Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Would Dozier Clear Waivers?


mudcat14

Recommended Posts

Curious, because the Braves are said to be on the lookout for a 2Bman with Uggla out of action. Even with his subpar batting average, I think Brian's play of late may have his value at it's premium and the Braves are usually flush with young arms. Even if we need to wait another year for Rosario to be ready, Escobar or a one year pick-up wouldn't be that bad to bridge the gap at 2nd in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's an automatic that Rosario will beat out Dozier. Also, I just read somewhere where Ryan said Rosario projects at every position. No idea what he meant by that. The Twins will deal blocked prospects and have vets to trade who were simply beat out by better players, but I don't believe that time has come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I highly doubt he'd clear waivers.

 

I think the other problem is that he wouldn't bring back what we'd want. He was pretty abysmal at the plate for the first two months of the season and pretty bad last year, and I think a wise GM is going to recognize this and discount it. His value will likely peak if he continues this into next year. With Rosario knocking at the door at this point, we can either move him to short or trade him for a nice haul. I don't see that happening this month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I highly doubt he'd clear waivers.

 

I think the other problem is that he wouldn't bring back what we'd want. He was pretty abysmal at the plate for the first two months of the season and pretty bad last year, and I think a wise GM is going to recognize this and discount it. His value will likely peak if he continues this into next year. With Rosario knocking at the door at this point, we can either move him to short or trade him for a nice haul. I don't see that happening this month.

If Parker broke it down that succinctly, so can every GM. Obviously not enough ABs to provide certainty, but enough to show repeatable results as Parker did. I think the return on Dozier would be good, but not blow you away.

 

agreed, he would never clear.

 

With rosario on the roter, he's more valuable as utility/Ss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should send him through waivers and see who claims him and what they want to pay. We can always pull him back. Any player that can bring back projectable starting pitching should be available for trade as an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love we have a solid young in house MI for te first time in a decade and people wanna trade him

 

Most of the trade speculation (in my opinion) should be what to do if Dozier is for real and Rosario is ready. You have 2B. Personally, I'd probably move Dozier back to SS, but I get the impression from some that this ship has sailed already. If it has, we have the luxury of having 2 quality 2B. I would think that ones value would be wasted as a backup. You'd have to trade one of them. Might not happen until next offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Parker broke it down that succinctly, so can every GM. Obviously not enough ABs to provide certainty, but enough to show repeatable results as Parker did. I think the return on Dozier would be good, but not blow you away.

 

agreed, he would never clear.

 

With rosario on the roter, he's more valuable as utility/Ss

 

To clarify, I don't think we should trade him, Rosario is still an unknown, and even if Rosario is the best 2b of all time, I think Dozier should be kept. I think he can play SS at lest well enough to be utility infielder. What makes me think this is his improvement at 2b over the last season and a half tells me he can go back to his natural position an relearn that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

Everyone wants to crown Dozier the answer after about 3 good months. Don't get me wrong, I'm very excited about the progress he has made, but I don't think we need to worry about having a logjam at 2B just yet. I need to see more from Dozier before I proclaim him the 2B for the next 5 years, and I would need Rosario to be much more of a sure thing before I would trade a young, cheap good player who has 5 more years of team control just to make way for him. Odds are, this situation works itself out, and if not, then we have quite a valuable trade piece, but we aren't there yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't you say you had given up on him earlier this year?

Maybe that was someone else, sorry if it was.

 

Yeah, but obviously my opinion changed. Is that allowed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, it's not like Dozier has been in the league for five years, performed weakly, and is just now having a good run. He doesn't even have 200 MLB games under his belt yet. It takes some time to adjust for most major leaguers when first entering the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, it's not like Dozier has been in the league for five years, performed weakly, and is just now having a good run. He doesn't even have 200 MLB games under his belt yet. It takes some time to adjust for most major leaguers when first entering the league.

 

Particularly when the guy was just not that good a prospect. We can't expect the B-/C+ prospects to come into the league and hit like Mike Trout... It's completely unreasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but obviously my opinion changed. Is that allowed?

 

Nope, you have to stick to your original opinion, no matter what changes. If, on the off chance, one does try that, they need to hold a press conference and give the whole mea culpa bit and let those who knew better 10 minutes to say I told you so :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but obviously my opinion changed. Is that allowed?

 

No, that way when someone wants to dismiss your opinion they can just say" Yeah but you were the one who wanted to get rid if Dozier" rather than come up with a rebuttal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that way when someone wants to dismiss your opinion they can just say" Yeah but you were the one who wanted to get rid if Dozier" rather than come up with a rebuttal.

 

Why would I wan't to dismiss his opinion, it's an opinion I share.

 

I just find it funny that a guy goes from saying a player is junk, a waste of a spot, will never be anything, and should be cut, to suddenly preaching to others about their opinion on the topic within a span of 90 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that way when someone wants to dismiss your opinion they can just say" Yeah but you were the one who wanted to get rid if Dozier" rather than come up with a rebuttal.

Haha. Also in my defense, over a month ago I believe I started an entire thread about how I was wrong about the kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would I wan't to dismiss his opinion, it's an opinion I share.

 

I just find it funny that a guy goes from saying a player is junk, a waste of a spot, will never be anything, and should be cut, to suddenly preaching to others about their opinion on the topic within a span of 90 days.

I said, the Twins haven't had a legit in house MI option in...well... a decade? Why on earth would we suddenly want to trade the one guy we finally found? Even with Rosario our MI depth in the minors is, average at best.

 

If this was Hicks doing well, then sure, maybe the argument could be made since we have plenty of OF depth, but trading away MI depth is about the last thing this team should be doing (unless by some miracle you end up with a front end SP type guy for Dozier)

 

Also the idea of this thread of Dozier clearing waivers is preposterous. He would be claimed instantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said, the Twins haven't had a legit in house MI option in...well... a decade? Why on earth would we suddenly want to trade the one guy we finally found? Even with Rosario our MI depth in the minors is, average at best.

 

If this was Hicks doing well, then sure, maybe the argument could be made since we have plenty of OF depth, but trading away MI depth is about the last thing this team should be doing (unless by some miracle you end up with a front end SP type guy for Dozier)

 

Also the idea of this thread of Dozier clearing waivers is preposterous. He would be claimed instantly.

 

I know, like I said, I agree with you there.

 

I respect the fact that you were able to admit you were wrong in your initial opinion of Dozier, that is hard to do.

I didn't mean to pile on, we all make predictions that go south on us, so I'm sorry about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha. Also in my defense, over a month ago I believe I started an entire thread about how I was wrong about the kid.

If you reread the terms of use agreement that you carefully pored over years ago before you clicked on the 'sure, whatever' button, there's an opinion reversal buyout option you may have forgotten about that expunges any wrong opinions... for a price.

 

Good news is that proceeds go toward covering TD bigwig farm team junke...I mean road tri.... actually, they're carefully planned research missions to evaluate Twins minor league talent.

 

So they disappear your previous opinion and use the money to bring us even more up-to-the-minute info on whether Rosario will be able to stick at second. It's win/win! Take it from someone whose Lew Ford ASG appearance prediction...never happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...