Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Extend Miggy


    Jeremy Nygaard

    Now that we’ve got to see Miguel Sano play third base for the better part of a month, it’s probably fair to say that he’s going to man the hot corner for the foreseeable future (or at least until Mauer moves on). The pop-ups that plagued him last year haven’t been an issue (yet) and the barehanded plays that he seems to make on a consistent basis are starting to prove the doubters wrong.

    And he’s taking walks and hitting bombs again.

    Image courtesy of Jesse Johnson-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Pre-arbitration extensions have been pretty popular around the league. There have been eight such deals in baseball since the end of the winter meetings. Though the Twins, who have a whole nucleus of players that fit in that pre-arb category, were not one of those teams.

    That should change with Sano.

    Currently, Sano is a 1+ player, which means that he’ll be a pre-arbitration (near minimum) player again in 2018. He’ll enter his first of three arbitration years in 2019 and will first be eligible to be a free agent after the 2021 season.

    Looking specifically at deals of players with 1+ year of experience, we need to look no further to find one than the most recent extension that was signed: The Cardinals and outfielder Stephen Piscotty. The two parties entered into an agreement that will earn Piscotty $1 million in each of the 2017 and 2018 seasons. He will earn $7 million in each of his first two scheduled arbitration years and $7.25 in what would be his final arbitration year and his first free agent season. The Cardinals hold an option at $15 million for the 2023 season with a $1 million buyout. Piscotty also got a $2 million signing bonus and is three years older than Sano. The formatting of this deal - the large jump into arbitration and the small jump into free agency - is definitely unique. He also was given a $2 million signing bonus. His guarantee is $32.5 million over the six years that begin next season.

    We can look further though to see, perhaps, a better comparison: Christian Yelich of the Marlins. Yelich was 24 when he signed his deal, a year older than Sano is currently. Yelich also holds an advantage in bWAR, both career-wise and in head-to-head seasons. Any potential deal should probably follow the Yelich framework. Scheduled to receive $570,000 and $1 million in his final two pre-arb years, Yelich will get a big bump during his arbitration years, earning $3.5 million, $7 million and $9.75 million. His first two free agent years are bought out at $12 million and $14 million. Then there is a team option for $15 million with a $1.25 million buyout. All told, Yelich is guaranteed $49 million from his 2+ year through two years of free agency plus an option (seven years).

    Using those two as models, what would an offer to Sano potentially look like?

    It would be fair to assume that the bump he’ll receive in his final pre-arb year (‘18) will be $1 million. Piscotty’s deal gives a significant bump in the first year of arbitration, but not the first year of free agency, which makes Yelich’s a more believable model.

    Looking at the Twins pre-arb extensions, they’ve used even jumps from arbitration years to the next. (Span was $1.75m and Dozier was $3m.) Using $3 million as a good starting point with $3.5 million increases, Sano would make $3 million, $6.5 million and $10 million.

    The part that I will always feel the Twins screwed up with Dozier’s deal was not buying out any free agent years. The Twins can’t make that mistake with Sano.

    Though the Marlins got two years of Yelich plus an option, I’m not going to suggest the Twins do the same with Sano. Mostly because I don’t think his reps would go for it. But my contention has always been that the tradeoff of cost-certainty for the team and guaranteed money for a young player isn’t fair. There has to be an added benefit for the team. And that comes in the form of a free agent year and a team option.

    The $12 million that Yelich is getting for his first free agent year is fair and the $15 million option that the teams are getting on both players are getting is also fair. As an added bonus for Sano, the team’s buyout will be $2.5 million, increasing the guarantee.

    Here’s the breakdown:

    2018: $1 million

    2019: $3 million (would be first arbitration year)

    2020: $6.5 million

    2021: $10 million

    2022: $12 million (would be first free agent year)

    2023: $15 million or $2.5 million buyout

    Six years and $35 million.

    Would you?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    But if you are not getting a discount, then why extend? With no discount the team takes ALL the risk.
    If no discount, just sign him when he hits FA for the same price.

     

    Well, he could sign with someone else.....there is that risk.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If he's willing to sign with another team for same or less money, then why would he be open to an extension?

     

    you asked why you'd sign him to an extension if you were the Twins.......I'm not opining on anything about Dozier.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    you asked why you'd sign him to an extension if you were the Twins.......I'm not opining on anything about Dozier.

    And if he's willing to sign an extension at full price then he'd also be willing to sign as a FA at full price.

    Therefore, I don't understand how you are mitigating the risk of him leaving by offering a full price extension.

    When you approach him about a full price extension, he's either interested in staying in MN, or he's not. Approaching him about a full price extension only keeps him in the scenario where he's open to staying- so you haven't gained anything. In that scenario he's open to staying via FA as well. The scenario where he's not open to staying, you lose him whether you approach him or not.

     

    The only alternate scenario I can think of is where he was open to staying, but then gets bitter that he wasn't offered an extension so he changes his mind.

    Dozier doesn't seem like the petty, bitter type of guy, so I'd place small odds on that scenario.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    And if he's willing to sign an extension at full price then he'd also be willing to sign as a FA at full price.
    Therefore, I don't understand how you are mitigating the risk of him leaving by offering a full price extension.
    When you approach him about a full price extension, he's either interested in staying in MN, or he's not. Approaching him about a full price extension only keeps him in the scenario where he's open to staying- so you haven't gained anything. In that scenario he's open to staying via FA as well. The scenario where he's not open to staying, you lose him whether you approach him or not.

    The only alternate scenario I can think of is where he was open to staying, but then gets bitter that he wasn't offered an extension so he changes his mind.
    Dozier doesn't seem like the petty, bitter type of guy, so I'd place small odds on that scenario.

     

    You see no difference between signing him, and not signing him, on the likelihood you can sign him in the future? We'll just disagree. I don't care one way or the other if they sign him at this point, since they won't trade him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You see no difference between signing him, and not signing him, on the likelihood you can sign him in the future? We'll just disagree. I don't care one way or the other if they sign him at this point, since they won't trade him.

    I'm saying I don't see enough to justify paying full price.

    Obviously anything can happen in FA, but its pretty likely that if he was willing to sign an extension he'd also be willing to come back in FA if we match any offer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like Brian Dozier. I like him a lot. If the Twins magically spring into contention and acquire an arm without trading Brian, even better. You just keep the guy and let him walk if it helps you win baseball games and reach the postseason through 2018.

     

    But extend him? No, man.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Something to consider is that if the Twins start trading veterans like Ervin and Dozier for pitching will Sano want to sign? Will he feel that the Twins are committed to winning? He's going to get paid no matter what. But he may feel that his best chance for true greatness is to be on a perrenial contender as opposed to a perrenial also ran. Questions only he can really answer. So, I think the Twins have to either extend Sano before making those trades or sit down and talk to him about the direction of the team.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...