Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

  • They Couldn’t. Could They…?

    Jeremy Nygaard

    By Jeremy Nygaard

    The Twins have been having on-and-off conversations with the Padres for the greater part of a week. Various different reports have them linked to a number of different Padres relief pitchers, primarily 38-year-old Joaquin Benoit.

    Image courtesy of USA Today Sports

    Twins Video

    During conversations - not just with the Twins - the Padres have tried to package James Shields (and the three years and $63 million left on his contract, plus the rest of this year) into deals. It was a notion that at first I dismissed, figuring the Twins would try again as the deadline came closer and the Padres would back off of such a crazy demand.

    But the whispers haven’t left.

    It’s no secret that the A.J. Preller and the Padres are seeking to be very active at the deadline. It’s no secret that the Twins have always had a little man-crush on “Big Game” James Shields. And the Padres have relievers that the Twins would like to add to their bullpen.

    Are there specifics? No. But are there on-going discussions? Yes. Is a deal going to happen between the Twins and Padres? Maybe.

    For the Twins to take on such a big contract - an idea I first mentioned on Twitter Monday night - the belief is the Padres would have to either a ) send substantial money with Shields or b ) take on the contract of Ricky Nolasco (which has about $30 million remaining). If you follow Nolasco on social media, you’re well aware of his love for Southern California.

    There would still be player-cost as well. Everybody around the league is aware of the Twins having Oswaldo Arcia on the block. They are also aware of Arcia’s struggles both defensively and with the making contact offensively. His value is not that of a prime trade-candidate.

    There are also rumblings that the Twins have made Kohl Stewart available in trades. Though Stewart recently dropped out of Baseball America’s Top 100 Mid-Season Prospect List, he still is considered an asset.

    It would definitely take a bigger package to net a return of Shields and Benoit.

    And that’s where the speculation begins. Jorge Polanco? Max Kepler? Eddie Rosario? Alex Meyer? The Twins extra comp B pick?

    From the Twins perspective, adding Benoit makes a ton of sense. He’s got a team option for next year at $8 million (with a $1.5 million buyout) and could slide right into an 8th inning role he’s held and succeeded in.

    Adding Shield would likely be met with more skepticism. He’ll cost $63 million for his age-34 through -36 seasons (not to mention the team option for his age-37 season). But he would add a pitcher to the rotation this year who has a lot of postseason experience and would presumably fill the hole that soon-to-be-free agent Mike Pelfrey will open up. It’s hard not to like a potential top four of Hughes, Santana, Shields, Gibson with either Trevor May or Jose Berrios rounding out the rotation.

    The Padres continue to talk to many teams about moving pieces. Might the Twins be their first deadline dance partner?

    Jeremy Nygaard has been a season ticket holder since the Metrodome days, loves the draft and lives on the other side of the river.
    Follow Jeremy Nygaard on Twitter: jeremynygaard

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share
     Share
    Go to articles

    Community Blogs

    • How many games will the Minnesota Twins win in 2023?
    • Gopher Preview (Week 3)

    Forum Topics

    • PVTEST
    • Hey, look here
    • This is an exceptionally long title to test how various points look on a phone and smaller devices
    The Ultimate Minnesota Twins Gift Ideas Shopping Guide

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Tibs

    Tibs 844

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    I'm interested, obviously depending on the details. These series after the All Star break have been deflating, but the Twins still hold a wild card spot.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    nokomismod

    nokomismod 169

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    So trading bad contract for slightly less bad contract. The Twins would be relieved of Nolasco and get Shields for 3 years and $33 million. I'm not sure how the Nolasco's insurance policy would factor in, but Shields should still be an above average SP for the next three years.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Seth Stohs

    Seth Stohs 23,732

  • Owner

    • Posted

     

    Crazy how a guy can go from one of the best SP in free agency.  Get a four year deal that is not really that crazy.  Have an ERA sub 4.00 and now the team has to take back Nolasco to get any prospects for him.

     

    No kidding! I don't get it. But, the Nolasco deal makes me very much interested. Obviously it does depend on the other pieces too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    drock2190

    drock2190 1,140

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    Yeah I'd be interested in a trade that gets rid of Nolasco. 

     

    As for the bullpen it needs help but its not like the Twins are going anywhere anyways. The move should have happened already if they were.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Jham

    Jham 2,495

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    I think this deal like this should be taken seriously.  I wouldn't bet money that May or Berrios will be better than Shields over the next three years.  I would bet money that Nolasco would be in the rotation next year regardless of what May and Berrios do in spring training.  Look at the rest of the rotation.  We had sure better be in win-now mode next season.  Hu, Gonsalves, Thorpe, Berrios, Meyer, Jay, Stewart, Rogers, Slegers...  We have arms.  I'm happy to trade some of them to help the team win now and avoid the inevitable TwinsDaily '17 debate about Hu and Jay being blocked by an aging Hughes and Santana.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    HitInAPinch

    HitInAPinch 4,518

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    I don't know why...........

     

    1.  Twins would still be shopping for Benoit from the Padres when Latroy Hawkins could be had pretty cheap from the Blue Jays

    2.  Why they would consider adding to a rotation when they're already sticking starting talent in the bullpen.

     

    I think this trade talk is nonsense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    HitInAPinch

    HitInAPinch 4,518

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    Hey Jeremy!  Where did you read this?

     

    "Everybody around the league is aware of the Twins having Oswaldo Arcia on the block. They are also aware of Arcia’s struggles both defensively and with the making contact offensively. His value is not that of a prime trade-candidate."

     

    News to me.  But that's nothing new :)

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    clone52

    clone52 285

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    Obviously Benoit would be a rental type player, but could be useful this year.  Shields should be decent for 3 years and honestly, spending money on Shields would feel a whole lot better than spending money on Nolasco (although you know he'd probably be lights out in San Diego and finish 5th in the 2016 NL Cy Young voting).

     

    How about Benoit/Shields/Norris for Nolasco/whatever other prospects are needed.to get the deal done.  If they could get Norris in return, I think we'd all feel better about the trade.

     

    How about Benoit/Shields/Norris for Nolasco/Fryer/Meyer/Stewart/Kepler?  I guess if it were me, I'd go for it, but I'd understand if people didn't want to give up prospects like that.  Would the Padres go for that?  I don't know what positions they are looking for.  I don't think losing Meyer, Stewart and Kepler would be a crippling blow to the future of the organization.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    clone52

    clone52 285

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

     

    I don't know why...........

     

    1.  Twins would still be shopping for Benoit from the Padres when Latroy Hawkins could be had pretty cheap from the Blue Jays

    2.  Why they would consider adding to a rotation when they're already sticking starting talent in the bullpen.

     

    I think this trade talk is nonsense.

     

    Why do you think Hawkins would be available cheap from the Jays?  Why would they take him in the Tulo trade unless they wanted to use him to bolster their own bull pen.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    halfchest

    halfchest 74

  • Provisional Member

    • Posted

    hmm, not sure what to think of this.  Painting it as a 3/33 deal due to offloading Nolascos contract makes it easier to stomach. 

     

    However, I'd rather give up a bit more and get a younger bullpen arm that has some control left.  Kimbrel would be spendy both in dollars and prospects I assume. 

     

    It's another interesting story line to follow for the next couple of days though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    laloesch

    laloesch 1,383

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

    I'm not a fan of this deal, unless we unload Nolasco and either Milone or Santana freeing up two rotation spots.  Next year the Twins need to have two slots for Berrios and May with Meyer as a distant possibility.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    HitInAPinch

    HitInAPinch 4,518

  • Verified Member

    • Posted

     

    Why do you think Hawkins would be available cheap from the Jays?  Why would they take him in the Tulo trade unless they wanted to use him to bolster their own bull pen.

    Well, the Blue Jays had to designated lefty Felix Doubront for assignment to clear a roster spot for Tulo, but I don't see a corresponding move for Hawkins.  I take that as, Hawkins was added to make the trade balance out somehow.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    tobi0040

    tobi0040 4,125

  • Provisional Member

    • Posted

    Obviously Benoit would be a rental type player, but could be useful this year. Shields should be decent for 3 years and honestly, spending money on Shields would feel a whole lot better than spending money on Nolasco (although you know he'd probably be lights out in San Diego and finish 5th in the 2016 NL Cy Young voting).

     

    How about Benoit/Shields/Norris for Nolasco/whatever other prospects are needed.to get the deal done. If they could get Norris in return, I think we'd all feel better about the trade.

     

    How about Benoit/Shields/Norris for Nolasco/Fryer/Meyer/Stewart/Kepler? I guess if it were me, I'd go for it, but I'd understand if people didn't want to give up prospects like that. Would the Padres go for that? I don't know what positions they are looking for. I don't think losing Meyer, Stewart and Kepler would be a crippling blow to the future of the organization.

    Benoit is due 8m next year. Actually not terrible if you look at his numbers the last five years.

     

    Just view it as 6-7m only, and the right to watch him get holds instead if guys like Boyer and that one guy we got from San Diego blow leads. He Must not have been very memorable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Richie the Rally Goat

    Richie the Rally Goat 9,100

  • Community Moderator

    • Posted

    You sign a guy like James Shields to get the performance at the front of the contract and hope the performance at the back of the contract isn't too painful. Trading for James Shields means you give up assets for a smaller window until you hope he isn't a disaster.

     

    He might still be an asset this year and next, but I think the Twins would be better served looking for a Catcher or SS that has a longer horizon and a pile of relievers. C and SA are probably more expensive, but definitely worth it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Hosken Bombo Disco

    Hosken Bombo Disco 15,870

  • Community Leader

    • Posted

    What about Shawn Kelley from the Padres? He has a 27% K rate and immediately becomes our best righty by a million miles. He is also pitching for a contract (sounds nicer than saying "rental"). If the Padres want to throw in Shields for Nolasco, all the better.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...
    ×

×
×
  • Create New...