Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Thrift Shop: 3 Sneaky Finds by the Front Office


    Nick Nelson

    If the Minnesota Twins are going to return to contention, it'll be primarily on the strength of their nucleus, which needs to rebound after a down year in 2018. But getting over the top will require a full team effort. That means identifying the right complementary pieces.

    Finding quality supporting parts was a continual struggle as the Twins failed to push their last formidable core past the first round of the playoffs. But this reconfigured front office has managed to add a few potentially key assets on the sly. It could prove to be a major positive amidst an otherwise dreary campaign.

    Image courtesy of Bruce Kluckhohn, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Through two drafts and two deadlines worth of "sell" trades, Derek Falvey and Thad Levine have netted a bounty of minor-league talent, supplementing the long-term pipeline. But the front office has also acquired more immediate help through low-key maneuvers

    While these players aren't going to be stars, they could all bring real value for essentially no acquisition cost. Let's take a look at three current contributors of modest origins who may factor for years to come.

    Jake Cave, OF: Acquired in March from NYY for RHP Luis Gil

    The Twins took notice of Cave while scouting the Yankees system during trade discussions at the 2017 deadline. They ended up getting back two pitchers for Jaime Garcia at that time, but later snagged Cave via trade this spring when he landed on waivers.

    Last summer, Cave was amidst a slugging breakout at Triple-A, hitting 15 home runs in 72 games after previously totaling 24 in 568 career contests.

    "He made some adjustments that we thought led to the power surge that he had, and we think those will continue going forward," said Falvey when the Twins acquired Cave in March. So far, that assessment has proven astute.

    The 25-year-old outfielder has launched a dozen home runs, which would've been a career-high before last year's 20. Six of those have come in the majors, including an absolutely majestic blast to straightaway center on Sunday that flashed his raw strength. Cave went to a part of Target Field only three have reached before: Jim Thome, Byungho Park, Miguel Sano.

    Through 164 plate appearances in the big leagues, Cave has tallied 17 extra-base hits with a .480 slugging percentage – awfully impressive for a guy who slugged .398 through four minor-league seasons prior to 2017. As a semi-random comparison, Michael Cuddyer slugged .399 with 14 extra-base hits through his first 164 plate appearances in the majors.

    The MLB sample size remains small, but Cave has looked very capable at the plate and he's also a strong runner – albeit not a burner – with the makings of an asset in the outfield. He's a bit stretched in center, and his rookie season has been marred by some painful defensive blunders, but that'll happen.

    Given what the Twins risked to get Cave – Luis Gil, a 20-year-old righty currently at rookie ball in the Yankees system, and Kennys Vargas, who was DFA'd to make room but ended up back here anyway – the move looks like a slam dunk. Cave probably won't be a full-time starter but he can be a valuable bench piece or platoon mate, and the Twins control him through age 30.

    Tyler Austin, 1B: Acquired in July from NYY along with RHP Luis Rijo for RHP Lance Lynn

    Last offseason, one of Minnesota's top needs was a right-handed masher for the bench, to complement a predominantly left-handed lineup. It went unaddressed, and still existed when the Twins were able to bring Austin aboard in the Lance Lynn trade.

    Scavenging 40-man casualties from one of baseball's best systems is a strategy that's now paid off in the form of multiple instantly productive power hitters. Austin was the odd bat out in a loaded mix for the Yankees, but offers a welcome infusion for Minnesota. Through eight games in the new uniform he already has three homers, a double, and six RBIs.

    With 298 plate appearances under his belt, Austin has a .487 slugging percentage in the majors, and a 1.075 OPS against left-handed pitching. He's solid at first, and can play the outfield corners in a pinch. In others words, he's pretty much exactly what this offense needed – a gem of a find. And all the Twins had to do was expend four months, several groans, and a few million bucks on a non-performing malcontent.

    Oliver Drake, RP: Acquired in August off waivers from TOR

    We're dealing with small samples in all cases here, and Drake's is tinier than either of the above. So the praise here needs to be qualified with that. However... he has looked really, really good.

    On Monday night, Drake ran his hitless streak as a Twin to 8 1/3 innings by tossing two perfect frames with four strikeouts. He has now averaged 10.1 K/9 rate as a big-leaguer – albeit with a 4.67 ERA and 1.48 WHIP – and his Triple-A numbers are immaculate: 1.80 ERA, 1.04 WHIP, 12.7 K/9.

    Much like lefty bullpen counterpart Gabriel Moya, Drake plays up his unspectacular fastball with a quirky delivery and standout offspeed pitch that give hitters fits. The 31-year-old has pitched for a record five different MLB teams this season, which speaks to his perceived expendability, but in a way, it also speaks to the opposite.

    He's hardly entrenched already as a long-term bullpen cog, but Drake adds another very intriguing arm to the mix going forward. Like Cave and Austin, the Twins can control him very reasonably for a long time if they desire.

    These sort of pickups aren't necessarily the flashiest, but they're crafty, and each could pay immense dividends as affordable components alongside those central building blocks in the sustainable winner Falvey envisions.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Very weird to see so much Jake Cave hate and skepticism. I would've thought everyone would have loved seeing this guy develop into what looks like could be an every day outfielder next year.

     

    Cave has been a significant upgrade at the plate over Buxton and seems to play decent defense. He should be starting every day on this team right now, and until Buxton proves he can hit, Cave should be above Byron on the depth chart. He's ahead of Bux right now in my eyes. There I said it.

     

    Remove Jake Cave, add Zach Granite and you could've wrote the same post last July. 

     

    It's nice that the Twins have found what looks like a usable piece. But it's not "hate" to acknowledge the extremely small sample size and luck driven factors.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hindsight is 20/20, but I would reverse the Jake Cave trade in a heartbeat. Luis Gil is throwing 99 mph and has a 1.37 ERA, 1.17 WHIP and 13.3 K/9 in a league where the averages are 4.83, 1.50 and 8.8, respectively.

    Yeah it's premature to call this trade a win for the Twins. Is Cave bringing something to the table that Wade couldn't do? Or even Granite if he wasn't injured.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't hate or love the Cave deal right now.....but I'm not sure how it's all that helpful. They have Wade, who likely could do about what Cave is doing, I think. And, they don't have Gil right now......

     

    If you looked at the trade now, and someone said you could trade Cave for Gil right now, you'd do that trade every time. that might not be a good trade either, but you'd do it.

     

    I like the Austin acquisition. I don't know if he's good or not, but he can crush a ball when he hits it. I'd have him at 1B every day Mauer isn't, to get him rep after rep.

     

    Drake? Uh, hmmmm. I have my doubts, but he's been fine here.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have already posted here, but ESPN has announced that the Braves are bringing in another 20 year old to start pitching for them.  The move to young players getting a chance early is exciting, and maybe it can get rid of the debacle that analytics has caused.  

     

    In case you wonder what Analytics have done that I do not like - this essay from Bleacher Reports - https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbleacherreport.com%2Farticles%2F2791455-i-find-it-very-difficult-to-watch-why-mlb-greats-think-baseballs-in-trouble%3Futm_source%3Dnewsletter%26utm_medium%3Dnewsletter%26utm_campaign%3Dmlb&data=02%7C01%7C%7C26a7aaa421e1431f9d0c08d607721406%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636704583868910839&sdata=CipaREO8lPDAzZutfj9tNwP0%2Bqln4879Y%2BBX0TGzRdE%3D&reserved=0  says it well. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    No hate here, but skepticism is warranted. I hope we're not betting on a .371 BABIP again...

    He's also a rookie getting his first taste of the major leagues. I think we're betting on luck neutralizing while other factors improve, which would be pretty standard.

     

    Hindsight is 20/20, but I would reverse the Jake Cave trade in a heartbeat. Luis Gil is throwing 99 mph and has a 1.37 ERA, 1.17 WHIP and 13.3 K/9 in a league where the averages are 4.83, 1.50 and 8.8, respectively.

    With poor control, as a 20-year-old in rookie ball. He's got a big arm but you can't just hoard promising young throwers forever. 

     

     

    Yeah it's premature to call this trade a win for the Twins. Is Cave bringing something to the table that Wade couldn't do? Or even Granite if he wasn't injured.

    Power. Neither Granite or Wade have much to speak of, and that can hinder a player's major-league viability. Also, it's not an either/or scenario. Nothing wrong with having both Cave and Wade in the system right now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good pick ups.  For the 2018 Twins.  However, the question we all should be asking is whether any of the 3 would have had a place in the 25 men rosters of the Yankees, Red Sox, and Astros.

    Because that's where the bar has to be set if the Twins were to be competitive in the post-season ever again.

     

    Not at the Detroit and White Sox levels...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I get why people are keeping expectations in check with Drake but guys like that -- with monster Triple-A numbers and a stupendous MLB strikeout rate -- aren't available everywhere, despite what some of the comments above might suggest. He has a 12.4% swinging strike rate in the majors and 12.5% this year, putting him in the same range as Busenitz and Hildy.

    Same range as JT Chargois too...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Praising the FO for stumbling into three AAAA players? Boy, it has been a rough year.

    One of the reasons these new executives were brought in was to provide a competitive edge by identifying and acquiring overlooked/underrated/inexpensive talent. This is a necessary ingredient in sustained winning for teams with finite budgets, and it was certainly a trademark of Cleveland while Falvey was there. So I'm not sure I understand why you feel the need to downplay it.

     

     

    Same range as JT Chargois too...

    Yes. I already said I was disappointed to see Chargois go. Do we have to dwell on his absence any time we evaluate a new reliever addition going forward? Also Chargois continues to show he can't stay healthy (which was presumably the Twins' rationale in letting him loose) so let's ease up on the sulking a bit. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes. I already said I was disappointed to see Chargois go. Do we have to dwell on his absence any time we evaluate a new reliever addition going forward? Also Chargois continues to show he can't stay healthy (which was presumably the Twins' rationale in letting him loose) so let's ease up on the sulking a bit.

    Sorry, didn't mean to sound like I was sulking. I was questioning the rarity of players fitting Drake's profile.

     

    Another one could be Tonkin over 2016-2017, at least in terms of K rate in AAA/MLB. His swinging strike rate was comparable in 2017 too.

     

    A few of these guys turn out interesting, like Kirby Yates or Blake Parker. (The Twins new FO passed on both of those guys last year too.) That's more of the challenge, actually getting something out of these types.

     

    Bullpen seems like the easiest / quickest way to put your stamp on the MLB roster, and the new FO has performed pretty marginally in that regard so far.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One of the reasons these new executives were brought in was to provide a competitive edge by identifying and acquiring overlooked/underrated/inexpensive talent. This is a necessary ingredient in sustained winning for teams with finite budgets, and it was certainly a trademark of Cleveland while Falvey was there. So I'm not sure I understand why you feel the need to downplay it.

     

    Doesn't Drake fit in the mold of Casey Fien? Or Jared Burton, or even Caleb Thielbar? Is this really an achievement specific to the new front office?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Seriously? I usually agree with you but this comment seems way off. Just compare the stats:

     

    Cave - 25 years old, .275/.313/.480 (.793), OPS+ 111. 33% SO rate, 1.0 WAR in 51 games, in the MAJORS. Also a good corner OF, decent CF. Starting OF stats in the Majors, even as a complimentary player on a good team. Could be a starter hitting 5th or 6th if he can drop the SO rate down to 20-25%.

     

    Wade - 24 years old, .235/.357/.355 (.712), 21% SO rate, in AAA. Also a good corner OF, but not good enough to play CF. Has not yet shown enough to project him as a 25 man roster guy in the Majors, much less a starter. Needs at least another half year to year in the minors before there's a chance.

     

    Granite - 25 years old, .237/.282/.245 (.527!!), 11% SO rate, also a good corner OF, decent to good in CF. THis year an aberation due to injury? He had a shot last year with the Twins - .237/.321/.290 (.611), 9% SO rate, looked completely overmatched at the plate. Zero power, looks like a .230-.260 banjo hitter.

     

    There's lots of reason to criticize the FO this year but this choice isn't one of them. Cave is simply the better player at this point and deserves to be on the 25 man roster this year and going forward. Wade may become something in the future but not looking great so far in AAA. Granite? May be playing for someone else next year if there isn't enough space on the 40 man.

    My intention in the first post wasn't to criticize the FO. I'm saying it's too early to call this a win for our Twins. Cave is good and probably has a 2-3 year tenure with the Twins.

     

    The player we gave up is young and throws gas. If he figures it out at higher levels of baseball it could come back to haunt us. Or he flames out in the minors. That's all I'm saying.

     

    Going forward, the Twins now have several 4th OF candidates who all hit LH. Wade requires 40 man protection this offseason, and Granite may remain on roster too. Was it worth giving up a high upside reliever that can throw 100? Time will tell.

    Edited by Vanimal46
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jake Cave has been astounding, but I keep reading:

     

    - He's too old (he's 25)

    - He's a platoon bat only

    - He'll never be a starter

    - Cave only looks good to the Twins because the Twins suck

     

    Fine, he strikes out too much. Rookies always do. Just curious -- if you are against Jake Cave, were you also one of the many people who railed on Rosario until this year? Or Dozier before his power surge? For the record, this was most of you!

     

    Follow up question: Why do people get stars in their eyes for people like Kepler and Morrison but look down their noses at players who actually look like they can be special once they work through their rookie years?

    I *want* my rookies to swing at the ball and strike out. It's a part of learning about the pitchers they face. You will never hit the ball with the bat on your shoulder all the time. Swing the damn bat, figure out what you can do against MLB pitching. If your OPS is staying over .700 as a rookie, you're doing great and you're only going to get better. If it's .793 like Cave, WOW.

     

    Rookies who start out boring and methodical have careers that are largely boring and methodical. You should only be methodical after you have experience in what you're doing, especially in a competitive sport.

    Edited by Doomtints
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I like Cave and Austin and I'm not ready to call for the heads of Falvey and Levine yet but one of the principle jobs of the guys in the FO should be to know what the team has and looking at some of their transactions, they didn't.

     

    Relief pitchers like JT Chargois (3.45 era 116 ERA+ 31ip 38k for Dodgers), Randy Rosario (2.83 era 155 ERA+, 35ip for Cubs), and Nick Burdi (recovering from TJ) would probably help the Twins and we let them all leave for nothing.

     

    Starting pitchers Derek Rodriguez (6-1, 2.25 era 180 ERA+, 80ip, 2.5 WAR 12 starts for SF), Anibal Sanchez (9-4, 3.13 era 126 ERA+, 97ip, 1.7 WAR, 17 starts for Atlanta) would have looked good in our rotation or as trade bait but we let both leave for nothing.

     

    Daniel Palka and Niko Goodrum are dinged a lot by dWAR but both have some power and are only 26 and yet we let them both leave for nothing.

     

    And while getting Austin for Lynn is nice, it's worth remembering that Lynn cost us a draft pick and the corresponding draft pool amount. Looking at the transactions over the year (including the deadline trades), it looks like the FO sent away more talent than it brought back.

    Spot on. It's important to remember why Cave, Drake, Austin, ect are on the active roster. 

     

    I hated the Sanchez signing and couldn't have been happier to see him go, so I can't really get on the FO for cutting bait early on what looked like a horrible decision from the get go. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He's also a rookie getting his first taste of the major leagues. I think we're betting on luck neutralizing while other factors improve, which would be pretty standard.

     

    Young Twins players improving a problematic K rate hasn't always been "standard", unfortunately!

     

    And while the power has been nice, going forward it might mean it has nowhere to go but down. Hard to look for his power to improve to neutralize other factors either (which is a more common development pattern).

     

    The post I was responding to mentioned the possibility of Cave starting in 2019, and I'm not too comfortable with that at the moment, that's all. I like him as a 4th OF with options, and a fill-in starter when necessary -- if anything, I would have liked to see him much earlier this year when Buxton first went down, rather than starting LaMarre/Grossman.

     

    Not sure yet about counting on Cave/Buxton to hold down a starting spot next year...

    Edited by spycake
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Doesn't Drake fit in the mold of Casey Fien? Or Jared Burton, or even Caleb Thielbar? Is this really an achievement specific to the new front office?

    Sure, I always thought discovering quality relievers off the scrap heap was a specialty of the last front office. But unless I'm mistaken, none of those players were acquired and auditioned in-season, which is what I like about the Drake move. They're taking advantage of readily available innings to test out an intriguing player against MLB competition. So far I like what I've seen.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Jake Cave has been astounding, but I keep reading:

     

    - He's too old (he's 25)

    - He's a platoon bat only

    - He'll never be a starter

    - Cave only looks good to the Twins because the Twins suck

     

    Fine, he strikes out too much. Rookies always do. Just curious -- if you are against Jake Cave, were you also one of the many people who railed on Rosario until this year? Or Dozier before his power surge? For the record, this was most of you!

     

    Follow up question: Why do people get stars in their eyes for people like Kepler and Morrison but look down their noses at players who actually look like they can be special once they work through their rookie years?

    I *want* my rookies to swing at the ball and strike out. It's a part of learning about the pitchers they face. You will never hit the ball with the bat on your shoulder all the time. Swing the damn bat, figure out what you can do against MLB pitching. If your OPS is staying over .700 as a rookie, you're doing great and you're only going to get better. If it's .793 like Cave, WOW.

     

    Rookies who start out boring and methodical have careers that are largely boring and methodical. You should only be methodical after you have experience in what you're doing, especially in a competitive sport.

     

    You are really all over the board here.  So because some people on this board were skeptical about Rosario swinging at everything and he has turned into a good player... it means that Cave will be that good?  BTW, Rosario reached the majors 2 years earlier and had a similar OPS as a rookie (in a much more substantial sample size)

     

    If you swing at everything as a rookie thats great, and if your OPS is over .700 its only going to go up?  Don't tell that to Danny Santana

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Fine, he strikes out too much. Rookies always do. Just curious -- if you are against Jake Cave, were you also one of the many people who railed on Rosario until this year? Or Dozier before his power surge? For the record, this was most of you!

     

    Dozier never really struck out too much -- he always had reasonable K rates, even when he was struggling as a rookie, before his power surge.

     

    Rosario definitely improved in that department, although he was starting from a lower point -- his 25% K rate in his first 2 years looks like a contact hitter compared to a lot of recent Twins! (Including Cave's 31%) And Rosario's K rates in the minors were good too, while Cave's have trended higher.

     

    That said, I like Cave and the trade, even though I am a bit skeptical of his value going forward. (I had completely forgotten who Luis Gil was until this thread!)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sure, I always thought discovering quality relievers off the scrap heap was a specialty of the last front office. But unless I'm mistaken, none of those players were acquired and auditioned in-season, which is what I like about the Drake move. They're taking advantage of readily available innings to test out an intriguing player against MLB competition. So far I like what I've seen.

    With the size of modern bullpens, I think there are readily available innings at the start of most seasons too.

     

    But in any case, Breslow (*young* Breslow :) ) was a midseason pickup in 2008 (and regretfully a midseason loss in 2009). I guess Neil Ramirez was a midseason attempt in 2016.

     

    I endorse the Drake move, but it doesn't strike me as anything special quite yet. Would have been more encouraged if they had picked him up in late May or mid June instead of Belisle. Or maybe way back in April 2017, when the Brewers got Drake from the Orioles for cash as we kept trotting out Breslow (Old Breslow :) ).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Hindsight is 20/20, but I would reverse the Jake Cave trade in a heartbeat. Luis Gil is throwing 99 mph and has a 1.37 ERA, 1.17 WHIP and 13.3 K/9 in a league where the averages are 4.83, 1.50 and 8.8, respectively.

     

    He's also thrown a total of 39 innings in rookie ball. He's at least 4 years away from the majors and there are many "what ifs" between now and 2022.  Gil looks good, no doubt, but I'll save my disappointment about this trade for another day, long in the future.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    From Nicks Post: >>>>>>"People seem way overly worked up about Rosario. Outside of the shiny ERA he hasn't been good for the Cubs this year. Rodriguez is a great story but does anyone really think he'd have even gotten a shot here? Chargois is the loss that bums me out, but it's not a given that he's gonna have more success than Drake".............. My question is why wouldn't Rodriguez have gotten a shot here? Because our pitching staffs have been so overloaded with talent we haven't room? I am not nit picking the Rodriguez issue, but I am nitpicking the Matt Belisle type wasted roster spots. What is the difference if you send. Belisle clone out there in a 5 run game, or a Rodriguez. It can't be about Rodriguez's clock ticking, since you got rid of him anyway. That is the part about FO decisions that mKe me crazy.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Kennys Vargas also hot a homer over the "batter's eye". I think it was early (May) in 2017 or '16. But I remember the broadcast.

     

    Play-by-play: But he needs to show he can hit

     

    <<crack>>

     

    Color commentator: That will help.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    From Nicks Post: >>>>>>"People seem way overly worked up about Rosario. Outside of the shiny ERA he hasn't been good for the Cubs this year. Rodriguez is a great story but does anyone really think he'd have even gotten a shot here? Chargois is the loss that bums me out, but it's not a given that he's gonna have more success than Drake".............. My question is why wouldn't Rodriguez have gotten a shot here? Because our pitching staffs have been so overloaded with talent we haven't room? I am not nit picking the Rodriguez issue, but I am nitpicking the Matt Belisle type wasted roster spots. What is the difference if you send. Belisle clone out there in a 5 run game, or a Rodriguez. It can't be about Rodriguez's clock ticking, since you got rid of him anyway. That is the part about FO decisions that mKe me crazy.

    Rodriguez is a starter, not a reliever.

    He would have been behind Romero, Littel, Gonsalves, and Slegers before he got his shot, which means he'd maybe just be on the cusp of getting his first taste right now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The Twins' 2018 bullpen has the club's best league-adjusted xFIP since 2008 (and that's a tie). The last clearly superior bullpen was 2006.

     

    So, the 'Falvey sucks at bullpens' notion is badly lacking in empirical support.

     

    While I agree they aren't bad, shouldn't the comparison be to the league, not how bad the Twins were?

     

    On that front, they do ok.....league median in WAR and other measures.

     

    On the general topic.....I don't know why we have to discuss all the bad decisions, in order to discuss some good ones (or not good ones, depending on you feel about these three decisions). That seems like a tough bar to cross for every conversation.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...