Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Twins Daily

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Leaderboard

  1. Mike Sixel

    Old-Timey Member
    Points
    36,790
    Posts
  2. Brock Beauchamp

    Administrator
    Points
    29,619
    Posts
  3. USAFChief

    Community Moderator
    Points
    24,700
    Posts
  4. Nick Nelson

    Administrator
    Points
    7,006
    Posts

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/10/2021 in all areas

  1. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    SwainZag and 22 others reacted to wsnydes for a post in a topic

    23 points
    Fact of the matter is that ownership has never shown themselves to be impatient. This FO started to rebuild the organization from the top down and there's been every indication that ownership is onboard with that and will allow them the time to do so. One year certainly isn't going to change that. So, this FO is going to be here to help clean up the mess unless they decide to bail on it themselves. There are plenty of reasons to dislike what was done in the past year. I imagine if you could get a candid response from the FO, they'd have a list of their own. For a FO that has had pretty good success, I'm now interested to see how they react and deal with some adversity. To me, that's the real test. Things aren't always going to go as planned. How they react is a good barometer of how fit they are for their jobs.
  2. 21 points
    My problems with the front office don't have a lot to do with this season in Minnesota, at least not directly. They made some mistakes, did dumb stuff, was slapped around for it. That happens, now let's see how they rebound next season. But... 1. They've shown to be pretty bad at self-evaluation of the organization. They're routinely trading or waiving or leaving unprotected players that immediately turn around and have success elsewhere. Their trades from their first two seasons, 2017-2018, are showing mixed results at best. I can forgive them a Baddoo but not multiple Baddoos over only a few seasons. 2. People are being rather unfair with the pitching timeline (there are currently only five pitchers from that 2017 draft with >1 career rWAR, pitching takes time) and I've been quite patient with the results, particularly with Covid. But in the wake of Covid, we have over half a MiLB season to evaluate and let's just say they're not blowing my socks off with these results. Right about now is when we should be excited to see the coming wave of prospects but what we're really excited about is other teams' prospects that the Twins gave away high-end MLB assets to control. That's not an encouraging sign. 3. This is tied into #2 but... Beau Burrows. And a thousand other players like him in 2021. It's time to wipe out these fringe acquisitions and promote from within. If they don't see what they have right now, they won't know what they have to start 2022, either. And while it's primarily a problem with pitchers, there is zero reason for Andrelton Simmons to be on this roster right now. Play Gordon, IL Donaldson, call up Miranda... shuffle things up because record no longer matters in 2021. I'll forgive the front office for everything going to hell in a handbasket in the immediate follow-up to 2020 but their responses are almost as disappointing as the failures that led us to this point. I'm not ready to move on from them yet but where I was generally positive about them one year ago, I'm am equally as negative today. It feels like they're operating without a coherent plan right now and that's possibly the worst trait a front office can have in a time like this. They need to commit to a decision and move in that direction.
  3. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    SwainZag and 19 others reacted to DMN13 for a post in a topic

    20 points
    What a novel idea, to not be in the "what have you done for me lately" camp! Fantastic article and well thought out points regarding management. This team and overall organization still has a lot of talent and a lot of hope for the future. Personally I'm hoping for a re-tool and not total re-build so it will be interesting to see what happens in the off-season. Whatever it is, Falvey and Levine have earned the right to be in charge and keep moving the Twins forward!
  4. 19 points
    Actually, there is no denying it went very poorly but blowing it suggests there were much better options. I have asked twice now for those who are calling out the pitching acquisitions to articulate a plan (in hindsight) that would have put this team in contention. Pitchers that were actually traded and free agents we could have signed. Were we going to get Wainwright away from STL? James Paxton pitched 1 inning Garret Richards’s has a 5.22 REA and a WHIP of 1.65 Drew Smyly has been decent with a 4.5 ERA / 1.45 WHIP / .6 WAR Corey Kluber pitched 50 innings and is now on the 60 day IL Charlie Morton has been good but his geographic preference is well known so that was not going to happen. Mike Minor has an ERA of 5.39 and .3 WAR Jake Odorizzi was a popular choice here. His 4.95 ERA and 0 WAR would not have helped. The guy I wanted (Taijuan Walker) has been good but he got no support here when I floated him as an option. We could have traded for Blake Snell like so many here insisted was a no brainer. We could have given up a bunch of prospects for a replacement level player. The same is true for a lot of the BP options. Rosenthal / Clippard / Romo / Etc There was nothing wrong with the Simmons signing. He has had a bad year or is in decline. We should not sign most free agents if the possibility of decline makes it a bad decision. Sometimes reasonable decisions don't pan out in baseball. There is a credible argument that the choices that were popular here would have left the team in worse shape going forward.
  5. 17 points
    The Twins hired Derek Falvey (who hired Thad Levine) in the wake of a disastrous 103-loss season in 2016. By that point, the Twins had gone six straight years without making the playoffs, and during that span they lost more games than any team in baseball. The following year, Minnesota stunningly reached the postseason as a wild-card team. Then they missed out in 2018, still finishing second, before rebounding in 2019 with one of the greatest seasons in franchise history. The Twins followed in 2020 with another division title. To run all that back: this front office took over a team that had gone 407-565 (.419) with zero playoff appearances in its previous six years, and went 300-246 (.549) with three playoff appearances in the next four. Does their success owe somewhat to the foundation built before they arrived? Of course. No one would deny that Terry Ryan and Co. had cultivated an impressive nucleus before being ousted. But during those years, the Twins repeatedly failed in the draft, failed in acquisitions, and failed in player development. The results bore that out. Let's be clear about something here: This current regime was so successful and so impressive through four years that they were repeatedly poached of talent, both in the front office and the coaching staffs they assembled. Not only that, but Falvey and Levine themselves have been courted by big-name franchises like the Red Sox and Phillies. What did they say, according to publicized reports on the matter? "No thanks, we're going to see through what we're building here." And so, to see flocks of fans calling for their heads because of one bad season, which is no worse than the ones we saw repeatedly before they arrived ... it's a little hard to take. Falvey became the youngest head exec in the league when he took Minnesota's top job. Currently he is 38 years old, which is three years younger than the DH he traded to Tampa Bay last month. Up until now he never experienced serious adversity during his tenure, which speaks to how smoothly things have gone in the first four years. The same could be said, by the way, for his managerial choice Rocco Baldelli, who was named Manager of the Year in 2019 (as the youngest skipper in baseball, with no experience in the role) and then won a second straight division title in his second season. These people have shown their mettle. They've won. A lot. I realize they haven't won in the playoffs, and that sucks, but they haven't had nearly the opportunity of their predecessors. Are we not going to give them a chance to learn from failure? Obviously the free agent pitching additions from the past winter have failed at every level. But this front office has made plenty of good and savvy pickups in the past, which helped fuel the success of high-quality staffs the last two years. And in any case, Falvey wasn't really hired to sign pitchers. He was hired to develop them. On that front, the jury is still out. This operation was four years in when a pandemic came along and wiped out an entire minor-league season. The fact that Minnesota's upper minors are currently loaded with intriguing high-upside arms would suggest the mission was on track, and is just now getting back on the rails. Soon we'll start seeing those arms (along with the ones acquired at the deadline this year) ushered into majors, and at that point we'll be able to make real assessments. But until then, you're judging an incomplete project. This reassembled baseball ops department has been working ahead of schedule basically since they took over a moribund franchise in despair. They hit a setback this year, and it's been painful. Let's give them a chance to get back on track in the wake of a major disruptive event and humbling follow-up season. MORE FROM TWINS DAILY — Latest Twins coverage from our writers — Recent Twins discussion in our forums — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
  6. 13 points
    I think it's fair to say a franchise that led all of baseball in losses the previous 6 years and coming off a season with the most losses in Twins history was lacking vitality and vigor. You could say their system was healthy at that time but... was it? Their top 10 in 2016 included Nick Gordon (#4), Tyler Jay (#5), Stephen Gonsalves (#6), Alex Meyer (#8), Kohl Stewart (#9) and Nick Burdi (#10). I think you're looking through a really rose-colored hindsight lens to suggest this franchise was in anything other than a dire state when new leadership took over. TR's front office had been rebuilding fruitlessly for half a decade.
  7. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    SwainZag and 11 others reacted to bighat for a post in a topic

    12 points
    Everyone deserves a fair shake. I don't think Falvey or Levine should be fired. That said, they should not be immune to criticism. They made terrible decisions and those admonishing those decisions have every right to do so.
  8. 12 points
    This is all you need to know about the talent difference between these two clubs: up 11-1, the Sox can send out a LHer throwing 97 for mop up duty.
  9. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    Twins33 and 10 others reacted to Mike Sixel for a post in a topic

    11 points
    You expect a contending team to count on a guy that hasn't played in two years, not even at a high level to play for them? The mistake is Cave over Wade, not Badoo. Imo.
  10. 10 points
    The Rule V draft happens in early December. And I'd bet quite a bit of money that Detroit had no more than the typical confidence one has in a Rule V pick... and that's very little confidence at all. Sometimes, people just get lucky and others get unlucky. We don't need to attribute mastermind scheming - particularly from the likes of Detroit - to explain they took a calculated risk and won while the Twins took a calculated risk and lost. It happens.
  11. 8 points
    I agree with the general premise. I also agree with Brock. I'll be honest.... If Burrows is on this roster still, over at least three candidates in AAA, I don't like what they are doing at all. In five years, we still don't have one pitcher, starter or reliever, we are confident in. While there weren't great free agents this year, their inability to trade for or sign guys to longer deals, meant they had to, again, get two new starting pitchers. That's not a sustainable model. Next year is the year they are out of excuses. If there aren't multiple pitchers up from the system after six years...... Also, their emphasis on bat first, mediocre or worse fielders in the draft? Not a fan at all.
  12. 8 points
    This is my biggest concern as well. No organization had a better access to assess Baddoo, and they completely misjudged. Same with LaMonte Wade. And selling low on the area of greatest need with this organization (pitching) is also really bad. Right now, the two they gave away in meaningless trades (Ynoa and Gil) are far more prominent and promising than any they've developed. That's a very, very bad sign - that means we're feeding wins to our MLB competitors. I also disagree with this: "which is no worse than the ones we saw repeatedly before they arrived." Look, bad seasons are bad seasons, but the Twins have likely never been further from their preseason expectations than they are this year. It's far worse to watch a contending team crumble to dust than it is to watch a bottom-feeding team face expected struggles. I appreciate what you're doing here, but fans can be forgiven for any anger and pessimism. This FO inherited a promising young team on the cusp of greatness. And with zero playoff wins to show for it, they have now turned it into a bottom-5 MLB team with the worst pitching staff in baseball. Is it a blip or a trend? I guess we'll find out next year.
  13. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    bighat and 7 others reacted to MMMordabito for a post in a topic

    8 points
    The returns so far on Falvey's development pipeline are mediocre at best. Bailey Ober is the only one that really looks like he has a decent chance to stick in the rotation so far, but he may never be a workhorse due to either health or management. Barnes is likely AAAA, but I'll give him a chance for the rest of the season. Dobnak flashed, got his contract, took a dump and got hurt. Duran is hurt. Enlow is hurt. Sammons is struggling in the high minors. Landon Leach is at the complex. In the pen, Alcala has hopefully only hit a bump and is now hurt. Gore switched positions and might have a shot. Molina is still in Cedar Rapids and not lighting it up by any means. That's the pipeline that Falvey started and developed. Injuries happen, but 44% is pretty high. Is there a flaw in the mechanics coaching? Are they pushing something that's not sustainable? Now, they've obviously had four drafts, another deadline and also picked up Vallimont in the Romo deal when they were going the other way, but I mostly just see hype and injuries from those recent waves. Every front office had to deal with the pandemic, so that's an even playing field as far as I'm concerned. If Falvey was hired to develop instead of sign, then he better start showing results very soon. If we're all sitting here this time next year and reading about the bright future with the deep system loaded with Winders, Sandses, Canterinos, Durans, Balazovics, Pettys and SWRs but none of them are showing up to play or being constantly bridled by Baldelli, then I think the fan base is certainly within reason to call for a different direction.
  14. 7 points
    I would have a much easier time chalking up 2021 as some bad luck if I could look optimistically at 2022. But from where I sit--and I realize there's an entire offseason to change the roster--it's very hard to imagine this team anywhere close to even .500 next year. They're short 4 starters, half a dozen relievers, and a SS at minimum. I'd say there's a reasonable chance they're WORSE next year rather than better. They said their goal is to compete every year. Hard to see them giving themselves a passing grade on that goal, so I don't know how I can.
  15. I'm really interested to see if Jax can continue to defy the odds......It would be great if he looked like a legit #4/5 for next year.
  16. 7 points
    Woof, I so strongly disliked Molitor's bullpen management. He would use and abuse his three best guys until they were ineffective or injured. While a burning fire to win is nice and all, the baseball season remains a 162 game slog and a pitching staff must be managed with that at idea at the forefront of the manager's mind nearly 100% of the time.* *this was something Gardy was excellent at for a very long time, IMO
  17. Not a fan of bat first, no fielders, in round one at all. Then this? Very disappointing. The two pitchers are interesting, and the kind I would convert to reliever and move up fast, which is why I'm no GM ...
  18. 7 points
    If MLB had 60-man or 80-man rosters to play with, maybe I could support this kind of farting around like we see with Beau Freaking Burrows. But they don't, so I don't. Then again, if the rosters were larger, then the waiver-wire pickings would be even slimmer, and the flyers this team takes would still be impossible to support. This is the kind of Brownian motion that bottom feeder teams do when trying to improve themselves, not a team that styles itself as a contender. Oops, wait, this year we are a bottom feeder team. Again. I still don't have to like these moves, and I remain a skeptic even when they seemingly catch lightning in a bottle with the occasional Matt Wisler (only then to manage to convince themselves that it was all smoke and mirrors and let him go). I'd like to just ignore today's ballgame and pretend it didn't happen, and move Burrows off the roster ASAP.
  19. Game Score: Twins 4, White Sox 3

    darwin22 and 5 others reacted to Mike Sixel for a post in a topic

    6 points
    Who had 10 strikeouts on their bingo card? I admit to true amazement. Good for him!
  20. 6 points
    I think the Twins tried to construct a bullpen similar to their 2020 one -- a pen that was reliant on breaking balls instead of fastballs. In the off-season, they acquired established personnel that would fit that blueprint (Colome, Robles) to replace guys like Romo, Clippard and May while adding Matt Wisler-like arms that could potentially fire sliders (Derek Law, Luke Ferrell, Glenn Sparkman, Ian Hamilton) like he did. I don't think anyone thought Colome was going to regress this much. Maybe they were too optimistic on Jorge Alcala and Cody Stashak taking strides forward. Or that Randy Dobnak would become a strong reliever. Maybe they believed too much in their system that they could create a reliever off the waivers like they had done in the past (Shaun Anderson). With no reliable relievers at the beginning of the year, it's hard for me to challenge the Twins' in-game bullpen management. Whatever button Rocco pushed was set to implode. It will be interesting to see how the Twins handle this off-season with their bullpen. They are clearly auditioning some arms now. Do they stick to the same script and find a few established free agent arms while grabbed up an assortment of slider-throwers to see what sticks? Do they go out and try to trade for some? Do they pivot away from the breaking ball-heavy plan and try to get power arms?
  21. 6 points
    While I am critical of the front office, I think it's hindsight and unreasonable to accuse them of mistakes for not outbidding other teams for the likes of Gibson and Schoop. The Twins simply do not have the budget to retain every player on their roster, especially someone like Gibson who was terrible and sick when he entered free agency. That contract looks a lot less great if Texas didn't luck out of not paying him much in 2020 when he was, again, awful. And while they made mistakes with pretty much every pitcher they signed this season, that doesn't mean it's fair to go back multiple years and point fingers for not signing players who no one really wanted signed at the time. Not a single person I can remember was sad to see Gibson so somewhere else on a 3/$30m deal. The same goes for the likes of Schoop, who had just been replaced by the younger, better, and yet-to-be-injured Luis Arraez.
  22. I like your write up on Vallimont and feel the same. I just don't understand how he can walk the first two guys and be nowhere near the strike zone then potentially K the side in the same inning. He has great K rate but the walks are killing him. I hope he figures things out because we need him as a starter. Happy to see Louie this high on the list. He has been dominant from the start of the season. It looks like he still needs work on those secondary's but reliever looks like his floor now instead of his ceiling. Thank you for moving Sabato down. I think from what we have seen he could have been even lower than this. The eye has been good at strike zone management which is important but terrible when trying to get the bat to the ball. He swings and completely misses everything far, far too often. Hard to believe a top pick could be this bad. He has a ton of work to do and hopefully he is ready and willing to do it or his career will be sunk. I don't really consider Nick a prospect anymore and while he can and likely will be a good utility player I think the Twins have too many guys in front of him to make it work. I have been high on Jullien since early in the season. His eye was really good to start the season. Still he too seemed to struggle getting contact at times. For an 18th round pick though he looks like a steal right now. Glad the Twins upped the anti to get him to sign. He might make up for the poor Sabato pick in 2020.
  23. Personally, I like the group you had the other day at 26-30 better than this group. If Sabato hadn't been a first round pick, would any of you even consider him for your top 30? I doubt it. Reminds me of a guy I expect Seth will remember. A high school first baseman taken in the first round, maybe a comp pick, a long time ago that scouts said had the best power bat in the draft. Don't recall if it was best high school power bat or overall. Kid may have made it to low-A ball. Think his name was something Sanchez, but could be wrong. Anyway, this pick reminds me of that one, one in which some scout(s) fell in love with some long home runs and talked the decision makers into taking him in the first round.
  24. Should the Twins cut Burrows?

    LA VIkes Fan and 5 others reacted to Seth Stohs for a post in a topic

    6 points
    Because of his youth and the fact that he has options remaining, they do have time if their pitching people believe there's something there. There are several others that could be DFAd to make room, or some 60 Day IL options. That said, the fastball isn't overly exciting. The command isn't exactly good. If they have seen enough, I won't argue with it.
  25. Game Score: Twins 4, White Sox 3

    USNMCPO and 4 others reacted to USAFChief for a post in a topic

    5 points
    I did. Unfortunately that old ***** from 2C jumped out of her walker with a "BINGO!!!" one call before. I hate her.
  26. Mrs Chief and I were getting dressed for church Sunday when I looked at her and said "Your underwear is just too tight. It doesn't look good." "Well, wear your own then," she said.
  27. My dad is a fellow long standing twins fan (and sufferer). After that first inning, he looked at me and said “let’s hope that’s not the end of the scoring”. but we both knew,
  28. I asked Alexa which Apple product I should consider buying, and she responded with "Considering your bank account, juice."
  29. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    sjunisu and 4 others reacted to USAFChief for a post in a topic

    5 points
    No reason? They have one major league starter on the roster. One. They're going to need a lot more than "better health and some good breaks." I don't see it. Hope to be wrong.
  30. Some of you may know, I spent a good part of the summer in my camper up in northern MN. I got home a couple weeks ago, and Mrs Chief asked how many fish I froze and brought back to Tucson. "Well," I said. "I didn't catch all that many. I froze a dozen walleyes and they're in the freezer." "Jeez Louise," she said. "Those damn fish cost over $100 each." "Well then, Dear," I said. "You're lucky I didn't catch more."
  31. Be a little older. And less good.
  32. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    Twins33 and 4 others reacted to wabene for a post in a topic

    5 points
    Here is Larnach's OPS by month this season as an early call up trying to adjust to the bigs; 845, 704, 518, and 879. Looks like a guy who took some big shots and is picking himself up. That's exactly what we want from our prospects.
  33. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    Twins33 and 4 others reacted to Mike Sixel for a post in a topic

    5 points
    Maybe I'm not clear....I think we have no idea if they are great at their job or not, and if they don't have legit pitchers up from the system next year, I'll start calling for their jobs......As for the division wins, they literally can only play the games they are scheduled to play, and they won A LOT of them......I fail to see how that isn't impressive after the previous regime was awful at winning.
  34. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    wabene and 4 others reacted to Mike Sixel for a post in a topic

    5 points
    Nick Gordon, Kohl Stewart, and Tyler Jay say hi.
  35. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    Twins33 and 4 others reacted to Mike Sixel for a post in a topic

    5 points
    So it's their fault the other teams were bad? They won the division twice, after the team was awful under the previous leadership. It really is amazing how some won't give them credit for that. Truly.
  36. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    beckmt and 4 others reacted to bean5302 for a post in a topic

    5 points
    They had 2 starting pitchers with regular season ERAs of 3.18 and 3.58 that year. They won all 3 WS games where those pitchers pitched. Also, sometimes crazy stuff happens. I don't think MLB owners/mangement should rely upon luck. The Twins are not remotely close to small market.
  37. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    Twins33 and 4 others reacted to nicksaviking for a post in a topic

    5 points
    Is it possible that one of Thad Lavine and Derek Falvey is good at their job and maybe one isn't? I think we really need to know who does what. Who's in charge of negotiating contracts? Who's in charge of prioritizing free agents? Does Deron Johnson have full draft autonomy? I assume not so how's that dynamic work? I assume Falvey is in charge of implementing all the new statistical analysis to the organization? Who is making the decisions about which guys are called up from Rochester? Who's managing the 40-man roster? Who's managing the 26-man roster? Who's managing the payroll? Who's making the call on the coaching staff (and lack of bench coach)? Keeping this stuff vague probably helps insulate them from some blame, but these are two different people with two different jobs, they aren't, you know, actual Twins.
  38. 5 points
    And not one single team thought the Twins were wrong! It just shows how difficult it is to forecast the development of these players. Johan Santana was a rule 5 and Tatis Jr. was traded for James Shields and Shields was quite bad.
  39. 5 points
    I can give them a pass on Baddoo, as I suspect leaving him unprotected was a calculated risk that backfired. Having not played in a couple of years and being a Rule V candidate that needs to stay on the MLB roster, I completely understand why the front office would take the risk that no one would draft him and if someone did, the Twins would receive Baddoo back in short order. Trading Wade was probably the right decision but... wow... to dump Anderson so quickly while Wade was thriving requires a series of bad evaluation and mis-management that deserves loads of ridicule.
  40. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    USAFChief and 4 others reacted to PDX Twin for a post in a topic

    5 points
    Maybe it was the talent that got poached that was responsible for the success?
  41. 5 points
    I heard the Twins looked competitive in warm ups!
  42. Should the Twins cut Burrows?

    RonCoomersOPS and 4 others reacted to bean5302 for a post in a topic

    5 points
    Not sure why it's important to hurl personal insults at him. I'm pretty sure he didn't intentionally struggle in MLB.
  43. 5 points
    The Twins have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams in figuring out exactly what they have in Beau Burrows.
  44. I don’t know. Jax was doing a great job of mixing up pitches and locations and getting chase swings before those home runs. The home runs came on center-cut, belt high fastballs. As former Twins pitcher Kenny Rogers said about fastballs down the middle, you gotta know when to throw ‘em and know when to hold ‘em
  45. Talk of the Field of Dreams Game on Thursday…What should Twins fans root for? Maybe that the cornfield swallows up both teams?
  46. In Defense of the Twins Front Office

    Twins33 and 3 others reacted to Mike Sixel for a post in a topic

    4 points
    Any analysis that says Donaldson is a poor signing is suspect at best.....I'd move him to good, frankly. That changes the numbers dramatially. And, really, if you look at the ratios, that's probably about what every other team does .....which is 100x more than TR ever did, btw. I can't draw a conclusion, fairly, unless someone does this for every FA signed, and compares to the industry......
  47. Should the Twins cut Burrows?

    chpettit19 and 3 others reacted to Brock Beauchamp for a post in a topic

    4 points
    It's pretty hard to blame Baldelli for having no good options on his roster. He's not immune from blame this season but a bad roster definitely isn't under his purview.
  48. Should the Twins cut Burrows?

    RonCoomersOPS and 3 others reacted to Unwinder for a post in a topic

    4 points
    I'm completely fine with him going back to AAA, everyone has the capacity to learn and improve.
  49. Close game. Twins were in it until... the first inning.
This leaderboard is set to Chicago/GMT-06:00

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.