In a very basic sense I'd start with looking at runs, hits & walks, and strikeouts. I'd say 1.2 runs for every 3 innings pitched is a solid performance runs wise. 1 hit + walk per inning pitched, and at least 1 strikeout per inning pitched. So a 5 inning start (the average start in this era of baseball is about 5 innings) I'd want no more than 2 runs allowed, no more than 5 hits and walks combined, and at least 5 strikeouts to say they had a good start. But that is all just personal preferences for those numbers. As @Sconnie said, individual games are a bit tough to judge.
Obviously there's some wiggle room on those numbers. Maybe there was a 3 run homer they gave up after a couple of broken bat singles and those were the only 3 guys to reach base in their 5 innings. So their WHIP (walks and hits per inning pitched) is under 1, but their runs allowed are over what I'd like. But generally speaking if you can get 5+ innings of 2 or 3 run ball with a strikeout an inning or so the pitcher had a pretty good day.
These are good baseline expectations. Pitchers should strike out a lot of hitters (one per inning is lately the norm for being really good), not give up hits (about one per inning is pretty good), not give up walks (more than a couple per game will raise eyebrows), not give up extra-base hits (a solo home run every game or two maybe is unavoidable). To some extent, there is a tradeoff that pitchers will make - to cut down on the base hits, they may nibble at the plate, resulting in a few more walks, which are less harmful than base hits - to strike out more guys, they might have to risk a few more home runs over the course of the season - and so on. So you're looking for patterns, more so than any strict benchmarks. Did the starter keep his team in the game? Fine. Did he make it likely they'd win by giving up only a run? Even better. Did he give up so many runs, 4+, to make winning really difficult, or pitch so briefly that the bullpen had to be overworked? Bad game. Did every baserunner score a run? Bad luck for the pitcher. Did he put a lot of baserunners on but then wriggle out of jams? Good for him, but maybe also some good luck was involved in that particular game.
For the relievers, the game has evolved to where they typically come in for one inning at a time, so there's not a lot of gray area between shutting the other team down versus giving up a run or more. A clean inning with no baserunners is great, a harmless single or walk in one inning of work is no big deal, and more activity on the basepaths than that and you may just be philosophical and accept that even very good pitchers fail to get the job done now and then.
Depending on the box score you look at, there may be a cryptic entry that tries to summarize all this down to one number for the game, at least for the starting pitcher. On baseball-reference.com for instance, the line for the pitchers includes a column called Game Score (GSc). The above link for the season opener shows Joe Ryan with a game score of 50, which happens to be exactly the average that is intended by this tool. His start was a bit short, only 4 innings, but productive while he was in. By contrast, Robbie Ray's game score was a very good 68, which kind of conforms to what we all saw when the two players pitched against each other - Ryan was good, Ray was better. In yesterday's game, Marco Gonzalez came away with a very sub-par game score of 27. Elsewhere around the majors, Sean Mannea's 7 innings of no-hit ball the other day gave him a stellar game score of 83. It's only a quick and dirty tool, giving points for strikeouts and innings pitched and taking away points for hits and walks and runs, devised by a smart guy many years ago, but serves some purposes when you are trying to sort wheat from chaff over the course of a season.
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.
Jose Rodriguez was the Twins Daily short-season minor-league hitter of the year. He is at the Dominican facilities for spring training now but will likely join Extended Spring Training in Fort Myers.
I really hold back what I would like to say about then payroll arguments here. The fact that people don't accept the amount taken in dictates the amount going out requires one of two things. Extreme financial ignorance or fanatical bias that prevents the acceptance of something some basic. I did not change the argument. It's the same idiocy over and over. Do you really want to be on the side that suggests revenues does not determine spending capacity?
Recommended Posts
Posted by ashbury,
These are good baseline expectations. Pitchers should strike out a lot of hitters (one per inning is lately the norm for being really good), not give up hits (about one per inning is pretty good), not give up walks (more than a couple per game will raise eyebrows), not give up extra-base hits (a solo home run every game or two maybe is unavoidable). To some extent, there is a tradeoff that pitchers will make - to cut down on the base hits, they may nibble at the plate, resulting in a few more walks, which are less harmful than base hits - to strike out more guys, they might have to risk a few more home runs over the course of the season - and so on. So you're looking for patterns, more so than any strict benchmarks. Did the starter keep his team in the game? Fine. Did he make it likely they'd win by giving up only a run? Even better. Did he give up so many runs, 4+, to make winning really difficult, or pitch so briefly that the bullpen had to be overworked? Bad game. Did every baserunner score a run? Bad luck for the pitcher. Did he put a lot of baserunners on but then wriggle out of jams? Good for him, but maybe also some good luck was involved in that particular game.
For the relievers, the game has evolved to where they typically come in for one inning at a time, so there's not a lot of gray area between shutting the other team down versus giving up a run or more. A clean inning with no baserunners is great, a harmless single or walk in one inning of work is no big deal, and more activity on the basepaths than that and you may just be philosophical and accept that even very good pitchers fail to get the job done now and then.
Depending on the box score you look at, there may be a cryptic entry that tries to summarize all this down to one number for the game, at least for the starting pitcher. On baseball-reference.com for instance, the line for the pitchers includes a column called Game Score (GSc). The above link for the season opener shows Joe Ryan with a game score of 50, which happens to be exactly the average that is intended by this tool. His start was a bit short, only 4 innings, but productive while he was in. By contrast, Robbie Ray's game score was a very good 68, which kind of conforms to what we all saw when the two players pitched against each other - Ryan was good, Ray was better. In yesterday's game, Marco Gonzalez came away with a very sub-par game score of 27. Elsewhere around the majors, Sean Mannea's 7 innings of no-hit ball the other day gave him a stellar game score of 83. It's only a quick and dirty tool, giving points for strikeouts and innings pitched and taking away points for hits and walks and runs, devised by a smart guy many years ago, but serves some purposes when you are trying to sort wheat from chaff over the course of a season.
Fun question!
Great response.
Recommended by glunn
2 reactions
Go to this post
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.