Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Back in the Saddle: My Twins Offseason Blueprint


    Nick Nelson

    What would it take for the Twins to vault back into contention in 2022, while maintaining a standard budget and navigating the realities of this year's offseason market?

    Our roster-building tool challenges users to do just that. Below, you'll find my blueprint for a return to relevance.

    Image courtesy of Troy Taormina-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    First, let's go over the ground rules. In my plan, I'm aiming to be relatively realistic. This means trying to incorporate limitations and constraints that the Twins front office will actually face in its quest. Two implications:

    • Payroll: In the roster tool, you can choose from a variety of preset payroll thresholds, or enter your own custom number. You could select a 10% increase from 2021 ($143M), or even punch in a number like $160M if you want to give yourself some bigtime money to play with. Personally, I think it's optimistic (but plausible) to project payroll remaining steady at $130M, so that's the self-imposed limit I'm working with.
    • Free Agent Choices: Even if you can find the money in your budget to bring in a guy like, say, Max Scherzer, the reality is that he and other top-tier stars will have preferences pulling them away from Minnesota as a destination. It's a smallish market coming off a last-place finish, and these players will be in demand. We've seen in the past with targets like Zack Wheeler that money isn't everything and it takes two to tango. 

    With that out of the way, here's a look at my roster, and how I built it.

    blueprintfullroster.png

    Starting with the Starters

    The rotation is naturally where our journey begins, because it is far-and-away the biggest need on the roster. With both of the rotation carryovers being inexperienced young pitchers who offer nothing close to certainty, I knew I'd have to bring in some legitimate names to give this unit contention cred.

    Atop the list, my boldest offseason move: signing free agent RHP Justin Verlander to a one-year, $20 million contract. Verlander looks very much like a gun for hire, coming off Tommy John surgery at age 39. Given those factors, he carries considerable downside, but also massive upside: we're talking about a ready-made ace who finished first and second in the Cy Young voting his last two full seasons (2019 and 2018). Will $20 million be enough to outbid the competition for Verlander? It should be in the ballpark.

    I've already used up a huge portion of my available funds on Verlander, so for my next free agent target, I set my gaze on the middle class of starters. There are a number of guys available here in the $10 million range – including Michael Pineda – but instead I decided to go with RHP Jon Gray on a three-year, $30 million contract.

    Like most at this level, Gray's a good pitcher with flaws and shortcomings, but he brings the qualities I'm looking for in a secondary rotation signing behind Verlander: decent track record of durability, reasonably high floor, and a touch of real upside. If Gray merely pitches up to his Pineda-esque career 3.91 FIP and 107 ERA+, I'm fine with that, but it feels like there's another level for the former No. 3 overall pick to unlock outside of Coors. He turns 30 next month.

    For my third rotation edition, I'm turning away from the free agent market and toward the trade market. In a deal inspired by J.D. Cameron's feature in the Offseason Handbook, I'm trading OF Max Kepler to the Oakland Athletics for LHP Sean Manaea. This hypothetical swap was put forth by J.D. in his story, and to me it makes a lot of sense: The cost-conscious A's need outfield help, and are likely to value Kepler's contract (owed about $16M over the next two seasons with a team option in 2024) over Manaea's (projected by MLBTR to make $10.2M in his final year of arbitration). It's a bit of a lopsided exchange in that regard, and maybe the Twins can get Oakland to tack on a bit more, but quality starting pitching is at a premium. 

    Manaea was worth 3.3 fWAR in 2021, posting a career-high 9.7 K/9 to go along with a 3.66 FIP and 3.91 ERA in 180 innings.

    blueprintrotation.png

    Turning Back to the Lineup

    Admittedly, my efforts to bolster the rotation come at the expense of the position player group. With so many dollars committed to our three new starting pitchers, there wasn't much left in the bank for impact hitters. So I went instead with a transitional approach here.

    First: signing Freddy Galvis to a one-year, $3 million deal. Galvis is no one's idea of a long-term solution at shortstop, but he can play the position capably, and he brings enough power at the plate to be useful offensively. I'm looking at him as nothing more than a stopgap to fill in until Royce Lewis is deemed ready (maybe midway through the season?). This move is as much a vote of confidence in Lewis as anything. 

    I'm sliding Miguel Sanó to designated hitter and Alex Kirilloff to first base. These aren't static assignments – I foresee Sanó playing plenty of first, and Kirilloff plenty of outfield – but they'll be their prime positions, since it's where I think they're best suited. Luis Arraez reprises his role as a roving utility regular, seeing a health dose of action at third base with Josh Donaldson spending two days per week at DH. 

    Our corner outfield depth has clearly taken a hit since I've traded Kepler, non-tendered Jake Cave, and moved Kirilloff to regular first base duty. To offset this, I'm signing Corey Dickerson to a one-year, $5 million contract. There's nothing especially appealing about Dickerson, who has slashed a mediocre .266/.321/.406 in 161 games over the past two seasons, but he strikes me as a solid buy-low candidate that will be available on a one-year deal. 

    I've filled Kepler's vacancy in right field with Trevor Larnach, which might be a hazardous gamble after Larnach unraveled in his rookie campaign. But I'm a believer in his talent. I'm confident he'll get back on track, and quickly. That said, I'm for sure bringing in a few Kyle Garlick/Rob Refsnyder types to compete in camp, and leveraging the presence of Brent Rooker to protect Larnach from lefty pitchers. But at the end of the day, I'm inclined to let him run at age 25. 

    blueprintposplayers.png

    One other detail in the position players section might catch your eye: Byron Buxton's salary. I've got him slated to make $14M instead of the $8M he's projected to get in his last year of arbitration. That's because I'm electing to channel some of my limited spending flexibility toward taking care of my utmost priority.

    A Long-Term Contract for Byron Buxton

    This is the last chance to keep Buxton in Minnesota long-term. Leverage is running low with only one year remaining until he can hit the open market, but Buxton's history of serious injuries should at least keep him open-minded about long-term security. So too should his aforementioned arbitration salary projection.

    Injuries have hampered Buxton's earning potential in arbitration. Getting the center field for around $8M next year – at age 28 and fresh off flashing his full potential – is an absolute bargain that the Twins (or any trade partner) will be happy to take. Since extension talks fell short over the summer, I'm trying to figure out a framework that will be attractive to his side. The first step is nearly doubling his 2022 salary, in the first leg of a five-year, $84 million contract for Buxton (technically a four-year extension):

    • 2022: $14M (plus incentives)
    • 2023: $16M (plus incentives)
    • 2024: $18M (plus incentives)
    • 2025: $18M (plus incentives)
    • 2026: $18M (plus incentives)

    The "plus incentives" aspect of this should be accentuated, given that it's where the last round of talks apparently fizzled. I don't have specifics in mind but I'm pretty open to whatever Buxton's side wants. As long as he's doing the things necessary to trigger those bonuses, I'm happy to pay significantly more than the above for this historic player, and I'm not sure why the Twins wouldn't be. 

    In any case, this deal protects the Twins' financial interests with relatively low annual guarantees. It locks Buxton up throughout his remaining peak athletic years, and gives him a chance to hit the open market once again at age 33. 

    And Finally, the Bullpen

    My additions to the rotation and lineup, along with Buxton's salary boost, have mostly depleted my spending flexibility under the $130M threshold. With incumbents Taylor Rogers, Tyler Duffey, Caleb Thielbar, and Jorge Alcalá all returning, I'm left with about $6 million to spend on filling the final four bullpen spots. Here's how I'm divvying that up:

    • Randy Dobnak ($800K) is the long reliever. He's making that guaranteed money as part of his contract so we might as well try to get some value from it. I'm hopeful an offseason of recovery for his problematic finger gets Dobnak back on track. In his proper form, he's a good fit for this role as an efficient, strike-throwing ground ball pitcher.
    • Héctor Neris ($3M) is a setup man. He spent a few years as Philadelphia's closer – which will be handy, given Rogers' uncertainty – but lost the job this season due to first-half struggles. He rebounded in the second half, but Neris has never quite had the results to match his stuff, and that figures to keep him in an affordable range as a free agent. I'm taking my chances on that nasty splitter.
    • Juan Minaya ($1M) is a middle reliever. As we wrote in Arbitration Decisions section of the Handbook, "His FIP (3.97 in 2021) is more representative than his ERA (2.48); nonetheless, Minaya’s probably as dependable of an option as you’ll find for twice the price in free agency." He brings experience and a 95 MPH fastball. I'm fine with letting him keep a seat warm for one of the upcoming arms in the system. 
    • Kirby Yates ($1M plus incentives) is a gamble. The Twins were in advanced talks with him last winter before he ultimately signed with Toronto, and then underwent Tommy John surgery in March. He might not be ready for the start of the season but the upside and track record are good enough to be worth the wait on a low-risk deal. 

    In short, my view of the bullpen is that 2021 was an outlier, and this organization still has what it takes to identify and unleash overlooked relief arms in a cost-efficient manner. We saw them do that over the past couple seasons, building high-quality bullpens at low costs for division winners, and in fact we saw them pull it off on a smaller scale this year (Minaya, Danny Coulombe, Ralph Garza Jr.) following a series of misfires. 

    To me, this is the only model for building a bullpen when you're a team with Minnesota's resource constraints and competing needs. We've seen time and time again how easy it is to completely whiff on free agent relievers – even those with seemingly safe track records (paging Addison Reed and Alex Colomé). Give me one proven commodity in Neris, a wild card in Yates, and then build the depth with minors signings, waiver claims, and internal arms like Jovani Moran .

    The Final Product

    Ultimately, my intent with this blueprint was to create something that aligns philosophically with what the Twins front office might actually do. For the most part, it's a series of short-term commitments – one year for Verlander, Manaea, Galvis, and Neris – thus keeping the ability to build from within intact. I am bringing some longer-term stability to the rotation with Gray's three-year contract, and most importantly, cementing Buxton as a franchise centerpiece for the next half-decade. 

    What would your 2022 roster look like if you held yourself to a $130M payroll limit? Grab a copy of the Offseason Handbook, use it with our Roster Creator tool and share your own blueprint to share in our forums!

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, Nick Nelson said:

    In favor of Oakland? It's three cost-controlled years of a good outfielder for one year of a fairly expensive pitcher, and as usual the A's have a ton of pitching depth to offset his loss. 

    Based on the responses here I think a ton of Twins fans are vastly underestimating Kepler's trade value.

    Baseball Trades shows this trade favors Oakland but it's fairly close.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

    Baseball Trades shows this trade favors Oakland but it's fairly close.

    Is it possible that this site is messing with our ideas too much. I think they are often in the range of reasonable but when I see Buxton's value versus others, just to use one of many examples, I question how much anyone should quote or use the values. 

    Kepler is a super valuable player in my opinion even though I am frustrated with his ground balls into the shift. Oakland does have an interest in trading Manaea or Bassitt due to cost but I want to overpay for Montas and believe it is possible. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Nick Nelson said:

    In favor of Oakland? It's three cost-controlled years of a good outfielder for one year of a fairly expensive pitcher, and as usual the A's have a ton of pitching depth to offset his loss. 

    Based on the responses here I think a ton of Twins fans are vastly underestimating Kepler's trade value.

    No, in favor of us.  A SP has more value than a corner OF all things being equal.  I don't see any reason why the A's would take that deal when they can add OF for less than that cost.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, TheLeviathan said:

    No, in favor of us.  A SP has more value than a corner OF all things being equal.  I don't see any reason why the A's would take that deal when they can add OF for less than that cost.

    3 years vs 1 substantially influences trade value, especially when it's a cost controlled player in their prime.  One year just does not bring back that much in trades anymore as we have seen with numerous examples unless you are talking a Mookie Betts level player.  Trading players controlled for 3 or more years for 1 year of control is a good way to ensure long-term mediocrity.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

    3 years vs 1 substantially influences trade value, especially when it's a cost controlled player in their prime.  One year just does not bring back that much in trades anymore as we have seen with numerous examples unless you are talking a Mookie Betts level player.  Trading players controlled for 3 or more years for 1 year of control is a good way to ensure long-term mediocrity.

    While true, the value of being cost controlled is still attached to the value you bring as a player as well.  While I think Max Kepler is a fine player, and perhaps a guy I'd rather bet on to rebound from last year, I'm not sure his production makes the ability to control his costs all that attractive.  

    I could be totally wrong, I just don't see that the direction Oakland would go if they dealt Manaea.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, TheLeviathan said:

    While true, the value of being cost controlled is still attached to the value you bring as a player as well.  While I think Max Kepler is a fine player, and perhaps a guy I'd rather bet on to rebound from last year, I'm not sure his production makes the ability to control his costs all that attractive.  

    I could be totally wrong, I just don't see that the direction Oakland would go if they dealt Manaea.

    I actually agree that Kepler is not the type of prize Oakland would look for in a trade for Manaea.  I was just being Captain Obvious pointing out the considerable added value of three years of control.  Frankly, I think trading for any of the highly coveted pitchers mentioned here is going to cost considerably more than what has been discussed.  Teams in the Twins position generally don't leverage the future for the present so I think a lot of people are going to be disappointed. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    Teams in the Twins position generally don't leverage the future for the present

    To a fair degree the Twins position is largely due to their unfortunate past two winters. The management has a difficult job now. The players generally sign for the best contract offered but being on a competitive team is important too. Sometimes the future is the players you have plus what can be acquired via trade or free agency. Look back over time and the prospects face a stiff challenge to reach The Show and then make a mark. The Twins can afford to trade a number of prospects as well as some of their current rostered players. It is Falvey who must find the right mix and if the Twins fall back to 90-100 losses the patience for The Twins Way may dissipate quickly. In fact, the traffic on sites like Twins Daily is tied to the hopes of the fans. This is a big offseason for the Twins as viewership and tickets are on the line coming out of two tough Covid years. Unless the team shifts to a rebuild, the future is now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

    To a fair degree the Twins position is largely due to their unfortunate past two winters. The management has a difficult job now. The players generally sign for the best contract offered but being on a competitive team is important too. Sometimes the future is the players you have plus what can be acquired via trade or free agency. Look back over time and the prospects face a stiff challenge to reach The Show and then make a mark. The Twins can afford to trade a number of prospects as well as some of their current rostered players. It is Falvey who must find the right mix and if the Twins fall back to 90-100 losses the patience for The Twins Way may dissipate quickly. In fact, the traffic on sites like Twins Daily is tied to the hopes of the fans. This is a big offseason for the Twins as viewership and tickets are on the line coming out of two tough Covid years. Unless the team shifts to a rebuild, the future is now.

    Go back to 2011 and look at the posts on this site.  The majority of fans ALWAYS think the future is now.  Year after year the cry was we are ready go for it now.  Fans are simply much more willing to trade away the future compared to GMs.  It's a lot easier to take that stance when you are not accountable.  

    This team has far better odds of building a winner via developing internal pitching.  Therefore, any strategies that don't facilitate that goal are inferior strategies.  Prospects volatility is way overplayed for three reasons.  The most important one being that a below average revenue team has no chance if their prospects don't work out.  Second, free agents also fail at a significant rate.  Third, trades for prospects or yet to be established players has a bigger impact on building a team than trading prospects for established players for below average revenue teams.  

    Leveraging the future with so many unknowns is very poor management practice.  Falvey and Lavine are very skilled regardless of what some people here like to believe.  I will be shocked if they trade away any significant assets this year.  

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/27/2021 at 10:47 PM, Major League Ready said:

    I will be shocked if they trade away any significant assets this year.  

    The Twins traded Berrios (quite significant) and it seems understandable and now face a decision on Buxton (also significant). Willie Banks was seen as a very significant asset and might be compared to any prospect currently in value. Often trades benefit both teams. I'm curious about how many players can carry a "significant" tag. The Twins have redundancy in some positions and needs in other positions as do other teams. Falvey will be looking to improve the team via trades if there is really a plan to compete at .500 or better baseball next season. The free agent market can only fill a few parts. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/29/2021 at 5:37 PM, tony&rodney said:

    The Twins traded Berrios (quite significant) and it seems understandable and now face a decision on Buxton (also significant). Willie Banks was seen as a very significant asset and might be compared to any prospect currently in value. Often trades benefit both teams. I'm curious about how many players can carry a "significant" tag. The Twins have redundancy in some positions and needs in other positions as do other teams. Falvey will be looking to improve the team via trades if there is really a plan to compete at .500 or better baseball next season. The free agent market can only fill a few parts. 

    I framed this poorly.  I meant they won't trade away top 10 prospects for short-term (less than 3 yrs) controlled established impact players to get better next year.  In other words, they won't leverage the future.  I could definitely see a trade of Donaldson or even Arraez and they are obviously significant assets.  Rodgers wouldn't be a big surprise if the return was good.  Buxton wouldn't be a shock but I am with those who really want to see him extended.  I think they might even trade Garver if they got a haul.  Of course, Kepler would be a significant asset and he would not be a big surprise either.

    I believe they have too many holes to fill in one off-season without trading away a very significant portion of our top prospects.  That's why I don't think we see any top prospects traded similar to Snell / Darvish.  Any team could cash in the farm at anytime.  You just don't see below average revenue teams go there.  San Diego was absolutely loaded so they could afford to spend some of that capital.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We are all wondering how the Twins plan to put together a roster to reach .500 in 2022. The attempts by TD readers are just "playing around" fun. It would be more interesting to see Falvey try something other than Shoemaker and it seems to make sense to look for a decent trade considering the apparent redundancy on the current roster.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...