Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Five Remaining Free Agent Fits


    Cody Christie

    Minnesota’s biggest off-season move was signing Jason Castro to a three-year deal worth $24.5 million. The team had a clear need at catcher and Castro was the 13th best available player according to ESPN.com. But are there other free agent fits after a 103-loss season? Here are five names the Twins could still be considering.

    Image courtesy of Patrick Gorski, USA Today Sports

    Twins Video

    Jason Hammel, RHP

    Hammel posted a 3.68 ERA and a 1.16 WHIP over the last three seasons in Chicago and Oakland. With other Cubs’ starters ahead of him, the team could afford to let him go. The Twins need more pitching and he would slide into the rotation nicely. He might be a good candidate to sign to a one- or two-year deal so he could recoup some value. At the start of next season, he will already be 34-years old so he will not have many more opportunities to be a free agent.

    Doug Fister, RHP

    Fister is only two-years removed from a terrific season in Washington where he threw for a 2.41 ERA and a 1.08 WHIP. He has posted ERA totals greater than 4.15 in each of the last two seasons. Fister is younger than Hammel and he has pitched 237 fewer big league innings. He has pitched over 160 innings in each of the last four seasons where he was used exclusively as a starter. Like Hammel, there is an opportunity for him to produce a bounce back season.

    Scott Feldman, RHP

    Feldman was one of the players I targeted when completing my 2016 Twins offseason blueprint. I would offer him a two-year deal with some incentives since he has shown some positive signs since joining the bullpen. Minnesota’s bullpen has been overused in recent years so a new arm could add some life to a worn-out group. If he continues to make strides in the right direction, the Twins might be able to deal him for prospects at the trade deadline.

    Stephen Drew, 2B/3B/SS

    Drew will be entering his 12th big league season and he has shown the ability to play multiple positions around the infield. He could provide some insurance with young players like Miguel Sano and Jorge Polanco scheduled to start. He got on base almost 34% of the time last year. His .864 OPS was his highest total since his rookie season. Drew could take over the role vacated by Eduardo Nunez while providing a veteran voice in the clubhouse.

    Austin Jackson, OF

    Minnesota is scheduled to start the year with Byron Buxton, Max Kepler, Eddie Rosario, and Robbie Grossman as the team’s outfielders. The young trio of Buxton, Kepler, and Rosario all have things to prove. Jackson would add a veteran bat who can play all three outfield positions. If any of the young core needs more seasoning in Rochester, Jackson could take over the starting duties.

    Derek Falvey, the Twins Chief Baseball Officer, told the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, “The reality is, we’re standing here today with players still available in free agency that I don’t think any of us would have predicted in October. Things change.”

    Regardless of whether the front office pursues any of the names listed above, it looks like the Twins are incredible longshots to make it to the World Series. Mytopsportsbooks.com, which already has MLB Futures odds posted, lists them at 200-1 right now.

    While the odds seem to be against a World Series run, it seems likely for the Twins to head to Fort Myers with a player or players who are not currently on the roster. Who would be a good fit with the club’s current direction? Leave a COMMENT and start the discussion.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Pressly, Chargois, Berrios, May are all part of the future for sure. 

     

    I guess I'd like to see May stay on the mound before I say that.  Ditto Chargois.  

     

    And even if I granted 4 guys, that's a third of a pitching staff.  Looks like plenty of building room to me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I guess I'd like to see May stay on the mound before I say that.  Ditto Chargois.  

     

    And even if I granted 4 guys, that's a third of a pitching staff.  Looks like plenty of building room to me.

     

    They have plenty of guys who are close, too. Gonsalves, Stewart -- I'm interested to see how he develops w/ Falvey, Romero, Hildenberger, etc. There are the pieces for a fairly competent pitching staff that are close.

     

    I do think, however, that they'll have to add one truly great SP from the outside. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    They are not rebuilding. The rebuild is basically over. You can't rebuild what isn't built. They are on the upswing, which unfortunately is starting very low. 

    They went from winning 83 games to only 59...if they're moving in a direction right now its a backswing. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Pressly, Chargois, Berrios, May are all part of the future for sure.

    im less convinced, there's the most potential with this list than the others. The pitching staff looks like org filler just waiting to be replaced by prospects. The problem is there aren't any prospects in the pipeline. If trading vets isn't happening, are you really ok with so much filler taking up half the roster?

     

    I agree that it's not a rebuild without prospects on the horizon. it's just bad. And patience with bad becomes apathy and complacency.

     

    Gotta sign at least one or two relievers who are a step up from Kintzler and Boshers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    They have plenty of guys who are close, too. Gonsalves, Stewart -- I'm interested to see how he develops w/ Falvey, Romero, Hildenberger, etc. There are the pieces for a fairly competent pitching staff that are close.

     

    I do think, however, that they'll have to add one truly great SP from the outside. 

     

    Wouldn't a team full of close players who aren't there yet be the definition of a rebuild?  That's if I even accept that they are "close"

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not to be a Negative Nelly, but I don't see how those remaining FA's really help this club.

     

    As it stands, it will take something extraordinary for the pitching staff to be any good. There will be some bright spots, but mediocrity will be the majority.

     

    I am cool with rolling out what we have as position players. There is definitely talent in that group of players. Rosario, Buxton, Kepler, Sano, Polanco (defense in question), Dozier.

     

    I hope the org gives a fair opportunity to Vargas, Park, etc. to take AB's away from Mauer.

     

    I expected the off season we have had. I am hoping that the new FO can have a quick and effective result on the development of our current players and the guys down below.

     

    I did not expect the Twins to spend their asses off out of this, because the money the Pohlads and Ryan gave out the last handful of years have been ineffective.

     

    Effective development is the key for me as a fan.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Wouldn't a team full of close players who aren't there yet be the definition of a rebuild?  That's if I even accept that they are "close"

     

    No. The rebuild was when they were signing garbage pitchers like Kevin Correia and Mike Pelfrey to round out the rotation. They then compounded that by bringing Pelfrey back (for two years!). 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    im less convinced, there's the most potential with this list than the others. The pitching staff looks like org filler just waiting to be replaced by prospects. The problem is there aren't any prospects in the pipeline. If trading vets isn't happening, are you really ok with so much filler taking up half the roster?

    I agree that it's not a rebuild without prospects on the horizon. it's just bad. And patience with bad becomes apathy and complacency.

    Gotta sign at least one or two relievers who are a step up from Kintzler and Boshers.

     

    Why? Kintzler and Boshers were both useful and dirt cheap last season. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    No. The rebuild was when they were signing garbage pitchers like Kevin Correia and Mike Pelfrey to round out the rotation. They then compounded that by bringing Pelfrey back (for two years!). 

     

    I guess I'd call that "stupidity" and not "rebuilding".  :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I guess I'd call that "stupidity" and not "rebuilding".   :)

     

    If you don't have MLB quality starters and need to patch things up, you have to sign *someone*. 

     

    I hated it at the time, but I at least kind of got it? Still preferred guys like Brandon McCarthy and even Joe Blanton, though. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Yes. They weren't as bad as they played last year, and simple regression plus a drastic improvement behind the plate should help a lot. Young players being a year older doesn't hurt, either. 

    The pitching staff had the worst ERA in baseball by almost an entire run. Regression to even bottom third of the league isn't simple for this team. I wouldn't say that coming off a 103 loss season and remaining quiet during the offseason is an upswing. Also with a pitching staff this bad I think calling the rebuild complete is premature. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The pitching staff had the worst ERA in baseball by almost an entire run. Regression to even bottom third of the league isn't simple for this team. I wouldn't say that coming off a 103 loss season and remaining quiet during the offseason is an upswing. Also with a pitching staff this bad I think calling the rebuild complete is premature. 

    The ROTATION had the worst ERA by .20.  5.39 is pathetic.  Of course, having the 2nd worst defense in baseball didn't help.  By FIP, the worst rotation was the Reds. The Twins and Royals ONLY tied for being the next worse by FIP.

     

    But other than that, I too am having issues wrapping my head around the idea this team is about to turn things around because young guys are getting older and the rotation was somehow not as bad as they were. I also wonder about how drastic the difference behind the plate will be,  

     

    Mostly, the talent just isn't there, IMO.  I was saying this towards the end of 2015 and during the offseason before 2016 too.  

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    What? That is not even remotely accurate. 

    Compared to the league average, as a staff they were nearly a full run higher. I could have phrased that better. It doesn't change anything else in the post. 

    Edited by KirbyDome89
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The pitching staff had the worst ERA in baseball by almost an entire run. Regression to even bottom third of the league isn't simple for this team. I wouldn't say that coming off a 103 loss season and remaining quiet during the offseason is an upswing. Also with a pitching staff this bad I think calling the rebuild complete is premature.

    the team had the second worst ERA in baseball. Still awful. Agreed with the intent
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The ROTATION had the worst ERA by .20.  5.39 is pathetic.  Of course, having the 2nd worst defense in baseball didn't help.  By FIP, the worst rotation was the Reds. The Twins and Royals ONLY tied for being the next worse by FIP.

    Agreed, the D was horrendous and certainly didn't help. If only there was some way to fix these problems.....hmmmm

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    They have plenty of guys who are close, too. Gonsalves, Stewart -- I'm interested to see how he develops w/ Falvey, Romero, Hildenberger, etc. There are the pieces for a fairly competent pitching staff that are close.

     

    I do think, however, that they'll have to add one truly great SP from the outside. 

     

    by this argument, why fire Ryan, if they are done rebuilding?

     

    I couldn't disagree more strongly. They have no 3B long term, no 1B, no C, 1 SP, and maybe 2-3 RP. Their LFer walks less than your average 90 year old. And that's assuming Buxton learns to hit, and Gordon and Polanco are legit every day players.

     

    I think we'll just disagree on this....which I'm cool with.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This stuff being considered, and the way they're talking, it does seem like they still don't want to give the young'uns a shot again this year. That's why the single most disappointing thing this offseason is that they didn't clear the dugout first. Molly was horrible handling the kids the past couple years, (in addition to the rest of the team), and we're still thinking he's they guy for a young roster?

    Phooey.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Per Doogie's scoop podcast... The Twins have no interest in Austin Jackson.

     

    But he did mention at least 3 guys that the Twins very much have on their radar...

    I heard the Twins Daily plug over there, so I am sure you want to make everyone listen. :)

     

    But the 3 guys Doogie mentions are Mike Napoli, Greg Holland, and Joe Smith.

     

    Hopefully they're looking at Holland a lot more than Napoli...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Holland's reported demands are ridiculous for a guy coming back from TJ surgery; a two year deal with a player opt out. So basically if he can't pitch this year, or doesn't pitch well, you're stuck with him for two years. If he pitches well he's gone.

     

    In other words, I like the Twins chances of signing him!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think we need more bullpen depth...well, we need a lot of things...but bullpen depth would be a priority.  I think this is the year that we really need to see what some of the young guys can do in the rotation.  It could be a revolving door this year (even more than other years).  I see Kintzler as this years Jepsen.  When I watch him close a game, I hold my breath.  He's not overpowering and throws a lot of ground balls with a less than stellar defense behind him.  Seems like a formula for failure.  So, improve what you can, and the bullpen seems like an easier target than some of the other weaknesses.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...