Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • The Hunt For An Ace Starter


    Nick Nelson

    Clayton Kershaw. Dallas Keuchel. Rich Hill. Justin Verlander.

    These veteran studs, with their ace-type profiles and plentiful big-game experience, were tabbed by Houston and Los Angeles to start Games 1 and 2 of the World Series. Each played a major role in getting his team to the big stage.

    The Twins' deficiency in this area is the biggest reason it's hard to view them as serious contenders to make their own deep October run next year.

    What can they do about it?

    Image courtesy of Troy Taormina, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Minnesota has one starting pitcher who can credibly be placed in the same category as the four mentioned above, and in many ways it feels like a stretch to do so.

    Sure, Ervin Santana had some core numbers in 2017 that were on par with the league's top tier – namely, a 3.28 ERA and 1.13 WHIP to go along with 16 wins – but for various reasons, he just doesn't quite measure up.

    There's the track record. To his credit, Santana enjoyed a career year at age 34, but in 2,170 previous MLB innings he had a 4.09 ERA and 1.28 WHIP.

    There are the peripheral numbers. Santana was among the league's most homer-prone starters this season, with walk and strikeout rates that were closer to average than elite. The success was heavily aided by a career-low .247 BABIP. His 4.77 xFIP suggests the performance was not nearly as good as the results, and that we shouldn't expect the same going forward.

    And then there is the wear and tear. Santana's durability is to be admired – he has made 30-plus starts in each of the past seven seasons (excepting his suspension-shortened 2015). But all those innings take a toll. Erv threw 100-plus pitches in 17 starts this year, and threw 37% sliders overall. He'll turn 35 in December. There hasn't yet been a drop-off in pitch velocity or quality, but few arms can escape the ravages of time and attrition forever.

    For all these reasons, Santana looks like a poor bet to be the No. 1 starter that the Twins need in 2017 if they're aiming for a championship.

    So where can they find this most coveted of assets? If he's coming from within the organization, it'll still probably take at least a couple more years. So let's explore a few avenues for realistically adding an ace-caliber starter from the outside.

    FREE AGENCY

    There are three pitchers set to be on the open market who could slot above Santana in the Twins rotation: Jake Arrieta, Lance Lynn and Yu Darvish. All three have the attributes to be a rotation-fronter for a true contender, and each has more or less filled that role within the past few years.

    Signing Arrieta, Lynn or Darvish will also require more than double the $54 million that Terry Ryan committed to Santana in 2014 when making him the highest-paid free agent in franchise history. So in a way, it's a little hard to envision.

    Or is it? There's a lot of payroll coming off the books over the next few years.

    In the 2018 Offseason Handbook (coming next week, make sure to preorder and get yours early!) we'll give you the low-down on these three free agents and 18 more, as well as a breakdown of payroll flexibility and how they all might fit financially.

    CTA-Banner.jpg

    TRADES

    Last winter, in the ultimately fruitless Brian Dozier trade talks, the Twins seemingly targeted the right kinds of arms in a loaded Dodgers system. While they probably won't revisit discussions with LA, this increasingly impressive scouting department undoubtedly has some other names from other organizations on the "Want" list.

    Are they willing to pony up? High-end pitchers, or prospects with that kind of potential, don't come cheap. Minnesota would surely be looking for a younger guy with multiple years of control, and that only ups the ante.

    The name that pops here is Chris Archer. One of the best pitchers in the game, he keeps getting mentioned as a candidate to be moved, though it's not clear why; he's 29 and signed very reasonably through 2021 with team options. I can't even imagine the package it would take to get him.

    Since established aces are exceedingly tough to pry away, the Twins would more likely need to identify someone who is on the verge of reaching that level. A tall task indeed.

    I'll just throw a name out there: Dinelson Lamet, of the Padres. The 25-year-old right-hander looked solid in his MLB debut this summer, averaging well over a strikeout per inning and featuring a 95 MPH heater. San Diego, perpetually one of the worst offensive teams in the majors, would LOVE to add some promising young bats.

    Are there other names out there that catch people's attention in the same way? Share in the comments.

    INTERNATIONAL

    We may see an unprecedented scenario play out over the next few months. By all accounts, Japanese superstar Shohei Otani fully intends to sign with an MLB team and head to the States. He's been called "Japan's Babe Ruth." Otani touches triple-digits and piles up whiffs with a nasty repertoire. Oh, and he's a good enough hitter that some legitimately believe he could DH on top of pitching.

    Two-way player or not, there's a decent chance the 23-year-old quickly becomes one of the top starters in the majors. And cost will not really be a factor in acquiring him.

    Per the new CBA, foreign players under the age of 25 are considered international amateurs and are thus subject to the bonus pool system. Otani could only sign a minor-league deal with a bonus of a few million tops.

    Many teams have already spent a majority of their allotted amounts. It bears noting that Minnesota is one of eight clubs that could offer a bonus of more than $1 million, though the Rangers and Yankees are also on that list, and probably more attractive destinations.

    I just don't see how the Twins make this happen. In fact, I really can't see Otani coming over this winter and forfeiting the $100M+ he'd be eligible to earn by waiting two more years. But, he says he's doing it, so we'll have to wait and see what happens.

    It's going to be an interesting offseason on all fronts. And with the World Series now officially underway, it's suddenly almost upon us.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    If you're dangling both of them, I think you are trying to get something more of a sure thing like Archer. I don't know enough about Lamet, but I think the thought is that he could be had cheaper b/c he has more question marks. You shouldn't need two top 100 players for that.

    That's good insight. Thanks for that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    What is lame is ignoring the effects of a line drive to the wrist and the pins/screws that needed to be used to put his pitching hand back together. I'm not saying Andy/Gardy didn't play a role there, but Slowey didn't exactly become that ace when he left the Twins either.

    Also, we're complaining about the Twins urging him not to rely on his straight 89 MPH fastball in the majors? Huh. 

     

    Some people just refuse to believe there's any explanation other than coaching ineptitude for successful minor-leaguers who don't translate their numbers to the majors, even though it happens all the time in every organization. There's really no room for common ground when contending with that kind of unnuanced viewpoint. (I say this as someone who thought Slowey got a somewhat raw deal from the Twins.)

     

     

    That's a hell of a qualifier. Over the past two years, Hill has put up a 149 ERA+ in 246 innings while pitching in the NL in an extremely good pitching ball park. He's amassed 3.5 WAR.  Santana has pitched in a hitters park in the AL the last two years and put up 8.4 WAR while throwing 393 innings with a 131 ERA+. I can't see how anyone can make a claim that Hill is an ace but Santana is not. And Hill got rocked in his first start this post-season too.

     

    Rate stats are nice but you're taking them a bit too far.

    This is more a discussion of talent/ability than past production. Do you actually think Santana is a better pitcher than Hill? 

     

    Of course I don't think the Twins should be targeting an injury-prone starter in his late-30s. But they need to identify guys who can dominate the way Hill can. That's really the point here. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I wonder how much Alex Cobb will cost? He's decent and 2 yrs away from surgery and pitched well this year. Trade rumor has him getting something like Santana got.

     

    If he gets a QO his market could be real small. Anyone know what pick the Twins would give up for singing QO'd free agent?

     

    This is a good primer on the QO: https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/07/2017-qualifying-offer-expected-to-be-worth-roughly-18mm.html

     

    I could get on board with Cobb, 4/56 strikes me as palatable for the Twins right now, could have some upside. 1 decent sized 4 year deal for a free agent pitcher really fits their need and payroll structure well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This is a good primer on the QO: https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/07/2017-qualifying-offer-expected-to-be-worth-roughly-18mm.html

     

    I could get on board with Cobb, 4/56 strikes me as palatable for the Twins right now, could have some upside. 1 decent sized 4 year deal for a free agent pitcher really fits their need and payroll structure well.

     

    TL;DR - Twins would give up their 3rd best pick if they sign a QO free agent.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    TL;DR - Twins would give up their 3rd best pick if they sign a QO free agent.

     

    Given where they are picking, that wouldn't bother me too much. They won't have the pool money this year to play games, so giving up the 2nd or 3rd round pick wouldn't bother me personally. That's well worth it for the right player.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

    This is more a discussion of talent/ability than past production. Do you actually think Santana is a better pitcher than Hill? 

     

    Of course I don't think the Twins should be targeting an injury-prone starter in his late-30s. But they need to identify guys who can dominate the way Hill can. That's really the point here. 

    Yeah, I don't even think it's close.

     

    Take Hill out of Dodger stadium and his 89mph avg fastball, his flyball tendencies, his HR tendenices and it's not even a debate. You have to really love fip to think Hill is better.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Given where they are picking, that wouldn't bother me too much. They won't have the pool money this year to play games, so giving up the 2nd or 3rd round pick wouldn't bother me personally. That's well worth it for the right player.

     

    I would agree. Seems they would lose a Competitive B pick (between 2nd and 3rd round) or a 3rd rounder (if they don't get a Competitive B pick). I would hope they don't find that cost prohibitive to add a much needed starter.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I would agree. Seems they would lose a Competitive B pick (between 2nd and 3rd round) or a 3rd rounder (if they don't get a Competitive B pick). I would hope they don't find that cost prohibitive to add a much needed starter.

     

    Wondering if they get a competitive A round pick this year. They are probably still in bottom 10 in market. Revenue may have went up though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Wondering if they get a competitive A round pick this year. They are probably still in bottom 10 in market. Revenue may have went up though.

     

    My understanding is that if you get an A one year you can only get a B the next year (and vice versa). Not the easiest rules to track.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd rather see them spend the money and maybe lose a draft pick than trade several prospects for pitching.

    However, I'd like them to spend what it takes to sign JD Martinez first then go after some mid range starting pitching.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'd rather see them spend the money and maybe lose a draft pick than trade several prospects for pitching.

    However, I'd like them to spend what it takes to sign JD Martinez first then go after some mid range starting pitching.

     

    Don't think they'd sign Martinez unless they were also planning on moving Kepler or Rosario (presumedly for pitching). Could be another way to upgrade this offseason.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I would agree. Seems they would lose a Competitive B pick (between 2nd and 3rd round) or a 3rd rounder (if they don't get a Competitive B pick). I would hope they don't find that cost prohibitive to add a much needed starter.

     

    Or maybe just sign a starter who isn't tied to a QO

     

    ~ Do Anything Realistic Via Incremental Salary Hikes ~

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah, I don't even think it's close.

     

    Take Hill out of Dodger stadium and his 89mph avg fastball, his flyball tendencies, his HR tendenices and it's not even a debate. You have to really love fip to think Hill is better.

    Hill had better numbers away from Dodger Stadium last year. This year they are worse. Both years combined they are about a wash.

    Ballpark doesn't seem to have much effect on Hill.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the Twins have some nice young arms on the way. Besides Berrios, you have Gonsalves, Romero, Thorpe, maybe even Stewart.

     

    I've said it before, and will say it again - just throwing money around is a fool's errand. I think the owners feel the same way.

     

    I hope the new regime will be able to uncover the future Klubers and Arrietas on the cheap. They are out there.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think the Twins have some nice young arms on the way. Besides Berrios, you have Gonsalves, Romero, Thorpe, maybe even Stewart.

     

    I've said it before, and will say it again - just throwing money around is a fool's errand. I think the owners feel the same way.

     

    I hope the new regime will be able to uncover the future Klubers and Arrietas on the cheap. They are out there.

    I would love to see us sign Arrieta!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I hate the idea of sinking a lot of money into a free agent, because that means that pitcher is likely on the wrong side of 30, and there aren't many pitchers that are still effective at 33/34 and older. I can guarantee you that someone like Yu Darvish or Arrieta will want a contract that extends longer than the 2 or 3 years beyond what is left of their prime, at which point, you have a lot of money tied up in a ticking time bomb.

    People can complain about Mauer's contract, but signing someone to an extension in their late 20s, especially a position player, is a reasonable move, but sinking a lot of money and years into pitching free agents effectively kneecaps your payroll in just a few years, and you know it ahead of time. Your time to win with Sano and Buxton is a lot shorter than what is left under their team control. 

    Trade prospects for guys with many arb years let, or reallocate your prospect depth to patch the holes in the system that you need. Any signing over 1-2 years is going to irritate me. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cobb will be closer to 4/64, Lynn will be about 4/80 and Chatwood may be 4/56.  Would rather go big, Prior 3 will have big market teams after them as they all want to be under the luxury tax threshold before 2018.  Pohlad's have always spent the money when they feel the team has a chance.  This team has a chance, but needs to upgrade the pitching staff significantly to succeed. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cobb is good but has been snake bit trying to make it through a full season.

     

    Not to rehash a debate, but trading two top prospects and paying three arb years for Sonny Gray seemed like a much better deal than waiting for this offseason to sign a Cobb for 4/50-60. Which is to say I think a trade will happen this offseason.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Cobb is good but has been snake bit trying to make it through a full season.

    Not to rehash a debate, but trading two top prospects and paying three arb years for Sonny Gray seemed like a much better deal than waiting for this offseason to sign a Cobb for 4/50-60. Which is to say I think a trade will happen this offseason.

    How much do you want to gut the farm system.  Our midlevel farm system cannot stand that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Even if we accept the figures in the handbook, why shouldn't they spend the money in 2018 that they didn't spend in 2017, and 2016?

    They just get to bank that, without anyone questioning it?

    They can spend whatever they chose to spend. And they could certainly add $30m in 18 and not lose money, particularly if you average over the past several years.

     

    This premise of “MLB owners should operate as a non-profit so we could improve our team keeps coming up.  This premise is a failure of economics 101.  If MLB owners operated as a non-profit we would still be in the same position in terms of competing for free agents.  We might even be worse off because some of the large market teams make about the same net percentage as the Twins but have higher revenue.  Therefore, even more incremental revenue would be available to those teams. The net effect would be player salaries would be even higher.  The only way this would benefit our team is if the Pohlads were willing to operate as a non-profit while the rest of league maintained business practices focused on maintaining profitability as they do now.

     

    There also would not be MLB at least not even remotely close to form we enjoy now.  It takes a whole lot of capital to build and maintain an entire industry.  Given business valuations are based on sustainable profitability the only way MLB could exist in this form would be if it were government sponsored non-profit.

    Edited by Major Leauge Ready
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This premise of “MLB owners should operate as a non-profit so we could improve our team keeps coming up.  This premise is a failure of economics 101.  If MLB owners operated as a non-profit we would still be in the same position in terms of competing for free agents.  We might even be worse off because some of the large market teams make about the same net percentage as the Twins but have a higher revenue.  The net effect would be player salaries would be even higher.  The only way this would benefit our team is if the Pohlads were willing to operate as a non-profit while the rest of league maintained business practices focused on maintaining profitability as they do now.

     

    There also would not be MLB at least not even remotely close to form we enjoy now.  It takes a whole lot of capital to build and maintain an entire industry.  Given business valuations are based on sustainable profitability the only way MLB could exist in this form would be if it were government sponsored non-profit.

    You haven't addressed a single word in the post you quoted.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How much do you want to gut the farm system.  Our midlevel farm system cannot stand that.

    I don't consider trading Nick Gordon and a top minor league arm to be gutting the system. There are good shortstops coming behind Gordon and arms are unpredictable.

     

    I also wonder how pessimistic people are of Falvey's ability to build a farm system, that we can't part with a good minor leaguer or two.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Unless the guy was traded mid-season, for example.

     

    So... Jamie Garcia (who wouldn't get a QO) and Yu Darvish (who everyone says we won't sign)... I'm missing a couple I'm sure, but it's not a long list.

     

    That's kind of my point... it narrows the list if we refuse to sign someone who gets a QO. I'd be hesitant to trade a 1st round pick for a QO guy (though I'd probably still do that this year), but a 3rd round or comp B round? I wouldn't think twice about that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't consider trading Nick Gordon and a top minor league arm to be gutting the system. There are good shortstops coming behind Gordon and arms are unpredictable.

    I also wonder how pessimistic people are of Falvey's ability to build a farm system, that we can't part with a good minor leaguer or two.

     

    You're likely able to start conversations there for a guy like Cole. I doubt Archer would be available at that point. If I'm trading, I think I want Archer personally. For that matter, I'd still probably consider dangling Dozier and see if someone bites.

     

    Personally, I'd rather bite the bullet and spend cash, especially given the risks that all pitchers bring. That saves our minor league bullets for later if that expensive pitcher gets hurt or to shore up another hole if everything goes as planned.  But... the system is definitely good enough to bring a pitcher home.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...