Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Game Thread x2: Twins @ Guardians, Noon:10 and 6:10 CT


wsnydes

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SwainZag said:

At least be reasonable.  No one is making trades right now.  It's not even July 1st yet.

How dare you point out facts like the date!

I'm kind of glad work got in the way of the end of that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, mrtwinsfan said:

Which team looks like a winner ?????    

My honest assessment is: they look pretty evenly matched, only one will make it to the playoffs, and whichever one that is will be a heavy underdog against the likes of New York or Houston. And both teams know this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

That really is my point here. I wouldn't have been pissed if he used Duran for 2 innings, but it's a 162 game season and it'd be worse if Rocco managed every game like it was a playoff game and paid no attention to upcoming games. That'd be bad managing. They need help in the pen. I hope Alcala can be part of that solution. I hope they bring in another guy or 2 via trade. And I hope Maeda is back in September to reinforce things more. It just gets old seeing these game threads turn into "Rocco screwed up again" fests everyday no matter whether they're winning or not because he has to put in so many questionable relievers.

I hope Alcala and in particular Maeda are bonuses and not Plan A. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Aggies7 said:

Ok. And I think my reasoning here is pretty solid and not hypocritical.

You and I had a back and forth just a couple weeks ago about using Duran in innings other than the 9th. You were adamant that they shouldn't do it. You admitted that in this thread as well that you want Duran used only as a closer. You then complained that Rocco should have used Duran as something other than just a strict closer today. 

I think you have many good thoughts. I don't agree with them all, but it's just a matter of opinion on different baseball strategies. Like whether or not teams should have strict 7th, 8th, and 9th inning guys. Reasonable takes on both of our sides there. But the "use Duran as only a closer" followed by "bring Duran in in the 8th!" is going to get a call out every time I see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Community Moderator
1 minute ago, James said:

How dare you point out facts like the date!

I'm kind of glad work got in the way of the end of that game.

I mean...I will be right there with my pitchfork if guys are flying around the league and it's July 30th and the Twins haven't acquired anyone yet.  But it's a little early for that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KirbyDome89 said:

I hope Alcala and in particular Maeda are bonuses and not Plan A. 

Alcala should be back very soon so they should have an idea of whether or not he's the guy he was at the end of last year. Definitely don't want Maeda as plan A, but do have hope that he can provide some more reinforcement late. They need to bring in outside guys for sure. I'd like 2, but if Alcala is back in 2 weeks and throwing lights out I'd be ok with just 1. Duran, Jax, and Alcala have the chance to form a very nice back end to the bullpen for years to come, but I definitely want more brought in for this season. I'd like 1 righty and 1 lefty ideally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SwainZag said:

I mean...I will be right there with my pitchfork if guys are flying around the league and it's July 30th and the Twins haven't acquired anyone yet.  But it's a little early for that 

BTW, the deadline is on August 2nd this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

You and I had a back and forth just a couple weeks ago about using Duran in innings other than the 9th. You were adamant that they shouldn't do it. You admitted that in this thread as well that you want Duran used only as a closer. You then complained that Rocco should have used Duran as something other than just a strict closer today. 

I think you have many good thoughts. I don't agree with them all, but it's just a matter of opinion on different baseball strategies. Like whether or not teams should have strict 7th, 8th, and 9th inning guys. Reasonable takes on both of our sides there. But the "use Duran as only a closer" followed by "bring Duran in in the 8th!" is going to get a call out every time I see it.

I think you are misremembering the argument. The issue is question was using him in the 6th and 7th against the tigers (a game pagan also blew).  I don’t recall ever saying that he should NOT be used in the 8th inning ever. I literally do not recall ever saying that. Certainly I agree that it’s not a viable long term strategy to keep asking so much from a guy with inning concerns. I am definitely adamant that he should be THE closer (and not burned in the 6th/7th innings) and unfortunately on this team that means pitching more than one inning per outing.

I have also been strongly adamant that pagan should not pitch late in games if at all possible. The earlier the better so that when he inevitably fails to do his job, we have more than an at bat or two to recover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

I don't like Pagan either, but the answer isn't "just throw Duran every late inning of every close game." You want Duran as the closer so you have to deal with lesser pitchers who shouldn't be pitching late game, high leverage innings. That's how it works.

The problem is that Baldelli has one great reliever and one good reliever.

When the typical starter goes five innings and a good outing is six innings. simple math tells me that's a real ****ing problem and it's not Rocco's fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

And if Rocco uses Duran for 2 innings this game and then loses tonight and tomorrow in close games he's not available for you're back on here complaining that he didn't have Duran to use.

Minority Report guilty before one acts, eh? At least give him a chance to commit your assigned crime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is if not Pagan, then who? It was supposed to be Duffy or Alcala but Duffy melted down and Alcala got hurt. I wonder if Tyler Thornburg can fill that role? Cotton, Thielbar, probably not on a consistent basis. We need an 8th inning guy in the worst way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

The problem is that Baldelli has one great reliever and one good reliever.

When the typical starter goes five innings and a good outing is six innings. simple math tells me that's a real ****ing problem and it's not Rocco's fault.

Well..... he could actually stop going to Pagan in the late innings. You know, at least try something different!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Game 2 lineups have been posted.

Twins

CF - Buxton

SS - Correa

RF - Garlick

DH - Arraez

2B - Polanco

3B - Urshela

1B - Miranda

C - Jeffers

LF - Celestino

On the bump is Josh Winder.

 

Guardians

CF - Kwan

SS - Rosario

DH - Ramirez

1B - Naylor

2B - Gimenez

RF - Gonzalez

LF - Palacios

3B - Clement

C - Maile

On the bump is Konnor Pilkington

 

Let's hope for a better result in the nightcap!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LA VIkes Fan said:

The problem is if not Pagan, then who? It was supposed to be Duffy or Alcala but Duffy melted down and Alcala got hurt. We need an 8th inning guy in the worst way. 

Today? Could have been jax for another inning (although he had 21 pitches) or even thielbar who I trust more than pagan (which doesn’t say much). Or as mentioned, 2 for duran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LA VIkes Fan said:

The problem is if not Pagan, then who? It was supposed to be Duffy or Alcala but Duffy melted down and Alcala got hurt. I wonder if Tyler Thornburg can fill that role? Cotton, Thielbar, probably not on a consistent basis. We need an 8th inning guy in the worst way. 

YES! At this point, and even today, at least try Thornburg, and NOT Pagan!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, h2oface said:

Well..... he could actually stop going to Pagan in the late innings. You know, at least try something different!

Who, though? The front office is rotating through guys who are mediocre on their best days. While I wouldn't have put Pagan in today, he's just as likely to get through an inning as "fill in blank of random name here".

The front office either needs to overpay or they need to take a chance on catching lightning in a bottle with an upside arm from the minors. Even though he walks way too many hitters, I'd rather see Evan Sisk on the mound right now over Emilio Pagan.

I'm not even sure Pagan would be the guy I cut today but that doesn't matter, either. There are several guys I wouldn't hesitate to let go of in hopes of catching upside in a MiLB guy long enough to limp toward the trade deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

Who, though? The front office is rotating through guys who are mediocre on their best days. While I wouldn't have put Pagan in today, he's just as likely to get through an inning as "fill in blank of random name here".

The front office either needs to overpay or they need to take a chance on catching lightning in a bottle with an upside arm from the minors. Even though he walks way too many hitters, I'd rather see Evan Sisk on the mound right now over Emilio Pagan.

I'm not even sure Pagan would be the guy I cut today but that doesn't matter, either. There are several guys I wouldn't hesitate to let go of in hopes of catching upside in a MiLB guy long enough to limp toward the trade deadline.

Thornburg. Agreed there is a huge problem. It has been that way all season and before it even started. It is like hearing little baby chicks....."cheap, cheap".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, h2oface said:

Thornburg. Agreed there is a huge problem. It has been that way all season and before it even started. It is like hearing little baby chicks....."cheap, cheap".

Thornburg's a guy who's mostly cooked, already got DFA'd once this year and hasn't been throwing in high leverage situations since 2016. I can't blame Rocco for not wanting to use him in a 1 run game - we saw what happened when we threw AAAA guys into high leverage situations last year - Brandon Waddell, Luke Farrell, Dobnak as a reliever? Yeah, I've seen enough of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Danchat said:

Thornburg's a guy who's mostly cooked, already got DFA'd once this year and hasn't been throwing in high leverage situations since 2016. I can't blame Rocco for not wanting to use him in a 1 run game - we saw what happened when we threw AAAA guys into high leverage situations last year - Brandon Waddell, Luke Farrell, Dobnak as a reliever? Yeah, I've seen enough of that.

Well, so far this year, so good. Only one bad outing in May, and out all 2017 and 2020 (started great) and 2021... and 2016 was very good. Granted 2018 and 19 were rough. I guess you got what you wanted. How was Alex Pagan...... this year and last? At least San Diego was smart enough to not let him save games! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...