Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: 2016


Recommended Posts

I'm curious how people are so casual with the year 2016 to be the first year of "winning". Cue the Tigers: 2003 this team was wretched winning only slightly more than 1/4 of their games; yet by 2006 they are in the World Series. No one is even making a comparision of the methods used by these two teams to rebuild. There is simply blind acceptance of the Twins methods with a "wow isn't it neat they have two great minor leaguers".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious how people are so casual with the year 2016 to be the first year of "winning". Cue the Tigers: 2003 this team was wretched winning only slightly more than 1/4 of their games; yet by 2006 they are in the World Series. No one is even making a comparision of the methods used by these two teams to rebuild. There is simply blind acceptance of the Twins methods with a "wow isn't it neat they have two great miner leaguers".
It works for me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has been pointed out by many others, not all of these prospects will pan out. Some won't be as good as we hope, and others will not even be viable major league caliber players. That being said, is anyone else worried that we'll get a uneven mix of success between hitters and pitchers? It would be crazy to have Buxton, Sano, Arcia, Hicks, Pinto, et al pan out, while our pitching prospects have much less success. It just looks to me like it could actually go this way, with our hitters seeming like much surer bets. That leaves free agency or trades as the only options for fielding a quality rotation, something even a Ryan backer like myself would say is not Terry's strong suit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether the Twins compete for a divisional title in 2014 or 2016 depends on how motivated the Twins are to supplement the youngsters with more expensive veterans.

 

Let's remember though, we play in a very flawed division. If the 2013 Twins go on a tear they could easily win the Central this year. Of course they would most likely get crushed in the playoffs with our starting rotation, but it's fun to realize that it's very possible. I'd say no worse than 20% chance we win the division this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has been pointed out by many others, not all of these prospects will pan out. Some won't be as good as we hope, and others will not even be viable major league caliber players. That being said, is anyone else worried that we'll get a uneven mix of success between hitters and pitchers? It would be crazy to have Buxton, Sano, Arcia, Hicks, Pinto, et al pan out, while our pitching prospects have much less success. It just looks to me like it could actually go this way, with our hitters seeming like much surer bets. That leaves free agency or trades as the only options for fielding a quality rotation, something even a Ryan backer like myself would say is not Terry's strong suit.
Future starting pitching has to be a major concern, but he did find us Meyer, May, and Pressly. Let's hope he finds another top prospect or so at the deadline. As I posted on another thread, we need Ryan to continue to perform his magic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who's playing first base?

 

I don't think they'll have trouble filling 1B. In fact, between Arcia's Delmon-esque defense, Sano growing into Ryan Howard's body, and Mauer aging out of full time catching duty, there could be a logjam at 1b and DH. And then there's the 6 or 7 all stars we'll need to find room for in the outfield. Luckily we'll have 3-5 aces in the rotation so we will be able to roll with a 9 man pitching staff to free up roster space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious how people are so casual with the year 2016 to be the first year of "winning". Cue the Tigers: 2003 this team was wretched winning only slightly more than 1/4 of their games; yet by 2006 they are in the World Series. No one is even making a comparision of the methods used by these two teams to rebuild. There is simply blind acceptance of the Twins methods with a "wow isn't it neat they have two great minor leaguers".

 

Honestly, I think they will flirt with .500 next year and make a failed run in 2015. I think 2016 is more or less the point when they will have enough experience to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

Pretty amazing that in one year o. The job TR has the farm system back on top and the big league club is at least competitive. A far cry from most of this board calling for him to be fired for signing our ACE Kevin Correia in the offseason!! LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's good stuff.

 

As far as 2016 goes, I would keep Deduno and Diamond off that list, btw ;)

And I would add Florimon instead of Dozier. Color me impressed.

Kepler, Harisson, and a handful of relief pitchers from the 2011 and 2012 drafts will be there too.

 

Also I suspect that there will be 2-4 veteran and/or not infusions in the roster and maybe a college kid from the 2014 draft in there. I think that the Twins can win the Central next season if they play it smart (and get rid of certain older players) and if 3-4 pitchers currently at AAA and AA develop the remainder of the season and get rotation spots next season. I think that a Baxendale, Gibson, Meyer (alphabetically), Worley (better) and Diamond/Correia rotation might make this a competative team, but the first 4 need to improve between now and April 2014 and the ones who are running the team (hopefully new people) trust them enough to go with them. I'd also suspect that late 2014 will be the ETA of both Sano and Rosario and late 2015 the ETA of the kids who are in Cedar Rapids right now.

 

And Mauer will be the first baseman (and his brother the third base coach)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd keep Parmelee around as PH, 1B, RF, DH - as I've said before he's Randy Bush (10-14 HR's, 50 RBI's off the bench), and by then a veteran presence. The list of pitchers shows how weak we are from the left side (the reason I'd keep Diamond on Thry), I'd also add Albers and Melotakis, just for balance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who's playing first base?
Of course, it's easier to find a first baseman than a third baseman, but if Sano keeps growing and/or his glove doesn't get any better at third, I've gotta think he's a logical successor to Morneau.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

Almost every franchise, if they are looking ahead to the 2016 season, can say about the same things this article is saying. They just insert their players where the Twins players are. I agree that things seem to be on the upswing with this franchise, but I don't know if I would be predicting a dominating team in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty amazing that in one year o. The job TR has the farm system back on top and the big league club is at least competitive. A far cry from most of this board calling for him to be fired for signing our ACE Kevin Correia in the offseason!! LOL

 

I'm not sure how proud one should be about that ace designation, but it has been a surprising positive. That said, TR didn't put this team at the top of the farm, that was a mutual effort with his predecessor.

 

I'm happy Ryan is back too, but criticism/credit should still be accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member
I'm not sure how proud one should be about that ace designation, but it has been a surprising positive. That said, TR didn't put this team at the top of the farm, that was a mutual effort with his predecessor.

 

I'm happy Ryan is back too, but criticism/credit should still be accurate.

 

I think it's funny that one waits until after he finally has a good game again (relatively speaking...5 innings) to start patting Ryan on the back for signing him. He had an ERA over 6.00 in May. Where were all the TR is a genius for signing him posts then?

 

Yes, we should be happy he's had some good games, but it's not like him pitching against a bad offensive team like the Phillies is a sign he's turning back into April Correia. It'll be a miracle if his ERA isn't really close to if not over 5.00 by the end of the season.

 

Like you said, being our 'ace' is no kind of praise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member
I am not on the 'Sano to 1B' bandwagon.

 

Someone out there (Keith Law?) suggested that if Sano cannot stick at 3B they should put him if RF. His point was that Sano has such a great arm that you shouldn't hide it at 1B.

 

A good arm can be useful weapon at 1B. Pujols' arm and fearlessness helped him set a MLB assist record for 1Bs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not on the 'Sano to 1B' bandwagon.

 

Someone out there (Keith Law?) suggested that if Sano cannot stick at 3B they should put him if RF. His point was that Sano has such a great arm that you shouldn't hide it at 1B.

 

If that is in response to what I said, I was talking leave Sano at 3B, and move others to 1B......Yes, KLAW has suggested RF, Sano has some speed, and a great arm. Regardless of Sano, they don't have anyone really sitting at 1B in the minors right now that people love, do they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not on the 'Sano to 1B' bandwagon.

 

Someone out there (Keith Law?) suggested that if Sano cannot stick at 3B they should put him if RF. His point was that Sano has such a great arm that you shouldn't hide it at 1B.

 

Isn't Hicks the right fielder of the future - with Buxton in center? (Arica in LF?)Looking ahead, the Twins have more outfielders than 1B. The preference, clearly, is for Sano to anchor 3B. But it that isn't viable, 1B seems a better choice than supplanting somebody in RF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...