Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Does Joey Gallo Make Sense for the Minnesota Twins?


    Ted Schwerzler

    It’s big bat week at Twins Daily, and there’s undoubtedly no bigger bat than Joey Gallo when it comes to power potential. He had a poor 2022 season, but at just 29 years old, does a deal with the Minnesota Twins make sense?

    Image courtesy of Jayne Kamin-Oncea-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Realistically the Twins are inundated with left-handed bats in the outfield. Alex Kirilloff, Max Kepler, and Trevor Larnach all hit from that side of the plate. With Byron Buxton as the lone right-handed hitter, manager Rocco Baldelli could use more from the right side of the dish. Given what Gallo’s market could be, and the banning of the shift, it may make sense to bring him in.

    There’s been more than a few instances in which the hulking slugger has had fun at Target Field. During his All-Star Futures Game experience in Minnesota, Gallo blasted a home run through a truck window beyond the right field wall. Since then, he has hit some tape measure shots to nearly the same part of the park, including one for the New York Yankees this season.

    Primarily Gallo has played in the corner outfield, but despite his immense power, his athletic ability has been shown in centerfield as well. Gallo won Gold Gloves in both 2020 and 2021 while rating out well defensively. He may not be Buxton in center, but few people are. He can also play the designated hitter role and has handled first base plenty.

    Despite 2022 going so poorly with the Yankees, and not much better with the Dodgers, he’s only a year removed from a 121 OPS+. Despite the goofy statistics we saw during the pandemic-shortened 2020, Gallo actually performed much better in 2019. His 145 OPS+ was a career-high and marked a run of three straight seasons in which he was above league average.

    There were more than a few times last year when Baldelli’s lineup stalled out. Despite boasting plenty of internally developed hitters, and names such as Carlos Correa and Gary Sanchez, far too often runs were hard to come by. Manufacturing runs wasn’t something Minnesota was good at a year ago, and they doubled down on the poor showing by failing to hit many home runs either.

    For the first time in his career, Gallo will face defenses that are unable to shift him as they have. He may see all three outfielders play on the right side of center field, but the infielders will need to remain in their given positions. For a guy with a strong launch angle and hard-hit rate, he could see additional hits dropping in, and raise his overall numbers to places we haven’t yet seen.

    What Gallo’s market looks like will be interesting. He made just over $10 million last season, and despite coming off the down year, someone will certainly see an opportunity for a fresh start. The massive power potential is there, and the plate discipline isn’t bad either.

    What do you think? Would you take a shot on the former All-Star?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    One thing most are forgetting is that Gallo is a very good outfielder with a very good arm. However, I would not want to add him to what we have already. We are probably saying good-bye to Sano though he could be a decent DH and bats from the right side. Then, as others have said, we are loaded with left handed batters. While I would vote "no" with our current roster, if we made changes by trading some of the lefty batters (which I would not do), then Gallo might be worth taking with a cheap contract. But there are other fish out there.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, Riverbrian said:

    I'm trying to understand the logic in this discussion. 

    If we trade Kepler with a career .232 BA and 1 year left at 8.5M on his contract before a club option at 10m. 

    We could acquire Joey Gallo with a .199 BA for a 1 year deal at 10M to replace him. 

    We hope that Kepler will benefit from the banning of the shift, while we believe that Gallo could benefit from the banning of the shift. 

    It's been my experience in life that treading water doesn't get you very far. 

    One other thing... I've seen a lot of comments about a potential Kepler trade. I assume this sentiment comes from his performance the past two years. If he performed well, we wouldn't be talking about a potential trade. 

    So to recap:

    We have lots of folks that want to trade Kepler.

    We also have lots of folks that list Kepler as our 2023 RF and 2nd best outfielder. 

    And... And... We have lots of folks who say OF is not a top priority. ?

     

     

    I don't think Gallo makes sense unless somehow cheaper than 8 million.  That said, one could argue that they would prefer a strikeout with more power potential over a grounder to 2nd base.  Gallo also might have a higher ceiling than Kepler at this point.  I think the argument for Gallo is also under the assumption trading Kepler brings back a player of need...backup SS, RH OF, backup C, RP... (Which remains to be seen.)  Gallo would provide better defense than our current non-Kepler corner OF players.

    But like you said, this seems like treading water in many ways.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, TwinsAce said:

    I don't think Gallo makes sense unless somehow cheaper than 8 million.  That said, one could argue that they would prefer a strikeout with more power potential over a grounder to 2nd base.  Gallo also might have a higher ceiling than Kepler at this point.  I think the argument for Gallo is also under the assumption trading Kepler brings back a player of need...backup SS, RH OF, backup C, RP... (Which remains to be seen.)  Gallo would provide better defense than our current non-Kepler corner OF players.

    But like you said, this seems like treading water in many ways.

    Maybe I'll be surprised but I can't see Kepler bringing back anything in a trade. 

    Lets be honest... I assume the reason there are so many comments from TD faithful about the possibility of trading Kepler is because he hasn't been good.

    If he had been good, the TD Faithful wouldn't be thinking about trading Kepler. 

    If he hasn't been good... Why would a team give up any value for him? 

    The only sensible course of action with Kepler is to hope and pray that the shift rule changes are a tremendous help to him. Give him one of the last roster spots and let him earn playing time back by showing that he can be productive without the shift. He is going to cost us 8 million this year regardless, let's see if he can build that value back... but whatever you do... do not walk into 2023 with Kepler listed as a starter and think it's covered.    

    Gallo might spring back into something of value. He might not. He can hit the ball long way and defend his position but we need a corner outfielder that isn't Kepler or Gallo... We need a corner bat that is way better then both of them. We need a corner bat that is a better hitter than Polanco is. Better than Miranda.     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...