Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Extend Miggy


    Jeremy Nygaard

    Now that we’ve got to see Miguel Sano play third base for the better part of a month, it’s probably fair to say that he’s going to man the hot corner for the foreseeable future (or at least until Mauer moves on). The pop-ups that plagued him last year haven’t been an issue (yet) and the barehanded plays that he seems to make on a consistent basis are starting to prove the doubters wrong.

    And he’s taking walks and hitting bombs again.

    Image courtesy of Jesse Johnson-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Pre-arbitration extensions have been pretty popular around the league. There have been eight such deals in baseball since the end of the winter meetings. Though the Twins, who have a whole nucleus of players that fit in that pre-arb category, were not one of those teams.

    That should change with Sano.

    Currently, Sano is a 1+ player, which means that he’ll be a pre-arbitration (near minimum) player again in 2018. He’ll enter his first of three arbitration years in 2019 and will first be eligible to be a free agent after the 2021 season.

    Looking specifically at deals of players with 1+ year of experience, we need to look no further to find one than the most recent extension that was signed: The Cardinals and outfielder Stephen Piscotty. The two parties entered into an agreement that will earn Piscotty $1 million in each of the 2017 and 2018 seasons. He will earn $7 million in each of his first two scheduled arbitration years and $7.25 in what would be his final arbitration year and his first free agent season. The Cardinals hold an option at $15 million for the 2023 season with a $1 million buyout. Piscotty also got a $2 million signing bonus and is three years older than Sano. The formatting of this deal - the large jump into arbitration and the small jump into free agency - is definitely unique. He also was given a $2 million signing bonus. His guarantee is $32.5 million over the six years that begin next season.

    We can look further though to see, perhaps, a better comparison: Christian Yelich of the Marlins. Yelich was 24 when he signed his deal, a year older than Sano is currently. Yelich also holds an advantage in bWAR, both career-wise and in head-to-head seasons. Any potential deal should probably follow the Yelich framework. Scheduled to receive $570,000 and $1 million in his final two pre-arb years, Yelich will get a big bump during his arbitration years, earning $3.5 million, $7 million and $9.75 million. His first two free agent years are bought out at $12 million and $14 million. Then there is a team option for $15 million with a $1.25 million buyout. All told, Yelich is guaranteed $49 million from his 2+ year through two years of free agency plus an option (seven years).

    Using those two as models, what would an offer to Sano potentially look like?

    It would be fair to assume that the bump he’ll receive in his final pre-arb year (‘18) will be $1 million. Piscotty’s deal gives a significant bump in the first year of arbitration, but not the first year of free agency, which makes Yelich’s a more believable model.

    Looking at the Twins pre-arb extensions, they’ve used even jumps from arbitration years to the next. (Span was $1.75m and Dozier was $3m.) Using $3 million as a good starting point with $3.5 million increases, Sano would make $3 million, $6.5 million and $10 million.

    The part that I will always feel the Twins screwed up with Dozier’s deal was not buying out any free agent years. The Twins can’t make that mistake with Sano.

    Though the Marlins got two years of Yelich plus an option, I’m not going to suggest the Twins do the same with Sano. Mostly because I don’t think his reps would go for it. But my contention has always been that the tradeoff of cost-certainty for the team and guaranteed money for a young player isn’t fair. There has to be an added benefit for the team. And that comes in the form of a free agent year and a team option.

    The $12 million that Yelich is getting for his first free agent year is fair and the $15 million option that the teams are getting on both players are getting is also fair. As an added bonus for Sano, the team’s buyout will be $2.5 million, increasing the guarantee.

    Here’s the breakdown:

    2018: $1 million

    2019: $3 million (would be first arbitration year)

    2020: $6.5 million

    2021: $10 million

    2022: $12 million (would be first free agent year)

    2023: $15 million or $2.5 million buyout

    Six years and $35 million.

    Would you?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    On the "Touch 'em All" podcast  (Basically 30 minutes of Twins content on 1500AM) this topic came up.

     

    I ended up yelling at my radio.

     

    They did two "who says no" scenarios.

    Scenario 1: 10yr/250M

    Their contention was that both sides might not be all that interested. Which I don't necessarily disagree with, but one of their reasons for Sano's camp saying no was that it wasn't enough money. (more on this in a minute)

     

    Scenario 2: 6yr/100M

    Everybody said Sano's camp would definitely say no. Not enough money. This is when I started yelling at my radio, something to the effect of "DO YOU PEOPLE NOT UNDERSTAND HOW THE FIRST 6 YEARS OF SALARY WORKS?!?!?!"

     

    Basically, that would be buying out two free agent years for $35M each, as well as guaranteeing the whole contract. AND THAT'S NOT ENOUGH? 

     

    I understand the desire from the Sano camp to hit free agency a) as early as possible, and B} at a prime age, but 6 years puts him at what? 28? That's pretty prime.

     

    My opinion:

    6/70 with a team option that would make it 7/100. Also, I'd keep it pretty flat over the length of the contract. Might as well pay a decent amount now, when we're on the way lower end of our payroll range.

     

    2018: 10

    2019: 12

    2020: 12

    2021: 12

    2022: 12

    2023: 12

     

    This allows us future financial flexibility as well as, if we need to, a valuable, low-cost trade asset. 

     

    I just don't see the Twins offering Scenario #1 as a first contract.  They are too cheap to do that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I just don't see the Twins offering Scenario #1 as a first contract.  They are too cheap to do that.

     

    I agree, but not because they are cheap, but because it has too much risk. 

     

    Right now the Twins are saddled with a 23M/yr below average first baseman that was (when the contract was inked) supposed to be a HOF catcher. The Twins could replace most if not all of Mauer's production internally, with someone who's pre-arbitration. 

     

    We'd hate the Twins, in 2023, to be saddled with a $35M "3 outcome" DH who could be replaced or at least mostly replaced by someone making 20% of that. 

     

    Do, I think he's going to become a 3-outcome DH? No. But anyone looking at this objectively has to realize that's a possibility. 

    Edited by amjgt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I say pay the man.  I would guess that 10/$350 would get it done.  Maybe you could get by for $300.  That would take him to age 34, but I feel anything less would not get it done.  He probably wants to win on a consistent basis and play for a coast team.  If you do not lock him up by the end of 2018, you will only be able to sign him if he does not become a mega superstar.  Less and you are gambling he wants to be here and I do not want to lose him after his age 28 season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The entire league is trending towards 3 outcomes... Sano isn't an outlier when it comes to his approach at the plate.

     

    Yeah, I generally think these sorts of things are a bad idea, but I'm on board.  Pay the man.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Let us not jump the gun to quickly on Sano. He only has a .255 batting average in the MLB. Even looking at his minor league numbers they really dont jump out at you.

     

    His batting average has continued to fall over the last week and his strikeouts are creeping up which is not shocking.

     

    IMO I think they simply need to wait until the offseason to see where he is at. He has proven that he is a hands down all star as of yet.

     

    How many times does teams need to be screwed over with these 6-8 year contracts? Have we not learned with Mauer?

     

    In short I believe it is a simple wait and see approach. If the guy doesnt hit below .280 or so by the end of the season I would say they should consider a 4-5 year contract and for the love of God do not give him a no trade clause.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    How many times does teams need to be screwed over with these 6-8 year contracts? Have we not learned with Mauer?

     

     

    Ummmm.... the current count is 1.

     

    Past contract should have nothing to do with what is or is not offered to Sano.

    Edited by amjgt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I say pay the man.  I would guess that 10/$350 would get it done. 

     

    C'mon.... he wouldn't even get that much if he became a free agent tomorrow. Why would we give him that with 4 cheap years still to come?

    Edited by amjgt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Let us not jump the gun to quickly on Sano. He only has a .255 batting average in the MLB. Even looking at his minor league numbers they really dont jump out at you.

    His batting average has continued to fall over the last week and his strikeouts are creeping up which is not shocking.

    IMO I think they simply need to wait until the offseason to see where he is at. He has proven that he is a hands down all star as of yet.

    How many times does teams need to be screwed over with these 6-8 year contracts? Have we not learned with Mauer?

    In short I believe it is a simple wait and see approach. If the guy doesnt hit below .280 or so by the end of the season I would say they should consider a 4-5 year contract and for the love of God do not give him a no trade clause.

     

    You realize almost no one hits .280 anymore, right?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I agree, but not because they are cheap, but because it has too much risk. 

     

    Right now the Twins are saddled with a 23M/yr below average first baseman that was (when the contract was inked) supposed to be a HOF catcher. The Twins could replace most if not all of Mauer's production internally, with someone who's pre-arbitration. 

     

    We'd hate the Twins, in 2023, to be saddled with a $35M "3 outcome" DH who could be replaced or at least mostly replaced by someone making 20% of that. 

     

    Do, I think he's going to become a 3-outcome DH? No. But anyone looking at this objectively has to realize that's a possibility. 

     

    I certainly hope Mauer doesn't make them gun shy. Catastrophic brain injuries are rare. They're even rarer when you're not a catcher.

     

    Besides, the things that made Mauer a great catcher don't translate to first base as well as the things that make Sano a good ...well whatever it is he plays. Sano's power bat earns him his bread, not an odd combo of good bat and good defense at catcher that gets significantly devalued when the catcher can't play catcher.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    You realize almost no one hits .280 anymore, right?

    Ah yes, those illusive players who hit close to .300 with 30+ home runs. I believe they are sometimes known as Mike Trouts.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I certainly hope Mauer doesn't make them gun shy. Catastrophic brain injuries are rare. They're even rarer when you're not a catcher.

     

    Besides, the things that made Mauer a great catcher don't translate to first base as well as the things that make Sano a good ...well whatever it is he plays. Sano's power bat earns him his bread, not an odd combo of good bat and good defense at catcher that gets significantly devalued when the catcher can't play catcher.

    Yeah, Mauer's contract shouldn't make them gun shy with Sano. They're very different players. Mauer's bat played well at any position but not at the level we expect from Sano. A large portion of Joe's value came from the fact that .300 average, .400 OBP, .850 OPS catchers are unicorns.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Now that we've come to the conclusion that Mauer and Sano are completely different players..........

    If people are hesitant about giving a long term contract to a 24/25 year old, I'm not sure if there's any example of a player to sign long term. 

     

    Especially one who doesn't seem to be an injury risk and whose skillset doesn't tend to drop off a cliff with some age.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I wouldn't count on it.

    ESPN's pains are from overpaying for MNF and NCAAFB.

    Baseball revenues will be fine, if some people start cutting the cord, mlb.tv subs will go up. MLB has been on top of this for a long time.

     

    No doubt. MLB is leading the way for streaming options with their games. NHL being a close second.

    NFL and NBA are light years behind in the streaming game, and the two biggest investments that ESPN has. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mauer's contract was negotiated by the guy 2 GMs ago, I can't see that causing our new guy to be gun shy. These aren't the same men.

     

    And his contract was negotiated at that time because the guy 3 GMs ago (also 1 GM ago) WAS gun shy. Mauer should have been locked up at minimum 1 year earlier than he did and plenty of forward thinking GM's would have done it much, much earlier say about where Sano is at in his career now. If there's any lesson to be learned, it's the longer you wait the more you pay. Or get nothing at all.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mauer's contract was negotiated by the guy 2 GMs ago, I can't see that causing our new guy to be gun shy. These aren't the same men.

     

    And his contract was negotiated at that time because the guy 3 GMs ago (also 1 GM ago) WAS gun shy. Mauer should have been locked up at minimum 1 year earlier than he did and plenty of forward thinking GM's would have done it much, much earlier say about where Sano is at in his career now. If there's any lesson to be learned, it's the longer you wait the more you pay. Or get nothing at all.

    Mauer was locked up at the right time originally. It just should have been for longer than 4 years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mauer was locked up at the right time originally. It just should have been for longer than 4 years.

    They did wait until after he had won a batting title. That probably gave Mauer enough leverage to force a shorter deal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After looking at Sano's stats regarding how many games he has played in both minor and major, I just dont think you can sign him to any megadeal without first seeing if he can actually play a full season and be able to justify the kind of longevity and price some of you are talking about.

     

    His sample size in the majors is to small and I say give him this season and possibly next to determine the size of the contract.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After looking at Sano's stats regarding how many games he has played in both minor and major, I just dont think you can sign him to any megadeal without first seeing if he can actually play a full season and be able to justify the kind of longevity and price some of you are talking about.

     

    His sample size in the majors is to small and I say give him this season and possibly next to determine the size of the contract.

    If you wait until after next year then Sano is already into his ARB years and probably wouldn't have as much incentive to sign a long term extension.

    The incentive to the player now is that they haven't really gotten paid yet (Aside from bonus), only making roughly 500k per year.

    I think the window for a long term deal is the next 10 months. You either get it done in that frame or probably not at all.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    C'mon.... he wouldn't even get that much if he became a free agent tomorrow. Why would we give him that with 4 cheap years still to come?

    Have you noticed the comment that he would like to be the guy to break $50 million a year.  Wait another year and any deal chance except an overpay may be off the table.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If you wait until after next year then Sano is already into his ARB years and probably wouldn't have as much incentive to sign a long term extension.

    The incentive to the player now is that they haven't really gotten paid yet (Aside from bonus), only making roughly 500k per year.

    I think the window for a long term deal is the next 10 months. You either get it done in that frame or probably not at all.

    Good point.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The time to sign him I am afraid was this last off season. It's a shame we wasted a full cheap year of him by running him out to RF 100 times.

     

    I tend to think that he may not even want to stick around on this club, I imagine that the comments about his weight, going home to the DR etc don't sit very well with him. His star power would be massive as well in a major market.

     

    If he were a Yankee, Red Sox, Dodger or Cub he would be one of the faces of baseball.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I say pay the man.  I would guess that 10/$350 would get it done.  Maybe you could get by for $300.  That would take him to age 34, but I feel anything less would not get it done.  He probably wants to win on a consistent basis and play for a coast team.  If you do not lock him up by the end of 2018, you will only be able to sign him if he does not become a mega superstar.  Less and you are gambling he wants to be here and I do not want to lose him after his age 28 season.

     

    No way he gets 10/$350 million as a first contract.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The time to sign him I am afraid was this last off season. It's a shame we wasted a full cheap year of him by running him out to RF 100 times.

    I tend to think that he may not even want to stick around on this club, I imagine that the comments about his weight, going home to the DR etc don't sit very well with him. His star power would be massive as well in a major market.

    If he were a Yankee, Red Sox, Dodger or Cub he would be one of the faces of baseball.

     

    He would get comments about his weight on any ball club.  Staying in shape is part of the game in any sport.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I certainly hope Mauer doesn't make them gun shy. Catastrophic brain injuries are rare. They're even rarer when you're not a catcher.

     

    Besides, the things that made Mauer a great catcher don't translate to first base as well as the things that make Sano a good ...well whatever it is he plays. Sano's power bat earns him his bread, not an odd combo of good bat and good defense at catcher that gets significantly devalued when the catcher can't play catcher.

     

    Catastrophic?  Comeon...  Catastrophic would be something like a brain aneurysm, stroke or TBI.  But a concussion is mild compared to many brain injuries.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    He would get comments about his weight on any ball club.  Staying in shape is part of the game in any sport.

    Yes, but most teams would keep it in house instead of having the press do their dirty work AND making public statements about it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Catastrophic?  Comeon...  Catastrophic would be something like a brain aneurysm, stroke or TBI.  But a concussion is mild compared to many brain injuries.

    Concussions lead to CTE, that is pretty traumatic. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...