Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: Which Team's Aces Did the Twins Miss?


Recommended Posts

I count nine of them that were drafted before the Twins could even draft. It makes me wonder if maybe there is something to using that 4th overall pick in the draft on a pitcher, even if there is a little bit "better" player on the board. I'd be interesting in seeing how many of these guys fall into each category:

 

- players chosen before the Twins could get them

- players chosen in the 1st round

- players in teh 2nd round

- players after the 2nd round

- international signings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best of all these pitchers were unavailable or international signings. Cain would have been nice to have, but Span turned into one of the best players we've had this decade. Can't really fault the Twins for any of these. The best were already drafted and for a lot of the other guys, all teams passed on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be interesting in seeing how many of these guys fall into each category:

 

- players chosen before the Twins could get them

- players chosen in the 1st round

- players in teh 2nd round

- players after the 2nd round

- international signings.

 

- players chosen before the Twins could get them - 9

- players chosen in the 1st round after Twins picked - 5

- players in the 2nd round - 3

- players after the 2nd round - 7

- international signings - 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

The Adam Johnson pick was unfortunate but to say it is going to haunt them for decades is a little unfair. The 2000 draft was historically awful. Wainwright and Utley were the only big leaguers worth anything to go in the first round. Sure it would be nice to have those two but if the team only had a 7% on hitting on a contributor in that round can't fault them a whole lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member

I guess we don't include the Boston offer of Lester, Masterson, and CF Coco Crisp as part of our analysis. Perhaps said designation of "Ace" ( I'm guessing #1 pitcher on said team) is a bit too restrictive--maybe #2 pitchers should be included? IIRC, Cliff Lee was 5th or 6th Round. There are others who would sure improve the Twins rotation--but fall short of your "Ace" designation--that were definitely available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member
I guess we don't include the Boston offer of Lester, Masterson, and CF Coco Crisp as part of our analysis. Perhaps said designation of "Ace" ( I'm guessing #1 pitcher on said team) is a bit too restrictive--maybe #2 pitchers should be included? IIRC, Cliff Lee was 5th or 6th Round. There are others who would sure improve the Twins rotation--but fall short of your "Ace" designation--that were definitely available.

 

That was part of my issue. In adition to some teams having two aces (e.g., Boston, Detroit), a lot of guys designated as aces don't deserve the designation. Just because they are the best pitchers on their team doesn't make them better than whomever we drafted that year. You have to define it somehow, and this is the easiest way to define it. But it is one of the least helpful ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...