Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Feeling The Draft: Analyzing Minnesota's Stellar Early Returns


    Nick Nelson

    When Derek Falvey and Thad Levine took over the Minnesota Twins front office, they inherited a tremendous gift: the first overall pick, along with the largest signing pool ever, in the upcoming MLB Draft.

    This gift was also a potential curse, because if they didn't get it right, the new top execs were going to be judged harshly on their choices in this first draft for many years to come.

    We're still a long way from being able to make any truly meaningful assessments, but here in the early going, the team's decisions could hardly look better.

    Image courtesy of William Parmeter

    Twins Video

    In his recent Q&A at the Baseball Prospectus Target Field event, the general manager Levine shared some insights on the front office's drafting process, which featured an increased emphasis on analytics:

    For the first time, the organization had the analytics department put together a model to kind of inform us of some of the decisions we can make in the draft, and just big picture, without getting into too many details. If you tell us what the percentage chance was of the player appearing in one of the next three picks that we had, if you don't take them in the second round, what are the chances he'll be in the third, fourth, or fifth round.

    This method likely helped facilitate the key maneuver that defined Minnesota's draft: making a surprise pick at No. 1 in Royce Lewis, then using the savings from that selection to later take high school right-hander Blayne Enlow at the top of the third round and sign him with a hugely over-slot bonus.

    Those two teenagers are both experiencing incredible success in their introductions to the pro ranks, making the Twins look very savvy.

    Lewis reported to the rookie-level Gulf Coast League and dominated at the plate over 39 games before earning a promotion to Class-A Cedar Rapids last weekend. For a prep pick to reach a full-season league in the same year he was drafted is exceedingly rare (not even Carlos Correa, who we're all dreaming on as a Lewis comp, did it), but it speaks to the 18-year-old's extremely advanced game.

    The shortstop has made himself right at home as one of the Midwest League's youngest players, going 7-for-13 in his first three games with the Kernels. The last top draft pick for the Twins, Joe Mauer, reached the majors shortly before his 21st birthday, and no younger player has debuted for the franchise since. Lewis is now on track to beat him – maybe handily.

    Enlow, too, has been sensational in his initial sample. Through four appearances in the GCL, he has a 1.29 ERA and 0.74 WHIP. The righty has faced 54 batters and allowed only three walks and seven hits (five of them singles) while striking out 14 with a 57 percent grounder rate. It doesn't get much better than that.

    It was surprising that Enlow, ranked as the 33rd best prospect in the class by Baseball America ahead of the draft, fell all the way to the Twins at No. 76 overall, especially because he was widely reputed to have the best curveball of any high schooler in the draft and that pitch has increasingly become a central focus in the game.

    But it worked out, and the analytics system Levine alluded to may have played into that.

    Oh, and about that beautiful curveball. Enlow himself likes to admire it, and who can blame him?

    https://twitter.com/BlayneBlaynee/status/894946011587727361

    Looking beyond Lewis and Enlow, nearly every other high-end draft pick from this class is showing positive early signs.

    Brent Rooker, the collegiate slugger taken with their second pick at No. 35, has already moved up to High-A Fort Myers, and was just named Player of the Week in the Florida State League following a monster stretch for the Miracle. The polished 22-year-old hitter is on the fast track and could conceivably be in Minnesota next year. His presence looms large since the Twins have an upcoming vacancy at first base, and had no particularly attractive long-term solution before Rooker joined the organization.

    Second-round prep right-hander Landon Leach has looked very sharp in the GCL. Fourth-round left-hander Charlie Barnes has excelled and earned a promotion from Elizabethton to Cedar Rapids. Fifth-rounder Andrew Bechtold, a third baseman out of the University of Maryland, is hitting .311/.414/.472 through 32 games in the Appalachian League.

    Other pitchers taken in the top 10 rounds, Ryley Widell (7th), Bryan Sammons (8th) and Calvin Faucher (10th) are – without exception – off to terrific starts as pros, racking up strikeouts and shutting down opponents.

    We're barely two months past the 2017 MLB Draft, and these players have sample sizes so small it would be absurd to draw any definitive conclusions from what we've seen. Still, it's impossible to look at Minnesota's class at this point and not be reaffirmed in your belief in this new regime.

    The Twins followed a strategy that was viewed by many at the time as unconventional and controversial. Right now, it's looking awfully smart.

    So far, their batting average in this draft is even higher than Lewis's in the Midwest League.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    No. No no no.

     

    The best strategy is to keep him at third and let him develop there. He is still young. He has had only one real season playing at third. His bat is much more valuable at third than it is at first. There is zero -- ZERO -- reasons to move him off of that position.

     

    I can think of 275 reasons to move him off third base.

     

    Hey look, he pulls a muscle on a play like he made last night, he's out for a month.

     

    Go find me another 275 lb third sacker, ever, in the history of MLB. 

     

    Long run, you protect a guy that drives in runs by playing him at a position he can make plays and not get hurt.

     

    Hopefully he can pick it at 1B, but that's his future.  100% guarantee on that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    On Rooker:

     

    His presence looms large since the Twins have an upcoming vacancy at first base, and had no particularly attractive long-term solution before Rooker joined the organization.

     

    Um, Miguel Sano, dollars to donuts, is a 1B for 29 teams in MLB.  He is 6'4", 275 lbs and likes to snack.

     

    Twins best start looking for third sacker, preferably one that doesn't strike out so much.

    Uhh, you aren't watching many Twins games, are you? Sano has been excellent at 3B, even with his post-All Star struggles at the plate.

    Sure, he will end up at 1B eventually. But he's been, and will continue to be, an asset at 3B for the next few years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd argue it's a loss for us to forfeit Sano's arm by having him play 1b.  This isn't little league where everyone on the team bats right handed and the first baseman literally only makes plays on balls thrown to him from the left side of the infield.  Players at first have to make many of the same plays, as far as range goes on ground balls, as they do at third and more (holding runners, erasing bad throws from other infielders, more complicated footwork).  By moving him across the diamond you take away his biggest asset on defense, his arm.  I can live with the DH argument, but the 1B doesn't make sense to me in the near future.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I can think of 275 reasons to move him off third base.

     

    Hey look, he pulls a muscle on a play like he made last night, he's out for a month.

     

    Go find me another 275 lb third sacker, ever, in the history of MLB. 

     

    Long run, you protect a guy that drives in runs by playing him at a position he can make plays and not get hurt.

     

    Hopefully he can pick it at 1B, but that's his future.  100% guarantee on that.

     

    Nope. 

     

    Aaron Judge weighs 280-plus and he plays RIGHT FIELD. 

     

    Sano is doing fine at third. He will continue to do fine at third and, I imagine, he'll get better at it. It's not as if he's running up and down a basketball court and leaping for rebounds. It's not as if he's manning center field and running into walls. Dude plays third base. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Fixed it for you.

     

    Yeah? Who are the cheap DHs who were signed the last two years? Back it up before you "fix" my post.

     

    Sano is likely better than any of the sad sacks . If the Twins aren't going to have Miguel Sano play 3B (and again, I think he should be at 3B for the next 3-5 years), there's no reason to put him at 1B where he isn't particularly adept. He can DH at that point. The Twins don't have anyone coming up with no position.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's great the guys are doing well but it should be tempered with caution. In Rooker's case a good college hitter should hit rookie-low a pitching. Anybody with a plus-curve will have success in rookie-low a ball. As both pitchers and hitters get used to wooden bats which requires pitching inside. Those who can throw curves for strikes have a significant advantage. In low a ball pitchers are wild and the defense doesn't always catch the ball. Consequently individual stats are mostly meaningless as a predictor of Major League success.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's great the guys are doing well but it should be tempered with caution. In Rooker's case a good college hitter should hit rookie-low a pitching. Anybody with a plus-curve will have success in rookie-low a ball. As both pitchers and hitters get used to wooden bats which requires pitching inside. Those who can throw curves for strikes have a significant advantage. In low a ball pitchers are wild and the defense doesn't always catch the ball. Consequently individual stats are mostly meaningless as a predictor of Major League success.

    Rooker is in high-A, though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Lewin Diaz would beg to disagree with this.  I would suspect that the Twins see Rooker more like an OF (and his usage shows this) than a 1B, which is ok, because there is not a glut of OF power in the organiziation as well.  Good problem to have, but it is not like there were not other first basemen in the organization.  Vargas should probably added to that list.

     

    Lewin Diaz has a long ways to go before pencilling him in at 1B for the Twins. He's still all projection and hasn't really shown he'll fulfill that yet. The batting average and strikeout rate are okay, but he isn't taking walks or hitting for much power. He's not "flashing" yet like you'd expect for a future power hitter. I'm not concerned, but I'm not reserving any spots ahead of him in the pipeline either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Lewin Diaz has a long ways to go before pencilling him in at 1B for the Twins. He's still all projection and hasn't really shown he'll fulfill that yet. The batting average and strikeout rate are okay, but he isn't taking walks or hitting for much power. He's not "flashing" yet like you'd expect for a future power hitter. I'm not concerned, but I'm not reserving any spots ahead of him in the pipeline either.

    And Rooker has? Because that's what Thrylos was responding to.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    And Rooker has? Because that's what Thrylos was responding to.

     

    For his first taste of professional baseball and wooden bats, yeah. He's flashed legit power and the ability to draw walks. The strikeout rate is high but not unreasonably so (yet). I'd like to see more doubles and consistency but he literally just left metal bats and college dorms behind 2 months ago.

     

    The sample size is so small too. Take out his first few games at A ball, call it an adjustment period. Since then he's hitting .265/.365/.518 (.883 OPS) with only a .314 BABIP. He's proven to make adjustments quickly. No, I'm not saving a spot for him in MLB yet or declaring him a can't-miss prospect. But he's definitley showing an ability to progress up the system quickly.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd like to see Sano at 3B as long as possible, but whether he stays or moves from 3B really comes down to the alternatives.

    • If the available 1B is the second coming of a pre-concussion Morneau and the best 3B option is Nick Punto (and remember that Punto turns 40 this fall), it makes sense to leave Sano at 3B.
    • If there's a new Gary Gaetti at 3B and Craig Kusick Jr. is the 1B option, you move Sano.

    We can't predict either with precision for 2019, let alone 3-5 years or more from now. Either way, as my momma used to say, we'll cross that bridge when we get to it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For his first taste of professional baseball and wooden bats, yeah. He's flashed legit power and the ability to draw walks. The strikeout rate is high but not unreasonably so (yet). I'd like to see more doubles and consistency but he literally just left metal bats and college dorms behind 2 months ago.

     

    The sample size is so small too. Take out his first few games at A ball, call it an adjustment period. Since then he's hitting .265/.365/.518 (.883 OPS) with only a .314 BABIP. He's proven to make adjustments quickly. No, I'm not saving a spot for him in MLB yet or declaring him a can't-miss prospect. But he's definitley showing an ability to progress up the system quickly.

    We'll have to agree to disagree.

    Rooker hasn't shown enough yet to be called the long term answer at first base, not even close.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    We'll have to agree to disagree.
    Rooker hasn't shown enough yet to be called the long term answer at first base, not even close.

     

    I didn't say he had. I said he's flashed a powerful bat and the potential to be advanced quickly. Nothing remarkable, yet no real red flags yet either. He's basically meeting expectations. That isn't enough to make a strong assessment one or or the other, which is fine because he's only two months into his career. I don't think we'll know what he is until he's had a little more time to make adjustments and then get tested against upper minors talent.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And Rooker has? Because that's what Thrylos was responding to.

    Can we compromise and say neither had really flashed much and should not be penciled in for anything at this point.

     

    But I would bet more on Rooker than Diaz at this point. Diaz brings little but a low k rate. At least Rooker shows some pop and will take a walk.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Correct, high A in Rooker' s case. But, I'll have to agree to disagree with anyone saying he's doing stellar there.
    An. 805 OPS from a 22 year old, bat only college draft pick isn't good, IMO.

    In a league that the hitters average less than .700 ops, 805 is good. If qualified, it would be the 25th best. In all of A+ ball there are 120 out of the 792 with an ab younger than 22. 180 22 years old.  Rooker is not old for the league.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I didn't say he had. I said he's flashed a powerful bat and the potential to be advanced quickly. Nothing remarkable, yet no real red flags yet either. He's basically meeting expectations. That isn't enough to make a strong assessment one or or the other, which is fine because he's only two months into his career. I don't think we'll know what he is until he's had a little more time to make adjustments and then get tested against upper minors talent.

    I know YOU didn't, but the OP that Thrylos responded to did. That was what I was trying to point out before.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Can we compromise and say neither had really flashed much and should not be penciled in for anything at this point.

     

    But I would bet more on Rooker than Diaz at this point. Diaz brings little but a low k rate. At least Rooker shows some pop and will take a walk.

    That's not a compromise, that's my view as well, Rooker is just as big of unknown at this point as Diaz is.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In a league that the hitters average less than .700 ops, 805 is good. If qualified, it would be the 25th best. In all of A+ ball there are 120 out of the 792 with an ab younger than 22. 180 22 years old. Rooker is not old for the league.

    You are including a whole mix of guys with those numbers.

    Many of those have defensive value.

    Many of those were 18 year old draft picks or 16 year old FA's at one time.

    Most of those weren't top 40 picks.

    And very few, if any, were one of the best hitters in the SEC.

     

    But, of course, when i said agree to disagree, it was because I knew many would disagree.

     

    And, I'm far from saying he's been bad. He hasn't. But I don't consider his numbers at A+ to qualify as "stellar" either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, if you are including every player at a level, an actual prospect is never going to be "old" for their level, never.

    You have a bunch of career minor leaguers skewing that average age.

    22 is not young for Ft Myers for an actual prospect.

    That's not necessarily Rookers fault, he was older even for a college pick, I don't think he should be higher right now.

    But, that said, he had another full year of seeing advanced SEC pitching. And that's a developmental advantage, so it's part of the context just the same.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I can think of 275 reasons to move him off third base.

     

    Hey look, he pulls a muscle on a play like he made last night, he's out for a month.

     

    Go find me another 275 lb third sacker, ever, in the history of MLB. 

     

    Long run, you protect a guy that drives in runs by playing him at a position he can make plays and not get hurt.

     

    Hopefully he can pick it at 1B, but that's his future.  100% guarantee on that.

     

    He hasn't gotten hurt at 3B yet, right? His defensive play, even during his recent hitting slump,suggest that this issue can wait until he's in his later 20s. Molly pointed out today that he's doing great at the position and said it's widely acknowledged that Sano has a 7-8 arm, which is elite. Why not use that arm at 3B and get another big bopper at 1B until Sano makes the move sometime after 2020?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Great early returns...

     

    Rooker's already in Ft. Myers, way ahead of a 'normal' draft curve.

    Charlie Barnes, Bryan Sammons and Jordan Gore are already up in Cedar Rapids and doing well.

    And Lewis being in Cedar Rapids is  quite unusual... It's exciting to see. 

    Definitely an exciting difference in selection approach and developmental philosophy from the past regime. It feels like we're finally and inexorably beginning to catch up to the other enlightened rocket scientist baseball executives.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    He hasn't gotten hurt at 3B yet, right? His defensive play, even during his recent hitting slump,suggest that this issue can wait until he's in his later 20s. Molly pointed out today that he's doing great at the position and said it's widely acknowledged that Sano has a 7-8 arm, which is elite. Why not use that arm at 3B and get another big bopper at 1B until Sano makes the move sometime after 2020?

     

    And the answer is:  Because Sano is a cornerstone piece to the offense, you do not expose him to injury on defense.

     

    Sano looks good now at 3B, though apparently the metrics see him as average, but over time, with a better defender at third, the rationale for playing him there erodes, and then, just disappears -- decline, lack of mobility, injury risk.

     

    It's going to happen quicker than TD posters realize, maybe as soon as contract extension.

     

    You don't put $20M on a spot that pre-disposes his bat to being out of the lineup.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Rooker has 29 strikeouts in 98 at bats with the Miracle. He is almost 23. Maybe he will be the answer but let's wait a bit before we change this pick from an under slot reach to a can't miss Twins 1B

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The top 10 that are not injured from last year and the year before seem to be progressing through the minors. A cursory glance says no duds.  Stellar returns, too? Nope. Not until they hit the bigs or are traded for something worthwhile.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Seriously? 

     

    I get so tired of this sentiment. Sano may not be Brooks Robinson. But he made a spectacular play last night, and he's made significant improvements in his defense versus last year. He works hard at it, and wants to be a good player. As he showed last night, and on many other occasions, he can make seriously good plays over there. Give him time.

     

    He's only 24 years old. This is his first full season in the majors playing third base. He can definitely. And his best value is as a third baseman, period. 

     

    That's also the best option for the Twins, who can get a number of people to play first base -- you know, like the aforementioned Rooker, or Alex Kiriloff. I doubt anybody in the minors in the Twins' system, not Nick Gordon, not Wander Javier, not Royce Lewis, has the hitting potential that Sano has and is showing. 

     

    People shouldn't be so quick to put Sano at first base or designated hitter. 

    Unfortunately, Sano's desires to be a good 3B probably won't outweigh his appetite for, well, food.  Other than his obvious affection for food, his mentality won't play a part in his move.  Being 24 is why he can play 3B now.  When he's 27 and the desire to be the best fielder he can be has waned, he'll be only a 1B.  Everyone sees that, and I don't think it's really going to matter when, post-Mauer.  

     

    In 2019 Mauer might well be gone (I think there's a good chance he stays cheaply to be part-time on a Twins winner).  Dozier will be gone.  Gordon will be up and will have struggled.  Polanco will be here.  Sano playing 1B most of the time probably depends on whether Rooker, Lewis, or some wild card forces playing time.  Whatever happens, I don't see this as being too crowded. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For the folks who want to move Sano off of third I would remind you that he lost about two years of development time to TJ and the misguided outfield experiment. I'm not saying that he is the long term answer at third but I still think he could be. I'm certainly happy to let him develop there until someone forces the issue through their play. In the meantime let him spell Mauer at first to get some reps there as well. Remember, having options across the field isn't a bad thing…now let's hope the front office/manager make the choices that create the best on field product!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    In a league that the hitters average less than .700 ops, 805 is good. If qualified, it would be the 25th best. In all of A+ ball there are 120 out of the 792 with an ab younger than 22. 180 22 years old.  Rooker is not old for the league.

    For what it's worth, Kyle Schwarber and Kris Bryant both made it to the Florida State League a couple months after the draft. They had a .950 and 1.100 OPS respectively. For better or worse, that is the benchmark that I'm using to judge whether or not Rooker is on track to be a fast-moving, impact MLB bat.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The advancement of recent draftees is what I wanted to see out of the new front office compared to the old. Get them where they should be based on talent and the experience they brought to the table.

     

    But I'm also surprised they haven't then applied these principles to the players that were already in the organization from an overall overview perspective.

     

    No Romero in AAA, Gonsalves just moved there, Gordon not in AAA, Garver not in majors, etc... those types of things.

     

    I wonder if they have a really low opinion of the talent that was in the organization when they got here.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...