Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Can Hector Santiago Elevate and Dominate?


    Tom Froemming

    Hector Santiago is a fascinating pitcher in that he defies all the advanced metrics. Taking into account all the best ERA predictors, it makes no sense that from 2012-15 he managed a 3.84 ERA, which is identical to Jon Lester's mark over that same span.

    A big part of what made the difference for Santiago was that he was as tough as nails when pitching with runners in scoring position. His performance with runners on slipped last season, along with the majority of his other stats.

    The sabermetric community appears to have taken the stance that Hector's luck finally ran out, but is it that simple? Does he not get any benefit of the doubt for being a solid starter for over 500 innings prior to last season?

    Image courtesy of Gary A Vasquez, USA Today

    Twins Video

    First impressions are important, but everyone deserves a second chance. Santiago got off to an absolutely rotten start with the Twins, but he ended the season pitching well, and there’s reason to believe he could in line for a bounce-back year.

    Over his final seven starts of 2016, Santiago posted a 3.19 ERA and 1.23 WHIP while limiting hitters to a .207/.294/.389 line. He also may stand to benefit from recent changes in hitting philosophy. Santiago may be the perfect antidote to the "elevate and celebrate" trend so many hitters seem to have (justifiably) gotten behind.

    Jeff Sullivan of FanGraphs recently wrote a piece about how pitchers could adjust to that trend. I don't want to give away the whole article (it's well worth your time), but in it Sullivan makes a pretty significant discovery: Homer rates are trending up, but only on pitches in the lower and middle third of the zone. The takeaway?

    "... conventional wisdom has said the best way to avoid a home run is to pitch down. In truth, at least now, it’s probably to pitch up. High fastballs are associated with homers, but they should really be associated with pop-ups and empty whiffs."

    It just so happens Santiago’s fastball is pretty nasty up in the zone. His career swinging strike percentage is 8.1%, but that number skyrockets on heaters in the upper third of the strike zone, according to data from BrooksBaseball.

    ccs-19-0-61782000-1490320604.jpg

    To put that into perspective, neither Clayton Kershaw nor Stephen Strasburg have a single spot on the grid where their fastballs have a whiff rate of 20 percent, let alone three. Taking a look at the zone profile of slugging percentage against Santiago over his career, you can see even more evidence that staying up in the zone may be advantageous.

    ccs-19-0-93919900-1490320546.png

    With a defense led by Byron “Death To Flying Things” Buxton, the Twins are expected to be above average in the outfield. The infield? Not so much, particularly on the left side. Toss in the fact that BABIP is much higher on ground balls than fly balls and it seems to make a lot of sense for Santiago to try to continue his extreme fly ball ways. He led all qualified pitchers with a 50 percent fly ball rate last season.

    The Castro bump

    You can’t talk about Twins pitching these days without dropping the F Word: Framing. What did you think I was gonna say?

    With the arrival of pitch-presenting guru Jason Castro, the hope is the entire Twins staff will take a step forward, but it seems nobody wants to divvy out any of that hope to Hector. Well, Castro's strengths should actually be particularly well-suited to benefit Santiago. Here's a look at Santiago’s called strike percentage against right-handed hitters from FanGraphs:

    ccs-19-0-33687000-1490318528_thumb.jpg

    It's very difficult for lefty pitchers to get that up and away corner called as a strike against right-handed batters, but if anybody's going to help it's Jason Castro. Parker Hageman recently wrote an excellent piece on Castro's framing, er ... proper receiving. In that article, was this graphic showing where Castro excelled in getting strikes called:

    ccs-19-0-36138400-1490318473_thumb.jpg

    Castro is a wizard at getting outside strikes called on right-handed batters. Dallas Keuchel, a lefty who has thrown primarily to Castro over his career, gets that high and outside pitch to right-handers called strike called 61 percent of the time. Even a small improvement for Santiago up from 54 percent could go a long way toward him becoming a more effective pitcher.

    There's also evidence that Santiago has benefited from working with other good pitch framers in the past. Here is a breakdown of all the catchers he’s pitched to for at least 50 innings, sorted by ERA:

    A.J. Pierzynski: 2.84 ERA, .639 OPS

    Geovany Soto: 3.00 ERA, .653 OPS

    Tyler Flowers: 3.41 ERA, .692 OPS

    Hank Conger: 3.47 ERA, .660 OPS

    Chris Iannetta: 3.74 ERA, .727 OPS

    Carlos Perez: 4.26 ERA, .766 OPS

    The only one of those guys who rated out as a below-average framer during his time as a teammate of Santiago’s, according to StatCorner, is Perez (-6.6 RAA over last two seasons). Santiago had the least amount of success working with Perez. Hmm ...

    Infield flys rule

    Another part of the “secret sauce” that has made Santiago a deceptively good pitcher his his ability to induce popups. Santiago ranked ninth among qualified pitchers with a 13.5 IFFB percentage last season. If a pitcher can get a high percentage of strikeouts and infield fly balls, good things are going to happen. Here's a look at how Twins pitchers have fared in those categories over the past five seasons:

    Santiago: 20.5 K% + 12.1 IFFB% = 32.6

    Hughes: 18.6 + 11.5 = 30.1

    Santana: 19.3 + 9.5 = 28.8

    Gibson: 15.6 + 10.0 = 25.6

    What about the WBC?

    Santiago has been away from the team, pitching in a long relief role for Puerto Rico, but it would appear he's still in good shape to be ready for the regular season. Here's a summary of all his appearances this spring:

    Feb. 28: 12 pitches

    March 5: 24 pitches

    March 11: 42 pitches

    March 14: 52 pitches

    March 20: 63 pitches

    Santiago is scheduled to start for the Twins Sunday. I’d imagine he can crank it up to 80 or so pitches in that start before flirting with 100 in his final warmup game of the spring. Having pitchers in the WBC isn't ideal, but Hector looks like should be ready to go. Plus, I imagine he may have learned a thing or two working with Yadier Molina the past few weeks, so maybe that time away from the team turns out to be beneficial.

    So, he’s Cy Santiago?

    I’d love to wrap this up by making some bold prediction that Hector is going to be the ace of the staff and lead the Twins rotation back to respectability, but that’s probably not going to happen. Santiago’s command is spotty, his strikeout rate dropped to a career low last season and you can expect him to still give up his share of walks and home runs.

    But can we be optimistic about Santiago delivering a solid season? Something in line with his career averages prior to last year? I think so, yet most Twins fans are trying to find ways to run him out of town.

    There’s a reason Hector has made it this far. When he was drafted in the 30th round, he threw a fastball and … nope, that’s it. One pitch. Over time, he evolved a diverse enough pitch mix to become an effective major league starter.

    He’s been making adjustments his entire career. It seems unwise to count him out now, especially if you have any faith in Derek Falvey’s ability to foster a pitching staff. Santiago is also hitting free agency for the first time at the end of the year, so there’s all the incentive in the world for him to spin out a good season.

    Hector Santiago’s time with the Minnesota Twins didn’t get off on the right foot, but he deserves another chance.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Well Hughes is a righty. And that'll play better at TF, as it suppresses left handed hitters' power.

    And Hughes is coming from a park that inflates LH power (New Yankees Stadium) vs Santiago who is coming from a park that suppresses RH home runs. Edited by Willihammer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    He'll get away with 19 pitches up there then on the 20th one is cranked for a double. "That's why you gotta keep the ball down!"

    Immediately followed by "he just dropped the head of the bat...."  on a pitch low in the strike zone that got launched into the 2nd deck.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't have the link, but I have the SI (2017 MLB Preview) in front of me. Here's what "a rival scout" wrote:

     

    "They [Twins] gave Jason Castro a lot of money to be their front-line guy. They had a good defensive catcher in Kurt Suzuki and let him walk. I would rather have Suzuki than Castro..."

     

     

    Same scout said: Twins should have definitely moved Dozier (but doesn't say for what or whom); Sano is not good at third; Buxton needs to bunt; and - while admitting Rosario and Kepler both have strong arms - neither are offensive players, which is what teams need from their corner outfielders. 

     

    Ha, please let that be a scout for the White Sox!

     

    It's a real shame that rival scout's team couldn't muster $1.5M to match the Braves offer to gain the rights to Kurt Suzuki.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm buying into Santiago being an effective, dare I say, above average starter for this team. If they don't tweak his mechanics too much, and let him pitch "effectively wild" I think he can outperform his FIP once again.

     

    I guess it depends on how bad his FIP is.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I guess Twins Daily readers didn't get the memo about spring being the optimist season in regard to baseball. 

     

    Nice article my friend, a well-researched counter narrative, deserving of praise for using stats as a form of jujitsu against the conformity of saber-geeks.  

     

    I could literally hear thuds from heads hitting basement cielings as I drove through the northern suburbs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Same scout said: Twins should have definitely moved Dozier (but doesn't say for what or whom); Sano is not good at third; Buxton needs to bunt; and - while admitting Rosario and Kepler both have strong arms - neither are offensive players, which is what teams need from their corner outfielders. 

     

    This scout lost me at Buxton needs to bunt. #NeverBunt

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Ha, please let that be a scout for the White Sox!

     

    It's a real shame that rival scout's team couldn't muster $1.5M to match the Braves offer to gain the rights to Kurt Suzuki.

    Maybe the rival scout works for the Braves... They're seemingly the only ones to believe strongly enough in Suzuki to go and get him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Buxton should definitely bunt... if defenses give him the bunt for a base hit.

     

    That applies to almost everyone in baseball.

     

    A player should rarely step to the plate with a bunt in mind, though.

    I disagree with the word "rarely." Maybe "infrequently." would be better.

     

    i know most players don't think bunt, but in some cases it can be a very effective tool. If the corner infielders are playing back to avoid the extra-base hit, depending on who's following, a bunt for a base hit down the line could be very effective.

     

    The best true hitters IMHO make use of at least the threat of a bunt, so as to draw corner infielders in so they can hit hit the ball over their head. It's all about using the whole field – not only horizontally, but distance-wise as well.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I disagree with the word "rarely." Maybe "infrequently." would be better.

     

    i know most players don't think bunt, but in some cases it can be a very effective tool. If the corner infielders are playing back to avoid the extra-base hit, depending on who's following, a bunt for a base hit down the line could be very effective.

     

    The best true hitters IMHO make use of at least the threat of a bunt, so as to draw corner infielders in so they can hit hit the ball over their head. It's all about using the whole field – not only horizontally, but distance-wise as well.

     

    IMO, the best true hitters hit the ball hard, with elevation, and aren't worried about faking the bunt. Or even trying one.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    IMO, the best true hitters hit the ball hard, with elevation, and aren't worried about faking the bunt. Or even trying one.

    I think someone with Buxton's speed should bunt occasionally just to keep the fielders honest, playing in a few steps to guard against that 'occasional bunt.

     

    Another reason to bunt would be so that the player knows how to do it when they're asked to move a runner over, they're not thinking 'when was the last time I bunted' or 'how do I do this'??

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    He'll get away with 19 pitches up there then on the 20th one is cranked for a double. "That's why you gotta keep the ball down!"

    True... But have you ever tried to hit a high fastball (above the hands or letters)?   It usually doesn't end well.   Yes, number 20 will usually get hit on the screws, but that is more likely because the pitch comes in lower around the belt than because the hitter has learned to tomahawk a high one.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This scout lost me at Buxton needs to bunt. #NeverBunt

    Lost me at "They had a good defensive catcher in Kurt Suzuki and let him walk"  and just read the rest for laughs.  I don't think there's a cool hashtag for that, though.  

     

    My son is a senior in HS and is probably the best bunter on the team and is one of the two fasted kids.  He didn't get either of those from me - I coached kids baseball for about 12 years (3 sons) and I never gave the bunt sign in all that time.  We practiced it some, but it as never a priority.  I also had more of a Hrbek build, with wheels to match, so speed genes cam from mom.

     

    I will say bunting came in handy for my son earlier this year.  He hurt his back swinging a bat and missed a couple of games.  His first game back he could do everything but swing, so the coach had him play the field and used the DH for him. (In HS, the DH can hit for any position.)  In the 4th inning, the DH got on and coach sent my son in to run (DH now gone). (The next batter hit a  line drive with my son running - easy DP)

       We got to the bottom of the 7th (7 inning game) down 9-2 against a team we should beat. My son leads off with a bunt hit and comes around to score.  A couple of batters later, they change pitcher to a guy who throws BP.  My son gets up again with the tying run on 2nd and tells the coach he was going to try to swing. The 3B was in expecting a bunt, but he was able to slap a roller past him that the SS just got to.  The throw was late and shorthopped the 1B, so the runner from 2nd kept going and just beat the throw to the plate.  My son steals second, then steals third.  The throw to third bounced and deflected away.  The SS got to it pretty quickly, so there was a play at the plate, but my son beat throw - game over. 

       The coach afterwards told the team "You screwed up my post-game speech with that comeback, but I'm going to give it anyway because you never should have been down 9-2 to those guys."  It was still worth sitting through the first 6-1/2 innings to get to that

     

    I still want to get the coach one of the t-shirts I saw on the #neverbunt feed: 

    Make America Rake Again

    #NeverBunt

     

    (He likes to give away outs.)

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think someone with Buxton's speed should bunt occasionally just to keep the fielders honest, playing in a few steps to guard against that 'occasional bunt.

     

    Another reason to bunt would be so that the player knows how to do it when they're asked to move a runner over, they're not thinking 'when was the last time I bunted' or 'how do I do this'??

    Good hitters shouldn't be moving runners over, ever.

    If Buxton is such a crappy hitter that he's being asked to move runners over, then we have bigger problems than his bunting ability.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Maybe Santiago is ahead of the curve.

     

    There was another good article in the Times about how Tampa Bay pitchers work high in the strike zone.

     

    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/24/sports/baseball/tampa-bay-rays-pitching.html

    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/tampa-bays-cult-of-the-high-fastball/

     

    There is a certain logic to it. As more batters go with the upper cut swing, the high heater gets harder to reach."Mike Trout can hit a shin-high fastball 450 feet."

     

    Check it out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...