Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Projecting the Twins Opening Day Roster: Version 3.0


    Cody Christie

    Opening Day is right around the corner and many important decisions have already been made. Who gets the final roster spots before the team heads to Milwaukee?

    Image courtesy of © Jordan Johnson-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Catchers (3): Mitch Garver, Ryan Jeffers, Willians Astudillo

    Odd Man Out: None

    Garver and Jeffers have been locks to make the Opening Day roster since the 2020 season ended. Barring injury, Minnesota will rotate these two players throughout much of the season. Willians Astudillo hasn’t been on any previous version of the projected Opening Day roster, but the Twins have been hinting at him making the team. This includes signing Roberto Pena, a veteran catcher, to be a second catcher at Triple-A.

    Infielders (5): Miguel Sano, Jorge Polanco, Luis Arraez, Josh Donaldson, Andrelton Simmons

    Odd Man Out: None

    Like the catching group, the infielders have been virtually set since the Twins signed Andrelton Simmons. Polanco, Arraez, and even Sano can be used at multiple defensive positions, so it’s going to be interesting to see how creative Baldelli will be with his line-up construction. Astudillo can also fit into this group as he has shown plenty of defensive versatility throughout his Twins tenure.

    Outfield (4): Jake Cave, Byron Buxton, Max Kepler, Brent Rooker

    Odd Men Out: Kyle Garlick, Alex Kirilloff

    The biggest Twins news of the week was that Alex Kirilloff was sent to the alternate site after he had a rough spring at the plate. This leaves the Twins with one decision to make as far as the last outfielder to make the club. In recent spring line-ups, Baldelli has been using the trio of Buxton, Kepler, and Rooker as his starting outfield. This leaves Cave as the fourth outfielder and Garlick on the outside looking in. Garlick has been impressive this spring, but he has an option left and the Twins can use him as depth at Triple-A.

    Designated Hitter (1): Nelson Cruz

    Boomstick will be bashing homers into his 40s and Twins fans are along for the ride.

    Rotation (5): Kenta Maeda, Jose Berrios, Michael Pineda, J.A. Happ, Matt Shoemaker

    Odd Man Out: Randy Dobnak

    Dobnak isn’t going to be in the rotation to start the season, but that might not last for long. With his new and improved slider, Dobnak might be on track to be one of the AL’s biggest sleepers this season. Berrios may have made some adjustments to his fastball and that can be a scary proposition for hitters in the AL Central. Kenta Maeda will start on Opening Day in Milwaukee as he looks to build off his runner-up finish for the AL Cy Young.

    Bullpen (8): Taylor Rogers, Tyler Duffey, Alex Colome, Jorge Alcala, Hansel Robles, Caleb Thielbar, Randy Dobnak, Derek Law

    Odd Men Out: Shaun Anderson, Cody Stashak, Devin Smeltzer

    Anderson seemed like the type of player that might be able to fill the Matt Wisler type role on the club, but he was optioned to the minor league side. Smeltzer can fill multiple roles at Triple-A before being needed at the big-league level. Stashak and Law were vying for the last spot and Law’s strikeout filled spring put him over the top. Minnesota will also have the opportunity to use 14 pitchers at different times during the season, so some of the players at the bullpen’s back end will be shuffled back and forth between CHS Field and Target Field.

    Who do you think makes the Opening Day roster? Leave a COMMENT and start the discussion.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY

    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers

    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums

    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    How about Gordon? Time to move on.

     

    Why? He's a quality player with the worst luck I've seen in a while. Gordon was playing about as well as Arraez in 2019 at AAA when he got hurt and missed a window for a call-up. He got COVID last year and never had a chance to show anything in games for 2020. everything about him shows a floor as a utility guy in MLB with an upside as a hitter. If he's cut off the 40-man, he'll get snapped up immediately. 

     

    Smeltzer or Anderson at least have a chance to slide through waivers; Smeltzer is a classic back of the 40-man guy (some upside, reasons to have hope he might figure it out, but not a great track record of success in the majors/red flags in his MLB performance), and Anderson is a reliever with control issues who ain't 22 any longer.

     

    I'd cut Smeltzer, who right now looks like he's 10th or so in line to start a game for the Twins right now (Donak is currently 6th, followed by some combination of Thorpe, Duran, and Balazovic...but even Ober might jump ahead of Smeltzer if the injury parade really crushed the starters)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I haven't seen speculation on this, but with only two starts under his belt (and just one more scheduled, I assume, plus probably a simulated game around the 31st), I'm skeptical about Happ's likelihood for starting the season on the active roster. Starting him on the IL opens a roster spot for someone for the first week or two.  

    Starting Happ on the IL would just set him back more, no? There's no official rehab games to pitch, so it would just be more simulated games in extended spring training for those 10 days.

     

    With an 8 or 9 man bullpen, guys with options, and a stretched-out Dobnak likely to make the club, they don't even need Happ -- or anyone -- to be at full innings-eating capacity in the first week of the season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Twins don't need 3 catchers. Garver and Jeffers will do fine splitting the duties. Take Astudillo off the roster and add Garlick. I don't trust that Buxton will stay healthy and I don't trust Kepler to perform offensively right away. This gives more OF options. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You are changing the scenario. In Cody's proposed roster, Astudillo is a 2nd back-up. If Simmons goes down, Polanco goes to SS, Arraez to 2B, NO Astudillo.  If Polanco or Donaldson goes down, Arraez takes his place, NO Astudillo. Astudillo is there if your backup goes down too.

     

    Now, would I still keep Riddle instead of Astudillo? Probably. I don't really see the need for 3 catchers.

    I would still rather have Riddle over two middle infielders who lost their starting spots because they couldn’t field the position .

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Why? He's a quality player with the worst luck I've seen in a while. Gordon was playing about as well as Arraez in 2019 at AAA when he got hurt and missed a window for a call-up. He got COVID last year and never had a chance to show anything in games for 2020. everything about him shows a floor as a utility guy in MLB with an upside as a hitter. If he's cut off the 40-man, he'll get snapped up immediately. 

     

     

     

    I agree with your analysis on Gordon but unless you see Lewis starting next year one of the infielders has to go next year.  It looks to be either Blankenhorn or Gordon.  Blankenhorn better fits the Twins, hard hit rate, homer prone bat than Gordon, and Gordon is nothing special defensively either.  While I agree he has value I don't think it is enough to keep him past this year. 

     

    While I concur just cutting him makes little sense they could try and trade him but it probably makes more sense to see if his bat can lift his value.  At any rate they could decide to move on from him sooner rather than later depending on how they see things, but to your point Smeltzer makes more sense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't believe he is on the 40 man roster yet, so no options used to send him to a minor league team. As whosafraid said, the question is whether his deal has an opt out or not, as minor league deals to major league players often (but not always) do.

     

     

    Darren Wolfson tweeted at the time of the signing that Law's minor league deal includes an opt out provision.  The opt out date isn't stated.

     

    Wolfson says today that the Derek Law opt-out isn't until August 1st (unless an opportunity in Asia comes along):

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Wolfson says today that the Derek Law opt-out isn't until August 1st (unless an opportunity in Asia comes along):

     

    Thanks for the details!

     

    I like the phrasing Asian language, which in context doesn't mean they have a portion of the contract written in Asian, but that there is an English section pertaining to the event an opportunity to play in Asia comes to fruition.

     

    And having watched one video on a tweet about Law, something about his demeanor reminds me of Colon. I hope we see him on the Twins mound sometime this season, though i am patient, if nothing else.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I would rather have Riddle. A potential infield of Arraez, Polanco and Austudillo is not very appetizing . We have had to live thru that before.

     

    I assume you think Riddle must be a good defensive player because he clearly can't hit?

     

    I see no evidence that he's any better than Polanco defensively. 

     

    Either way, there's no reason to waste an active roster spot for a guy who can't hit just to be an emergency defensive player in today's game. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, I don't see Thorpe listed in the projections, but regardless of that fourth year option, I bet he makes the club over Thielbar. They should have another long man in the pen besides Dobnak. Especially if Stashak is going down.

     

    I know Thielbar started off dinged up, but only 2 2/3rds innings so far this spring doesn't seem like a good omen for him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    Now, would I still keep Riddle instead of Astudillo? Probably. I don't really see the need for 3 catchers.

    Astudillo has been seeing time at 1B this Spring and has him providing more defensive flexibility.  

     

    Thus he should not be considered "just" a 3rd string catcher, but as a versatile 26th man as others have suggested.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dobnak and Stashak should share a hotel room, since they'll probably be sharing a taxi back across the river within two weeks of opening day. 

     

    All spring I think I saw Astudillo totally whiff on one swing, which caused a commotion on the bench. Torts looked pissed, so he rifled the next pitch so hard to left field, it skipped over the low fence and scared the fans. Musta been going 110 mph off his bat. The guy must have the highest hard contact rate per swing in the league. Obviously Baldelli sees him as a great RBI guy. Looking for ways to keep that bat in the lineup. With a runner on 2nd and 0 or 1 out, who would you rather step up than Astudillo?

     

    Pretty good lineup, but I don't expect it to stay that way for long. I miss Eddie already.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Also, I don't see Thorpe listed in the projections, but regardless of that fourth year option, I bet he makes the club over Thielbar. They should have another long man in the pen besides Dobnak. Especially if Stashak is going down.

     

    I know Thielbar started off dinged up, but only 2 2/3rds innings so far this spring doesn't seem like a good omen for him.

    They can always swap Thielbar out for another long reliever once the season starts and the need arises too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The drop from the 40-man is tough - looks like either Anderson or Devin Smeltzer to me.  I think with Devin's numbers this spring, he'd have a better chance of making it through waivers.

    Just a minor quibble on this one.

     

    Personally, I think never enough starting pitcher depth, so I'd keep Smeltzer (unless there is something going on that we don't know about causing his slump)

     

    Anderson was the wild thing and not in a good way. Let a non-contender watch him walk people ad nauseam :)

     

    Just a weak opinion though on this

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have to believe Rogers, Colome, Duffey, and Alcala all have spots.  Robles likely as well since they are paying him 2M they aren't going to cut him loose this early.  So that is 5 out the seven right there.

     

    We haven't seen Colina pitch this spring so seems unlikely he would be a legitimate option but if he is still in camp maybe?

     

    I already had Thielbar and Stashak penciled in to start earlier.  They are both on the 40 man so would seem to have the inside track.  I guess the question is are they willing to bump someone off the 40 to add Law or Waddell?  They both have pitched really well the last couple of times out. 

     

    Would they replace Thielbar with Waddell?  Seems early to do something like that and Waddell doesn't have much MLB experience and seems to have just learned a new pitch or how to make his pitches more effective so maybe some time at AAA before adding someone like him?

     

    Law doesn't have an opt out until August but he has pitched really well this spring so far.  His WHIP has never been this elite before in fact if you look back at his stats he generally had more hits than innings pitched and plenty of walks to boot.  If he has better control of his pitches and the new found ability to miss bats he could be a force in the pen.  Spring means so little it seems almost impossible to know if this is something he can keep up or not but if the Twins think he can again would they add him and drop or trade someone from the 40 man?

     

    It looks like they will be evaluating those 4 guys to the bitter end to see what makes the most sense.  Stashak does have options so they can move him around.  Not sure if Thielbar has any options left or not but the only way I see them moving him is if they were to add Waddell so lefty for lefty.  Gonna be some suspense to the end of the month.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I prefer Thorpe or Dobnak starting over Shoemaker. Obviously Thorpe isn’t happening now but Dobnak not happening either isn’t great. Hopefully my gut is wrong about Shoemaker. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I prefer Thorpe or Dobnak starting over Shoemaker. Obviously Thorpe isn’t happening now but Dobnak not happening either isn’t great. Hopefully my gut is wrong about Shoemaker. 

     

    Yeah Dobnak has been awfully dominant this spring seems hard to keep him out of the starting five but hopefully Shoemaker does well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well I might’ve been too hard on Astudillo. I mean if he proves this season he can hit then I wouldn’t mind having him on the roster. But if he can’t then he shouldn’t be on the playoff roster.

     

    I can’t complain too much with AK being optioned to the alternate site. Broxton, Garlick, and Rooker all look like better options at this point in time. Although, could they’ve found a spot for him? I’d rather see him on the roster than...IDK...Smeltzer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    A trade would be ideal. Short of that happening, I am not worried about loosing Smeltzer if they believe in "the Law".   :lol:

    Agree, I am not that high on Smeltzer.  He is a nice story, but has not run away with his chances yet.  He may actually make it through waivers as well. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Well I might’ve been too hard on Astudillo. I mean if he proves this season he can hit then I wouldn’t mind having him on the roster. But if he can’t then he shouldn’t be on the playoff roster.

    I can’t complain too much with AK being optioned to the alternate site. Broxton, Garlick, and Rooker all look like better options at this point in time. Although, could they’ve found a spot for him? I’d rather see him on the roster than...IDK...Smeltzer.

    Smeltzer was optioned 4-5 days before AK. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I prefer Thorpe or Dobnak starting over Shoemaker. Obviously Thorpe isn’t happening now but Dobnak not happening either isn’t great. Hopefully my gut is wrong about Shoemaker. 

     

    I'm still a Thorpe believer, but I think they have to commit to him to the pen before they fall into the classic trap of trying too long to make a lefty starter out of a lefty reliever only for the player's next team to realize his potential.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'm still a Thorpe believer, but I think they have to commit to him to the pen before they fall into the classic trap of trying too long to make a lefty starter out of a lefty reliever only for the player's next team to realize his potential.

    I completely get that and normally I absolutely agree but I still think Thorpe is a starter. He’s better as a starter than Perkins or Hendriks ever were. Hendriks is obviously not a lefty but those were two “should have always been relievers” that I could think of off the top of my head. 
     

    My worry is they give up on starting (I can’t say too soon because he’s been starting awhile now) and he becomes some other teams 3rd or 4th starter. I’d much rather have a 3rd starter than a reliever. Maybe I am wrong. I probably am. And I know that scenario is probably so rare and if they did switch him right now to a RP I believe he would succeed and would never get to another team anyway but I just don’t think they can give up on it yet. 

     

    There is still plenty of time to make him a permanent RP even after this one last shot, if they give it to him. They may not have options left on him after this year if he stays down long enough but I think he’d have the skills to pick up relief very fast so I don’t worry about losing him in the way you mentioned as long as they give him a chance which they didn’t with Hendriks. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Just a minor quibble on this one.

     

    Personally, I think never enough starting pitcher depth, so I'd keep Smeltzer (unless there is something going on that we don't know about causing his slump)

     

    Anderson was the wild thing and not in a good way. Let a non-contender watch him walk people ad nauseam :)

     

    Just a weak opinion though on this

     

    My guess is the Twins value Devin more than this board does and starting pitching especially lefties in our system are hard to come by, so you might be right.

     

    For me and my untrained eye though Devin hasn't been "good" since his debut, isn't a hard thrower and has likely reached his ceiling. While he has pretty strong 5th starter upside after this year we will likely have several better options.  They could keep him for depth though because if they have a ton of injuries this year he is likely our best option behind Dobnak and Thorpe. So getting rid of him early could hurt later but hard to say.

     

    Like you I have not been impressed with the wild Anderson.  The thing is he has elite spin rates which are hard to come by and he throws hard.  His ceiling is shut down elite reliever.  Can he ever gain enough control to become that?  Hard to say, but given the fact the Twins just traded for him it would seem odd to just give him away without even trying to fix his control issues.  I don't see them dropping him this early.

     

    Back to Law.  If Derek has turned a corner and has his pitches under control and new K ability we could certainly use another shut down pen arm to start the season.  Losing Smeltzer who may not even be needed this year and almost certainly not next year for someone we could use day one is the decision that needs to be made.  They certainly can delay that decision since Law doesn't have an opt out but to me that is the trade off they have in front of them.  I guess we'll find out what they think soon enough.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't think the Twins should give up on Thorpe as a starter. While it isn't ideal to send him down because there are still 5+ weeks before AAA games start, having Thorpe available and stretched out at St. Paul makes sense to me. The back end of the Twins rotation has veteran pitchers with plenty of injury history. It is truly doubtful that all of them survive even the first half of the season without a trip or more to the IL. With his refound velocity and a good assortment of other pitches, I'd like to see Thorpe get another chance to have and hold a rotation spot for years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I completely get that and normally I absolutely agree but I still think Thorpe is a starter. He’s better as a starter than Perkins or Hendriks ever were. Hendriks is obviously not a lefty but those were two “should have always been relievers” that I could think of off the top of my head. 
     

    My worry is they give up on starting (I can’t say too soon because he’s been starting awhile now) and he becomes some other teams 3rd or 4th starter. I’d much rather have a 3rd starter than a reliever. Maybe I am wrong. I probably am. And I know that scenario is probably so rare and if they did switch him right now to a RP I believe he would succeed and would never get to another team anyway but I just don’t think they can give up on it yet. 

     

    There is still plenty of time to make him a permanent RP even after this one last shot, if they give it to him. They may not have options left on him after this year if he stays down long enough but I think he’d have the skills to pick up relief very fast so I don’t worry about losing him in the way you mentioned as long as they give him a chance which they didn’t with Hendriks. 

     

    These guys almost always take a full year of not being a starter to become a good reliever, sometimes two. They rarely seem to click in the years they are yo-yoed back and forth between AAA and the majors and the rotation and bullpen. Which makes sense; the approach is totally different.

     

    Perkins and Hendricks are good examples we've seen first hand as Twins fans. Trevor May and LaTroy Hawkins as well Duffey was one of those that took two years. Taylor Rogers had his wings clipped in Rochester; also a great move. But then you have Brad Hand, Wade Davis, Andrew Miller and Zach Britton. If the team waits until next year to commit, then there is no margin for error; he'll have to be DFA'd if he struggles with the transition. There's no room for him in the rotation now anyway.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...