Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • GM For A Deadline, Part One


    Jeremy Nygaard

    The All-Star break has been filled with Manny Machado rumors and an eventual deal that is the first domino in what will hopefully be a busy trade season. On Thursday, division leader Cleveland made a move to shore up their bullpen.

    As Twins fans, we’ve seen the hometown team win nine of their last 11, letting that six game skid that preceded the winning streak fade into distant memories. And that’s a problem. The Twins are 7.5 games behind the Indians… and the likelihood of them catching the Indians is extremely low.

    Image courtesy of Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    The idea of supplementing last year’s playoff roster with new additions to the rotation (Jake Odorizzi and Lance Lynn), adding three proven players to the back of the bullpen (Fernando Rodney, Addison Reed and Zach Duke) and plugging the potential of 30+ home runs (Logan Morrison) to an already potent offense raised expectations through the roof.

    But instead - with the last eleven games being an exception - it has been a disaster. Even with the great end to the first half, the Twins are still on pace to lose the division by 13 games. Though the front office will have two more weeks to make their final decision, they should have the answer already. You can’t give a superior team a head start over a half season and then expect to catch them over the second half.

    All of that is long for simply saying: LET’S MAKE SOME TRADES!

    The two big names to move, Brian Dozier and Eduardo Escobar, are going to get the ink in this part of of the rundown. We’ll look at the rest of the players soon thereafter.

    First, let’s look at Brian Dozier. Dozier ended the first half with a walk-off grand slam and gives hope that maybe he’s warming up for one of his (mostly) annual second-half power runs. He will be owed just shy of $3 million for August and September. There are a handful of teams competing for playoff spots that have big needs at second base: Milwaukee, Boston and Washington come at the top of the list.

    Washington might have to wait until closer to the deadline before determining if they are buyers or sellers. That leaves the Brewers and Red Sox, in my opinion, as the two teams with the biggest need at second base.

    The Brewers are unique. They have a big hole at shortstop and have Jonathan Villar, a serviceable player, at second base. But Villar has had a rough year and is now on the disabled list with a thumb injury that will sideline him until the end of the month.

    I’ve liked what the Brewers have done in terms of adding to their farm system via the draft and trades and I also like their move for Christian Yelich, which took some of those players I liked out of their system.

    But potentially dealing Dozier to the Brewers starts with prized pitching prospect Corbin Burnes. Burnes is a 23 year old right-handed pitcher who is a Top 100 prospect in baseball and projects as a mid-rotation starter. He’s only in his second full season and projects to help the Brewers in the bullpen during the stretch run. I’d expect the Brewers to balk at that asking price. Beyond him, the Brewers lack the high-end pitcher I’d be targeting.

    Brewers fans would suggest Luis Ortiz, but he has always struggled to stay healthy, missing time this season with a hamstring strain and failing to ever eclipse the 100 inning mark in a season. When you take that next step down in the prospect category, you’re looking at a number of outfielders, which is a position I’d try to avoid. (While it’s true you can never have too much depth at any position, I’m more than comfortable with the depth the Twins have in the outfield and would prefer to look elsewhere.)

    In addition to focusing on pitching, I’m also looking for middle infielders and Mauricio Dubon is a good one… who is missing the rest of the year with a torn ACL. It would take more than an injured infielder to give up Dozier.

    I also know the Twins liked burly RHP Cody Ponce coming out of college. Currently pitching at AA, Ponce projects as a back-end starter. Taking either of them plus a lower level prospect isn’t exciting as Burnes, but it’s possible that it could be enough.

    The preferred destination for me - and it’s a perfect fit with Dustin Pedroia likely missing the rest of the season - is Boston. The Red Sox always have ammo. Some of it is very appealing.

    I don’t see the Red Sox shopping Michael Chavis or Jay Groome for a rental. Bryan Mata, though, might be a fair ask. Mata played in the Futures Game, but has struggled with his command, walking 57 in 71 innings. The tall righty has a high-ceiling though, playing high A ball at only 19. A step below Mata is big lefty Darwinzon Hernandez, a 21 a year old who is still pretty raw but also is a high-ceiling prospect.

    In addition to one of those pitchers, I’d also ask about MLBer Blake Swihart. A former top catching prospect, Swihart would benefit from a change of scenery and the switch-hitter does better from the left-side of the plate, which would pair well with Mitch Garver. Despite his lack on innings behind the plate this season, a catching-starved organization (seriously, who’s the next catcher that gets the call if Wilson or Garver get hurt?) could do worse than to see if he can help fill a hole moving forward. Plus, he offers position flexibility and I’m a sucker for that.

    If the Red Sox were willing to part with multiple pieces, I’d be willing to move Dozier as well as Zach Duke if that’s what it takes to get it done.

    Do any of these potential trades appeal to you?

    Dozier to the Brewers for Ortiz or Dubon or Ponce plus?

    Dozier and Duke to the Red Sox for Mata and a lottery ticket or Hernandez and possibly Swihart?

    Eduardo Escobar is another appealing trade piece/pending free agent that the Twins should look to move. Owed $1.6 million in July and August, Escobar has played primarily third base on the season, but can move over to shortstop and second base as needed. In fact, with Machado off the board, Escobar might be the best option for teams looking for a shortstop.

    Philadelphia was in the Machado sweepstakes until the end, losing out when the Dodgers were willing to part with five prospects in a combination of quality and quantity.

    The Phillies remain in the infield market. By position and bWAR, the Phillies rank 28th at third base and 27th at shortstop. Though Maikel Franco has improved as of late, Escobar would be an upgrade for a team desperate to battle with the Braves and hold off the Nationals.

    My ask would be for short-season pitcher Francisco Morales. A tall, hard-throwing, high-ceiling 18-year-old righty who is having a good (albeit very early) season. There are other intriguing prospects in the Philadelphia system as well. Cole Irvin, a big lefty, is 24 and having a very good season in AAA. He projects as a back-half starter, without huge stuff, but throws a variety of pitches and has good control, striking out 93 while only walking 20 in 112 innings so far this season. Franklyn Kilome is another high-ceiling prospect, but his stuff has backed up a little as a 23-year-old in AA, walking over 4.5 batter per nine innings.

    How would you feel about dealing Escobar to Philadelphia?

    Escobar to the Phillies for Morales or Irvin or Kilome plus?

    The difference between Dozier and Escobar and the rest of the Twins potential trade chips is that there is a very good chance that if they don’t find a deal to their liking, they can make the qualifying offer to either or both and get draft pick compensation. Dishing out potentially $19 million to either player seems excessive and is, but one-year deals rarely hamstring a team because of the immediate cost certainty. And in the Twins case, who have very little committed to next year and many players still pre-arbitration, there will be plenty of money to spend, especially on productive offensive bats.

    There are many other players who fall into a different category - whether that’s impending free agency with no chance to get the qualifying offer or guys who will still spend a year or two or more under team control. We’ll take a look at some of those guys soon.

    Weigh in below. If you were GM, what would you do with Dozier and Escobar?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I can see a team feeling wishy-washy about trading an elite prospect for two full seasons of Yin/Yang Dozier.  There would be months of griping as he works through his off cycle.  But, a playoff team going all-in by picking up a red hot Dozier?  Especially when maybe packaged with a "name" lefty reliever like Duke?  Sure, why not.  Seriously, names, ages, sentimentality aside--Dozier on the warpath at second base might be just as much WAR value in the second half as Machado at SS.  Maybe not Machado at third...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, he's assuming Sano's at his lowest... in the last calendar year his bat has turned from All-Star caliber to Mendoza line hitter who would set the new single season for strikeouts if he got the chance, his defense has been subpar, he was accused of assaulting a woman, he's failed to lose [enough] weight, he got injured again, he's playing at A+ right now...

     

    Sure, it could get worse, but I'd have to imagine this is his lowest. Selling him within the next 8-10 months is not a good idea.

    I think most teams still view him as an all star. To me, the demotion to Ft Meyers was an extreme move. A desperate move. A make it out break it move. Now he's in the Dominican for a family situation. It reminds me a bit of when he "reported early" for spring training to shag fly balls to be ready for right field. Ruesse discovered he wasn't in Florida. He was home. Or the winter he turned down Arizona fall ball to return home. None of this is a slight on Sano, necessarily. A move could be best for all involved. I dunno. We haven't really seem him control his weight or stay healthy. If he's heavier next season...

     

    I just think it's a lot to assume at this moment that things are fine with Sano and he's still a as start who will be a perennial all star. My guess is enough teams still think that now. If his weight is 310 and not his batting average next year, that might not be the case. I guess I'm more worried than most. I specifically hope the kid is doing ok mentally.

    Edited by Jham
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Can anyone name a player with a career WAR under 1.5/season that has received a qualifying offer?

     

    How about under 2 WAR for the previous 3 seasons?

     

    The QA for Escobar is a terrible idea that can go wrong in too many ways. Trade him and then go sign him back this winter. 

     

    Here's a good one - Eric Hosmer, who was given a QO after 2017. 

    2014-2016: 3.5 fWAR in 1881 PA. (1.1 WAR/600 PA)

    2017:           4.1 fWAR in 671 PA    (3.7 WAR/600 PA)

     

    Escobar:

    2015-2017: 3.4 fWAR in 1322 PA (1.5 WAR/600)

    2018:          2.1 fWAR in 376 PA   (3.4 WAR/600)

     

    What's really funny, Hosmer turned down the QO and signed an 8yr/$144M contract!! 

     

    Of course the Hosmer contract is outrageous... But you asked!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Knowing the Phillies top 3 levels pretty well, I think that if the Twins get Franklyn Kilome and lefty Tyler Gilbert for Escobar, they will be set in the pen for a while.   Kilome is miscast as a starter.  Put him in the pen and you will get a dominant closer with consistent triple digit velocity.  He threw 102 as a starter at Reading last month.  Mark my words:  the next best closer out there ;)

     

    I think Kilome would be an incredible get for Escobar. Wondering, though, if the Phillies might think that's too much.

     

    Based on MLB.com's rankings (just for an easy comparison), he's Philadelphia's #7 prospect and has an overall 50 scouting grade. In the Twins system, the players with a 50 scouting grade are ranked #7-9: Brent Rooker, Blayne Enlow, and Lewin Diaz. Once Trevor Larnach is added, he'd likely rank right around here too. I'm not too high on Diaz, but even if you replaced him with the next ranked prospect - Akil Baddoo - I think it's clear that that's a lot to give up for a rental non-elite player. 

     

    So, I wonder if the Twins could add in Lynn, Rodney or Duke to get a deal done for Kilome plus a end-of-top-30 or unranked prospect.

     

    In general, like Jeremy mentioned with Dozier and Duke, I think trading multiple players is a good strategy in order to get a prospect the front office really likes. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I want a high level prospect, way more than I want someone that will be here next year. Getting someone that is both would be great, but unlikely.

     

    I never said I didn't want a high level prospect. Escobar should command one, and Dozier, if he continues to hit, should as well. I'm just noting that we have some gaps in the system right now in the high minors at C and 3B. I haven't written off next year, and I think it would be prudent to target those types of needs. 

     

    Again, I'd still take starting pitching if that was all I could get. It's always needed, but given our depth at MI right now, that wouldn't be a priority. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We need a 3rd basemen.   Sano, if he comes back, is our 1st basemen.   I dont know why everyone is fighting this.   LoMo will be gone after this year.   Mauer will be signed for two years as a backup 1st basemen/DH/bench.   I say trade Dozier to the brewers for Lucas Erceg(3B)  He can play in AAA next year and possibly be called up mid year.   That will be a good transition time for Sano at 1st with Mauer.  As a 2nd target with Erceg maybe we can get Payton Henry©.   I think Erceg/Henry will be great future pieces for the team. 

    Edited by spsdrock
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Falvinegaard has a nice ring to it ...

     

    My question to you, Jeremy, is now that we've seen a few trades go down and have some feel for how guys are being valued, would you change your expectations at all on what the Twins may be able to fetch for Dozier/Escobar? Or have things panned out close to what you would have expected?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    No way do you sell low on Sano or Buxton.  

     

    They don't remotely generate the return you'd want for either. They are both too young to trade at this point. 

     

    I think the Aaron Hicks situation is the perfect example of why you should remain patient with these players as long as humanly possible. Hicks would look great in the Twins outfield right now. He'd look even better alongside a healthy, productive Buxton. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I won't propose any names to receive from trades because I don't follow other teams' minor leagues. Do as the Indians did, trading away to another team's position of wealth like RP is for San Diego. Get as much quality as possible and/or get good quantity like the Orioles did, but don't wait for these prospects to play for us. Peddle them this winter for established players. The "waiting for prospects to help" game isn't working too well for us. We will have the money to pay proven players next year. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great article, Jeremy. I sincerely doubt the Twins would receive anything close to your suggestions. I would be happy to be proven wrong, but I doubt either Dozier or EE would return a player that would crack the top 20 prospects list.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    We need a 3rd basemen.   Sano, if he comes back, is our 1st basemen.   I dont know why everyone is fighting this.   LoMo will be gone after this year.   Mauer will be signed for two years as a backup 1st basemen/DH/bench.   I say trade Dozier to the brewers for Lucas Erceg(3B)  He can play in AAA next year and possibly be called up mid year.   That will be a good transition time for Sano at 1st with Mauer.  As a 2nd target with Erceg maybe we can get Payton Henry©.   I think Erceg/Henry will be great future pieces for the team. 

    If Mauer comes back, I don't see him in a back-up role. If he is batting .275-.300 and playing GG caliber 1st base, he plays. San would DH.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How bout Dozier and Esco for Freddy Peralta? I know we’d only be getting one guy, but Freddy looks legit, and will only get better.

    I would assume it would be impossible to convince a potential playoff team to give up a pitcher who's already in their starting rotation, especially one who is young, and only get rentals in return.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I would be happy to be proven wrong, but I doubt either Dozier or EE would return a player that would crack the top 20 prospects list.

    Jaime Garcia fetched a top 20 prospect for us. (More like top 10, depending on the source.) Nunez wasn't quite a rental, but wasn't as good as Dozier or Escobar either, and he fetched a top 20 prospect for us too (again more like top 10 by some as well).

     

    We may not get to pick and choose among top 20 prospects (i.e. targeting a particularly guy or position), but I feel like we should be able to get someone in that range.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    First, I do not see the Twins front office taking the gamble and giving a qualifying offer to either Dozier or Escobar. $19 million is a lot for either player. Yes, one one front you would say either player would be foolish NOT to take the offer. But looking at the bigger picture, you will be sitting around the same place in the standings in 2019 and have two guys who will be free agents at season's end and you'd be dangling them and WILL anyone trade for them, plus would you have to eat salary. That is ONE BIG IF!

     

    Also, I think we can say that the Twins really have no desire to longterm sign Dozier at this point, and Brian has made it known that he will welcome free agency and now has two months to increase his value and vie for a multi-year deal. If he does it somewhere else, the Twins CAN always come bsck and revisit Dozier, if they see that Gordon or whomever won't replace him in the near scheme of things.

     

    Escobar IS NOT an elite player. But at what price do you keep him, and does he see visions of glory in getting a BIG contract for multi-years in 2019? That is the question. CAN the Twins meet him halfway, give him a decent contract (south of, say, $25 million for three years). Is that too much to pay for another season as a starter, if need be, and two seasons as a versatile backup infielder, if push comes to shove. You can also justify overpaying for his clubhouse presence. BUT, and it is a BIG BUT, do you trust that he will not be deadwood at the plate or on the field for the next few seasons. If you can't reach an agreement NOW, you trade him -- and like Dozier, he is a revisit candidate in the off-season. Unfortunately, unless you are surefire that Sano IS your third baseman, you have a void.

     

    What do you get in return? Well, at this point neither player is #1 on anyone's want list, so any deadline deal will happen when other possibilities come off the plate, if at all. I don't see much in the way of a quality return (which will hurt the Twins more with the loss of Escobar). BUT if you ARE losing both at season's end, getting something is better than letting them just walk at the point you don't think you can catch Cleveland.

     

    And if you decide to ride this out a bit, do you let them walk in the August waiver claim time, hopefully getting a prospect (or pulling them back and keeping them), or just letting them go for salary relief and so you can play THE FUTURE. 

     

    Escobar is one of your top TRADE CHIPS, although, like I said, he is not an elite piece. He might be a productive piece for the remainder of a season, moreso than any other offensive-category player (Grossman, Morrison, Dozier, Wilson). But right now, he is not a prize glove in the middle infielder and an adequate glove at third base. He hits doubles. He has some power. But he goes hot and cold. He's not a leadoff guy, he's not a cleanup slugger. He is a solid player (this season, and the last two). Unlike Dozier, he ahs been consistent. Dozier may get a hot streak and slug out 20 homers in the next two months and hit .350, which is good for Brian and his future, but not really doing anything for the Twins if they play, at best, .500 ball the rest of the way.

     

    You just never know, but now is the time to judge your minor league system, make decisions on guys you have to remove from the 40-man to add more in the off-season. THAT IS MORE IMPORTANT in the future scheme of things. If you egt minor league depth, that second or third prospect in line from an organization, that 41st player, you might be happy.

     

    The Twins did a good job signing (and trading) for pieces to make them a stronger team in 2018. Unfortunately, none of them really worked out (shades of Rodney who gives us suspense). The joy is you can still go out and buy a rotation arm, three bullpen arms, a backup catcher and a 1B/DH in the off-season and probably egt what you with the spring training promises this year. But IS IT MORE IMPORTANT to advance and see what you will have for 2019 (or even 2020) now than do this all over again.

     

    Dozier you didn't feel like signing in the off-season. There wasn't much of a trade market for him the past couple of seasons. Escobar is an elite bench guy, but NOT an elite regular...although he does have flashes and shines...but I don't see any team going after him to be their 2-3 year future at any position. He will get a contract (think Nunez) and be able to stay in the majors at least 4-5 years in some capacity. 

     

    But these two players? Well, the Twins will have people kicking the tires and looking them over carefully as they judge other sellable items out there in the realm of baseball, or do they just go with the unproven parts they have in their own system.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If a deal for Dozier or Escobar - with or without Duke inlcuded - can return some of these top 10 players like Kilome, Burnes or Mata, I think the Twins would have to seriously consider the move. I would still wait until very close to the deadline to pull the trigger to see if this momentum carries through the roadtrip.

     

    I still don't understand the argument of moving either of them for just lottery tickets and the "benefit" of opening up a spot for Gordon.  Just because he was a #1 pick, doesn't mean he's earned a chance at the MLB level yet?  He's now been floundering at AAA longer than he was excelling at AA this season.   That tells me that he's hit a wall with his promotion, not that he's ready to take yet another step.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If a deal for Dozier or Escobar - with or without Duke inlcuded - can return some of these top 10 players like Kilome, Burnes or Mata, I think the Twins would have to seriously consider the move. I would still wait until very close to the deadline to pull the trigger to see if this momentum carries through the roadtrip.

     

    I still don't understand the argument of moving either of them for just lottery tickets and the "benefit" of opening up a spot for Gordon.  Just because he was a #1 pick, doesn't mean he's earned a chance at the MLB level yet?  He's now been floundering at AAA longer than he was excelling at AA this season.   That tells me that he's hit a wall with his promotion, not that he's ready to take yet another step.

     

    What if it isn't to open up space for Gordon, but to get lucky and get a good player? I mean, what is the point in keeping them, assuming they aren't catching CLE.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would assume it would be impossible to convince a potential playoff team to give up a pitcher who's already in their starting rotation, especially one who is young, and only get rentals in return.

    I guess you never know, but Milwaukee might be desperate/willing enough to deal Peralta. If not, I guess we’d all know why they lost out on the Machado sweepstakes (also a rental).

     

    MN’s got nothing to lose, and everything to gain, when it comes to dealing these rentals. The fact that I can’t say the same about the Brew Crew, a team that went “all in” to start the year (and still might not make the playoffs), means we “should” have leverage in making a deal with them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    First, I do not see the Twins front office taking the gamble and giving a qualifying offer to either Dozier or Escobar. $19 million is a lot for either player.

    For Dozier, it really depends on how he finishes. A strong finish at the plate will strongly suggest he's still the same plus player he's been for 5 years now, and worth a QO for a hopeful contender without an immediate replacement ready.

     

    Escobar doesn't have that history. Even if he somehow duplicates his first half success, there's probably not enough confidence in his 2019 projection to justify that deal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I still don't understand the argument of moving either of them for just lottery tickets and the "benefit" of opening up a spot for Gordon.

    How about opening up a spot for Sano to return? I guess they could DH him or plug him in at 1B, but I presume they'd want to see how he handles 3B in MLB with better conditioning.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    What if it isn't to open up space for Gordon, but to get lucky and get a good player? I mean, what is the point in keeping them, assuming they aren't catching CLE.

     

    This probably won't be popular, and I understand.  I'd rather watch better baseball for a couple of months than backfill the bottom end of the org or get the rights to a player whose equivalent can be had on a minor league deal next ST (Alex Presley).

     

    Dozier and Escobar are still playing for contracts, so we should get to see some good baseball.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    How about opening up a spot for Sano to return? I guess they could DH him or plug him in at 1B, but I presume they'd want to see how he handles 3B in MLB with better conditioning.

     

    You make an interesting point, but my process would be at the expense of Morrison and giving Escobar, Polanco and Dozier some DH PAs to allow for the new look Sano to play 3B.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Here's a good one - Eric Hosmer, who was given a QO after 2017. 

    2014-2016: 3.5 fWAR in 1881 PA. (1.1 WAR/600 PA)

    2017:           4.1 fWAR in 671 PA    (3.7 WAR/600 PA)

     

    Escobar:

    2015-2017: 3.4 fWAR in 1322 PA (1.5 WAR/600)

    2018:          2.1 fWAR in 376 PA   (3.4 WAR/600)

     

     

     

    What's really funny, Hosmer turned down the QO and signed an 8yr/$144M contract!! 

     

    Of course the Hosmer contract is outrageous... But you asked!

     

    I have to admit ... I did not think there were ANY reasonable examples. However, if you manipulate the numbers, you can make a case for Hosmer. However, you chose a 3 year period which included 2 years when he was at his worst and had near zero WAR. You elected to position the numbers in a manner not reflective of recent history. For example, he had 7.8 fWAR the 3 years immediately proceeding his FA year and that included a very bad year of .2 FWAR. You could have also used the last 5 years where he averaged 2.14 WAR.

     

    He was also rated the 3rd best FA on the market my MLB Trade Rumors so manipulating of war aside, comparing Hosmer  and Escobar makes little sense and the fact he received a $144M contract would suggest the league does not see them as anywhere near comparable.

    Edited by Major Leauge Ready
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    We need a 3rd basemen.   Sano, if he comes back, is our 1st basemen.   I dont know why everyone is fighting this.   LoMo will be gone after this year.   Mauer will be signed for two years as a backup 1st basemen/DH/bench.   I say trade Dozier to the brewers for Lucas Erceg(3B)  He can play in AAA next year and possibly be called up mid year.   That will be a good transition time for Sano at 1st with Mauer.  As a 2nd target with Erceg maybe we can get Payton Henry©.   I think Erceg/Henry will be great future pieces for the team. 

     

    Because he is much more valuable at 3B if he can play even close to average defensive with that cannon for arm. 1B is far easier to fill and we have waaaay more prospects that profile for 1B. Plus, if the reports are accurate, he is taking getting into shape seriously. He is a tremendous athlete that happens to be out of shape. How good could he be if he sheds 40 lbs. His value at 3B is worthy of further evaluation if he does in fact get in shape.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This probably won't be popular, and I understand.  I'd rather watch better baseball for a couple of months than backfill the bottom end of the org or get the rights to a player whose equivalent can be had on a minor league deal next ST (Alex Presley).

     

    Dozier and Escobar are still playing for contracts, so we should get to see some good baseball.

     

    I sympathize with this stance, but have a different priority. Neither of us is wrong, btw....just have different interests.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I would assume it would be impossible to convince a potential playoff team to give up a pitcher who's already in their starting rotation, especially one who is young, and only get rentals in return.

     

    yeah, the only way that works is if said young pitcher has been pitching poorly and the team is getting a good SP now. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Can anyone name a player with a career WAR under 1.5/season that has received a qualifying offer?

     

    How about under 2 WAR for the previous 3 seasons?

    Mark Trumbo! Of course, that was a bad decision and even worse contract... I think Escobar would at least be more useful in his utility role than Trumbo ever was.

     

    On the pitching side, Jeremy Hellickson.

     

    QO rules have changed since then, though, so the penalties aren't as great for signing a QO player, nor is the compensation as great for losing most players.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I look at the qualifying offer of ~18 million a little differently.

     

    When teams give a veteran free agent pitcher 4 years and 60 million they know they are likely to get 2 good years. That is what the Twins got from Santana which is a lot better than the return from Hughes and Nolasco. The Twins will likely get one good year from Castro for the three years.

     

    A one year deal for ~18 million to a player in their 30s can work out better than a 3/30 deal.

     

    As long as Dozier and Escobar finish strong, I would make the qualifying offer. I don’t go into the deadline feeling I must trade them. Instead I expect a return of at least a comp pick before I deal them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Escobar is not turning down the QO. He can take that, and then get a "meh" contract in a year, and make way more money combined. In the mean time, the Twins get nothing other than one more year of a guy that should be a utility player on a good team.....I can't see how that's a good investment of limited budgetary dollars. But, I guess I could be wrong, and he's a legit MLB starter on a good team. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    As long as Dozier and Escobar finish strong, I would make the qualifying offer. I don’t go into the deadline feeling I must trade them. Instead I expect a return of at least a comp pick before I deal them.

    As long as they sign for less than $50 mil (a virtual certainty for Escobar, and a likely possibility for Dozier), the comp pick is going to be roughly equivalent to the 70-something pick we traded with Hughes. We got $7 mil for it, but many observers thought it was a bit of an overpay by San Diego, and of course it was one of only a couple picks that could actually be traded/sold which boosted its value. The expected player value of that pick may only be $4 mil? And we paid $4 mil for Littell last deadline. I don't think that is a high bar to clear.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...