Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • The Argument Against Trading Max Kepler


    Matt Braun

    He's probably more valuable to the Twins than any other team. Find out why. 

    Image courtesy of Kamil Krzaczynski-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

     

    Perhaps no Twins player draws more ire than Max Kepler; the long-time right-fielder has disappointed over his eight-season MLB career as—with the exception of 2019—his offensive numbers fall below his potential. Season after season, the German product produces a .225/.317/.422 line, flashes an offensive profile with upside and fails to fulfill that promise in the following season. It’s madness.

    Naturally, the restless fans remain exhausted. They don’t boo—this isn’t New York, after all—but if there were some sort of passive-aggressive method to indicate disapproval, Minnesota fans would embrace it. Instead, we read yearly articles detailing all the teams interested in Kepler, watch him enter the season as a Twin, and endure the same style of season he has played since 2016. It’s madness.

    But maybe the Twins should hold onto Kepler for one more year. It’s crazy—madness, even—but it could make sense.

    One of the strongest arguments for Kepler’s exit rests on the internal options. The Twins possess about 20,000 left-handed hitting outfielders capable of catching a flyball at an adequate level, rendering Kepler’s skillset redundant in a sea of similarity.

    Those options may be weaker than we believe; neither Alex Kirilloff nor Trevor Larnach has played more than 80 games in an MLB season, so far always succumbing to an injury that cuts their year short. Matt Wallner may have the bat, but his outfield flopping netted him -4 DRS over just 138 2/3 MLB innings, 14th worst 91 players with 130 innings in right field. DRS is a cumulative stat. That’s bad. Nick Gordon may be best suited for the role, but he is more valuable as a jack-of-all-trades positionless weapon, not a locked-in everyday player. 

    Kepler, on the other hand, is an elite defender in right field and can cover center at an above-average level, perhaps not an easy skill to find with Target Field’s unusual characteristics in that section of the field. Maybe he’ll never break through the 100 wRC+ glass ceiling, but he’ll also never outright bust with the bat. And, sigh, there might be optimism for Kepler’s bat.

    WARNING. DISCUSSION OF MAX KEPLER’S BATTED BALL DATA BELOW

    It’s folly to analyze Kepler’s hitting; his BABIP baffles the wisest of sabermetricians, and this author swore an oath years ago never to attempt to understand it. More innovative writers have tried and failed, and there’s a good chance the answer to his mysterious hit tool lies wherever Jimmy Hoffa is buried.

    But let’s go.

    Kepler’s under-the-hood numbers improved drastically in 2022; his max exit velocity reached 113.8 MPH, his xwOBA stood in the 74th percentile of all batters, and he cut his already-low strikeout rate while holding steady with his walks. His Baseball Savant page has enough red to drive Joseph McCarthy crazy. Even in his weirdest batting seasons, Kepler’s batted-ball data never looked this pristine; there’s a chance he truly experienced bad luck in 2022. 

    If those improvements are here to stay—it would be weird if he suddenly fell off at 30 years old—the new limits to shifting combined with his changes in 2022 may finally unluck his offensive profile. Remember all those times he hit a sharp groundball directly into short right field for an out? Those days are gone; instead, he’ll earn a well-fought single for his efforts, not an out. 

    It makes sense to deal Kepler; the team has plenty of backup options, and if the team is pinching its pennies to sign Carlos Correa and a top-tier starter, Kepler is the obvious candidate for heaving. The logic is there. But there are worse things than having a guaranteed solid player on your roster, and Kepler’s defensive acumen will be difficult to replace. Maybe this sounds like Stockholm Syndrome, but Kepler should stay.

     

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    21 hours ago, PatPfund said:

    The part of the OP that is dead on? Max has more value to the Twins than to others. 

    A. (as pointed out) the vaunted OF depth doesn't exist. In both of the past two seasons we've been running a cast of players not-ready-for-prime-time to the OF for extended starts. One of them (Celestino) is often considered a fixture of some sort now, despite being a weak-bat/weak-mind player.

    B. Everyone else knows of Max's struggles. I'd trade him today if there was going to be something substantial coming back, but if it is just to move him (or dump salary with the tens of millions we have free to spend right now), then... no. And again, everyone knows Max, so something substantial isn't coming back. 

    Exactly - nothing positive coming back in a Kepler trade. Nobody’s trading for gold glove with 15 doubles & .225 avg. at $9 million!!!

    Completely agree on our “outfield depth”……Jake Cave, seems like a great guy and super effort guy, not an MLB hitter. He’s Kepler with less power & 30 points less batting average. Gone. Celestino is OK on defense, no power & .230 average and clueless on bases, not a member of a good team. Gone. Garlick looks like Harmon Killebrew playing outfield. Emergency outfielder. No offense Harm! We have Buxton at 100 games in CF - Gordon in LF with Larnach there when Gordon plays CF or 2B. Kirilof seems to be the 1B - DH - LF blend with outfield being last option. Walner is limited. With existing contract, Kepler is a necessary evil with some potential offensive upside with shift change.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, DJL44 said:

    Would rather have Max Kepler with his contract than Cody Bellinger with his new contract.

    Pretty sure, as hard as this is to say, Kepler is a better value. Kepler at $9 million with some potential power upside as well as 25-30 point uptick in BA without shift.

    Bellinger is making $17.5 million I believe, and has been down for 3 years with only “potential” for that $ number. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well yeah  Kep needs to "hit better" to stay in the lineup.  As you say his potential and results have been maddeningly mixed.

    But for the money, there are plenty of worse candidates who aren't elite fielders makking much more! Until someone in our minor league system unseats him, trading him makes no sense. We already gave away a solid player in Urshela and have had NOTHING to replace Rosario since we let him walk. Find a LF power hitter with speed and defense before we give away any more known quantities.

    And why are we so enamored with Correa when we have Lewis (if healthy) ready to star at the SS position? Spend the money on pitching!!!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/7/2022 at 6:33 AM, Riverbrian said:

    Before you use the word absurd. 

    Please do your 1 WAR = 8M dollar math on Eddie Rosario before we let him walk over an estimated 10m during Arbitration. Extrapolate his shortened 2020 season the same way as you did Max. 

    Also... Let me ask your opinion on how Eddie Rosario went from 4.3 to 1.5 bWAR from 2018 to 2019? Please break down the numbers that caused a 4.3 to 1.5 drop because I'm not understanding how it's possible and I could use some help understanding.  

     

    I was going off fWAR which shows a drop from 4.0 (a career high) to 0.9. Eddie had giant drops in both offensive and defensive production that year. You may recall he was playing with a hurt ankle (or some other injury in that area). Teams mostly didn't run on him due to his strong arm but his range was awful (likely due to the injury). His OPS was ~ the same from 2018-2019 but you have to remember that was the juiced ball year where offense was up across baseball. Having the same OPS actually dings him for not improving his numbers like the rest of the league. This explains his wRC+ dropping from 114 to 104. He went from good offense/mediocre defense to average offense (for a corner OF)/abysmal defender.

     

    He had a magical postseason and a great end of the season with the Braves but he had a .397 OPS in the first half of the year after they cut him! Nobody claimed him off waivers! He was awful last year too!

    Their career OPS comparison is .767 for Rosario and .744 for Kepler. The difference in value is in their defense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Seansy said:

    I was going off fWAR which shows a drop from 4.0 (a career high) to 0.9. Eddie had giant drops in both offensive and defensive production that year. You may recall he was playing with a hurt ankle (or some other injury in that area). Teams mostly didn't run on him due to his strong arm but his range was awful (likely due to the injury). His OPS was ~ the same from 2018-2019 but you have to remember that was the juiced ball year where offense was up across baseball. Having the same OPS actually dings him for not improving his numbers like the rest of the league. This explains his wRC+ dropping from 114 to 104. He went from good offense/mediocre defense to average offense (for a corner OF)/abysmal defender.

     

    He had a magical postseason and a great end of the season with the Braves but he had a .397 OPS in the first half of the year after they cut him! Nobody claimed him off waivers! He was awful last year too!

    Their career OPS comparison is .767 for Rosario and .744 for Kepler. The difference in value is in their defense.

    Thank you for this. I really appreciate it. I learned some things about the offensive weighting/adjustments from year to year.

    I'm still struggling with the defensive weighting that is taking place. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, Riverbrian said:

    Thank you for this. I really appreciate it. I learned some things about the offensive weighting/adjustments from year to year.

    I'm still struggling with the defensive weighting that is taking place. 

    Defensive metrics have improved over time but they are definitely less reliable than offense ones. Rosie definitely fell off defensively in 2019 but bounced back after that so I think it really was the injury that hurt him most.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Seansy said:

    Defensive metrics have improved over time but they are definitely less reliable than offense ones. Rosie definitely fell off defensively in 2019 but bounced back after that so I think it really was the injury that hurt him most.

    Could be the injury that hurt him or the less reliable defensive metrics. I question the weighting of the non-routine play that occurs. A RF or LF only makes a couple of plays a game and the overwhelming majority of those plays are routine.

    The penalty for a single botched routine play or the reward for a single non-routine play has to be too high because the defensive stats are making up a lot of offensive ground. 

    A RF might get one chance every 4 to 5 innings. 4 out of those 5 would probably be classified as routine. A difference making play might be one every 3 games.    

    I really appreciate the conversation. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...