Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • 4 Stories To Watch At The Winter Meetings


    Nick Nelson

    With Christmas only two weeks away, the Hot Stove has yet to heat up for Major League Baseball. But that's about to change.

    Two situations that have been holding up the offseason landscape – Shohei Ohtani and Giancarlo Stanton – have finally been resolved, and with the Winter Meetings set to get underway this week, the floodgates are going to open.

    Here are four (potentially) Twins-related storylines to track as the action unfolds.

    Image courtesy of Gary A. Vaquez, USA Today (Yu Darvish)

    Twins Video

    1) Darvish Market Heats Up

    In late November, Jim Bowden reported that there were six teams legitimately "in" on free agent starter Yu Darvish. It's reasonable to believe the Twins are one of those teams. Thad Levine, who has ties to the right-hander from his days in Texas, has called Darvish a priority.

    The 31-year-old makes plenty of sense as a fit for Minnesota. He'd fulfill their need for a frontline starter, and as one of the game's best strikeout pitchers, he aligns with the organization's growing emphasis on missing bats. But can the Twins swing it financially?

    Signing Darvish will likely require an investment roughly three times larger than the one Terry Ryan made in Ervin Santana, who became the franchise's biggest free agent splurge ever ($54 million) three years ago. But it's not like such commitments are unprecedented for the Twins; they did pony up $184 million to lock up Joe Mauer one year ahead of his free agency, and that contract is on the verge of expiring.

    The problem is that even if Levine is prepared to come to the table as a serious bidder, he'll face stiff competition for arguably the most coveted free agent on the market. However, it is worth noting that a few of the big-market heavy hitters seem limited or less urgent in their pursuit.

    The Yankees would be hard-pressed to go all in on Darvish after taking on Stanton's $250 million contract. The Dodgers must save up with an eye on re-signing Clayton Kershaw, who can opt out of his deal after next year. The Cubs appear to be focusing their attention on another free agent starter, Alex Cobb.

    2) Rays Trade Talks

    Speaking of Cobb, Tampa doesn't appear to have any intention of trying to bring him back, and in fact, it sounds like a bit of a fire sale might be in the works. Bob Nightengale of USA Today wrote the following: "The Rays, who have seen the disparity grow even greater in the AL East with Stanton coming aboard, are listening to anyone and everyone."

    It was reported earlier this offseason that the Twins had discussed Jake Odorizzi with the Rays, and plenty of other intriguing names could be in play. Their closer Alex Colome led the American League in saves this season and has three years remaining of team control.

    And of course, their ace Chris Archer would be the prize of all prizes. Can Levine muster an offer to make that happen?

    If it means giving up four of the team's top ten prospects, should he?

    3) Cole in the Stocking?

    Another noteworthy trade target is Pittsburgh's Gerrit Cole. The Twins have reportedly shown interest in the righty, who could conceivably slot ahead of Santana as Minnesota's No. 1 starter. He's two years away from free agency and in his prime at age 27. Because of these facts, Cole won't come cheaply, but he's more realistic than Archer.

    4) Rule 5 Rumblings

    The Rule 5 draft will take place on Thursday morning, giving teams around the league an opportunity to poach unprotected players from other organizations. The Twins have a few prospects who are candidates to get taken (I have a suspicion someone's going to grab Nick Burdi and stash him on the DL while he rehabs from Tommy John Surgery), but they also have flexibility to acquire someone, with four open spots on the 40-man roster.

    J.J. Cooper of Baseball America listed his top five Rule 5 candidates and, unsurprisingly, the first three are relief pitchers. Burch Smith, Mason McCullough and Cale Coshow all have big fastballs, and could be impact additions.

    It also bears noting that Justin Haley, Minnesota's Rule 5 pick from a year ago, is once again available. He pitched very well at Pawtucket after being returned to the Red Sox organization this past summer, posting a 2.66 ERA and 0.96 WHIP in seven starts.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    My question for many of the folks who say Gonsalves only has 4-5 range "stuff and potential"... have any of you seen him pitch or looked at his track record through the minors?   There is a reason that he's one of the top rated LH starting prospects by MLB.   I'm not saying he (or Romero) are untouchable, but... seriously??   He has potential, the kind you don't lightly give away. 

     

    I get the whole shiny, new toy syndrome or the allure of selling your cow for some "magic" beans, I do (I also really despise the Yankees and the SEC/Alabama... but that's another story and rant), but at a certain times you have to stand back and trust some of the cards you have in your hand.

     

    Aren't minor leaguers really the magic beans, and veterans the cow here? Hardly any minor league players make a serious contribution in the majors. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My question for many of the folks who say Gonsalves only has 4-5 range "stuff and potential"... have any of you seen him pitch or looked at his track record through the minors? There is a reason that he's one of the top rated LH starting prospects by MLB. I'm not saying he (or Romero) are untouchable, but... seriously?? He has potential, the kind you don't lightly give away.

     

    I get the whole shiny, new toy syndrome or the allure of selling your cow for some "magic" beans, I do (I also really despise the Yankees and the SEC/Alabama... but that's another story and rant), but at a certain times you have to stand back and trust some of the cards you have in your hand.

    I'm always a guy who loves the prospects and wants to hoard them (but not now, I want to cash in for the big prizes) and I've been thrilled with Gonsalves' development, but for a guy who is supposed to be polished and have good control, he throws so many pitches. In the minors he can get guys to chase off the plate, in the majors he can't count on that. Berrios did that too, it took a demotion and some re-tooling then he came back up, attacked the zone and did well.

     

    However, Berrios has great stuff and can still miss bats while throwing within the zone, Gonsalves doesn't have have the same stuff, I think it's pretty unlikely he finds himself at the top of the rotation.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I just can't see why the heck you would trade Gonsalves or Romero for another pitcher. Seems dumb to trade one of your 2 best pitchers in the Organization for someone that's had more success in MLB, but is older. And that's not counting any other players it'd take to aquire said player.

    I'd likely part with Gonsalves as the key piece to get Cole. Gonsalves will likely take lumps in the majors, and you have to factor that into his major league readiness part. He probably wont' be a significant contributor to this team in 2018. Cole likely would.

     

    I'd trade them both for Archer (though I'd rather sub Gordon in for one of them), and I suspect that this is where those talks would start. Archer has 4 years of affordable control and he's pitched VERY well. You're likely sending both Gonsalves and Romero to TB along with a higher ceiling lotto ticket or two in the low minors.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We have to be realistic about what kind of pitchers Gonsalves and Romero are. Both Archer and Cole have already reached a higher level than Gonsalves has a ceiling.

    This is the kind of unsubstantiated opinion that makes me roll my eyes (no offense).

     

    At age 24, in 2013, Chris Archer was the 44th rated minor league prospect, after a 2012 3.8 ERA at AAA, with around 9.5K/9

     

    Nobody would've said that 2013 Chris Archer's ceiling was actual Chris Archer's performance

     

    Pitching is fickle.

     

    I think talking about pitchers' ceilings is silly. There are too many examples every year of "WTF" to convince me that modern analytics have a great handle on pitchers. At the end of the day, results matter. Certain previous results can indicate likelihood of future success, but ceilings of successful minor league pitchers still seem more art than science.

     

    Having said all that, I have NO PROBLEM trading either of those minor leaguers for Cole or Archer

    Edited by amjgt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I hope they're in on Darvish, but won't be heartbroken if they're not. Lots of money and years for a 31-year-old with some past arm issues. I'd love him to be here, but something about him makes me a bit uneasy.

     

    I'd really like them to chase Cobb, but the Cubs' interest probably drives the cost up above where it belongs. And, even if the Twins are able to offer apples to apples in terms of years and dollars, the Cubs are probably a bit closer to winning again. I imagine if all other things are equal, that might be a pretty good tie-breaker.

     

    The prospect haul required for Archer might be a bit hard to swallow. Honestly, I think I'd prefer Cole to Archer - 2 years younger, comparable (if not better) career numbers, same number of years before FA, and likely a bit more reasonable in cost to acquire.

     

    I have zero interest in another Rule 5 pick-up. They have enough young guys of their own that could be treated as an in-house Rule 5 guy. Sign a veteran or two and let the young guys battle it out. Maybe look at a guy or two that's available and if they're not selected, trade for them. 

    Archer will be expensive in terms of prospects, but he's got four years left on his contract; $6.5 mill next year and options for just $9 million and $11 million in 2020 and 21. That's almost cheap in terms of salary; over 4 years you spend about half of what you would for two years of Darvish. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Archer will be expensive in terms of prospects, but he's got four years left on his contract; $6.5 mill next year and options for just $9 million and $11 million in 2020 and 21. That's almost cheap in terms of salary; over 4 years you spend about half of what you would for two years of Darvish.

    Yeah... I wonder if the FO earmarked $60M that we saved (over 4 years) by trading for Archer instead of signing Darvish, what they could do. It could be used for literally whatever they deemed necessary to build back the farm system assets that were used to get Archer.

     

    Basically they'd be buying comp picks, and Intl FA money, and have a full willingness to take on contracts with 1-2 year left, from teams like Miami who are begging to shed payroll.

     

    How much does a Comp A pick "cost"

     

    How much does $2M in Intl FA pool "cost"

     

    If we literally had $60M to play with could we end up with 5 comp A/B picks?

     

    How big of a Draft pool salary cap could one team amass?

     

    Nobody has tested those waters. Why not be the first?

    Edited by amjgt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It was pretty underwhelming what they did last year when they had the number one Rule 5 pick, I don't expect much this year as far as gains for the Twins.

     

    If they lose Burdi, I think that will hurt them in the long run, he has too much potential.

    Agreed. They completely screwed up the Rule 5 draft last year when they were picking first. Don't bother this year.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For only 2 years of Gerrtt Cole?  I understand the dire need for pitching we have, but it would be Cole for two years and then he's gone.

     

    Two questions: 

    Do we really think we have a window now?

    What do we think we have in Gordon?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    yeah, that's not a terrible offer at all. Gordon and Jay are likely MLBers with some upside. Granite is more of a role guy. Only real issue is that this doesn't solve our 40 man issues with too many pitchers. Actually, it makes them worse. Wonder if they would take a guy like Jorge over Jay (unless they plan on making Jay a starter).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    For only 2 years of Gerrtt Cole?  I understand the dire need for pitching we have, but it would be Cole for two years and then he's gone.

     

    Two questions: 

    Do we really think we have a window now?

    What do we think we have in Gordon?

     

    That window sure looks nicer with a guy like Cole in the rotation.

     

    You want my honest opinion of Gordon. Average to slightly above defense with a modestly above average bat. That's a nice asset at SS. I think he can have several .750-.850 OPS type seasons as he hits his prime while playing good enough defense to stick at short. That's a nice piece. He wont' get there in season one, but he should get there. Do you think that is too much to ask? 2 years of a good, above average pitcher, for a two potential above average pieces in a 4th OF.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Apparently Pirates will trade Cole for the following:

     

    https://twitter.com/pbcbreakdown/status/940390540998250497

     

    I wish we could substitute in Jorge for Jay . . . but, that's probably not realistic. Seriously have to consider doing this, if it is the offer.

    That seems like a fair price for a pitcher to slot in at the top of the rotation. Edited by AlwaysinModeration
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On the possibility of the Twins signing Yu Darvish, every post or article I read mentions the "ties" that he has to Thad Levine from his days in Texas. But how much of a factor is that really? Just because Levine was in the front office at the same time, does that really signify some sort of strong relationship he had with Darvish? I mean, were they golfing buddies, going out for sushi together, swapping wives or something else that might have created a strong bond? Otherwise, it doesn't seem to me that such a tenuous "link" will play any part in Darvish deciding to sign with the Twins or not. Any thoughts?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Apparently Pirates will trade Cole for the following: 

     

     

    I wish we could substitute in Jorge for Jay . . . but, that's probably not realistic. Seriously have to consider doing this, if it is the offer.

     

    If that's serious I'd like the think the Twins have already gotten confirmation that Chris Archer won't be traded because I can't see the Twins winning that sweepstakes without Gordon.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On the possibility of the Twins signing Yu Darvish, every post or article I read mentions the "ties" that he has to Thad Levine from his days in Texas. But how much of a factor is that really? Just because Levine was in the front office at the same time, does that really signify some sort of strong relationship he had with Darvish? I mean, were they golfing buddies, going out for sushi together, swapping wives or something else that might have created a strong bond? Otherwise, it doesn't seem to me that such a tenuous "link" will play any part in Darvish deciding to sign with the Twins or not. Any thoughts?

    Most of the time, I think that's just an easy crutch by a writer.

     

    But, I have to think that some percentage of the time it is true. Maybe one of Levine's main tasks was coordination with Japanese media. Maybe, in the same way that the MN Twins FO splits other MLB teams and player agents roughly evenly between Falvey, Levine, and Antony, Texas did the same thing and Levine has Darvish's agent.

    Edited by amjgt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    For only 2 years of Gerrtt Cole?  I understand the dire need for pitching we have, but it would be Cole for two years and then he's gone.

     

    Two questions: 

    Do we really think we have a window now?

    What do we think we have in Gordon?

     

    Question 1 - I think the odds makers have answered this question or we could ask ourselves what we need to add to be competitive with Cleveland first and foremost because you don't go all in for a chance to get to a 50% chance of getting to a playoff series.  Then, we need to consider what we would need to be competitive with Houston, NY, and Boston.  If we are honest, we could gut our farm system and max out our payroll and bot get there unless a few of the players we already have make big steps forward.

     

    Cole does nothing to position us for a playoff run so why give up inexpensive long-term assets for Cole?

     

    Question 2 - I don't really know but if we are to let him go it should be part of a package for a player that enables us to better compete in the playoffs.   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That window sure looks nicer with a guy like Cole in the rotation.

     

    You want my honest opinion of Gordon. Average to slightly above defense with a modestly above average bat. That's a nice asset at SS. I think he can have several .750-.850 OPS type seasons as he hits his prime while playing good enough defense to stick at short. That's a nice piece. He wont' get there in season one, but he should get there. Do you think that is too much to ask? 2 years of a good, above average pitcher, for a two potential above average pieces in a 4th OF.

    Not sure how I feel. I know I have never been high on Gordon (I hated it when we drafted him as high as we did and nothing has changed my mind) and it seems everytime I express my doubts about him, I am getting told I am wrong. But now we are okay with giving up 6 years of a guy thats been spouted to be an above average shortstop (a position of need for years and, if he is that, provides immense value) and Jay (another guy I didnt like from the beginning based on how high we drafted him and another guy I was knocked often for not liking) for two years of Cole?

     

    Id want someone who we would have for longer than two years, especially if Jay and Gordon are going to be as good as so many said.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Question 1 - I think the odds makers have answered this question or we could ask ourselves what we need to add to be competitive with Cleveland first and foremost because you don't go all in for a chance to get to a 50% chance of getting to a playoff series. Then, we need to consider what we would need to be competitive with Houston, NY, and Boston. If we are honest, we could gut our farm system and max out our payroll and bot get there unless a few of the players we already have make big steps forward.

     

    Cole does nothing to position us for a playoff run so why give up inexpensive long-term assets for Cole?

     

    Question 2 - I don't really know but if we are to let him go it should be part of a package for a player that enables us to better compete in the playoffs.

    Uhh, what? Cole does nothing to position the Twins for a playoff run? He'd slot in at the top of the rotation, and probably start multiple games in a playoff series. I don't understand your argument.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Uhh, what? Cole does nothing to position the Twins for a playoff run? He'd slot in at the top of the rotation, and probably start multiple games in a playoff series. I don't understand your argument.

    Not to mention the argument presented is circular anyway:

     

    "We need pitching, but we don't have enough pitching to go out and get pitching."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Not saying 'don't continue discussing this here,' but this is also being discussed, with this same Twitter post, in a 'more specific' article here. Hard to keep the overlap from occurring in these types of articles.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Uhh, what? Cole does nothing to position the Twins for a playoff run? He'd slot in at the top of the rotation, and probably start multiple games in a playoff series. I don't understand your argument.

     

    Cole is a good SP but it would take him and Kershaw to give us a chance to win the division so we would be expending considerable assets trying to get a wildcard.  The wildcard used to mean you earned a playoff series.  Now it means you get a one game shot at getting a playoff series. 

     

    In addition, the contending teams have better #1s so we would still be poorly positioned for a playoff run.  Plus, we would still need a major overhaul of the BP to be even close to most of the contender's bullpen.  So, expending good assets for 2 years of Cole makes no sense to me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...