching back but they likely need something to replace Stroman with and Graterol's floor looks like elite reliever for 6 years.  Tough to give that up so I understand them pausing there.  Also the Twins would likely need to include a couple more prospects in the 10 to 25 range to seal that deal. 

     

    It might be worth it but I am not a Stroman believer.  Isn't his K9 low.  Don't we always talk about needing pitchers who can strike guys out and now we want to settle for a worm burner?  I don't know I personally don't like this deal for the Twins. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I know this thread is about the rotation, but I am going to re-iterate the absolute need for a pair of RP. That HAS to be the priority!

     

    I like our rotation. I like it a lot. Some talk about Perez having his bad streak, but he's also looked much, much better his last few starts. Odorizzi has now been in a funk. It happens! More than likely, he is going to come out of it soon. Pineda has done about everything I hoped and expected.

     

    Does Stroman, and others mentioned, actually provide a lift? Because unless you are looking to add a rotation piece to be controllable next season, I just don't know that I see any actual improvement being made.

     

    There has obviously been a lot of debate about Syndergaard. I am honestly asking...is he an improvement???

     

    He's only hit 180IP one time. His next highest total is 154IP. His ERA...not the biggest determining factor I know...is over 4 this year while being in the NL.

     

    He is young enough that i think you are still buying potential, but just not sure I'm actually seeing a difference maker at this point. Certainly not worth the reported asking price.

     

    If I'm wrong, please let me know.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Then I do it for sure. A corner OF and an often injured minor league pitcher? Do it. If they won't do this, what will they do?

    I think either the front office really dislikes Stroman or something was lost in the translation of that tweet (ie. the Jays are rightly hesitant, not the Twins).
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Here I am, commenting away thinking this is the game thread. Ha. Sorry all.

     

    I took the liberty of moving the two posts over there. Hope that helps.

    I saw it an hour ago but I'm the type of petty bastard that just wanted to sit back and see how long it'd take for someone to figure it out.

     

    I'm mildly disappointed, to be honest. I hoped it would go for at least the rest of the game.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's pretty rare to see an injured pitching prospect being a key part of a trade. Not sure what to really make of that tweet.

     

    I seriously doubt the Twins are unwilling to trade Larnach . . . he's by far their most obvious trade piece that is a legit prospect. In the next tier, the Twins would undoubtedly be more than happy to part with Gordon and Rooker. But those guys obviously won't headline a high-end deal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    It's pretty rare to see an injured pitching prospect being a key part of a trade. Not sure what to really make of that tweet.

     

    I seriously doubt the Twins are unwilling to trade Larnach . . . he's by far their most obvious trade piece that is a legit prospect. In the next tier, the Twins would undoubtedly be more than happy to part with Gordon and Rooker. But those guys obviously won't headline a high-end deal.

    Agreed across the board.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have asked on several boards for the last week whether anyone has a status or timeline for Graterol.   He has been on the Il for over 2 months now.    I was hopeful he would be able to help the Twins this year yet but have no idea if he will even pitch again this year.    Anyone?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I have asked on several boards for the last week whether anyone has a status or timeline for Graterol.   He has been on the Il for over 2 months now.    I was hopeful he would be able to help the Twins this year yet but have no idea if he will even pitch again this year.    Anyone?

    I believe he started rehab just a day or two ago.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I believe he started rehab just a day or two ago.

    Thank you.  He was killing it in AA and I don't think he had much more to prove there.   If he can get back to where he was in 5 weeks or so I could easily see him being one of the missing pieces in the pen.   I have no idea if that is feasible.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Thank you.  He was killing it in AA and I don't think he had much more to prove there.   If he can get back to where he was in 5 weeks or so I could easily see him being one of the missing pieces in the pen.   I have no idea if that is feasible.

    He's not going to be in Minnesota this season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Would much rather sell a few lower end prospects for rentals.  Twins have had several years of bad play, which has helped our farm system become one of the bests.  Having a #1 pick in the 20's is like owning a lottery ticket.  Far from a sure thing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Syndergaard is about to turn 27. He's basically the Mets version of what we have in Jose Berrios, only with one more year of big league service time.

    IMO, they are very similar. Thor's "stuff" is probably better (arguably), but Berrios has been able to pitch more.

    A 1-2 of Berrios and Syndergaard headlining our 3-year "window" is pretty enticing. Save Kershaw-Ryu and Verlander-Cole (which likely won't even stay intact for the next 3 years), that's among the best 1-2 SP in the game and both relatively cheap, young, and controllable for 2+ years.

    To me, that's worth sending Royce Lewis for.

    If the Twins weren't very good and we were considering trading Berrios away, I would certainly be asking for other teams' top prospects.

    Our system is deep. Very deep. It's time to cash in on the last half decade's worth of 100ish losses. Especially on a guy with Syndergaards pedigree. The window is open now.

    Get them to throw in Edwin Diaz and I'm thinking Royce Lewis or Alex Kiriloff as a headliner. Probably not both, but if we can get a halfway decent prospect in addition, I'd at least entertain the idea of Lewis/Kiriloff/Smeltzer for Syndergaard/Diaz/Kilome.

    Call me crazy, but I'm sick of the perpetual idea that hoarding prospects means someday eventually we'll have a super team of emerging breakouts.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Syndergaard is about to turn 27. He's basically the Mets version of what we have in Jose Berrios, only with one more year of big league service time. IMO, they are very similar. Thor's "stuff" is probably better (arguably), but Berrios has been able to pitch more. A 1-2 of Berrios and Syndergaard headlining our 3-year "window" is pretty enticing. Save Kershaw-Ryu and Verlander-Cole (which likely won't even stay intact for the next 3 years), that's among the best 1-2 SP in the game and both relatively cheap, young, and controllable for 2+ years. To me, that's worth sending Royce Lewis for. If the Twins weren't very good and we were considering trading Berrios away, I would certainly be asking for other teams' top prospects. Our system is deep. Very deep. It's time to cash in on the last half decade's worth of 100ish losses. Especially on a guy with Syndergaards pedigree. The window is open now. Get them to throw in Edwin Diaz and I'm thinking Royce Lewis or Alex Kiriloff as a headliner. Probably not both, but if we can get a halfway decent prospect in addition, I'd at least entertain the idea of Lewis/Kiriloff/Smeltzer for Syndergaard/Diaz/Kilome. Call me crazy, but I'm sick of the perpetual idea that hoarding prospects means someday eventually we'll have a super team of emerging breakouts.

    Hoarding prospects has given us Garver, Sano, Polanco, Araiz, Rosario, Buxton, Kepler, Berrios, Gibson, and Rogers.     Maybe not a super team of emerging breakouts but pretty good and if we had hoarded a little more would have HIcks, Hendricks, and Pressley.    Ok, thats a stretch I know, but every one of those guys was a piece of trade propositions at some point.   The hoarding has not given us great pitching so I am open to the idea of trades.   I am  a little higher on Stroman now than Thor but I do like the control of years on Thor.   Lewis is more versatile than Kiriloff.    I laugh at the idea of both for Thor but like the idea of adding other pieces to make it less laughable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hoarding prospects has given us Garver, Sano, Polanco, Araiz, Rosario, Buxton, Kepler, Berrios, Gibson, and Rogers.     

    Quite literally my point. We have already done the waiting. Lewis and Kiriloff are not ready to contribute to this team. We could hold on to them and wait until they are ready, and be in the exact same position we are now in 4-5 years when half of the current 25 man roster is gone.

    It's only "laughable" if you believe the Twins will still have the same production and price from the aforementioned "graduated prospects" list you just mentioned. Which I would argue is the laughable point.

    It would sting. No doubt about it. But Thor is a top of the rotation, young and controllable arm. A move like this would potentially, possibly, limit our ability to compete in 2023-2026. Maybe. I'd argue otherwise given the depth of our system and the age of our emerging roster right now. But it significantly improves our chances of legitimately making a WS run in 2019-2021. I, for one, am sick of waiting.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’m not concerned about the rotation. Berrios is a legitimate piece. The way Pineda has been pitching, he looks like a solid piece down the stretch. I really like Gibson’s stuff, he can be as good as anybody when he’s on.

     

    Eggs and Perez have unsurprisingly crashed back down to earth. But, if those are you biggest rotation issues on the back end, you’re in pretty good shape.

     

    I don’t see the point of bringing anyone in (especially if it’s going to take away from addressing the bullpen) unless you’re bringing in Syndergaard, and I don’t see that as particularly realistic. I’d be all for Lewis and some change, but with his struggles who knows if that gets it done. Also, I don’t think Falvine would pull the trigger on that or that the Pohlads would cough up the cash (the PR machine claims they are, but I’ll err in the side of historical precedent until it’s proven otherwise - not buying the lip service).

     

    I’m not particularly high on MadBum. It’s seems like there are a whole lot of what-ifs and hopes that he may turn things around like Verlander. What people seem to forget about Verlander is that he battled arm injuries in his last years with the Tigers that they apparently misdiagnosed, costing him potentially years of being effective. MadBum is just an average pitcher, and has been for years now. The peripherals support that. Additionally, that’s in the National League. I wouldn’t be particularly excited about running MadBum out in a game 1 in Houston or New York.

     

    In conclusion, don’t overthink this. Allocate all resources to the bullpen at this point. That’s where it’s needed most, and this bullpen will kill us in the playoffs (if it doesn’t keep us from making the playoffs all together).

    Edited by Darius
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah the one player likely blocked the most is Larnach. Kiriloff is likely a slightly better hitter and younger and our outfield is set for at least 3 to 4 years I believe. Also they Drafted a Larnach clone in Wallner this year so the well is not dry. I would hate to have to trade pitching back but they likely need something to replace Stroman with and Graterol's floor looks like elite reliever for 6 years. Tough to give that up so I understand them pausing there. Also the Twins would likely need to include a couple more prospects in the 10 to 25 range to seal that deal.

     

    It might be worth it but I am not a Stroman believer. Isn't his K9 low. Don't we always talk about needing pitchers who can strike guys out and now we want to settle for a worm burner? I don't know I personally don't like this deal for the Twins.

    I don’t necessarily agree on Larnach. There is a reason why sellers are focusing on him from the Twins system (according to some reports).

     

    Is Kirilloff really a better hitter? He’s getting chewed up in AA this year (.730ish OPS). During his meteoric rise, there were some services that had serious questions about how his bat would play as he got closer to the majors.

     

    Waller hasn’t left E-town yet. I’m not sure we really know what we have there yet.

     

    Not saying Kirilloff has busted. But I’m not convinced he’s better than Larnach. I don’t know if other FOs are either.

     

    In addition, Larnach could possibly be a corner OF, 1B, or DH. Cruz and Cron will be gone. We aren’t going to pay all of Rosario, Kepler, and Sano. Not to mention injuries that are frequently shifting people around already (namely to Buxton). I don’t think he’s necessarily as “blocked,” as some are portraying. Things could look a lot different at this time next year.

     

    I do agree on Stroman and Giles. I wouldn’t break the bank for that package. Especially with both of their recent injury issues and Giles bad (but small) playoff track record.

    Edited by Darius
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would never give up BOTH Lewis and Kiriloff.  But I would give up one of them to get Thor and the guy I'd give up would be Kiriloff (it pains me to say it, because he's going to be a GOOD M.L. player).  We currently have Kepler, Rosario and Buxton on the major league club.  With Larnach and Rooker in the minors and getting closer we simply cannot play all of these guys.  Kiriloff would be a GREAT get by the Mets.  And I still think I'd give up a pretty big package headlined by Kiriloff and go for Thor AND Edwin Diaz.  Thor is 26 years old and has "Ace" stuff.  He headlines your staff with Berrios for years to come.  Taylor is a tremendous lefty out of the pen, but Diaz is 25 years old and saved 57!! games last year.  He's your closer for years to come.  How does Taylor in the 8th and Diaz in the 9th sound if you're battling the Astros or Yankees  I'd part with Kiriloff and Graterol (2 of our top 3 prospects) as well as one of Gibson or Perez if the Mets MUST have a back-end SP as part of the deal.  I'd probably include a Gonsalves as a sweetener.  If I HAD to in order to close the deal, I might offer another decent piece.  Thor just has higher upside than Stroman.  Look, I wouldn't be adverse to Stroman OR Giles (or both in the right deal).  I just like the tremendous potential of Thor at the top of our rotation.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...