Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • REPORT: Twins To Sign Jason Castro


    Parker Hageman

    The Minnesota Twins new front office did not waste much time addressing issues this offseason, first cutting ties with veteran third baseman Trevor Plouffe, now Fox Sport's Ken Rosenthal says the team has a deal in place with free agent catcher Jason Castro.

    Image courtesy of Kim Klement // USA Today

    Twins Video

    Yahoo Sport's Jeff Passan reports that the two sides have agreed upon a three-year, $24.5 million contract.

    As Nick Nelson detailed in the Offseason Handbook, Castro hasn't shown much with his bat over the last three seasons, posting a combined .215/.291/.369 line over that time. It would seem in the Twins' best interested to use him in a platoon role with the right-handed swinging John Ryan Murphy. Over the last two seasons Castro hit a passable .225/.315/.417 against right-handed pitching. In that sense, the $8.2 million per year is a hefty fee for a platoon candidate but as the left-handed hitting one, Castro would play the lion's share of the games.

    Castro's biggest upside has been his defense. Specifically his ability to steal strikes from outside of the zone, particularly against right-handed hitters.

    output_7BIM7U.gif

    This could be an immediate impact for pitchers. Consider Kyle Gibson. Gibson does not possess swing-and-miss stuff but has plenty of movement and stays around the zone. With his sinker and slider combo, Gibson could be one big benefactor to Castro's outer-half framing skills.

    Castro's receiving skill set goes beyond gaining a strike call from off the plate. It is ensuring that pitches that cut through the zone are also acknowledged as such. Consider this: over the last three season with Kurt Suzuki as the primary catcher, the Twins have had 81.3% of pitches that were in the strike zone and the batter watched it go by, called a strike -- the lowest in baseball. The Twins pitching staff, who did not need to be further behind the eight ball, was victimized to some degree by their catchers' performance. We cannot rule out some influence on inconsistent location or umpire biases, to be sure. However by comparison the Astros pitching staff, backstopped by Castro, had baseball's second best rate at 85.3%. While it may seem like a small percentage, that can make a significant difference in any given at bat.

    "Framing" might be the word that makes people cringe, as if the act is dishonest and swindling a human who is paid to make accurate calls. The reality is framing is receiving the ball in the right way. It is positioning your body to give the umpire a good look at a pitch. It is making a pitch that is one ball length off the plate look more like it clipped a part of the zone.

    What exactly does Castro's framing skills look like? Here he is stealing a called third strike, coaxing a pitch that passed by the zone back into it.

    http://i.imgur.com/Elr7puf.gif

    The previous front office regime did not put much, if any, emphasis on the value of catcher framing. The recent signings of Kurt Suzuki and Ryan Doumit did little to assist the pitching staff. Castro, on the other hand, has gone from a mediocre receiver to one of the game's highest valued, saving 32.2 framing runs above average (7th out of 103 qualified catchers) for the Astros over the last three seasons compared to Suzuki's -32.0 framing runs (100 out of 103 catchers). In theory, that is a six-game swing or could have been a two-game improvement in each season had the Twins employed Castro over Suzuki.

    When you break the numbers down further, we find that Castro is extremely adept at getting strikes called in hitter's counts. According to ESPN/Tru Media's framing stats, Castro was second in baseball among all catchers with a 15.3 framing runs above average mark when the hitter's were ahead. That means Castro was able to help get his pitcher from dangerous territory into more manageable areas.

    The move is not sexy from an offseason standpoint, however, this signing could give the Twins' pitching staff a much needed shot in the arm.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Yeah, this is my feeling, 1 or even 2 year deal would be fine, 3? Would the pohlads allow us to move on from another deal if Castro continues to decline?

    I just hope this doesn't take the focus off the fact that they should be actively looking to get some legit catching prospects in the system as well.

     

    I would assume the hope is that he's a backup catcher by the 3rd year on this deal. $8 million seems like a lot for a backup catcher now but baseball deals keep getting bigger so in two years, that may very well be the market value of a strong backup catcher. Until then, it's not like the Twins would use that money elsewhere (they're not realistically getting an ace starting pitcher, paying for elite relievers is dicey and they don't have a lot of needs in position players because they're young all over the place). If this keeps them from signing the next Mike Pelfrey, that's an extra bonus. To me this is taking money out of the Pole-dads coffers and using it for something useful. I'm all for it.

     

    That said, I'm a bit sad about what this means for Garver. I was hoping to see him aggressively pushed next year and now with JRM ahead of him, he's more of a "Cup of Coffee in September" guy than a June guy. Obviously the Twins FO and staff have so much more insight into his development so they likely see a lot of things he needs to work on but on a personal level, Garver was a guy I got excited about for 2017 and I'm a bit sad.

     

    Also sad (but less sad) about JRM. I know last year was awful but I was hoping he'd have a nice bounce-back year since his prior trajectory suggested he could hit well for a catcher. Hopefully he'll be a little less backup and a little more platoon this year under the new FO. I'd like to see what we have in him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    He's not a very good hitter, but he's one of the best pitch framers in the game. Going from the worst in Suzuki to one of the best should do something for you. Having good offense from the position would be nice, but the pitching is the problem, and this hopefully will help with that.

    My fear is that he is now entering the age when catchers regress and we are on the hook for three years.  2017 is not the year we contend and by 2018 regression might be a factor.  I hope I am wrong. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Also sad (but less sad) about JRM. I know last year was awful but I was hoping he'd have a nice bounce-back year since his prior trajectory suggested he could hit well for a catcher. Hopefully he'll be a little less backup and a little more platoon this year under the new FO. I'd like to see what we have in him.

     

    I think the Twins got duped with JRM.  The Yankees already traded off a catcher this year too, one who looks better than JRM ever did.  

    Sure, give JRM a shot in spring training.  But if he still can't block pitches, throw out runners, or hit the ball, let's hope they don't hesitate to make Garver the backup and leave JRM at AAA.

    Edited by Doomtints
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If a Dozier trade actually goes down, I'd hope a catching prospect is part of it.  Murphy was supposed to be that guy.  And could still be.  I want some backup for the backstop position.

     

    Oh man, disagree. If they trade Dozier, I want it to be entirely focused on pitching prospects - the more and the higher rated the better.

     

    The Twins with Castro are fine at catcher. Twins fans have been spoiled with a decade of Mauer - most teams never really have elite catchers. Castro/JRM/Garver/Turner/Rortvedt is a perfectly acceptable amount of catching depth. It's not going to be a position of strength unless Garver or Rortvedt take big jumps but it's not going to be what keeps the team out of the playoffs.

     

    Pitching will be. The Twins need an influx of pitching prospects. If you trade Dozier (and you should) that's got to be the focus. We aren't signing the next Jon Lester, we need to find pitching within.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     In 2015 base runners stole 42 out of 43 attempts and his weak arm is well document in Astros territory.     

     

    In 2015 he caught 24 out of 66 baserunners for 36%, an above rate (32% was league average). In 2016 he caught 14 out of 59 for $24% (29% was league average). He's been about league average over his career for this stat (which is highly variable BTW).

     

    Not sure where you got your stats but it would be hard for them to be more wrong.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think the Twins got duped with JRM.  The Yankees already traded off a catcher this year too, one who looks better than JRM ever did.  

    Sure, give JRM a shot in spring training.  But if he still can't block pitches, throw out runners, or hit the ball, let's hope they don't hesitate to make Garver the backup and leave JRM at AAA.

    If there's any consolation in that trade, Aaron Hicks was pretty bad too. So no blood lost in this trade battle. 

    I do agree that the clock is ticking for JRM. He probably gets one more shot next year to prove he's a worthy backup. Otherwise he'll be AAA fodder and Garver takes over the backup spot. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Avoiding the question of where do you play him if he can't catch, could the Twins have gotten WIlson Ramos for a similar price. 

     

    And question #2. Is there anyone in the system that will step forward and be the Twins full-time catcher in 2018 or 2019, or even 2020. This buys us some time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    My fear is that he is now entering the age when catchers regress and we are on the hook for three years.  2017 is not the year we contend and by 2018 regression might be a factor.  I hope I am wrong. 

    He may or may not regress. There are plenty of catchers in their 30's that are doing a fine job behind the plate. Bottom line is this 3 year contract isn't going to cripple the payroll for the Twins.

     

    There's a solid 3 year window before Buxton, Sano, Kepler, Berrios, and pick your flavor prospect become multi-millionaires. This is a perfect time to pay a premium price for someone who they feel is going to help a young pitching staff, and bring stability to a positional need in the organization. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Speaking of turning Castro into something he's not, you might want to double check your 2015 caught stealing data.

    As an aside, consider adding data over and above batting average to evaluate offense.

     

     

    Quote away.  blow me away with stats chief. 

     

    I don't really care what his other offensive stats are.  Managing no better than a .222 batting average in three seasons is bad any way you look at it.

    Edited by laloesch
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If this signing infuses the pitchers with more confidence, even if it's only a placebo, it's probably worth it. Not sure that it will, but signing a defensive catcher is really about getting the most out of your pitchers.

     

    I'd like this deal a lot better if the team also signed Geovany Soto to complement him. Probably not in the cards but he'd be cheap and we really have no clue what is going on in Falvey's head.

     

    http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh186/Retleo/python-my-brain-hurts.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    For good reason.  Castro's superior pitch framing means that he gets 0.92 strikes called per game that should be balls.  

    That's such dominance it just makes one tremble inside.  A world series is inevitable.

     

    It's probably just as much about the pitchers thinking that they can get those calls as actually getting the calls. I think the Twins and probably all Minnesota teams self-fulfilling prophesies have been of the negative variety for a long time, swinging that the other way might create more wins than anything else they can do this offseason.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    In 2015 he caught 24 out of 66 baserunners for 36%, an above rate (32% was league average). In 2016 he caught 14 out of 59 for $24% (29% was league average). He's been about league average over his career for this stat (which is highly variable BTW).

     

    Not sure where you got your stats but it would be hard for them to be more wrong.

     

    My mistake to not double check. 

    The Houston source was quoting Hank Conger stats alongside Castro's.

    Edited by laloesch
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I swear I posted earlier but I guess it didn't take. No matter. I like this move a ton. But I admit I'm shocked. I just didn't see it happening, or so quickly, and frankly, as rumors flew, I thought it would take more than $8M per.

     

    In my blueprint, I talked about Castro. I just honestly didn't think it would happen, so I quickly moved on to other ideas/options.

     

    Look, Castro is not a savior for the team as a whole, or the pitching staff as a unit. But a catcher who can call a game, throw decently, steal some strikes, etc, is a real quality get for this team. The fact that he bats LH and does well against RH pitching is a huge bonus. A catcher can't play every day. Murphy and Garver provide an interesting back up/platoon scenario that can work really well if the manager just approaches it logically.

     

    Now, another infielder when Dozier is traded, one bullpen piece, and a competent 4th OF piece and I'm really encouraged. First step done!

    im with you, I hope for a big upgrade in one rotation spot as well as the middle infielder is a good fielding shortstop.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    It is a good signing if you plan on contending soon. Does anyone see this team contending in 3 years? I am a dire hard fan but I don't see this turning around that soon.

    I don't see them contending in 3 years.   I see them contending the next  3 years.  I think there is talent on this team and I expect talented players to play well.   That was not the case last year.   Berrios, Sano, Buxton and May playing well and others just playing better can make a profound difference.    What's happening in 3 years that can't happen this year?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was against a 3 year deal for someone like Castro simply due to the age factor.

     

    However, now that I think about it, signing Castro says the front office does not believe there is anything in the pipeline close to MLB ready.

     

    Signing Castro also tells me a lot about the Murphy trade.

     

    It's looking like an interesting off-season.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't see them contending in 3 years.   I see them contending the next  3 years.  I think there is talent on this team and I expect talented players to play well.   That was not the case last year.   Berrios, Sano, Buxton and May playing well and others just playing better can make a profound difference.    What's happening in 3 years that can't happen this year?

     

    The hitting core is here now.  If we are 3 years out from contending, then Falvey/Levine failed in bringing in that pitching that we need.. and they failed in developing those young starters that we currently have.  Personally, I think 2018 is very reasonable for contention.  If we're lucky, 2017 will mirror 2015.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here is possibly a dumb question I have. 

     

    Now that a lot has been made of Castro's pitch framing ability, are umpires going to take notice and squeeze him a bit on those borderline outside pitches?  I hope they wouldn't try to guess, but if they know Castro can basically expand the zone by 2 inces (that's a random guess by me, I have no idea if it is actually 1 centimeter or 1 foot) will they call it ball now knowing he has that ability, taking away his biggest strength?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Castro's signing shows what Falvey values in a catcher and defensive metrics. It is a 180 degree turn from the Ryan era.

     

    Falvey does seem to be getting a pass on this one as those critical of the signing and skeptical of framing metrics are leaving Falvey out of the discussion for the most part. This is his first mark on the organization.

     

    Unfortunately, it is no longer possible to acquire a weak hitting catcher with good receiving skills at a bargain contract. The Twins missed the boat on that one and now Falvey and the Twins are paying full retail for the skill.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Here is possibly a dumb question I have. 

     

    Now that a lot has been made of Castro's pitch framing ability, are umpires going to take notice and squeeze him a bit on those borderline outside pitches?  I hope they wouldn't try to guess, but if they know Castro can basically expand the zone by 2 inces (that's a random guess by me, I have no idea if it is actually 1 centimeter or 1 foot) will they call it ball now knowing he has that ability, taking away his biggest strength?

     

    I would guess it's the opposite, otherwise good pitch framers would likely suffer extreme swings year-to-year once it's known that they are good pitch framers and I don't think that happens.

     

    I think umpires appreciate good defensive catchers and I also think they would prefer a 3 hour game if possible. I think if the umps know that if they are working with a good catcher, they tend to give him the benefit of the doubt.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    It is a good signing if you plan on contending soon. Does anyone see this team contending in 3 years? I am a dire hard fan but I don't see this turning around that soon.

    This exact team?  No.  But I assume the Twins brought in Falvey and Levine to take the young core of this team and add pieces necessary to make them a contender in 3 years, hopefully less.  How they use those core pieces is mostly up to them.  Some may become assets used to get new core pieces and some will become mainstays that help them win.  

     

    So to answer your question, yes I see them contending in 3 years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I would guess it's the opposite, otherwise good pitch framers would likely suffer extreme swings year-to-year once it's known that they are good pitch framers and I don't think that happens.

     

    I think umpires appreciate good defensive catchers and I also think they would prefer a 3 hour game if possible. I think if the umps know that if they are working with a good catcher, they tend to give him the benefit of the doubt.

    Thanks, that makes sense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Love the move. Think it will help the pitcher more than many realize. Not a world-changer in that regard, but will help move their needle.

     

    I didn't dislike Suzuki because of his hitting ability, or lack therof, just like I won't dislike Castro because of his hitting.

     

    I didn't like Suzuki because he was a bad defensive catcher. I probably disliked him even more because the front office tried to keep telling us he was good. 

     

    As a lefty hitter, he'll also make a pretty good platoon with Murphy or Garver I think. Can keep each hitter away from their weaknesses, and keeps Castro as the primary catcher.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The things that make a catcher a "bad" pitch framer are things like moving up and down when the ball is received (bouncing), pulling your glove through the zone while receiving and setting up too far away from a pitch which makes you reach. Good receivers minimize the motion required to catch the ball. They also tend to naturally move each pitch toward the center of the zone by extending their arm toward the pitcher when they receive. Keeping your thumb pointed toward the center of the zone is another technique. Good receivers do this without a lot of effort.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Avoiding the question of where do you play him if he can't catch, could the Twins have gotten WIlson Ramos for a similar price. 

     

    And question #2. Is there anyone in the system that will step forward and be the Twins full-time catcher in 2018 or 2019, or even 2020. This buys us some time.

    In my view, Ramos makes no sense for this team.  He's after a shorter term deal because of his knee injury.  A one year deal makes absolutely no sense for this or any other team, and a two year deal puts them basically in the same situation after 2018.  That's why I think they went with a 3 year deal with Castro. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Oh man, disagree. If they trade Dozier, I want it to be entirely focused on pitching prospects - the more and the higher rated the better.

     

    The Twins with Castro are fine at catcher. Twins fans have been spoiled with a decade of Mauer - most teams never really have elite catchers. Castro/JRM/Garver/Turner/Rortvedt is a perfectly acceptable amount of catching depth. It's not going to be a position of strength unless Garver or Rortvedt take big jumps but it's not going to be what keeps the team out of the playoffs.

     

    Pitching will be. The Twins need an influx of pitching prospects. If you trade Dozier (and you should) that's got to be the focus. We aren't signing the next Jon Lester, we need to find pitching within.

    Agree on the pitching needed...but we had similar catching prospects (to Castro) in Herrmann and Butera....except they both hit better than Castro over the last three years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think the Twins got duped with JRM.  The Yankees already traded off a catcher this year too, one who looks better than JRM ever did.  

    Sure, give JRM a shot in spring training.  But if he still can't block pitches, throw out runners, or hit the ball, let's hope they don't hesitate to make Garver the backup and leave JRM at AAA.

     

    I think it's way too early to say they got duped. That said, it was a terrible year.

     

    It's hard to quantify the catching part of it - there aren't easy stats and you end up in scouting reports and hearsay. But the hitting part is something I think he'll bounce back on. Over 99 MLB games and 257 PA in 2014 and 2015, JRM put up a .718 OPS. He also hit every step up through the majors, posting .700+ OPS each level. Last year was awfulness for a full year but just as we all were cautious when Danny Santana had one great year in a series of average years, we should be wary of dismissing JRM for one awful year in a series of decent years. He should be able to hit at an above-average rate for a catcher.

     

    So I think he's a fine backup catcher and would rather see Garver down in AAA catching and playing every day. If Garver has an impressive 1/2 to 2/3 of a year, maybe he can force a platoon that helps his development.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    In my view, Ramos makes no sense for this team.  He's after a shorter term deal because of his knee injury.  A one year deal makes absolutely no sense for this or any other team, and a two year deal puts them basically in the same situation after 2018.  That's why I think they went with a 3 year deal with Castro. 

    Ramos may not play much at all in 2017 due to his knee so he will either wait until he is healthy to sign or sign a 3 year deal now with a club hoping they will get a nice return on their investment in years 2 and 3.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...