Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • A Letter to MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred


    Cody Christie

    Major League Baseball and its owners officially locked out the MLB Players Union. MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred wrote a letter to baseball fans, and here is my response. 

     

    Image courtesy of Shanna Lockwood, USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    To the Commissioner:

    I first want to ask you why you don’t support the great game of baseball. In this past season, some of the greatest moments in the history of the sport took place. However, there continues to be a long list of issues tied to your time as commissioner. Fans understand that not all commissioners will be loved, but your actions have impacted a generation of fans, and it may be tough to bring these former fans back into the fold. 

    Fans list of grievances against the owners and yourself is long. During the unprecedented 2020 season, the owners and your office tried to paint the players as greedy and unwilling to sacrifice enough during a global pandemic. Baseball was lucky to get through the 2020 campaign, but plenty of teams and players were impacted along the way. 

    As reported in the Washington Post, “The minute it became apparent this season was going to have to be played in empty stadiums, Manfred and the owners began moaning about their losses, even though the game has never been healthier financially than in recent seasons. New contracts with regional television networks have lined the owners’ pockets, and attendance has been strong.”

    Another grievance fans have against your leadership is tied to the Houston Astros cheating scandal. Multiple managers and a general manager were fired in response to the allegations, but how much did they have to do with the scandal? None of the players involved in the scandal were suspended, and two of the three managers were back in baseball after missing a shortened 2020 campaign.

    In your letter to fans, you touted the $1.7 million spent on the “broken” free agent system during November. Guess what? Players were willing to strike these deals because of the looming lockout. It’s a fundamental human need to want to know where your family will live and how much income a person can expect. Players want security and to know what the future holds.

    Also, you said, “By the end of the offseason, Clubs will have committed more money to players than in any offseason in MLB history.” While that may sound good on paper, this shouldn’t be breaking news. Increasing revenues across baseball should allow teams to spend more money. Every offseason should see a new record amount of money being committed to players. 

    Your list of concessions to the players includes some ideas that will fundamentally make the game stronger. There should be a minimum payroll. Teams shouldn’t be able to engage in service time manipulation. Young players should be paid more, including those in the minor leagues. Fans want a universal DH. A new draft system can help to stop teams from trying to be competitive. All of these changes would make baseball more competitive, not less.

    There is one thing we can agree on; baseball can not afford to cancel games. Baseball’s popularity continues to decline, and losing any part of the 2022 season will push fans further away from this great game. As you referenced regarding the 1994 season, “We owe you, our fans, better than that.”

    Today is a difficult day for baseball fans. You have made questionable leadership decisions throughout your time as commissioner. What is baseball fans’ biggest problem with you? You don’t appear to be a fan of the game.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, chpettit19 said:

    The MiLB players are not part of the union and their salaries cannot be negotiated. That is the entire point here. You're taking away the 1 piece of minor league pay that the MLBPA can influence, the singing bonus system. You've also suggested never giving up the 6th year of team control which is another way the owners get away with paying young players very little (compared to their older peers). 

    There's no point in discussing what the minor league pay (beyond the bonus money) should look like coming out of this CBA because this CBA cannot, and will not, have anything in it about MiLB pay. It simply won't. Bonus pool money can be negotiated because it's part of the MLB draft before the players are assigned to minor league teams where the MLBPA no longer has say in what they're paid. It's that simple. The MLBPA simply cannot negotiate a deal that forces the owners to pay minor leaguers better salaries. It's impossible. They can't do it. So at that point you're taking away large bonuses and hoping the owners will pay better for no reason at all other than they're good hearted people who want to pay players what they're worth. And I don't think anyone disagree that that is not how the owners work.

     

    I understand where you are coming from.  That said ... What would stop the two sides from agreeing to form a contract outside the CBA stating  that IF the league instituted a salary structure of X, they would agree to the bonus structure I suggested.  It is their legal right to enter into such a contract, is it not?  They don't have to represent Milb players in order to make a contract.  Who would challenge such an agreement?

    Perhaps a different question is more pertinent.  If these two parties are responsible for negotiating a bonus structure, why can't they negotiate a pay increase?  I am not a lawyer.  I am asking what would prohibit such a pact?  Who would object? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    I understand where you are coming from.  That said ... What would stop the two sides from agreeing to form a contract outside the CBA stating  that IF the league instituted a salary structure of X, they would agree to the bonus structure I suggested.  It is their legal right to enter into such a contract, is it not?  They don't have to represent Milb players in order to make a contract.  Who would challenge such an agreement?

    Perhaps a different question is more pertinent.  If these two parties are responsible for negotiating a bonus structure, why can't they negotiate a pay increase?  I am not a lawyer.  I am asking what would prohibit such a pact?  Who would object? 

    It doesn't need to be a contract.  The two sides could agree to one, reduce the bonus structure as part of the agreement; provided the owner's unilaterally increase minor league salaries by X, Y and Z at the various levels.  Yes, the owner's could later change back, but there has to be some good faith or we ain't gonna see baseball for a long time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, roger said:

    It doesn't need to be a contract.  The two sides could agree to one, reduce the bonus structure as part of the agreement; provided the owner's unilaterally increase minor league salaries by X, Y and Z at the various levels.  Yes, the owner's could later change back, but there has to be some good faith or we ain't gonna see baseball for a long time.

    I agree.  If the agreement was made it would become very public and the league would not go back on it.  However, what I am floating here is what would prevent a contractual setting of salary levels as you stated?  If they wanted to include that the teams all give X dollars to charity, they could do that, right?  So, why can't they contractually agree to reduce bonuses while increasing Milb salaries by $200M or whatever number is agreed upon?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...