Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • José Berríos Traded to Blue Jays


    Matthew Taylor

    Multiple reports have confirmed that José Berríos has been traded to the Blue Jays in exchange for Austin Martin and Simeon Woods Richardson.

    Twins Video

     

    Jose Berrios has been traded. There have been rumors and now there are confirmations. Jose Berrios will be joining the Toronto Blue Jays as they head back to Canada to play for the first time in a long time. No doubt Berrios will be missed. He is a leader, a two-time All Star, and competitor. 

    In return, the Twins received highly-touted prospects, SS Austin Martin and RHP Simeon Woods-Richardson.

    Martin was the #5 overall pick in the 2020 draft out of Vanderbilt. Martin is a consensus Top 25 overall prospect in baseball. He should soon join the Wichita Wind Surge. He is ranked #21 by Baseball America and #16 by MLB Pipeline. 

    Martin made his professional debut this year, and he has played in 55 games for Double-A New Hampshire. He has hit .281/.424/.383 (.807) with ten doubles, two triples and two home runs. He also has nine stolen bases. 

    Woods-Richardson was traded two years ago from the Mets to the Blue Jays in the Marcus Stroman deal. The hard-thrower is currently in Tokyo with fellow newly-acquired Twins prospect Joe Ryan at the Olympics. He is ranked #68 by MLB Pipeline. 

    He was the Mets second-round pick in 2018 out of high school in Texas. The 20-year-old is also at Double-A New Hampshire. He is 2-4 with a 5.76 ERA in 11 starts. Over 11 starts and 45 1/3 innings, he has walked too many (26) and struck out a ton (67, 13.3 K/9). 

    On MLB Network, former GM Dan O'Dowd said, "In surplus value, the Twins won this deal. In present value, the Blue Jays get what they need." 

    Once the Washington Nationals traded Max Scherzer and Trea Turner to the Dodgers on Thursday night, Berrios became the best pitcher on the trade market, and the Twins took advantage. 

    The Blue Jays are working to stay in playoff contention in a division currently led by the Red Sox and Rays. They are also trying to keep up with the Yankees who have added sluggers Joey Gallo and Anthony Rizzo the past two days. A two-time All Star, Berrios will certainly help Toronto down the stretch and, the reason they got such a big return, will help them in 2022 as well. 

    Are the Twins done??? Don't count on it! 

     

    Story will be updated as we learn more information. You can also add to the story in the comments below.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    I agree, they aren't mutually exclusive, but it's hard to look at the situation and call it a W when the odds are stacked against the Twins. 

    We'd all go to FA in his place, but my moving him the Twins essentially told him they weren't interested in even attempting to pay him what he's worth. That's 100% on them. If they wanted him, they could have him. 

    Sure, there is an opportunity cost for keeping him. My point was that I've seen a number of posters in support of moving him also play the "nobody knows what '22 will look like," card. It seems disingenuous. If we can all agree assembling a staff next year, even with Berrios, was going to be incredibly difficult, I think we can also agree that moving him, barring some miracle trade(s), all but guarantees this team is punting on next season. 

    I think the "keep Berrios," camp is also dealing in probabilities when looking at the likelihood that the Twins add another pitcher of his caliber, whether that's via trade or development. I don't see a lot of the trade characterizations as sober, so we'll disagree there. My desire to keep Berrios wasn't about losing a few less games this year, it has way more to do with the fact he's the best pitcher this organization has had in a decade+, he's young and durable, there isn't any internal option that profiles to match his production, and we have a FO with a suspect track record when it comes to identifying and/or developing arms. 

    I don't think it's fair to say the Twins can win bidding wars in FA with the heavy spending organizations.  Baseball has a serious problem on this front, I'm not sure why we're approaching the system in denial of that.  We don't have to like it.  We can find it morally wrong.  Yet, nevertheless, this is our situation: we won't be outbidding the big dogs and Berrios wants to let the big dogs fight over him.

    We'd all love to be in a situation where keeping Jose Berrios made sense.  All of us.  We all wish the organization's status with MLB-ready pitching was better.  But it's the reality of both of those things that make the analysis of this rather simple, if depressing.  He isn't staying.  The Twins aren't going to spend 30M on a pitcher because that's not the way they operate.  They don't have anyone ready now or for next year that can step in and make this team a contender.  We look like a retool for 2023 by all probabilities.  Given that, it makes more sense to have two well regarded guys that could be here in 2023 over a guy with 0% chance.  

    The sober part is about not letting the emotional arguments you keep make rule over the cold analytical ones.  Hard as that might be.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, TheLeviathan said:

    I don't think it's fair to say the Twins can win bidding wars in FA with the heavy spending organizations.  Baseball has a serious problem on this front, I'm not sure why we're approaching the system in denial of that.  We don't have to like it.  We can find it morally wrong.  Yet, nevertheless, this is our situation: we won't be outbidding the big dogs and Berrios wants to let the big dogs fight over him.

    We'd all love to be in a situation where keeping Jose Berrios made sense.  All of us.  We all wish the organization's status with MLB-ready pitching was better.  But it's the reality of both of those things that make the analysis of this rather simple, if depressing.  He isn't staying.  The Twins aren't going to spend 30M on a pitcher because that's not the way they operate.  They don't have anyone ready now or for next year that can step in and make this team a contender.  We look like a retool for 2023 by all probabilities.  Given that, it makes more sense to have two well regarded guys that could be here in 2023 over a guy with 0% chance.  

    The sober part is about not letting the emotional arguments you keep make rule over the cold analytical ones.  Hard as that might be.

    I agree, it's a massive problem. I've never made the argument that the Twins have the financial safety net that competing teams do when it comes to spending in FA. That said, this organization made Joe Mauer one of the highest paid players in baseball over a decade ago, and he was absolutely worth it. The notion that the Twins can't pay Berrios what the market dictates rings hollow, at least for my ears. 

    That reality set in a while ago for me. Again, my issue is how the move is being framed. They're going to need to spend at least half, if not more of that $30M AAV just to replace Berrios with an inferior pitcher in FA. He was a guy they could've retooled around, even if the next season or two wasn't competitive, that's a rotation staple for an organization that has almost zero stability on their staff. 

    I don't that's a fair characterization of the points I've made. If one of the two prospects becomes a regular, above replacement level contributor in 2-3 years, that's a favorable outcome as far as prospect bust rate is concerned. If Martin is a utility IF/OF and Woods Richardson can slot in as the 4 man that's a great outcome relatively speaking. We wouldn't celebrate that swap. We're on the hope train, which I think has an equal if not greater emotional investment. 

    It sounds like we agree about the should but not the could. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    I agree, it's a massive problem. I've never made the argument that the Twins have the financial safety net that competing teams do when it comes to spending in FA. That said, this organization made Joe Mauer one of the highest paid players in baseball over a decade ago, and he was absolutely worth it. The notion that the Twins can't pay Berrios what the market dictates rings hollow, at least for my ears. 

    That reality set in a while ago for me. Again, my issue is how the move is being framed. They're going to need to spend at least half, if not more of that $30M AAV just to replace Berrios with an inferior pitcher in FA. He was a guy they could've retooled around, even if the next season or two wasn't competitive, that's a rotation staple for an organization that has almost zero stability on their staff. 

    I don't that's a fair characterization of the points I've made. If one of the two prospects becomes a regular, above replacement level contributor in 2-3 years, that's a favorable outcome as far as prospect bust rate is concerned. If Martin is a utility IF/OF and Woods Richardson can slot in as the 4 man that's a great outcome relatively speaking. We wouldn't celebrate that swap. We're on the hope train, which I think has an equal if not greater emotional investment. 

    It sounds like we agree about the should but not the could. 

    Yeah, I am for sure making an "is" argument over an "ought" one.  

    What I will say is this, if you've come to terms with the idea that the Twins aren't going to spend 25-30M on a single starting pitcher, especially one intent on trying the market, then this deal is a no brainer IMO.  

    Instead of Berrios and his salary and an impending loss of him to FA, we now have more money immediately and long term to find his replacements and more prospects/talent around which to build the team.  Part of how a team like the Twins win isn't in having a few very good to great players like Berrios, but in having a major league roster with as few bad players as possible and a couple studs sprinkled in.  At this point, our major league roster this year and next year just has too many negative players to be optimistic and one Jose Berrios doesn't change that. Making this trade, however, gives them more assets towards that end, especially from 2023 and beyond.  

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All it comes down to for me is this. Jose wants to bet on himself, which is probably a decent idea considering his track record. He's not signing anywhere until he's a FA, and thats his right, and I applaud him for all he's done and will do. We don't know any of the real numbers, but most people agree he's worth about wheeler money, maybe a few more dollars, Ive seen 150/5 type contracts as what it would probably take to get his to forgo FA. And maybe he goes and balls out in Toronto and is worth all that and more, hell I hope he's worth Cole money and gets himself paid.

    But the Twins don't like that bet, because they get no guarantees. They can take that money and try to sign another pitcher of similar quality for the same contract, and get two highly regarded prospects in the process. And thats a really smart move, because while I love Berrios, and always rather see the players get paid, I don't want to see the value for pitchers of his caliber jump like 8mil/yr in an already shaky couple years, and I know teams in any market, but especially mid/small don't want that either.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, TheLeviathan said:

    Yeah, I am for sure making an "is" argument over an "ought" one.  

    What I will say is this, if you've come to terms with the idea that the Twins aren't going to spend 25-30M on a single starting pitcher, especially one intent on trying the market, then this deal is a no brainer IMO.  

    Instead of Berrios and his salary and an impending loss of him to FA, we now have more money immediately and long term to find his replacements and more prospects/talent around which to build the team.  Part of how a team like the Twins win isn't in having a few very good to great players like Berrios, but in having a major league roster with as few bad players as possible and a couple studs sprinkled in.  At this point, our major league roster this year and next year just has too many negative players to be optimistic and one Jose Berrios doesn't change that. Making this trade, however, gives them more assets towards that end, especially from 2023 and beyond.  

     

    Part of the reason I couched the "might've been the best way to salvage the situation," in my OP. 

    My confidence in their ability to spend the $$ wisely on pitching isn't exactly high, nor do I anticipate them spending if they see themselves as punting, despite whatever PR spin the fanbase is fed. Isn't avoiding replacement level players every team's goal? I don't think the Twins are unique with that approach. Berrios' departure created a massive hole, I'm skeptical the Twins are able/willing to fill it in completely. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...